I like the fact that we can now close our questions, but why does the website have a say in WHEN to close your questions?
I understand if there was something wrong with the questions and such, and therefore it gets closed... That's reasonable...
BUT if there's nothing wrong, nor breaking any rules, why does gag decide when to close a question?
What if someone had valuable input to add later on?
I personally think the people running the website should not be allowed to close our questions unless they are breaking some type of rule or the like...
What if the question asker is still not yet satisfied with the answers provided as of yet? Why take it upon yourself to decide that for the question asker?
I think it's a violation to our question. >;[! (If it's not breaking any rules or hasn't even been up for 30 days) etc.. etc..
What do you guys think?
- Question should remain open (unless it breaks rules, or the question asker decides to close it)92% (12)100% (10)96% (22)Vote
- they should close it whenver they feel like it, even if I still haven't received the answers I was looking for. ... 😒😒8% (1)0% (0)4% (1)Vote
2 days!!! 2DAYS!!! 😯😯😯😐😟😟😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 whyyy?
G@G you're awful.
Most Helpful Girl
I agree completely!! I don't want my questions to be closed so soon. Within two days, you might only get 3 unhelpful responses. Then, the site features specific questions, and nobody has time to find your own. I wish WE had the option to close our OWN questions, or even delete them off the face of the internet.
It wouldn't reduce clutter or traffic at all, by the way. People might feel obligated to create that same question again, because they didn't get the right answers the first time.1