- Group 1: Doctor, Fast Food Employee, Tailor17% (3)8% (3)11% (6)Vote
- Group 2: Ex Army Officer, Janitor, Baseball Player22% (4)14% (5)16% (9)Vote
- Group 3: Farmer, Actor, Psychologist17% (3)19% (7)18% (10)Vote
- Group 4: Engineer, Minister, FBI Agent22% (4)30% (11)27% (15)Vote
- Group 5: Truck Driver, Fireman, Gunsmith22% (4)29% (11)28% (15)Vote
Most Helpful Guy
I went with group 4.
Going with each group with pros and cons...
Group 1: To be honest, the doctor is really the only valuable member on the team in terms of apocalypse standards. While a doctor would be a great addition to have in case diseases or some wound happens, I don't think the team is the best option compared to the others.
Group 2: The weak player would be the janitor, the strong would be the ex army officer. The army officer would be good for leadership, good with guns, know combat first aid perhaps, among various other apocalyptic need. I dunno why though, but I keep imagining he'd have aggressive tendencies that would create some issues.
Group 3: The farmer would actually help for long term solutions when you try to create a stable situation for yourself instead of wandering around... assuming it is an apocalypse that lets you do that. The psychologist would be good for mental health of the group 2. I had this one in 2nd place.
Group 5: The gunsmith would be nice to have in the fact he knows guns through and through. Perhaps this would help in building traps like the engineer. However, the Truck Driver and Fireman, other than possible strength, don't bring much to the table for an apocalyptic situation in my opinion.
Group 4: The Engineer would be great for building things like traps, and he'd be an overall smart guy to be around for the technical aspect of things. The FBI agent is kind of like the ex army officer in the fact that he has training (around 20 weeks worth). The agent has leadership qualities, firearm training, is fit, and are taught in how to deal with people. The minister is the weakest member of the group. He may be able to help with mental well-being of the group kind of like the psychologist from group 3. He may stop us from going insane and losing our morals too if that makes any difference haha. The only issue is if he raises moral problems with the group and others disagree with him, leading to conflict.0