Like if a certain statistic offends them or challenges their point of view, they will just write it off as bullshit. However if a statistic supports their viewpoint then that statistic is totally legit.
so essentially the only valid statistics are those which support that specific person's argument
have you noticed this?
- I've noticed thisVote A
- I haven't noticed thisVote B
- OtherVote C
Most Helpful Girl
People tend to be more critical of studies that oppose their point of view than those that support their point of view.
A big problem too, I think, is that many people do not really understand statistics, and many people don't have much education/experience with understanding and critiquing research papers.
Also, research is often presented in misleading and/or sensationalized ways in the media, and it can be difficult to gain access to the actual research paper (since many are behind paywalls).1