Not at all
PG-13 rated
PG rated
G rated
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
No. That's kind of what the ratings are for. They give an indication of what's in the movie for anyone who cares. Different ratings have different meanings. If you lump everything together then the ratings become worthless.
Probably the vast majority of the population don't pay attention to them anyway. But the ratings are there for the people who want to know what they (or their kids) are getting into.
There is no need for it unless it is absolutely necessary for story and that goes for all ratings.
Well 13-year olds are already watching series like Game of Thrones which has a lot of nudity and sex... Plus many are already watching porn at that age. 😐 It wouldn't be necessary to have nudity in PG-13 movies however, if it is what the director wants then fine... I think I actually saw nudity in a PG-13 movie though, Total Recall (2012) a woman flashed her 3 boobs ahah 😂
Why is the human body bad like tf?
Anyways I voted PG because I think parents or a guardian should supervise children when seeing nudity so that they will understand what is happening.
Movies like PG and G rated movies are usually aimed towards small children. Why the hell would any sensible person want to expose them to something like that?
Opinion
6Opinion
No, G rated is aimed for pre-kinder/1st-4th grader children and PG is under 15. I don't think a five year old should be exposed to that kind of content from an early age.
No.
I don't want to see any nudity there.
My bros watches them and that's not something that they would want to see.
It's not appropriate.
There was a movie I recall that had nudity even though it was PG-13 - Doc Hollywood... I quite liked that movie when I was younger
No. Too early and not something that should be seen by under 18 uear-olds.
Not for that age group no.
Nothing wrong with nudity.
It should be mandatory.
Oh fuck no.
NONE
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions