- John44% (16)28% (14)35% (30)Vote
- Paul39% (14)42% (21)41% (35)Vote
- George14% (5)22% (11)19% (16)Vote
- Ringo3% (1)8% (4)5% (5)Vote
paul clearly was the most successful. almost 50 years post beatles and he is still going strong.
john lennon had some big highlights but double fantasy was the only excellent album in my opinion
personally i liked george harrison's post beatle career. perhaps because it wasn't expected but i also truly loved his music. All things must pass is an amazing album. the concert for bangladesh was awesome and the traveling wilburys were simply incredible. plus he was a big time movie producer, producing the early monty python stuff
Ringo continues to be an outstanding entertainer and I highly recommend that you go see his All Starr Band if you have the chance. But Paul is a music genius AND a nice guy. John Lennon got too messed up with Yoko. George was also an outstanding person and musician but he just was not as prolific as Paul with his musical output.
Definitely George, I would say him, and his friendship with Eric Clapton (and thus working together), probably resulted in the better solo career despite Paul's incredible pop credentials, and John's whatever the hell the Plastic Ono Band was. George was more well rounded, he had some artsier songs, but also some that were fun Pop Rock. Then he also had the Travelling Wilburies
What happened to John was very tragic. The world lost a very gifted musician and beautiful human being.
Paul is still going at it and he still has the magic. He is my choice.
I love John's songs ❤️
Regardless, the Beatles were the best!
I voted John for "Imagine"
Paul by a mile!
George had chops
Hahaha... Poor Ringo!
I like John Lennon a lot
George Harrison was no doubt the best of the best of the Beatles. John Ringo or Paul don't compare.
Listen to the depth in george Harrison's songs always underrated always the best!
I believe George was the most productive and successful solo artist of all the beatles
George because he had a lot going for him before he died he was awesome
John for quality, Paul for quanity.
Ah, trick question! They all suck.
Paul, by far.
I admired George's work. He's underrated one
That's like choosing between the earth moon, stars and sun.
But here's my attempt John (taken way too soon, prolific songwriter) Paul (major successes after Beatles 40+years worth and he's a knight) , George (part of one of the first "Super Groups post Beatles, Traveling Wilburys) and Ringo, Pete Best's replacement with some fun solo hits.
They were all extremely talented dudes in quite different ways. As far as solo artists, it just depends on your personal tastes, because they're all very different. Like not similar at all.
They all did some cool solo stuff, but personally, even though there were a few great singles... I don't think any of their albums ever came close to what they did together as The Beatles.
Good luck and Great question. xx
John or Paul, but Imagine made me vote for John.
George for sure
Paul hands down the best of the Beatles
Paul is by far the most talented.
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.