Search Results: define intimidated

Please keep in mind that in the US, domestic terrorism involves ideologically driven crimes intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy, primarily within the US, and is not a specific federal offense, but rather prosecuted under existing laws.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Definition:

The FBI and DHS, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, have developed standard definitions of terminology related to domestic terrorism and uniform methodologies for tracking domestic terrorism incidents.

Not a Specific Federal Offense:

While the federal government defines domestic terrorism, it's not a standalone crime that can be charged. Instead, domestic terrorism cases are prosecuted under existing laws, such as those related to violence, threats, or destruction of property.

Focus on Ideology:

Domestic terrorism is characterized by acts driven by a domestic ideological goal, such as political, religious, social, racial, or environmental motivations.

Intent to Intimidate or Coerce:

The key element is the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy or conduct.

Examples:

This could include acts of violence, threats, or destruction of property targeting government facilities, infrastructure, or civilians.

Federal Agencies Involved:

The FBI and DHS are the primary federal agencies responsible for COUNTERING NOT PROSECUTING domestic terrorism.

State-Level Laws:

Some states have their own domestic terrorism laws, which may define the offense and prescribe penalties.

HATE CRIMES:

Please also keep in mind that hate crimes per statute are against protected classes of people, not businesses.

Slavery and enslavement are the state and condition of being a slave, who is someone forbidden to quit their service for another person and is treated like property.
Slavery relies heavily on the enslaved person being intimidated either by the threat of violence or some other method of abuse.
In chattel slavery, the enslaved person is legally rendered the personal property (chattel) of the slave owner.
In economics, the term de facto slavery describes the conditions of unfree labour and forced labour that most slaves endure.
Unpaid labor is defined as labor that does not receive any direct remuneration.

---

And they say slavery is abolished. I say it has a different name and has a different disguise and consists of different methods of execution.

BACKGROUND:

Most recently it's Biden being accused of groping (grabbing a womans privates). This is wrong for an employer, intimidating to a woman and could cause emotional trauma for decades... if it happened.

Clinton had sex in the white house (BJ at least) but lied about it to avoid being convicted. That started the ball rolling... towards pathetic and denial of all and sex as a weapon.

Trump said what he said, he's pretty lame with women and likely paid off for affair (s). That's only so bad... not like he was abusing someone.. she participated... he just talked aggressively and adultery. that isn't assault. I know it's awful to some, but those church goers ignored it all and believe he's sent by god

Franken admitted... at least he's the only one with the guts to say what he did, which of what I heard, wasn't that bad and was acting, playing around... that was his life to some extent.

Oh yea, who can forget about Kavanaugh. And Clarence Thomas! Clarence I believe lied... shoulda said the truth, but would be destroyed if he did. That's wrong. Kavanaugh, not sure. People do stupid Sh_1 when young, they forget, they see different, and people make things up, and are sometimes wrong... I've seen it. I've seen people with false perceptions... they exist. I've seen people lie.

I've been groped by women several times and it's either accepted or is out of place. I understand it can be traumatizing to some, but to destroy someone's life for it? nah...

Do you think we should give people some leeway when being judged including from the other political side... relative to the good they've done. One moment or two doesn't define them in totality.