Anonymous User

Are there Christians who admire secularism and "separation of church and state"?

Average Rating:
Your Rating: 
MiserableBoringEnjoyableInterestingFascinating
 
Anonymous User (Age:25 to 29)     When: 3 months ago
Category: Other

It seems to me that whatever religion becomes a majority it tries to push it's views on the rest of the country through government. Do you think this is fair to children and parents that don't want your religion? Isn't it supposed to be a choice?

Wouldn't you dislike it if another religion became the majority in the US and tried to spread it's beliefs through government and had it's beliefs painted all over government buildings in the country? People also make Christian prayers mandatory before council meetings which is against the religion to begin with...

Matthew 6:1 "Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven."

The constitution says "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" People should be free to privately practice their own religion without interference from the government. If people don't want to take part in a religion that should be their freedom to have without interference from government.

I just feel like if other religions became the majority and tried to influence laws American Christians would be really upset.

Does anybody understand what I'm saying?


Update: Yeah I always tell myself that it's just the fundamentalist minority that doesn't want the government infringing on their rights while maintaining the position that American government should have a Christian worldview and influence the people as such. I think that's kind of hypocritical.. It should be a neutral space so nobody has their rights infringed.    3 months ago

3000 characters left  Anonymous
Question Id
When you are on a question page, id of that question can be found in your browser address bar (URL). Ex: This question id is 797600
  Poll added by question asker. Cast your vote to see the current results.   What is this?

Yes (explain)

No (explain)

Other (explain)

Answers

    From Guys  
6
From Girls  
9
 

What Girls Said

  • cazza3
    8875  
    3 months ago
    Having grown up in a country where state and church were one, its something that touches a nerve. The church ran this country for a long time. If you disagreed with a priest, you're life was over. Every school was run by the church, every child taught catechism, which you dared not question it or you were beaten. The Magdalene Sisters, the Christian Brothers were for many institutions of torture. Birth control was illegal as was homosexuality. The church was the state. It is only now we are starting to emerge from under the claws of the church but we still have a long way to go. It can still be very difficult to get a place in a school if your child is not baptized, even if the parents have no belief system or haven't seen the inside of a church since they were kids.The church still believes it can have a say in our laws and tries to influence politicians. It is never a good idea to mix religion and law. If someone wants to have their beliefs then let them but it doesn't mean that just because something goes against church law it should be illegal for all citizens.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Okay I'll keep a mental note of that thank you.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      Ever hear of the Magdalene laundries? The last one closed in 1996, not exactly a long time ago. If you ever want to know the affect the church had in Ireland watch The Magdalene Sisters or Song for a Raggy boy
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      wow that's horrible...
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      I agree completely. But how has the church changed? Father Brian D'Arcy, one of the best-known and most popular priests in our country, has been censured by the Vatican and his newspaper and magazine articles are now effectively censored in advance of publication by the church authorities simply because he expressed his disgust and deepest sympathies over child sex abuse carried out by members of the church while those children were in its care.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Well I come from the school of thought that... you shouldn't hold what happened in the past effect your view of someone or something if they have the will to change and better themselves. That's a really sad story though...
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      Many people (not all) have no idea what atrocities the Catholic Church has been responsible for and yet they follow it blindly. Freedom of religion also means freedom from religion. I have no issue with religion being taught in schools aslong as its ALL religions. There was a recent news story of a woman dying because doctors wouldn't perform a termination because the fetus had a heartbeat. It should have been legislated for 20 years ago but still the church believes they have a say in law
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Wow I didn't know all of this. Thanks for teaching me something new. I agree for the same reason.. Government should be a neutral space so nobody has their rights infringed.
  • lilstrwberygal
    1876  
    3 months ago
    Yes in theory. I don't like this whole "We can't even talk about good," concept in America. Like where I did my student teaching, teachers were discouraged to say God bless you...to me that's over the top. I really wish we could embrace religion (all religions) into our society, especially our education system. The same way kids learn about Native Americans, I wish they could learn about Christianity, Buddism, Islam, ect...from a cultural standpoint, not a theology standpoint.

    With that said, I don't think any religion should have a place in government but it shouldn't be something that people actively try not to discuss.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I completely agree with you.. In fact it is perfectly legal to teach comparative religion or religion as literature it's just frowned upon to teach it as truth in government or the public sphere. I think it's a slippery slope though because I'm sure both you and I know some people who would jump at the chance and think "teaching the history of religions" as "preaching my religion" lol
  • serendipitygirlvrm16
    525  
    3 months ago
    Absolutely. If there was none, all of the pig headed Christians, my mother included, would abolish the death penalty, and make homosexuality and abortion illegal. Most Religious people are extremely closed minded. They all promote "loving thy brother", but forget to mention that it only applies if thy brother is also a follower of your religion. When I think of churches ruling with the government, the crusades and the Salem witch trials come to mind. A world run by religion is a world in chaos.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
  • RedSmartie
    12231  
    3 months ago
    I believe that the separation of church and state should go both ways. As long as the state stays out of religion, religion will stay out of the state. Unfortunately there is very much overstep on either side.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • 3 months ago
      Well the government profiles based on religion. Following the 9/11 attacks, all Muslims in the city were detained for almost two weeks, quite obviously for no reason.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      How does the state interfere with how people worship?
  • PricelessPearl
    -1  
    3 months ago
    I believe that a true Christian would be in the world and not of it.

    No Christian can truly mix with the world's system.

    So no.. I don't agree with the church mixing with the government, etc, etc.

    Neither do I agree with them pushing their views on people.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
  •  
    Anonymous User
    N/A  
    Anonymous User
    3 months ago
    state = a religion.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      They force their beliefs onto us with laws, if you break them you go to jail (hell). We have a president who is seen to be a savior who will lead us in the "right" direction. What is our destination? Will we ever not need leaders?(gods) can we ever just live freely and trust our own intuitions and know that , humans are good from within and naturally want peace and harmony we do not need an institution (government or religion) to force that upon us.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      what do you mean?
  • Deft_maiden
    22814  
    3 months ago
    Upset would be an understatement.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
  •  
    Anonymous User
    N/A  
    Anonymous User
    3 months ago
    A lot of Christians I know do -- some for the reasons that you mention (they might not always be the majority), some because they are tolerant and understand the world is complex. The more radical someone is, the louder they are. That goes for just about any belief or movement.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
  • emzy-89
    13256  
    3 months ago
    I'm a practicing Catholic and I don't like it when religion and law are intertwined. eg. I'm against gay MARRIAGE because of my beliefs, however, I don't think it would be a bad thing to have same-sex couples have some sort of civil ceremony (not marriage) which would give them the same rights as a married male/female couple.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      You do need a church/priest to be married, technically anything 'marriage' outside of a church/without a priest is a civil union, regardless of the participants gender, it's just the law that has slapped the term 'marriage' onto it.
    • 3 months ago
      If the church doesn't allow gays to get married, that's their business. But if the STATE doesn't allow gays to get married, that's the business of all citizens, which includes gays. You seem to forget that you don't need a religion or church to get married. And that's why gay marriage should be legal, otherwise it is discrimination, nothing else.
    • 3 months ago
      And if you don't register your marriage its null and void in the eyes of the law, regardless of what the church thinks
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      So if the state allowed for just legal marriage of same sex marriage but said churches didn't have to follow it would that be okay?
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      Actually, according to the church, who invented (for want of a better word) marriage, marriage and holy matrimony are ALWAYS the same thing, you need to be married in a church by a priest/minister in order to actually be married. In the eyes of the church even male/female couples who get married outside a church are only joined through civil union, it's just the state who call it marriage.
    • 3 months ago
      Typical hypocrisy here. Marriage is not a religious right. It's a state right. HOLY MATRIMONY is the religious one. There's nothing wrong with gay marriage. You say one thing, but do another.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I admire that you don't like when religion and law are intertwined.. You're right that usually whenever it does it causes a lot of discord and enmity for those of different religions and even those who aren't religious at all.

      Thanks for answering :)
 

What Guys Said

  • AndyWes
    7403  
    3 months ago
    Question: Humphreys, Austin, Baumgardner, and Snelling examined zircons and found that the helium diffusion rates didn't line up with billions of years old. The zircons had a ton more lead and helium in them than they should have--pointing to more like 6,000 years old, not billions.

    Evolution relies on earth being billions of years old--but there is ample evidence that the earth is fairly young, still in the thousands.

    Which means that while you might not accept is as complete proof--evolutionists who ignore such proofs are taking their beliefs on faith. Evolution is hardly a proven fact.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
  • Kiran04
    2426  
    3 months ago
    I can already tell by the responses that there are no true secularist Christians out there. The girl that thinks gays should get "civil unions" and not marriage is lying to herself. Marriage isn't a religious union. It's a state union. Marriage is NOT holy matrimony. The two are not the same. Gays should be able to marry as they please and call it MARRIAGE.

    Christians also grossly misinterpret the term "separation of church and state". The separation protects all beliefs, religious or otherwise, equally. However, separation is not exemption. Breaking the law under the guise of religious freedom is still illegal. Your religion is still required to operate within the bounds of the law. Christians don't understand that, and it's no surprise given that the law panders to them. For example, Churches are non-taxable. Why? Every other form of business or organization is taxable. Why are churches so special? We give them exemptions from the law, so they try to take more and more. If you give a mouse a cookie...

    All in all, there are no secularist Christians. It's not in their nature and I doubt it ever will be.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
  • AndyWes
    7403  
    3 months ago
    You'd have to be more specific.

    Catholics, for instance, would want to ban birth control.

    Protestants--lists of what Protestant Christianity bans includes rape, kidnapping, burglary, murder, dishonoring your parents, adultery, bearing false witnesses against people...

    How much of that is your *rights* as an American that the 'religious nutjobs' want to take away?

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I think it is important to explain some errors that are repeatedly committed in these arguments. The first fallacy is claiming that an unexplained mystery supports the creationist view simply because science is not currently able to explain it, and the second fallacy is looking at only one side of a natural equilibrium and claiming that an unlimited build-up would occur, posing a challenge to mainstream science.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Like I always say with anything.. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.. Until you can provide me with that I have no reason to accept these fringe claims.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Well you're the one giving me opinions from a very small fringe that isn't accepted by the worldwide scientific community and you expect me to take it seriously? Provide me with the proof of these claims and it's acceptance in the greater scientific community and I will accept it too :)
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Also can you link to me the studies of these claims? And if it has been accepted and peer reviewed by the scientific community? I'd appreciate it thanks you :)
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      As I said. You provide no counter evidence, just simple statements of your opinion.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Or do you think it's just because our understanding of a subject isn't perfect and therefore needs to be refined?
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      For instance there are a few fundamental constants in physics that if we perform fundamental calculations we get a number that is many orders of magnitude wrong. Do you think all of physics is bull just because of this one thing?
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Do you think the big bang is false too? Because we can certainly trace that this is true as well.. Do you believe in the 13.7 billion year old universe? I think you're misunderstanding something.. Science is a meritocracy.. Of course there are some things we don't understand whether it's in biology or physics. Do you think a couple contrary points to the otherwise overwhelming span of evidence is enough to toss something out? Or just a reason to understand these differences?
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      You say it yet provide no counter argument. Zircons, blue stars, oil reserve pressures, the diameter changes in the sun, changes in the San Andreas fault, all point to a young earth. Do you have any semblance of a counter-argument or are you relying on simple statements of "well, it's proven" and lofty claims of high credentials?
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      This is from people of many different scientific fields (religious people included) and peer reviewed by organizations around the world. There are reasons creationism isn't taken seriously even by many scientifically minded religious people.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I have looked into creationism and I've read apologetics from a few religions so I've definitely heard the arguments. Someone has already pointed out to me that I took that verse out of context and I apologized to them for it. I also didn't say that our understanding of everything is complete either. We don't know how asexual reproduction evolved sexual reproduction for instance. All testing of different methods points to the earth being 4.54 billion years old.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      BTW, Matthew 6:1 isn't saying to not try to be righteous if others are around. It's speaking against the Pharisees, who were basically politicians. It doesn't mean in the least that you shouldn't try to act morally at all times.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      High claims to make for an anonymous question asker. Regardless, all it takes to destroy the theory of evolution is proof of a young earth--of which there is plenty. I notice despite all your accomplishments you couldn't counter the facts I pointed at.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      push creationism in*
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I'm sorry to say but you seem like someone who isn't well read on biology or evolution (which ties all of biology together). This is one of the major reasons scientists usually always beat creationists at board hearings when they try to put take evolution out or push evolution in. link This is just one example.. You'd think if there was merit in creationism and no merit in evolution it would be exposed...
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I've also contributed to the field of medicine, agriculture, discovered origins of new mutations, human disease, This is all purely on the studies of evolutionary biology but this is what I've personally worked on so far. If it was a load of bull I wouldn't be able to use tried and tested methods to determine any of these things nor would I be able to contribute like I have.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      hypothetically though if evolution was false it wouldn't make creationism true. Science is about hoisting whatever has the most merit to prominence and again the greater majority of scientific thinkers think is has no bearings at all.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      It's true because gravity is one of the least understood of the four fundamental forces (gravity, electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force). It's also the only one we haven't been able to tie to the others in physics. You wouldn't say based on the very little understanding of gravity and how it works makes it false would you?
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I'm an evolutionary biologist.. Do you think the studies I do to track the relation of species on this planet is all nonsense? We use genetics and provable methods to determine these things. I suggest you look into mitochondrial DNA and genetic relation of life on this planet. It's definitely more complicated than these things but it's a good start. There are religious scientists that have stated that evolution has more explanatory power than the theory of gravity.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      The fact is, while you might wish to decry creationism as religious nutjob theory, there's a fair amount of proof against evolution. Though in all fairness, perhaps neither should be taught, to let kids decide for themselves. Evolution is FAR from a proven fact. It's just a theory, at best.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      Is there that much reason to teach evolution in schools? It's hardly proven. Pressure of oil reserves alone argues otherwise. (Oil reserves are under pressure, but rock is porous, and if the world is trillions of years old, there should be almost no pressure, like tapping into a lake.) Also, the sun's diameter has shrunk about 5 feet per hour over the last few hundred years. At that rate, 11.2 million years ago, the sun would have physically touched the earth, burning it to a cinder.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Just a few examples...
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I'm not talking about things like that.. I'm talking about people using government to push the religion itself into public schools and such. I'm talking about people taking science out of schools and pushing religion into them. Pushing mandatory prayer or mandatory oaths into schools. Pushing creationism into schools. I mean strictly religious things. Pretty much things that preach things from a religion instead of government being a neutral space to it.
  • TheGodEmperorLeto
    34430  
    3 months ago
    What's that? Religious people are pushy about their religion and their values and beliefs onto others? Shock and awe...

    seriously, it's one of the main reasons our country has gone to sh*t. Christians (yes, Christians) that have pushed crap legislation due to their bs morals (that don't even necessarily line up with the Bible) that screw us over. See Prohibition for a chief example. But if you want something more recent? See the bible thumping f***tards trying to push the teaching of Bible and Christianity in public schools. I don't care if it's a private school, but PUBLIC SCHOOLS should not have anything to teach about religion. The most I could see would be an objective look at ALL religions, but even then, don't care, let that happen in college so the person can make their own informed decision.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • 3 months ago
      People can disagree with this answer as much as they want, but maybe they should read a history book first. Personally I claim to know at least enough about history to completely agree with this answer.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      I would blame Christians and Corporate Greed tbh
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I agree in a sense... but I wouldn't blame Christians for the downfall of America. My gripe is just pushing religion into what's supposed to be a neutral space.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      Btw, while it's Christianity in the US and other countries, all religions are problematic. And yes, Anti-Theists (not atheists, mind you) that try and push that you can never have religion anywhere are also a problem, but they are a tiny TINY group compared to any religion.
  •  
    Anonymous User
    N/A  
    Anonymous User
    3 months ago
    I don't really have any reason to 'admire' secularism. But the same people complaining that religion is being pushed on their kids are the same people who end up going to religious schools pushing for them to enforce secularism to not offend those who aren't religious... this I do not respect but I do respect the ones who keep their secularism to themselves. I live in a country where secularists are the majority and atheists penalize, make fun of and patronize christians whereas they will give religions that are violent that they are too scared to criticise extra priveledges (i.e Islam)

    P.s Please refrain from quoting passages without knowing the meaning..., you can't just pick bits out without understand the full context, its offensive

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      Well atheists shouldn't push anything in private religious schools.. It's private for a reason.. it isn't part of the public school system. They have every right to teach whatever they want to teach.
    • Answerer
      3 months ago
      all it says is "if you want your religion to be respected, you have to kill someone for offending it" which is normal with what Islam does and much the uneducated west on islam thinking every negative about it is untrue, it can't be true... but I only dislike it when atheists do the things like I said. when they enter christian schools pushing for less religion within them and win it
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I've had Christians tell me that they weren't supposed to do that either.. I guess they misinterpreted the Bible.. I'm truly sorry I didn't mean to offend. Maybe I quoted the wrong passage.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I also apologize if I offended you.
    • Question Asker
      3 months ago
      I don't think people should promote atheism or anything else for that matter. Like I said I think government should be a neutral space. If people want to believe in a religion they should have that freedom to do so while being treated with respect. I don't think any religion should have special privileges I agree with you there. That isn't secular if it shows bias to different belief systems.
  • onlyaguy
    9803  
    3 months ago
    I answered C because I don't believe all Christians are that way, but many/most just believe they are "right" in their views and it's therefore "right" of them to impose their view of morality on others via laws or otherwise.

    You have 500 characters left
    Submit Comment
 
   
Home > Other Questions > Are there Christians who admire secularism and "separation of church and state"?
 
Join GirlsAskGuys
 
Earn Xper Points to get Tshirts, Amazon & Netflix Gift Cards and more!
 
 

 Open Contests  
Best Vacation Ideas For Couples
Summer has come! Are we all ready for a vacation? Some of us have already planned their summer vacation and some are still looking for best vacation ideas. For couples it's a bit tricky...First...
$25 Amazon Gift Card   $25 Amazon Gift Card
Check out the winner of the last contest!
Best Love Songs Videos
Winner received $25 Amazon Gift Card
View All Contests >>
Is your Gynecologist/OBGyn male or female?
Anonymous User asked 22 hours ago

I have only had women Gynos/OBGyns and prefer them.

I have only had men Gynos/OBGyns and prefer them.

I have had both and prefer women Gynos/OBGyns.

I have had both and prefer men Gynos/OBGYns.

I'm a man - see results.

Other Articles
 
●  Top 10 Interview Tips: 10 Steps to getting the job you want
by  TheChristian
1. First impressions DO mean something.Wear something completely neutral and express yourself with one minute detail in your attire to express your personal style (i.e. one of the following - tie,...
●  How to Succeed in College
by  Moderatordoctorwhofan23
I have seen a number of people ask questions about college and going to school, friends, and many things relating to that. I thought I would just give my top 10 tips and then maybe a few other pieces...
Other Xpers
  
ixi10
164798  
ixi10
Dating, 26 years old
United States
173 Questions - 10763 Answers
Other Xper: 35393
ihatework
36021  
ihatework
21 years old
United States
124 Questions - 5017 Answers
Other Xper: 17523
Belgie
69472  
Belgie
Single, 40 years old
Belgium
35 Questions - 3869 Answers
Other Xper: 13806
peace.love.couture
55964  
peace.love.couture
19 years old
Antarctica
225 Questions - 3562 Answers
Other Xper: 12796

What is Xper? View Rankings