A lot of females also don't know what submission and subservience is, and confuse that with letting men boss them around and being a door mat...
I don't know, maybe seduction and knowing how to treat a man is encoded within my DNA, but a lot of females are doing it all wrong. They give the practice a bad name. By being easy, and not knowing the art of seduction like the back of your hand, you make a bad name for women who are actually described by men as being seductive, because the first thing that comes to mind is a promiscuous woman. No, I make men desire me and make them go crazy craving me, all while keeping my legs shut. This puts the man in a position of emotional subsevience, where not only will you consume his every thought, but your actions trigger his instinct to pursue, placing you at higher value than other competing females.
And females who do not understand subsevience also create a bad name for subservient women! I treat my men like kings, while also expecting the same in return. Catering is my way of showing affection but not at the expense of my self respect and dignity. Some females have it all wrong...
Females who don't under stand what seduction and subservience is, remind me of those men who created a bad name for "players".
Back in the day, a player was a man who had multiple females, and all the females knew about each other and agreed to share him in the relationship. That is what made him a player, because he could pull multiple women. My grandpa was a player. All his ladies would sit at dinner together planning on what to do for him for christimas and his birthday/
Now days, these younger guys ruined the image of a player. They have multiple females (check), but they are cheating, and 9/10 the women don't know about each other or did not agree to share him. You're not player.
Most Helpful Opinions