Have men's standards of beauty 'actually' changed all that much?

Anonymous
I just watched a documentary about obesity, and one of the things it talked about was the difficulty of being perceived as less attractive.

It then went on to discuss how the "thin obsession" is a new and socially-constructed concept caused by the malleability and superficial nature of men.

Here's the thing, modern humans have been around for 200,000 years. Obesity has been the norm for about 30 years. That means for 200,000 years humans have evolved to be attracted to each other based on a frame we would consider thin. Why are we shocked when we're less attracted to obesity, which was almost nonexistant for most of human history?

Furthermore, we idealize those that are farthest from the current epidemic. When starvation runs rampant, we idealize a curvaceous figure, while still pairing up with the thin women around us. Now that obesity is the greatest epidemic of the modern western world we idealize thin-to-normal figures. And contrary to the social narrative portrayed in your local health or sociology class, men's standards have actually raised in weight to reflect women's rise in weight.

I'm all for fat acceptance and not being a jerk to someone just because of their weight. But I don't like being told that I'm shallow and malleable for not thinking it's the sexiest thing in the world.

Can anyone identify with this?
Have men's standards of beauty 'actually' changed all that much?
6 Opinion