Any Male Who Hits a Woman is NOT a Real Man

gobsmacked3

Any Male Who Hits a Woman is NOT a Real Man

Acknowledging women's violence as a serious issue has been a welcomed evolution in Society giving voice to men who in the past suffered in silence.

With the gag existing through shame, ridiculed if men dared to admit being beaten by a woman with the repercussions being direr if they were known to retaliate. Every male in my Generation taught that hitting a woman was something you never ever did. One became fair game to all if you did in any circumstance with it being the ultimate act of dishonour.

Instincts play a huge part in this with it natural for guys to wanna protect the women in their lives, not harm them. So hitting them seems and feels wrong because we're going against the grain of our being. One developed from day dot in the awe and respect we have for our mothers translating to a regard for all women. Our lives completed by the presence of women in our lives and culminating in the meaning of their love.

The current Generation view honour as dying with chivalry pointing the accusing finger at feminism as the drive by shooter. Ushering in a new Age where everything is about 'equality' even if it lurches into hysterical extremes. Exalting that if women are viewed as equal and are violent towards men, it gives the green light for males to retaliate in kind.

It gives a very black and white take on equality without fully exploring the shades of grey that are so apparent when looking at this incendiary topic. Found not in treating everyone as though they were the same, but in treating everyone as they ought to be treated.

The difference in size and strength with men as a rule 15-20% larger than women compelling a duty of care. Found in the dual ability of a male to inflict real damage on a woman if he does resort to violence as well as being very equipped to restrain, or fend off her assaults if need be.

Meaning there is never any justification for it.

Rampant Generation Y's extolling the virtues of retaliation always get butthurt in the face of logic. With them resorting to vicarious justifications of the 'bitch deserving it' or tapping into extreme cases of the woman being akin to an Amazon or wielding a knife, gun, or baseball bats in each hand.

This YouTube video would be a classic response:

The stand out of the video is the absurdity of the male resorting to violence. He is twice the size of the woman; her blows were felt by him as if they were mosquito bites meaning he should have just walked away. When he stood his ground, hugging her was a perfect way to restrain her with her trapped in his embrace with no escape.

When he let her go after placating her and riled her up culminating in hitting her, all he did was run the risk of really causing damage against her more petite and fragile form.

Paying little respect to the repercussions likely to follow.

Meaning it is always wise to think before you do in regards to being violent towards anyone, let alone a woman. I hear self-defence- an ambiguous claim underpinned by one allowed to respond with force similar to what they are faced with.

How would a court respond if the womans jaw was smashed by the males blows or worse, cracked her skull on the concrete after going down?

Think of the response if you ever think of hitting a woman......

Any Male Who Hits a Woman is NOT a Real Man

Any Male Who Hits a Woman is NOT a Real Man
88 Opinion