I am doing on essay on Plato's Theaetetus, and when Theaetetus and Socrates are saying that knowledge is true judgment, what do they mean by judgment?
Answer only if you know about Plato's Theaetetus.
What Guys Said 1
What Girls Said 1
The Theaetetus basically proposes three definitions that they (Socrates and Theaetetus) define to be knowledge. The funny thing about the piece is that it merely ends up concluding what knowledge is not rather than defining what it is. The definitions they suggested they both argued to be wrong. I can't remember the definition off the top of my head but there are two based on knowledge being true judgement, one including judgement with account.
In this case (i'll try and explain this better than my lecturer did lol) knowledge according to the defintion is gained through our sensory experiences (empiricism) and how we reason these sensory situations. It is there that we can make judgements. Therefore, knowledge is true judgment. However, Socrates and Theaetetus both ended up rejecting this definition.
Extra bit in case you didn't know! Plato went on to propose that sensations and sensory experience have no cognition (ie, we sense them but we cannot contruct reason and belief from them), he said there needed to be something that we refer to in order to make true judgements and beliefs from our senses. He stated that what we neededwere the Forms (but you probably have learnt that! lol)
Too any memories of college right there lol, I hope that helped though :)0
Select as Most Helpful Opinion?
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.