Looks Aren't Everything, But Neither is Personality (Page 2)
Click "Show More" for your mentions
Most Helpful Opinion(mho) Rate.
Learn more
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
You can also add your opinion below!
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
27Opinion
I was surprised that I agreed with you as much as I did - Very sound logic throughout your piece.
Agree with the take buttttt... sometimes acnes due to hormones and shit teens can't control but either way no acne does show good genes lol
Well, unfortunately it seems to me like the person isn't as healthy as a person without acne.
^^^ yes @Dipsy
It's a strong indicator of being unhygienic as well. I know because I've never had bad acne but my brother has because he never washes his face lol
Lol, i dont have acne too, but i didn't wash my face with soap often, until a few weeks ago. Although my younger brother didn't wash his face either, but he got a few pimples. So it might not entirely depend on unhygienic
*Unhygienic behaviour
Not entirely, but it doesn't help lol Every teenager should expect a break out here and there but I was directing my original statement more so towards people in their mid-twenties who have yet to grasp the concept of face wash. (A surprising amount of people I might add).
True I don't mean acne caused from being unhygienic lol I meant acne from being a oily teen. It's weird I don't breakout on my face but when I pms I get acne on my chest. It's weird
"It's weird I don't breakout on my face but when I pms I get acne on my chest" I call overshare, I didn't need to read this.
@oracle12c
Tear *sarcasm intended
Then don't read it buddy. I get you @Marshmellowking I get blemishes on my shoulders when I work out on my period lol
Has fit body
Dresses nicely
Grooms self constantly
"He's to into himself" 😭😭😭😭
Forever alone
I agree looks are VERY importnat just as important as being a nice person when it comes to dating
From my experience ratio of looks-personality is 20:80.
Obviously a bit of this and a bit of that. First and foremost people go by appearance, especially young girls. I even ran an experiment, went clubbing in normal clothes and brand clothes - I became a degenerate magnet while wearing an armani suit.
When people talk about looks they generally don't mean grooming or dress or even fitness. They mean how well your features fit the template of beauty. It's not something you can do much about short of surgery.
Appearance is ideology. https://www.rooshv.com/appearance-is-ideology
Yes your are right, it's a combination of personality and looks.
A fit body doesn't mean that you're healthy. There's more to health than your body fat percentage.
Also the way someone dresses is more personality than straight out looks.
This take flew over your head.
Thank you xD @Albinoninja66
Ooh someone's trying to score points with the ladies.
Look how many people agreed though. It's just common sense, not this take going over my head
Look how many people agreed in their opinions, then get back to me
Long before you wrote this take I already determined that you weren't a very bright person. I haven't read a single opinion you've ever posted that made sense. I don't have time for this.
by the way I wasn't even talking to you...
Lol Considering your unintelligent opinion, I will assume that your opinion of my opinions is meaningless. Can you take off anon like a big boy and let me judge you based on your opinions? Thanks
If you don't have time for this, why are you commenting? I don't give a damn who you were talking to, you made what in my opinion is an offensive comment to someone on MY take, if you can't handle a response to your response, don't make one.
Telling him that people agree with me was offensive? Ok then. Did I say that I can't handle it? Please. Like I'll let some little girl get the best of me.
*says she doesn't give a damn
Writes a paragraph*
"Ooh someone's trying to score points with the ladies"
This above was the offensive comment.
No, you said you don't have time for it. I said I didn't give a damn about who you were talking to, reread and maybe you will understand better.
A fit body doesn't always mean you're healthy, but fit bodies tend to be more healthy than unfit ones.
I honestly don't care about looks. If a girl is DTF, that's all I care about.
When will girls stop using the "provider" label on guys? Golddigers are a huge turn-off.
While I too admit that I have a taste; I can't resist hardcore, tough as nail gothic tomboys (especially when they're so random you'd assume they're high 24/7). Clothing and body type are only clues and I have been fooled too much by people's looks to be superficial.
Minor (petty) comment: I hate suiting up, suits are ugly, doughy and makes you look like an accountant.
Men ARE the providers whether or not YOU provide is up to you, but that's just determining whether or not you're a lazy fuck.
The male PROVIDER since the beginning of man was there PROTECTING and HUNTING for food, making him THE PROVIDER.
But you're somewhat right, in modern day we don't have these problems, so all men are really useful for, considering nature, is conceiving.
Okay gender bias and sexist mode on: Shut up woman, make me a sandwich then spread your legs for me because that's the only things you're good for according to nature! Are you offended now? Because that was my plan.
Gender bias and sexist mode off: As a strong independent woman who wants to be treated as my equal, I see no reason why you shouldn't get off your lazy ass and provide for yourself.
Okay... that was very immature and childish.
Well isn't that my point? Now women can do everything themselves because we are not being physically forced to submit to males. Could the world not go on if men were only kept for the use of having children? We need women for pregnancy, raising children, and apparently, now we have to provide for them ourselves too. So what is the use of you?
I'm making satire of a 50's sexist man while you non-ironic highlight that men are destinated to pay for everything while you get none of the drawbacks associated with the appropriate time period. That apparently makes me childish? I doubt so.
As I see it, if feminists want equal treatment and to kill the oppressive role of the housewife. I see no reason for me to upheld the perks now that there's no longer anything in it for me.
After all, you're a strong independent woman who don't need no man, right?
Then why shouldn't I split the chores and bills 50:50?
I wonder what you're going to provide me in a relationship.
An uterus? If the next generation is that important I can just be a doner and get paid.
Sex? There's always someone willing
The pleasure of your approval? I'm not sure you're my type anyway.
LMFAO Don't about what I'm going to provide for you, because I don't date idiotic people. I have nothing more to add to this, so please read my previous comments
I learned my lesson. In a relationship with a modern woman expect to end in an all take and no give.
In short, men provide everything and women demand everything!
Women don't provide children, for one?
I agree with you anonymous the take owner isn't making sense.
How so?
Oh wait, you're 14, never mind xD
So in a relationship, a woman provide an uterus. If I'm that desperate for the next generation, becoming a sperm doner is cheaper. If I want a child to be "mine" there are plenty of orphans ready to be adopted.
Besides children are not the first reason to date and if I were to make you pregnant, we could call MTV and cast you for 16 & pregnant.
You are talking about yourself, as if just what YOU want to do alters the whole universe. You're meaningless.
Also, why do you keep talking as if I would date someone such as yourself? I'd rather jump off a bridge xD and yes, I could, if I were a slut, what's the point?
Ready for my punchline? I've been mocking you the entire time, because you keep talking about yourself, as if just what YOU want to do alters the whole universe. You're meaningless.
P. S. Remember how I hated on golddigers? You're the reason why.
Well that was very irrelevant, useless, and childish... Thanks for nothing!
"so all men are really useful for, considering nature, is conceiving. "
Oh boy. If a man were to say, "so all women are really useful for, considering nature, is having babies," the skies would darken, the earth would quake, tsunamis would roll, and the stars would fall from the skies with all the justifiable anger people would feel at a man saying this about women.
Really? It took you eleven days to come up with that? Take a nap hun
true... but i don't this is as prominent as scietnstis say.
Great take! especially on the fitness part :)
Nice take. I agree.
This is soooo true :)
Reading this later
Great article
Totes true !