Well for me looks aren't everything, it doesn't define the person. I'd rather have a guy that looks alright but with a wonderful personality and outgoing and is fun and funny than to have a hot guy that's just plain boring. But I would say looks on scale 1-10 umm I say the lowest about a 4 or 5.
looks are not everything..sure they matter..but I could not stand being with a self centered hot guy..-worst case scenero to me id say maybe a 5-6..as long as his appearance is OK and doesn't scare me:P
whats the real prize is him in general-is he sweet,caring...etc--he has to have a good personality..
If it's a guy I just want to sleep with, and do nothing more with, looks would be the most important thing. But, if it's somebody I would want to be in a relationship with, I would care less what they look like.
Ten if I'm not attracted to him why would I pursue him? :S lol but then everyone has diffrent tastes someone who might be a ten to me might be a 2 to someone else. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder :)
Looks are rated around a 5 in importance. To be in a healthy relationship I need to be sexually attracted to them. It wouldn't work out too well if I was repulsed by even looking at them. However I could be not as sexually attracted to them as another person and still like them more because of their personality.
Looks is what gets my attention, personality keeps me focused on you
Like Moviedude said, there has to be SOME physical attraction. If a guy has an amazing personality, but is generally ugly (whether is is just his genes or bad hygiene(that can change A LOT, I am telling you)), it will be very hard for any girl to fall in love with him.
I consider myself to be a decent guy and looks are for me not the most important thing, but I would not be happy in a relationship with a great girl, but who is not attractive to me. I don't think there is anything wrong with that at all. Standard serve a good purpose.