- Girl is worse.15% (2)40% (6)29% (8)Vote
- Guy is worse.23% (3)7% (1)14% (4)Vote
- Both are equally bad.54% (7)53% (8)54% (15)Vote
- See results.8% (1)0% (0)3% (1)Vote
Most Helpful Girl
I don't know. Both are equally bad to me. But I'd rather be robbed than used for sex. I value my body and trust of others above money.
Money does take time to earn, but trust takes more effort and it hurts more when that's taken. And yes I've been robbed before. Of money and possessions. It still hurt more to have my trust being abused.
I guess it depends on what holds more value to the person.
I voted A because I was trying to scroll but meant C.1
Most Helpful Guy
I'd say both are bad... but look at it this way: the sex is something she offers, and they both get something out of it. he might be a dirt bag, but she still got off.
money, though? that takes hours of hard work. If a guy makes as much as $15 an hour, taking her out to a nice dinner and dropping 50 bucks on her literally cost him 3 and a half hours of his life. A $150 trinket? he worked 10 hours to pay for that.
So, whether she is getting drinks, or food, or clothes, or jewelry, or he's paying her rent, every penny is time he spent laboring, only to willingly turn that money he earned, over to her.
Using a woman for sex is emotional manipulation, and it is sexual contact she may regret later (regret is not rape! if it were, he would be worse, hands down!). So his action is horrible.
But using a man for his money is theft. And the more money taken, and the lower his wages, the more hours of his life were burned away only for her to leach from him the results of his labor. That is pretty low. And seeing as he likely did this thinking she cared for him? it is ALSO emotional manipulation. Her action is also horrible2