Mud covered people?
Why is it that there is so much of a difference when you see a Fit person covered in mud, than seeing a fat person in mud?I mean, when you see a fit person in mess, you'd think its hot right?but a fat person... You'd think its really nasty or something bad right?so why is there so much of a diff? Oh and add your opinion on that too lol
What's Your Opinion?
Most Helpful Opinion
This has got to be the most hilariously bizarre question I've seen on this site. Clearly fat people are a little gross even before the mud enters the equation, but let's be nice to them because if they could help it, then they wouldn't be fat to begin with.
What Girls Said 2
By the way you have phrased it, we have 2 variables: fit/fat & mud/no mud. In the scenario you have outlined:fit + no mud= hotfat + no mud = not so hotfit + mud = hotfat + mud = not so hotSensing a a pattern here? It seems as though mud is the superfluous variable and the decision of hotness depends mainly on the variable of fitness.So to answer your question, it the difference has little to do with the mud but a lot to do with how fit the aforementioned muddy person is.