This Guy: vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/.../latest
Because he's like a mix of Samurai, sword carried on the back and he's also a gunfighter from the old west.
Now back on topic, depending upon the environment, distance, skills, luck, patience, how much ammo the Gunfighter has and depending upon if he also has MORE THAN a Single gun, and whether or not the Samurai can throw his swords or blades, or whether or not have a crossbow or bow and arrow, I'm sure samurais have ranged weapons as well. But the odds would still be greatly in the favor of "The Guy With The GUN", especially if the Samurai does not have anything he can really use to reach at the gunfighter.
All because, "the gun is the best defense."
Most Helpful Opinions
Who brings a sword to a gunfight? Also their swords were pretty shitty
Unless the samurai is some kind of superhuman so he could dodge the bullets the "gun fighter" would win. Disarm them both and make chances fair and the "gunfighter" will be knocked out faster than you could count to 3 😂
Nobody stands a chance against Clint Eastwood! I wouldn't stand for him either but I'd sure lay with my legs spread offering him a warm moist holster he can slide his six shooter into.
Samuri. He'd doge the bullet with his blade or cut it in two. And he'd look cool af doing it :)
The gunfighter lol
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
47Opinion
According to history books, some Samurai used matchlock weapons. Samurai were trained in various arts of war. So the samurai with a gun would probably win.
s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...d8153e9ba5.jpgModern gunslingers can slip leather in seconds and hit the target and they aren't even as good as some of the legendary gunslingers of old. The Samurai would win if they were able to flank him and sneak up (Limiting the time to pull a gun) but if it was a duel, ten paces and such, gunslingers win every time.
I think the samurai gets shot, still manages to close the distance and slice gunfighter to pieces, dies of infection later.
Early guns were not particularly more effective than earlier weaponry, they just required far less training.
For instance, in early 1800s, muskets could be fired by most people once a minute. Elite troops might fire 4 times a minute. Their effective range was < 100 yards. That's where the old 'wait till you see the whites of their eyes' comes from - after you fire, the opponents can close the gap and engage in bayonet warfare before you reload, so you might as well fire your one round at point blank range. By contrast, longbowmen from centuries earlier could fire 10-12 times a minute and hit a man sized target 80% of the time at 300 yards. Wellington asked whether a few hundred longbowman could be used in the Napoleonic era, but there was simply none around. Learning to be a longbowman took years, where musket infantry could be deployed far, far faster.Well of course that samurai in your poll wouldn't stand a chance... look at the lad, he looks scared and nervous already lol.
But now if you'd have put up samurai jack
66.media.tumblr.com/.../...msWmiO1rvxid3o1_500.gif
Haha now we have ourselves a true battle...
And samurai jack would win😎.Well, not exactly a Samurai and not exactly a Gunfighter but it's close enough for the government:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YyBtMxZgQsSome samurai used muskets but would probably still be dead before he even got to point it against a skilled gunslinger.
Only case I could think of samurai prevailing in that case is because samurai are apparently a bit insane and ready to die at any moment (at least the more romanticized version of the samurai, not all were like this). So he might take a few rounds and still go kamikaze on the cowboy charging at him and then die after swinging his sword.Samurai, because they are faster, more dexterous and precise. Samurai had throwing knives like these, they could kill old west gunfighter before they would manage to draw a gun: https://www.edgeimport.com/images/97618480631.jpg
It basically works out like this but with a lot more bias going to the cowboy... Whoops technology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCtuZ-fDL2EIt would depend are they in a forested area are they dueling does the samurai have a bow is he on horse back etc, etc.
Not really as simple as yes or no to many variables.considering that the use of guns sort of eliminated the effectiveness of the samurai i'd have to say the gun slinger. i'd like to choose the samurai but even a great samurai can only avoid so many bullets
Even am idiot who's never used a gun before but knows how it works would win against the most skilled fighter in the world if he has a gun. There is just no competition. The only thing that might hinder him would be an unsteady aim and fear to shoot.
The samurai would be dead before he could react. I've seen videos of a man slicing bullets with a sword, but you have to be pretty special to be able to do that. Your average samurai wouldn't pull it off.
Did you not watch Indiana Jones?
https://youtu.be/7YyBtMxZgQsUnosuke from Yojimbo might give Clint a run for his money: he's bought a pistol from the Black Ships.
ibfilmsas.wikispaces.com/.../...012.38.32%20AM.pngSamurai all day long... A gun won't change a thing for a good samurai. Just sayin'...
Samurai, easily.
He'd be on horseback sixty-yards-away pumping arrows into the gunslinger from his Yumi bow before the guy ever knew what hit him. The Samurai are too well trained with the bow.The Samurai would throw his sword at the Gunfighter as he fires his gun. The sword will hit the bullet and it will ricochet back to the Gunfighter's head, killing him instantly.
Winner: Sumurai! :)Well, the anime nerd in me says SAMURAI but the logical part of me says man+gun beats sword. so...*sigh* the gunfighter... but if he loses his gun ITS ON.
Sounds familiar...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=anEuw8F8cpESamurai no longer exist because of guns so yeah gunfighter though samurais are cooler.
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions