I think it's stupid to automatically choose a most helpful if it may not be the most helpful. And there shouldn't be a limited time for choosing it.
On the contrary I think you shouldn't be able to choose a most helpful for at least 5 days or so after asking the question. Because when a question already has the most helpful chosen it puts people off wanting to answer, and it's not fair to choose most helpful without having seen everyone's opinions
- I think it's a good rule21% (3)20% (2)21% (5)Vote
- I think it's stupid64% (9)50% (5)58% (14)Vote
- Neutral15% (2)30% (3)21% (5)Vote
Most Helpful Guy
I'm totally against it. I really don't understand why GaG feels it's so important to pick most helpful. It should be up to the QA to pick MH, not GaG. If the QA doesn't pick one, so what?
Also, 15 days is pretty short. I've gotten a LOT of MH much later than that, like 2-3 months. I've probably gotten them as long as six months or more. Let the QAs pick when they want, or not at all if that's their choice.5