Usually I dont care about these things but I've heard it a few times the last few days on the radio and it just irritates me.. I also find her voice annoying. Anyway, the whole basis of the song is that God made girls for guys
What do you think?
She's has a southern accent so that's why you find her voice annoying umm like i said it's southern it was made for people that think like this and well for them in the Bible it says that God made women from the rib of Adam and she was there to be by his side because she came from his side you see what they mean? if you think that's sexist than you probably think the Bible is sexist too.
Based on most peoples lack of explanation on their posts, I think the problem is that people don't understand what the definition of sexist is. "
1
:prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2
:behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ". This is exactly what the song sings about. She says all women feel this way. She says all women were created in order to support men
No I dont find it sexist. Its cute. Before you go after this song try going after song that talks about bitches and hoes, or how about girls on here wanting to be submissive? No, nothing wrong with this song.
of course it's a country song lmao
Nothing is wrong with it but she is writting it as a submissive, so if you dont like it then got after all the girls who write that they are submissive. and God did make girls for guys, and, He made guys for girls. It may not ne said in this song but they dont have to cover all those ooints just so you are happy with the balance.
Wow, you are stubborn. both were made for each other, you just dont like hearing it especially since she only sings about one of them. It pisses you off because you are a strict feminist who won't though go after the bigger issue of songs that talk about bitches and hoes, why not?
[Snoop] Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks...
[Chorus (Snoop (2X):]
Bitches ain't shit but hoes and tricks
Lick on these nuts and suck the dick
Get the fuck out after you're done
And I hope in my ride to make a quick run...
www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/drdre/bitchesaintshit.html
How about this one princess?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYHL6AYAwQU
Based on most peoples lack of explanation on their posts, I think the problem is that people don't understand what the definition of sexist is. "
1
:prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2
:behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ". This is exactly what the song sings about. She says all women feel this way. She says all women were created in order to support men. Not all women feel this way
hahahaha oh man this is bad. I never saw this before. Incredible.
Yeah its misogynist lol. And like, so upper-middle-class bourgie white girl femininity womanhood that is so predictably self-serving
I don't think it makes sense because actually Adam and Eve and then their sons and daughters created girls lol (if Adam and Eve was real), but the populatioon had to of started some where... lol.
Yeah, it's pretty sexist. The writer also seems to think that every girl is straight (as well as every guy)
and when i say pretty sexist i mean blatantly o-o
well I like how she showed only girls and didn't make it all sexual though
OMG all the dislikes, like are they reading the same lyrics as I am?
Opinion
16Opinion
Fuck this shit. Of course it is sexist. (like most songs nowadays)
Nothing sexist about it, she is just singing that God made girls basically to be man's companion. Which is true. So where is the sexism. Nowhere does she say girls can't have dreams and passions etc, but that doesn't change the fact girls are meant to be with a man. I guess if you are an anti-marriage person who doesn't believe in God then you could think it's sexist.
Yes I did read them did you cause obviously you did not read these parts...
"He needed something soft and loud and sweet and proud
But tough enough to break a heart
Something beautiful and breakable that lights up in the dark"
"Something that can wake him up and call his bluff and drag his butt to church
Something that is hard to handle"
"Somebody's gotta put up a fight,
Make him wait on a Saturday night
To walk downstairs and blow his mind,
So God made girls."
"God made girls (for dancin' to our own beat)
He stood back and told the boys, "I'm 'bout to rock your world."
And God made girls."
... that doesn't sound very soft or weak to me. Again if you are anti-man or anti-marriage or whatever I can see why you'd be upset but otherwise there's nothing sexist about this.
What you call "least sexist" actually empowers women and not sexist at all. How about you give me examples where it is sexist, cause I just gave you some very good points on how its not.
The only lines I left out are...
"Somebodys gotta wear a pretty skirt,
Somebodys gotta be the one to flirt,
Somebodys gotta wanna hold his hand so God Made Girls"
"Somebodys gotta be the one to cry
Somebodys gotta let him drive
Give him a reason to hold that door so God made girls"
... so lets look at them. Uh what girl doesn't wear a skirt when they wanna look pretty for their guy? Thats the go-to thing to wear a sexy skirt nothing wrong with that. When do girls NOT flirt with a guy they like? And sorry but when a couple is together they hold hands.
Second verse what girl doesn't cry to her boyfriend? We support them as their man. Most girls dont want to drive when they're with their man, if you do that's fine. And holding the door? Sorry that's called manners for a guy or a girl
HHHHHHHHHHH
You won't be able to make sense with this asker.
You say black, she says white.
You agree and say white, she goes for black.
She is a confused, conflicted feminist.
HHHHHHHHHHHH
Based on most peoples lack of explanation on their posts, I think the problem is that people don't understand what the definition of sexist is. "
1
:prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2
:behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ". This is exactly what the song sings about. She says all women feel this way. She says all women were created in order to support men. Not all women feel this way. Get over it
I think you're looking too deep into things. I seriously don't think song wasn't made to be sexist, or to degrade women. It was just supposed to be catchy and fun.
Im not saying it isn't sexist, because it undeniably is. I'm just saying that's not the point of the song, and isn't what consumers should really be focusing on.
... I don't.
But hey, to each their own.
Based on most peoples lack of explanation on their posts, I think the problem is that people don't understand what the definition of sexist is. "
1
:prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2
:behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ". This is exactly what the song sings about. She says all women feel this way. She says all women were created in order to support men. Not all women feel this way
I get that, and I agree 100% that the song is sexist, but what I'm trying to say is- Nevermind.
Yes. No. Well, kind of. I think the song was made to appeal to teenage girls, and that's about it. There is no point or meaning or purpose to the song, it's just catchy stupidity.
I think that yeah maybe this song is sexist but there is no point asking people what they think and then telling them they are wrong
Where have I stated that I have a problem with people disagreeing?
Please, I would like to see?
What I do have a problem with is people such as yourself who will ask for a view, ad hominem those who disagree, and then pretend to be the innocent, good one.
This closes down discussion, and gets nowhere.
Yes you're allowed to disagree with something but you don't need to prove your opinion right
i dont think its sexis because its written by a woman
i just think it would be more sexist if a man wrote it be cause other women could take it as women aren't good for anything but being pretty and girly when its clearly not true because a woman can do the same as a man and more
i understand that but it also doesn't have to be taken literally
"i dont think its racist, since a black man said N___"
to demonoloy that would be like me calling a nother white person cracker or honkey it doesn't have anything to do with being racist
to the asker no i dont there are some songs that have a good message but do you know the song live like you were dieing
I get what the song is TRYING to say, but it's pretty stupid, to be honest.
The artist forgot to include in her song what god created lesbians for.
God didn't create lesbians. Lesbians have been torn from God by satan. Duh. Did you skip church last Sunday
@LauraMarx @been_waiting
I don't expect much intellectual integrity from a song whose lyrics contain a line about god making girls for the purpose of dragging a man to church.
This song is so obviously pandering to white Christian America.
I fully agree. Which is why it doesn't offend me.
@been_waiting
Yep. It's something I'd expect to hear on Christ FM, lol, not taking this one seriously.
Kinda sexist, ultra annoying. Its ironic hearing it be played often back-to-back with 'Girl in a Country Song', which is like a feminist country song.
what about it is sexist? God made girls for guys and guys for girls, if assuming a God exists. so?
should every song follow LGBT standards to not be labelled anything these days?
hmm... I just read the lyrics. no I don't see a problem. This is praising the feminine traits of women as a valuable possession for men.
"He needed something soft and loud and sweet and proud
But tough enough to break a heart"
And I think you do not know anything about artistic exaggerations that was made from when literature was made, if you consider this sexist. this is actually a very beautiful line.
Also this is a heterosexual and a religious view. as Homosexuals have freedom to express their love in Artistic ways, heterosexuals also have the freedom to do so, and if it is followed by religion it is again free.
In this lyrics she is as I said praising the feminine traits that she finds precious in herself, as a God-made valuable possession for men.
and the possessing behaviour does exist in men. it is not something new or something odd to call it sexist. it is the sexual behaviour of men. And if the girl didn't like to be for a man she would not sing this song.
If you don’t like that behaviour go say it to nature. also though the girl is considering women for men she is not considering them a tool for men. She is just emphasizing the feminine traits that men find pleasant and long to possess.
The real sexists are the people who support p*rn industry and over sexualization and Sexual objectification of women under the name of independence.
I couldn't disagree more. p*rn is fine if its consensual. No one gets to say what's empowering ir degredaing for another person as its subjective. To me, this song is sexist because she sings about what she thinks ALL girls purpose is. She says all girls purpose is to satisfy men. That is clear. Therefore, I find it sexist. And it disturbs me that there's children in the video.. And she talks about all women and how we all feel the same way. Its uncomfortable. I think it sends a oppressing message to young girls
"sexist because she sings about what she thinks ALL girls purpose is"
no she is a religious heterosexual woman and she is obviously singing for religious heterosexual women.
by the same logic p*rn also shows all women as invaluable sexual objects, So we could ban it as it is harmful and sexist. But people like the feminist you want it so it exist.
the same way many women like to hear an emphasize on their feminine traits and so this song exist. done.
Also I would 100% let my daughter hear this than to search for p*rn . This very beautifully praises the feminine traits and the feelings of a heterosexual female towards a male. It is not to induce a mentality but rather exaggerate a positive feeling. a very good song for young heterosexual girls.
You clearly rake it differently than me. She says nothing about how this song is "only for heterosexual women." she sings about how all women deep down feel their purpose is to be there for men. by the way, my update doesn't apply to you. You did back up your opinion. I tried to mention that but I can't update more than twice.. Any who, I explained my position and its mainly that I'm worried for the message that young girls get from songs like these
"To me it says a lot about how its normal for us to view women as just a being to support men."
then what are women?
women are just a being to support men, men are just a being to support women. and naturally both are made by nature to support and survive together. nothing else.
Here the homosexual community who may not feel the same is a part of the society which is respected, but its existence is because of the heterosexuals. So considering heterosexuals the main sexuality and nature of not humans but creatures is more than true.
And so singing about women, and the majority of them, being as a support for men is again more than true, naturally.
as man also is pictured in the song as a loving creature to see, hold and possess the feminine values of a woman dearly. nothing degrading. done.
also when someone directly includes religious context in her song she is meaning it to be for a certain group in a world which she knows all do not hold the same belief as hers.
I think you're over-analyzing it. I don't think it's meant to be sexist. It's not that deep.
Looking at the way you responded to his comment, you might be someone who over reacts and over-analyze things. And honestly it's just a song, if you don't like it, don't listen to it.
Don't call me buddy, I don't know you and I don't want to know you either. You just come off as 12 year old girl, who's pissed off because daddy didn't buy her a new iPhone. And your over reaction makes YOU seem weak. Are you a troll? Because that's the only way I can justify the way you talk to people.
I read all the other comments you made here, you constantly go off topic and call people women haters for saying it isn't sexist. And I don't become friends with people who act like bitches either, that's why I don't want get to know you. Just look at your comments on @chadsten You said, "by the way we all judge as you know based on what people say", and I'm judging you. Why can't I do that and you can? This is my last comment to you Asker, have fun in Troll Land.
"lol no response" = "i guess i win by default, since i came here to argue with people"
RaeLynn is actually an old republican man, secretly plotting to destroy female rights.
@demonology I think you need to calm down. IDC if you don't expect people to mean what they say, but I do
>sitting here smiling
>calm down
Based on most peoples lack of explanation on their posts, I think the problem is that people don't understand what the definition of sexist is. "
1
:prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2
:behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ". This is exactly what the song sings about. She says all women feel this way. She says all women were created in order to support men. Not all women feel this way
never listened to it but the lyrics are terrible in my opinion
It just reminded me again that I basically know nobody who lives like people in country music songs. I read about them. But thats it.
I personally don't see it as "sexist." At least, not nearly as sexist as other mainstream music these days.
Because I don't think it's sexist so I put in quotes because that's the term you used to describe the song.
It's too stupid to give any thought to. If a person takes something from this song, then they have a IQ on par with Mr. Gump. Is it sexitst, sure.
It obviously is. Does not require a dissertation.
Umm, do you find everything like that sexist? I think it's implied that God made guys too.
this song is about the typical gender roles of girls.
some people have a problem with this.
Oh. I've never read the lyrics, just based it upon your question. No, that's not why you are created. We are in fact created for each other. Both ways.
It sounded like you were implying something you were very uneducated on. No, God did NOT create women just for man's purposes, else there would be no lesbians. And there would be no gay men, for that matter.
Based on most peoples lack of explanation on their posts, I think the problem is that people don't understand what the definition of sexist is. "
1
:prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2
:behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex ". This is exactly what the song sings about. She says all women feel this way. She says all women were created in order to support men. Not all women feel this way
Well, you would do best to ignore it. There are plenty of things like this on the internet.
Well its consistent with Christian beliefs so
Well considering God is male, what part of this doesn't seem logical?
It's as sexist as "it's raining men"
It's a bunch of women happy that's it's raining men. Claiming they want men to fit a certain exact specification too... thus... made just for them ^_^
So by sheer logic, it's on par with what you're saying about your song in question :3
So is the one I mentioned, ok in your books? O_o
How so?
bothhave the underlying feature that a certain gender is there just for the other.
so what makes the one you mention, worse?
Both have the exact same message.
just presented differently.
So what makes the one you stated, worse?
Also, read the lyrics of raining men again, the point isn't hidden.
I ment underlying as it's presented in a jocular manner as if it's nothing and all fun.
i disagree that both have the exact same message. "god made girls" is expressing what girls can give emotionally got guys, while "its raining men" is all about getting her soaking wet.
to* (replaced with the word got?)
@demonology it's the exact same message in the sense that one gender is solely there for the other, as stated
that i can compromise on, sure.
No, you didn't explain the difference in severity at all actually.
Also, I'll flip it on you.
The song you linked, I have never heard and im sure not too many people have, right?
The song I did, is huge.
Thus, surely it's more severe to affect a lot more people? If read into it like you have
Actually I did, in the simplest of terms. And if you live in the real world and are aware of pop culture, which you are, you know that historically, women have been oppressed for years and still are. So no, I dont think its fair to compare the effects these two songs have. This new song is played all the time
I do live in the real world thanks :3
Looking at your comments to other people as well as myself now, it's clear to see you were not looking for a discussion. .. but for people to agree with you :3
Both songs claim that the a gender is just there for the other.
Yet you claim yours is worse.
Agree to disagree
As this has grown ever so tedious ^_^
To which I'm open for discussion and my mind to be changed :3
You, on the other hand, don't seem to comprehend that.
Thus, this is pointless? No?
Well, people agree 5-1 or did you not notice.
HHHHHHHHHH
Having to resort to grammatical and punctuation errors... tis a sad sight
Simply can't prove your point, now going on the attack lol
how pathetic ^_^
Guys made gods, Girls accepted them. Loved them.
more so stupid than sexist
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions