Just a quick question? So I work for two companies one of them I work most hrs and the other only like once or sometimes twice a week but I'm confuse on what is better normally I get two check separately since its two different places. But would you rather just do all your hrs in one place and get a just one total amount check or get two checks? Obviously one check is way Less than the other since I get pay biweekly in both but is it more or less money that way since I got to pay taxes (like we all do ) . It's the same pay in both places but I'm thinking of just taking one for just full time instead of going somewhere for just one day a week.. What makes more sense?
Most Helpful Guy
Well, there are pros and cons.
By working full time at one company, you might / probably would get benefits... health insurance, dental insurance, paid sick/holiday pay, 401k, stock options, etc.
By splitting your time between two companies, working two part-time jobs, you are working the same amount of hours but aren't eligible for benefits from either place.
Now the benefits of staying with two different jobs might include employee discounts that you use often, having different jobs and places to go so it doesn't get too dull and boring spending all your time in the same place doing the same thing, and less risk of losing your job and being out of work.
If you got laid off at one job because the company was downsizing or moving out of state, you could probably pick up more hours at the other job and not lose out on pay (lets forget about severance packages if you were full time and got laid off). If you lost one job, you might lose a little bit of income, but you'd still have money coming in from the other job.
Are either of these jobs career type jobs, or just temporary jobs?2