Yes
No
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
No, of course not.
The world has developed and evolved over thousands and thousands of years, through the process of random mutations, coincidences, biological impulses and human choices by free will with choice of partner. There is no definite reason for anything - there is no grand design made for this world. It simply exists.
Male and female was evolved because it works in the context of reproduction. Successful things facilitate themselves because they are successful, while failures are quickly removed from the gene pool as they could not be passed on to the next generation. Though this in itself does not denote any sort of servitude. It is just the dichotomies of sex and sexual roles.
This means we are left with nothing but our own choices. Humans are smart. Though we cannot question our biology at its heart, we are intelligible and thoughtful - enough to create our own societies, morality and so on. We are self empowered, and thankfully, in my country we have a created a society that values individual willpower. I, personally, would never kneel to serve "male" as a concept. Individual men, yes. If it is my boss, or something. But my boss could easily also be a woman, and I would offer her the same thing.
Though this does not exist in every culture. There are no natural implications of women being in a servitudal role. That is just what those cultures have chosen for themselves. This can be changed over time and is not set. And I, myself genuinely hope it does.
God made woman so man would not be alone, to reproduce, and grow families.
Never bothered? Here we go again.
Alright. I simply said unless you're an Atheist. Never did I say I was or imply I was. No matter if I am an Atheist or not, I don't need you to shove religion down my throat.
And by the way, just because you read a book doesn't mean he is there.
@Logical_Idolist ok first off you message me, secondly I not showing my views down your throat I'm simply giving my opinion like you did yours. If you didn't like what I had to say then next don't message me. God is everywhere. And for the record those who seek God will find God. If you don't like my belief s too bad.. get over it
HAHA!!! I didn't message you. I commented on an opinion. And you are shoving it down my throat. I assume you think I am an Atheist. Being the case, you are shoving it in my face. You are repeatedly telling me god is everywhere and all of this stuff.
When I said "Unless you're an Atheist" you could've said true. Because it is true. Your statement is the case unless one is an Atheist. And I know I am correct in that aspect. And get over it? Am I shoving Atheism in your face? Didn't think so.
Triggered? I'm not triggered. No reason to be.
Wtf..
I made a statement that is true.
@Logical_Idolist I agree totally with your statement. but this original opinion if messed up.
Thank you haha. And this guy asks pretty good questions.
@Logical_Idolist Thank you 😊
You're welcome haha.
It ain't in my job description and I ain't getting paid for it so nah.
😜😜
@rjroy3 lol. She's beautiful. And Mother of Dragons, fights for slaves, loyal, fierce... lmao. She seemed an appropriate response to this question 😎
@rjroy3 😊👍 thank you
The question implies you believe someone created women. Humans evolved, women instinctively care for their children, or we wouldn't be here, they perform useful tasks for men, like gathering Berry's so men can concentrate on hunting. But, men are serving women by killing monkeys, bush pigs and wilderbeast.
No, women and men were meant to be equals yet opposites.. Made compliment each other.. To rule the Earth together.. Lol..
Opinion
47Opinion
I think God meant for humanity to serve each other.
Yes, but likewise men were meant to protect and provide for women. It was always a partnership where the two together were stronger than either alone.
Men and women have different strengths and weaknesses, but they compliment each other.
Meant to? No.
Did they? Sure, because men were violent and in charge, for the most part.
These days, thankfully, there is more equality. A man can serve his woman in a variety of ways, because he wants to. And vice versa. No one should be forced to serve another, especially against their will.
No, they are not here to serve men
However with that being said, being women , giving birth and usually they choose jobs that sucks... all in all they usually end up serving their families which i dont see anything wrong with, if you're not gonna serve your family then who are you gonna serve?
Lol im gonna get shit for this but I do believe that women are meant to serve men.
Holy shit. Lol. I've never heard a woman say such a thing...
@TonyRyanAgain lmao I'm not saying every woman has to, only if they want to of course. Reason why i believe that, is because i think men are naturally superior to women. Physically and mentally. Men are more logical and women tend to make decisions based on emotions, so I think that makes men better leaders.
Sorry if my English sucks, it's not my first language.
Oh i see. And no, you did good. 👍
this is the kind of girl i gotta marry. she knows how to act like a women and be in her feminine state. while the man takes care of her and the family while leading.
Both men and women were meant to contribute to reproduction and society through their own unique gifts.
We're literally a bunch of carbon based multicellular organisms, we came to live together to not die. There isn't an edict declaring women be subserving to men, only, quite literally, man made rules where men originally enforced them.
Lol at 60% of women voting yes while 76% of men voted no.
And some people say men are sexist.
Yeah I was surprised about the poll lol...
But it can also kind of depend on how you interpret the question
These polls are beautiful, I give 10 keks.
The voting on this question has me baffled beyond belief.
>mfw I see the poll
https://i.imgur.com/oFW3kbD.jpg
omg! 42% off people said "yes" ... what the hell!
i think the first one cellular life forms just formed themselves somewhere on this planet and sexually reproduced without actually having one serve the other sex.
Biologically-everyone's purpose is to continue the species.
So, no, a woman's purpose is not to serve, just as a man's purpose is not to serve.
People need each other. Bottom line. If you are into the whole subserviant thing, then you better find a lady that is into it as well.
No, they were meant to breed, and men were made to protect
It's scary how many people said yes...
Well, I'm not a guy who wants a girl who is a pushover and a slave. So, nope. I like tough tomboys like my girlfriend.
To the women who voted yes, where the heck you from? Saudi Arabia, Iran, India, etc? Do you want to be a slave?
um no.. no i dont want girls to do that they are my equal only difference is organs no ones ment to serve anyone... without getting paid that is lol
Yes, they were. But men were meant to serve women, too - to the same extent.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions