It seems like people are writting mytakes after someone else writes one and then they directly criticize the person writting the mytake like its some political debate or something. Like people see a mytake and write a title that opposes a title but they write it in a way that directly attacks a person's mytake. For example this female user wrote a mytake and she calls another mytake stupid yet she claimed hers was positive.
Once you attain "Editor" statues, you must write two myTakes a month (or something like that) to retain that title. What I see is people grasping at anything to write about and the quality of the myTakes becoming poorer as they write about anything just to keep that two a month. Picking up on someone else's myTake and arguing it is just a lazy way of coming up with a topic.
I haven't noticed, but I'm not surprised. Some (maybe a lot of) people tend to think they know it all and have all the right answers. I'm not one of them. I'd like to think I have the right answers, but sometimes I don't. That's why I hope people take my advice that I give with a grain of salt. I'm not offended if they do that. In fact, I'd recommend it. Because after all, I'm not perfect. I make mistakes, too. I don't intentionally do wrong to people.
I don't like mytakes and I don't really read them unless I like the author or someone links me. The admins read and promote them so it's their problem as far as I'm concerned. You can browse new questions only if you use this link http://www.girlsaskguys.com/recent?t=questions