Just curious, because I know some women think a man is "handsome" or "good-looking" just based on his style (and I'm sure it's vice versa too). I mean, even I've been called handsome just because I was wearing a suit! What about when I'm not wearing a suit!
So I ask, what gets your attention more?
A guy's biological features - facial structure, body physique, complexion, etc
A guy's appearance/style - how kempt he is, how he's groomed, sharpness, etc
Essentially, it's comparable to ask - would you prefer a man who is well-groomed, dresses sharp (or whatever your preference is) who is ugly in the face and out of shape? or a man who is very handsome in the face and has a great body, but is shlubby in his appearance?
- His biological featuresVote A
- His styleVote B
- Both are equally important or unimportantVote C
- Unsure / I'm a guyVote D
Most Helpful Girl
well you know a handsome and fit guy can look good in pretty much everything. For all the others, style is key in how women see you.
So many guys wear really unflattering clothes. You can pull of shorts and t shirt when you look like liam hemsworth link but not if you look like jack black link Both look better in suits, but proportionally there Jack Black makes a much bigger improvment.
To answer your question, I'd take a hot body/face over style any day1