For meI cannot stand when jumped up pricks where them as fashion, Not just Justin bieber, But anyone.
For those who aren't aware, ''Dog Tags'' are NOT a fashion accessory, Dog tags were invented, So that when a soldier is blown up / unrecognizable after being killed in combat, They can look at his Dog Tags to indentify him and then make the appropriate action for his remains. It makes me feel so pissed off when you see little shits wearing them to ''look cool'' when you think that they quite literally are an identifier for men who have been killed and mutilated beyond recognition, And you see these pricks sporting them around like a fucking necklace.
- Yes, Dog Tags should NOT be worn as a fashion accessory, It is offensive to the men who have died in combatVote A
- No, Dog tags SHOULD be worn as a fashion accessory, because i'm a swag faggot and have no respect for the dead.Vote B
Most Helpful Girl
Same goes for Che Guevara T-Shirts, not as serious a faux pa but the same principle: wearing shit you have no clue about.
I don't think it's very clever to do so unless you are making a statement, but I think people have the right to dress how they like.4
Most Helpful Guy
You are being overly dramatic. Dog tags aren't just worn by the dead. They are worn by living soldiers, some of which unfortunately die and are identified by their dog tags. A lot of people look up to soldiers and may even want to emulate certain aspects about our soldiers. It is said that imitation is the most sincere form of flattery and this is no exception.
Guys don't even have many accessories that aren't seen as girly. It only makes sense guys would gravitate to the accessories that are seen as being more masculine. That doesn't mean they are disrespecting anyone.4