- The characteristics of Zeus are physical, It's more likely that a non-physical God exists since we his effects without seeing him.
- There are no wheat fields in outer space for spaghetti to be orbiting the Earth, unless astronauts released it there for fun, and "monster" is a subjective term, so there may be a spaghetti monster...
- Pink unicorns are animals that we would find on the Earth if they existed, and we would find some genetic resemblance. Unless there were genetic deformations that happened to a horse that we haven't seen, It's improbable.
Now what makes the existence of an intelligent creator improbable.
Something other than denial. Denial is a psychological condition that makes it impossible to reason with someone.
Most Helpful Guy
The fact that the existence of an intelligent creator is not improbable does not mean the intelligent creator exists.
How can you "ban" people from using hypothetical scenarios when you used one as well. That's enormously hypocritical.
Besides the hypothetical is used to make a logical ends of something which may or may not be logically existant and/or in the field of abstract thought, like you stated about the unicorn.
Besides, it's pretty difficult to have a conversation about something as abstract and inexistant as a supernatural intelligent creator without using hypothetical scenarios. The whole teaching of any religion that professes an illogical belief in a supernatural being is hypothetical at least in its assumptions.2