Why we need to eliminate the word "slut" from our vocabulary.

This is my fist ever "myTake" - which I'm posting because I am so SICK of seeing so many questions posted here on GaG about whether a girl is a "slut" for doing this or wearing that, etc.

For the record, I am NOT a feminist. But I AM a virgin. And I do NOT dress showing a lot of skin. I don't have cleavage, and I wouldn't flash it around it I did (I dont think) ;)

To me - although it has nothing to do with race or religion, this word is like the new "N" word in our society (please don't flame me for this anaolgy, I'm only try to relay a personal point/opinion), or calling a gay person one of the commonly thrown about slurs because of thier sexual preference. It's not only insensitive, it's disgusting, and just plain wrong to call other people some dispicable name just because you judge them with your own self-righteuosness, racism, or bigotry.

The below is laregly pulled from an article I read on the subject, with adds and deletes by me. I think it gets the point across quite well. Dissenting opinions are welcome, but please make them thoughtful, with some reason behind them, not simple blind ignorance, disagreement, or sarcasm. If you are a name caller or mysogynist, you will be reported and/or blocked.

Why we need to eliminate the word

How would you describe that low-cut, tight dress you just bought for your best friend’s party? Would you call it sexy? daring? fun? Or would you use a more negative term like “slutty?”

And that fun one-night stand your neighbor had last weekend – would you describe her actions as adventurous, or “skanky?”

The word slut is a common slur in our modern day vernacular. No doubt, it still carries weight if said with malicious intent.

But in recent years, the word has become deeply ingrained into our culture to the point where people say it too easily and too casually.

As innocuous as using pejorative terms may seem when used in reference to clothing or the activities of others, they undoubtedly still imply negativity surrounding female sexuality.

And using them just validates the societal standard of a perfect, virginal-until-marriage, demure woman as an ideal.

I’ve often asked myself “What can we do about this nasty, negative word choice that is so standard in our culture?” Maybe learning more about the word itself – and more empowering words we can use instead – is a good start.

What Are We Really Saying?

Many women have been called a slut at some point in their lives — or have thrown the epithet at someone else. But what does it really mean?

The word “slut” originates in Old English, meaning a “messy, dirty, or untidy” woman or girl. Because of this, it was frequently used as a term for kitchen maids and servant girls. By the 15th century, the word took on the meaning of a “promiscuous woman” as well.

Think about it: Have you ever called someone a slut, whether in jest or seriously? What did it mean to you? And what do you think it meant to the person it was directed toward?

Slut-Shaming: Are You Guilty, Too?

Why we need to eliminate the word "slut" from our vocabulary.

To slut-shame means to “degrade or mock a woman because she enjoys having sex, has sex a lot, or may even just be rumored to participate in sexual activity.”

Most of us, whether we realize it or not, have judged or degraded someone (usually a woman) for being sexual, having one or more sexual partners, acknowledging sexual feelings, and/or acting on sexual feelings outside of marriage.

It happens all the time. That young celebrity who wears something more daring than her usual attire is automatically described in terms of “her slutty side.” We see a beautiful woman who is wearing heavy makeup and comment on how she is lovely, but she looks like a stripper. We condemn our sexual thoughts as slutty instead of explorative.

As a culture, we are quick to use words that paint female sexuality as disgraceful – even if we don’t realize that we are doing it.

Think: Have you ever called yourself (or someone else) a slut when your true feelings weren’t ones of disgust or disapproval?

Did you even consider using an alternative word? Or was slut the first thing – almost the natural thing – that came to mind?

And more importantly, what consequences do your words really have?

Slut-Shaming Can Have Serious Repercussions

For some young women, the stigma of “slut” is so hurtful that it leaves their lives in ruins.

Take Rehtaeh Parsons, of Canada, who was allegedly raped by four boys who distributed photos of the attack online. She was afterwards bullied and slut-shamed mercilessly by her peers to the point where she decided to take her own life at 17 years of age.

Her mother told Canadian news source CBC, “She was never left alone. She had to leave the community. Her friends turned against her. People harassed her. Boys she didn’t know started texting her and Facebooking her, asking her to have sex with them. It just never stopped. People texted her all the time, saying ‘Will you have sex with me?’ Girls texting, saying, ‘You're such a slut.’”

This story is a modern tragedy, fueled by cyber-bullying and slut-shaming. The girls and boys who taunted Rehtaeh so cruelly probably had no idea how deep their words cut until it was too late.

Why did so many of her peers turn on her? Why did other girls – some of whom conceivably had endured similar experiences (because hell, they live in this messed-up society, too) – call her a slut and disown her as a friend?

While the blame for the crime rests on the shoulders of the alleged rapists, it is possible that if Rehtaeh hadn’t been labeled a “slut” and endured the cruel bullying that she did, she might be alive today.

Tragically, this type of cyber-slut-shaming is not uncommon among the younger generations.

Imagine how it would feel to be that teenage girl who everyone is whispering about in the halls. To have hurtful names like “slut,” “whore,” and “skank” assigned to you by people who barely know you. To be judged harshly and without caution for engaging in sexual activity, as most curious teens do.

These young women were intensely slut-shamed, and had their very traumatic experiences invalidated by judgment from their peers. Their very worth was brought into question because people chose to side with the rapists instead of the victims.

Slut-shaming is rape culture, plain and simple. And for some people, it is utterly life-destroying.

Slut-Shaming Doesn’t End Just Because We Grow Up

Whether in the dating world, the professional arena, education, or in friendships, adult females are not immune to slut-shaming either.

Women are not only the favored targets of slut-shaming, but very often the perpetrators as well. Due to generations of internalized sexism, women often reject their sexually promiscuous peers as worthy companions or friends – even as adults.

A Cornell University study puts this theory to the test, revealing that college-aged women are much less likely to form deep friendships with promiscuous women.

When most of us have spent our childhoods being taught that gaining male validation is the route to power, and even happiness, it is not surprising that many women will view their sexually explorative peers as threats. This may cause women to lash out against other women in an attempt to rise above the competition.

  • Is any of this fair? No.
  • Is it valid? Hell no.
  • Does it hurt women of all races, ages, and sexual orientations? Yes.

Internalized sexism is a disease, and by carelessly throwing around sexist, hurtful epithets like “slut” and “skank,” we all act as the carriers.

Sluts Versus Studs

The double standard remains: Why is it that a girl who has sex is a whore/slut, but a boy who has sex is a stud/player?

In movies, on television, in magazines, and in our communities, people throw around the term “slut” willy-nilly when talking about women. But men are held to a very different standard.

As a society, what are we teaching our children? that a girl or woman is a dirty, unclean, and unworthy because she has sexual desire? that because she is female, she should save herself for marriage or she is a whore? that women should ignore or otherwise not act upon sexual desires even though men should and do?

Why do we accept sexual exploration from our sons but not our daughters?

  • It’s simple: The word slut is a decidedly female insult, and using it enhances gender discrimination.

Dumping the Word Itself

Why we need to eliminate the word "slut" from our vocabulary.

We may not be able to change the way that others talk to each other right away, but we can start by presenting an example with our own behavior.

**This is why I encourage everyone to eliminate the word slut from their vocabulary**.

(even if you're thinking it, how hard is it just to NOT say it?)

I have spent the last few years working on this: if I catch myself about to describe myself, one if my choices, or even my outfit, as slutty or skanky, I make a concerted effort to replace that language with something more empowering.

For example: The other night, my friends and I were talking about one of our favorite TV shows and discussing how the characters have changed over the seasons.

One of my friends mentioned a female character who started out as a virgin, and has embraced her sexual side throughout the show by having various partners and experiences. Unsurprisingly, my friend simply said: “She’s gotten really slutty.”

I refuse to accept that ideology, even in casual conversation. There are so many sex-positive alternatives that we can use.

  • She was exploring her newfound sexual desire.
  • She was experimenting with what she likes and doesn’t like.
  • She was taking a defined step into adulthood.
  • She was opening herself up to new possibilities.
  • She was – simply – trying something new.

I stand by my next statement: No harm can come from being more sex-positive and less chauvinistic in our speech patterns. I dare each and every one of you to give it a try.

Next time you want to call a girl a slut, rethink your choice and start chipping away at the double standard by using positive descriptive language.

Try to remember that everyone has a personal choice. While you may not lead a similar life to someone else, it is unfair and unjust to ascribe your values to their character.

And moreover, it sets a terrible example for future generations.

Some women wear sexy dresses and choose to have multiple partners. Others wait until marriage and dress demurely. And some are in the middle.

That doesn’t mean that Group A are sluts, Group B are prudes, and Group C have hit the perfect moral high ground. All choices are both fabulous and individual.

***** Let’s take the word slut out of our vocabulary *****

1 4

Most Helpful Girl

  • This was a really amazing take.
    I personally have never used that word to be honest because it never made sense to me! It's like.. I just always thought a person who has a lot of sex just simply means hey they love having sex! Man and women. If they just happened to have many sexual partners then hey! Whatever they love sex as it is.
    It's true that men are looked up to for having many sexual partners or hookups always given high fives n what not". And if a woman did what do we mostly hear? You hoe! Or slut! Why can't a women be looked up for that too? Makes no sense what so ever. Another problem is a girl will be called either a slut or whore and a guy is "Man whore"? Where in anyway does Whore mean a woman? Not even close! Anytime I heard a guy consider himself by saying Manwhore I'd say no. You are a whore. XD!
    Unfortunately there are so many problems with words in this time!
    You are one of the very few people who understand! Yes and that poor girl who died because of those immature stupid people! Just wow. What gets me mad is if she was such a whore ( as those people claimed her to be) and these dudes are trying to get with a "slut" makes them SLUTS AS WELL! Why weren't they called out for that too? Ahhh it's endless.
    Great take!

    • I expected this from a majority of men. I'm saddened by thr number of self-righteous female les that the think they are better people than someone else because of their sexual choices.

Most Helpful Guy

  • I don't want to get rid of the word. The problem is not people calling a girl a "slut" when she engages in promiscuous, meaningless sexual behavior. The problem is people not calling a guy a slut when he does the same thing.

    The idea that people are free to engage in any behavior whatsoever without suffering consequences encourages irresponsibility. Yes, you are free to engage in sluttery if you want, but I am equally free to judge it and call it as I see it. Of course, the word is overused with women, it is used to describe behavior that is not necessarily promiscuous or even sexual, and it is rarely used at all with respect to males.

    Telling others what they can and cannot say is presumptuous and contrary to the spirit of free speech. Does freedom of speech have no currency for you?

    • I think you make a valid point... until you get to thread "free speech" part. Clearly, you misread the primary point. I'm advocating that we (people) eliminate the word (voluntarily) from our individual vocabularies. Not to make hate speech illegal or remove it from tCool story bro. So no basis of legitimate reason for you to be such an insecure mysongynist. You can't even back up your own weak ass position with any facts. Thanks for confirming my intuition. he dictionary. The N word is in the dictionary too, but that doesn't make it OK use it as a slur against another person. I'm not sure how people are assuming that we CHOOSE to remove a word from our collective vocabulary, somehow suggests that I think the word doesn't exist or should be made illegal. The number of "but the word is in the dictionary" replies is sadly dissapointing. It makes me wonder if people even understand what the word "vocabulary" means. Just because you have a "right" doesn't make it RIGHT.

    • So you feel entitled to tell people what they should/should not do (be promiscuous) and you have no problem with this, but telling you to mind your own business and not insult people is where you draw the line? How is it any of your business how people live their lives? What makes you think you are in a position to judge people? Oh and that's not what freedom of speech is about. You should know that by now.

    • "Telling others what they can and cannot say is presumptuous" How hypocritical of you !

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

28 95
  • OK. First point I just want to make clear that I read every word of your article and all of the many comments and your sometimes less than polite replies.
    Secondly I get that you are asking us to rethink our use of the word not outright ban it, although your phrasing is open to interpretation and I find it arrogant that you instantly insult the intelligence of anyone who read it differently.
    Thirdly I don't agree with your take. If you convinced people to stop saying slut a new word would be developed to fill the hole. It's not the word that is the problem but the connotation behind it. Encouraging people to rethink their attitude (eg embracing feminine sexuality or whatever) is just trying to polish a turd. Give an action a different phraseology and it's still the same action. At best you're trying to dress tge behaviour up to make it socially acceptable. At worst you're advocating promoting "sluttish" behaviour as a positive and empowering thing. Those women who are enjoying sexual freedoms have that right. Even those who take it to levels you consider inappropriate or obscene have that freedom, just as you/we have the freedom to judge, and no amount if guilding will change that.
    Fourthly, your example of the poor girl bullied into suicide is extremist and overplayed. Yes this happens but you'll find the PST associated with the initial attack caused the suicide. The bullying would have contributed but an unstable mental state was the driving force. To say every instant of slut-shaming is this extreme is to say every Muslim is part of the Taliban and every priest is a child molester.
    I've just sat through a news story about a celebrity chef campaigning to "eliminate" sugary drinks from kids' diets. With him telling me what I can feed my child and you telling me what I should be ashamed to think or say I am beginning to question this freedom of speech you make reference to.
    Finally, I appreciate the sentiment in your take and understand this is something important to you but please accept it is just that YOUR TAKE. There are other ways to achieve what you are advocating. Use of a word will not do this. A change in mindset is needed. I hate to say it but you seem so fixated on the negative connotations that it appears you should start by changing your mindset. Where I am from it is not nearly as negative a word or view as you insist it is.

    I await your abuse.

    • I don't have time girlfriend. I agree that the mindset needs to change, and Im advocating that we collective change the mindset that it's proper behavior to use slurs in general. I also learned that no one is ever going to change a position that they already hold from reading a My Take or debating it on GaG. So, I heard you. You may now move on to a new crusade. Thank you.

    • Shall do. I hope you're able to do the same.

    • You're super funny. Are you trying to bait me? This Take is a week old. I personally got a LOT out of it. But I'm done with it now. You won't ever change your view, and I will continue to think that word is every bit as despicable as many others that I refuse to use.

    • Show All
  • Lets take every bad word out of our vocabulary please. 😂
    THAT STORY GAVE ME THE FEELS, THATS SO FUCKING SAD. I'M LITERALLY DYING, WHAT A POOR GIRL AND FUCK THOSE GUYS, WHERE WERE HER FRIENDS? AHEM? Ok i'm done, but crying.

    • I thought the same thing. Where were her REAL friends? And why so many callous dip shitty replies to this MyTake... sigh...

    • Yess... and whats with the down vote? I think there may be a hater around._. ?

  • The problem is that we think of women as sluts at all. Just because she enjoys sex, or likes to wear tight clothing, all the sudden she's a bad women, a skanky women. The whole idea of sluts is just wrong. *sigh* But I agree, the word needs to go.

    • Exactly. And contrary to all the ignorant plucks that keep thinking I'm trying to say we should "ban" the word or be the "thought police"... For the MILLIONTH TIME... NO... FFS! Just please THINK about eliminating it from YOUR Vocabulary. Where did you people learn to read? Eliminate from vocabulary = choice Banning a word = fascism. Good gawd...😩👈

  • OK here is a more in-depth description of what is going on with the slut/stud double standard. I've thought about doing a MyTake on this, but I'll summarize it here.

    Basically, the entire nature of how we view sexuality in many or most societies today centers around the idea that sex is something a woman shouldn't want, but give, and that sex is something that a man SHOULD want, but that he must fight tooth and nail to win from the reluctant, asexual woman.

    This basically permeates every facet of our dating lives. How long can a woman hold off? How quickly can a man get it?

    It is the old Victorian/Darwinian notion that women are relatively asexual beings who trade sex for resources and protection. As Chris Ryan puts it, "Darwin says your mother is a whore." Because he basically says that women prostitute themselves to gain resources and protection from men. And we seem to hold to that in a lot of ways to this day. From an economic standpoint, women are the supply, men are the demand.

    I can write for days about how humans didn't actually live like this. But I'll save it.

    So if a man has a lot of sex, he is seen as a victorious, high-status guy because he is so amazing as to "actually" convince women to "want" sex. Studs aren't exactly loved. It's more like they are viewed with an internal disdain and frustration, accompanied by the feeling that we are supposed to mimic these guys, because they are doing things "right." This is reinforced any time a girl says things like "you'll never get laid with that attitude" when a guy disagrees with her.

    So thus is the traditional courting scheme that girls seem to love for *obvious* reasons, and cling to despite sharing the same foundation as derogatory titles like "Slut" and "Whore". Man sweeps woman off her feet to ask her out. Man takes her to fancy restaurant, buys her food, spends a few hours convincing her that he is worth her time. (Heaven forbid she have to prove SHE is worth his time.)

    If a man can sleep around, that is quite a feat.

    If a woman goes out a lot and sleeps with a lot of men, in this structure, she is seen as taking the selfish route. Taking what she can get at the drop of a hat, that men have to fight for. So men view her as a slut.

    When women call each other sluts, it seems to have to do with cheapening the "trade" that women are supposed to make. "Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free?" Or because they are indulging in something women are expected to hold off on.

    • It's funny, because there is no need for this structure before agriculture was invented. Women has the same access to food. They weren't prevented from it. And in fact, women in hunter-gatherer tribes provided most of the calories, while men provided most of the meat, and it was all shared throughout the group. There was no need to trade anything for food, because it was already shared, anyway. Similarly, bronze age cultures went to extreme measures to prevent women from wanting sex. And to this day, female circumcision exists to prevent women from wanting or enjoying sex. If women "naturally" made this trade, it wouldn't be necessary to take such extreme measures to prevent it, they would just naturally act that way. Humans have one of the highest female libidos on Earth. And this was arguably one of the greatest peace-making traits in human development, because it dissolves the need for males to form violent hierarchies.

    • Replace *Similarly* with *On the other hand* Also, don't be afraid of the word feminist, or at least don't feel the need to denounce it any time you write something that sounds "feminist." I think people should be able to have opinions without everyone assuming they are part or some group, and assigning all its baggage to you. I used to not have an issue, but these days I don't identify as "A" feminist because of how outrageously politically-correct, infantilizing, and regressive the movement seems to have become. "Man-spreading?" "Safe spaces" from speakers with controversial views? Can't be sexist against men because "sexism is a social structure"? Banning words? It's like they are TRYING to reinvigorate the stereotype that women are frail, emotional crybabies. Tell that to every tom-boy I know. They'll have none of it.

  • I'm all for females expressing their sexuality. Why wouldn't any male be? No reason except religion, in my opinion. I will fight for yoga pants and cleavage to my last breath! And also so women realize that if you have your tits hanging out, they will be stared at.

    You make a word forbidden, and it becomes immeasurably worse. When everyone says it, it loses it's severity. This post is as if the word 'slut" is responsible for the whole of societal perspective on women. The word "slut" is a symptom--not a cause. The primary cause is what you mentioned--the idea that women are "societal standard of a perfect, virginal-until-marriage, demure woman as an ideal." That is the cause. You get rid of the word 'slut', and the idea will still remain. You can't kill an idea, but you can supply a better idea. And really, as time goes on, the baby boomers die off and that old school way of thinking is going, as well. It's a natural progression, as racism fades away, as children grow up with all kinds of different races. it's not something you can say "Hey, we should put a bandaid on that festering wound, and then everything will be great! Yay!" The medicine has already been applied. It will just take time, from now on.

    "The [definitive] blame lies on the *alleged* rapists." Of course, a horny pubescent girl would never willingly have sex with more than one boy; and women are weak and vulnerable flowers, so no one could even suggest that she carried any degree of blame. No. I am not victim blaming. I am just pointing out the questionable wording. And no, I am not saying rape doesn't happen; but, I am saying "what do we know about this particular instance?" Obviously, I haven't looked into it yet, but that particular wording made me think of this.

    And a boy who hasn't had sex is a worthless piece of garbage, while a woman who hasn't had sex is the aforementioned ideal. Oh look. Multiple double standards with the same concept. Who would have known.

    The reason we shelter women is because they are more important than men. Eggs are finite, while sperm is infinite. This is why when a man dies, it's expected or even funny, and when a woman dies, it's a tragedy beyond epic proportions. The idea is women are the biological cornerstone of reproduction, and thus their eggs should be used importantly, not thrown away on anyone. It's instinct from 20,000 years ago when human pop was low.

    I wonder how you view a 40 year old man who has never had sex. Or a man who 'can't get laid'.

    • Women are biologically important to the human race.* This is why their so-called oppression through marriage was a form to protect them from the *actual danger and hardship*. While they rubbed their fingers to the bone and raised children, men were dying horribly and losing limbs and shit, providing for them and protecting them. Incidentally, the so-called freedom and infinite benefit from the so-called patriarchy was paid for in blood and sweat. Then women got it for free when they wanted it, curiously at the end of the industrial revolution when everything got infinitely safer. To claim women were oppressed is to claim they were the only people to never rise up against their oppressors, until a virtual eye blink ago, and to spit on the graves of the millions of men who died protecting them. If there was *ever* a better argument for innate female inferiority, I have yet to hear it. -paraphrase, Karen Straughan AKA GirlWritesWhat.

    • I couldn't really add in the female value without the anti-feminist pro-gender-equality ramble. But, to what I actually wanted to say: women have innate value in society, whereas men must prove that they're more valuable to society alive than dead, or dying to fulfill a function to the benefit of society. This innate value stems from the aforementioned reproductive methods: eggs vs. sperm. Eggs are a finite quality, while sperm is infinite. Naturally, that makes one more important than the other, instinctually. 20k years ago when the human pop. was low, it was of paramount importance that women use their eggs most efficiently. That instinctive ideology remains in modern times. A woman who is indiscriminately sexual, people will feel subconsciously as if they are hurting humanity by not making sure their eggs are fertilized by only the best males. Even though there's 7 billion of us clogging up the works, instinct takes a while to adjust.

    • I stopped reading when I got to the point where you said "make a word forbidden". Never said that. never suggested that. Never would. No words should be "banned" from Free Speech. Choosing not to use certain slurs... is another story.

  • What's wrong with this word? We may not like it, but it describes a certain type of female in US society.

    Banning words won't ban sluts, you see.

    Notice these people would scream bloody murder if we suggested outlawing' 'creep' applied to men.

    • Dude... I never suguested banning the word. I don't think you even read the MyTake. Im making a case for people to CHOOSE to eliminate this (among other) slurs from their vocabulary. Clearly, you're not one that would be willing to do so. Carry on.

    • Chuckle, 'trying something new" sounds like you're switching to flats instead of heels. No one will understand what you mean by these alternative phrases.

    • Wow and you're a communist teaching English in China. I feel bad for China. Your reading comprehension and vocabulary is clearly limited. I never suggested banning words from the dictionary, only making a thoughtful choice not to use some hurtful ones.

    • Show All
  • Unfortunately women are judged for everything we do, not just with sexuality but with a lot of our life choices. Men never get that level of scrutiny. A guy who sleeps around is praised but if we act the same we are shamed. We need more equality for men and women then we would be treated with more respect.

  • We choose our words to express our opinions and feelings. If the word were to be removed from our vocabulary, we would choose an equally repulsive synonym in its place.

    Attitudes have to change first. That will lead to the slow dissolution of the wordage as it becomes irrelevant.

    BTW: If you're asking people to remove this from their vocabulary, why stop there?
    Are there not a host of similar derogatory words that could be removed from our vocabulary?

    • Agreed. You get it.

    • I agree. I'm advocating that people just choose to not use offensive slurs against other people. What good purpose does it serve? If you think badly of someone, if it doesn't effect you personally, how hard is it just to say nothing at all? Just take three high road.

  • People need to stop acting like there is a double standard, making women sluts and guys studs. Men are shamed for our sexuality all the freaking time. Women may get slut shamed, but men get pervert shamed. At least women aren't being seen as sexual predators for their sexuality.

    How about we just stop shaming both genders for their sexuality, and stop pretending like only women can be victimized by hurtful words? Men get called, creep, pervert, man whore, womanizer, etc. The moment you bring up this supposed double standard you lose all credibility with most guys. Don't believe me? Just read what most of the guys wrote.

    America is a sexually repressive country to both genders. It doesn't have to be like that. In some countries both genders can be open about their sex lives without fear of being judged.

    When you make this into a woman's only issue and ignore the male side of this issue, most guys will not listen to a word you say. Even though you state you are not a feminist, by not realizing that guys have the same problems as women, you end up sounding like one. If you want to get men to listen, you need to be more careful of how you word these things so guys don't feel like you are promoting a double standard.

    • I agree to some extent. Only "man whore, etc." can be perceived as less than derogatory. But your points are understood ("pervert") In retrospect, if I had it to do over again, I would have put a little bit different spin in there. I was hoping to get across that "slut" is used primarily towards women, just as the N word is used towards African-Americans. Both are shameful, and yet only one of those words has been eradicated from MOST people's normal vocabulary. But if you read some of my follow up comments, What I'm saying is that the LABELING of people, and more importantly the hurling of ANY type of SLUR (i. e. calling a gay person a f*ggot) is inexcusable. Admittedly, the word "Slut" gets under my skin so much that MyTake is slanted that way, as it is typically directed only towards women. Especially by other women. If I did it over again (which I won't) - I might have leaned more towards "bullying" using that word, which might have been a more gender neutral way to phrase it.

  • I don't think we should ban the word or delete it.. BUT I don't think we should EVER call people using it... You wanna say she's a slut? Well leave it to yourself IN YOUR MIND but don't say it to her coz it can hurt her, especially she might be bullied about it which will commit suicide, and the worst thing of all is if she actually isn't a " slut " .. So we should think before saying anything to other people

    • That was exactly the point. Very few people actually got itm most people read it as a call to actually ban words from language which is not at all what I was saying

    • Its coz if this sentence"***** Let’s take the word slut out of our vocabulary *****" so they thought to remove it totally, but never mind, thanks for trying to spread the awareness. 😌

    • Yeah, unfortunately people don't have a good grasp of their own language. A vocabulary is a personal inventory of words that a person uses. Not a dictionary or a language. Therfore to remove a word from your PERSONAL inventory of words... is simply a choice to do so. Had I realized how many people would equate choosing to stop using a word, with some fascist banning... I would have phrased it differently ☺ That sentence was a simple plea for people to make that choice. It's still being misconstrued because people don't understand the difference between vocabulary and langauge (or dictionary).

    • Show All
  • I'm keeping it. It's served me well in my life. That and I like words that upset people, especially when its not a big deal. Context makes a word offensive, not the word itself.

  • Amen! The slut/prude mentality is really effective in what it does - getting women to doubt themselves, and pitting women against one another.

  • WELL WRITTEN!

    Wow, you put a lot of thought and research it this.

    • Thanks but 3/4 of it someone else wrote. I just did some adds deletes, but its everything I've been wanting to say.

    • @Dipsy No sir. Did you read about the girl that committed suicide. I've seen SO many girls harmed by this word when they did NOTHING. Also... this is not the only word that I WISH that people would CHOOSE (not ban from existence) to not use. That's all. It's a terrible word that does NO good, but CAN do serious harm. And I'm passionate about it. That's it.

  • I like this take. Why do we need to insult people over their lifestyle choice? It's not necessary, and it doesn't do anyone any good. Sure, people are free to say what they like, and judge people as they please, but there's NO REASON to insult people, or tell them that you think they're trash. They're not hurting you. If you don't like their choices, don't get involved in them.

    • Thanks. I keep trying to say that just because you have a legal "Right" to Free Speach... doesn't make it RIGHT to always exercise it. Sometimes it's the higher road to say nothing at all.

  • Agree with all your points. However, the title is technically not Incorrect, but you should have reasonably expected it to be confused with banning. "Eliminate" is equivalent and "vocabulary" is ambiguous enough to be taken as well. I know it's not what you wrote or intended to write, but the title will lead people that way

    I actually do think that less of this is going on, but as it becomes less acceptable in general the extremists who slut shame more boldly get louder because they know they are losing their grip on society.

    • Yeah... if I had it to do over again, I would change the title... obviously it confused a lot of people. And of course a lot people didn't read past the first paragraph. Anyway... the in the larger picture, I learned here that people who frequent Internet forums as a rule have no intention of considering a point to of view change. They're only here to attempt to out shout those with opposing views. As far as I can see, there are ZERO people that agree or disagree with me, that indicated that they read what people wrote here, and reconsidered the way that they use or fine use slurs. Particularly this one. I also don't recall reading any comments from people that disagree about the teenage girl from Canada. It was as if that situation never happens. I don't care if folks disagree, but the way this went down... I should have titled t somethingredients ridiculously obvious like. .. "why I think we shouldn't use the word..." Oh well. In the end, no one would change their mind anyway.

    • I read it all. I think that readings of this nature do cause me, and others, over time to change their views. Not everyone is capable of that type of open, evolving thought. It also doesn't happen from reading then changing that moment. It may be years of reading and hearing thought that facilitates change so you helped. I don't think the Canadian girl example is as relevant as you think. That's fringe behavior that happens with or without words for all of Time.

  • Good read, but from some of your comments and responses, you seem to want to be insulted and are looking for an argument.

    • Lol no. I'd just like for people to think about taking the high road... even when they have a "right" to say what they want. But thanks for your comments

  • Thank you. That was awesome. I will try my best to not use that word anymore

    • Geezus THANK YOU! :) someone gets that is a simple CHOICE!

    • It is a choice.. me and my friends use that word so easily. Just today we used it as a joke. It makes me sad

  • Wow! This was SO needed to be said! Thank you!! I've had this word thrown at me, by my own boyfriend (ex) no less! A pretty offensive experience to be shamed for pleasuring and enjoying pleasure with my own mate! But the most offensive times I've heard it are from the mouths of fellow women. I think you hit it on the head that women will say or do anything to give themselves a leg up in the hunt for men. Pitiful! Just this morning I was channel hopping and came across the Steve Harvey show whose topic was gender roles and double standards. There were women publicly shaming other women on stage for having double digit sex partners. So F'ing what? It's like, what qualifies you to judge anyone. I could go on but again, you nailed it. I hope men, women, boys and girls all read this and re-think what it means to toss around that word. Thanks for taking the time to publish this. ❤️

  • I reserve the word for only those promiscuous women whom I deem to have a truly contemptible attitude. It is not a word to be taken lightly, but I disagree with banning it entirely. I believe it is a word to be used only when appropriate with its historical meaning, and reserved only for the lowest sewer rats of women.

    To me, a "slut" isn't just a woman who has had more than one partner. Or a woman who has had only two, but cheated on the first. That's a cheater.

    A slut is someone who will lie and seduce any man she meets only to use him and then throw him away. Who will then say evil things about him to twist the knife. Who will immediately move on to another guy, and then sabotage the birth control just to make him live in fear, because she thinks that's funny. It's not: it's called rape-by-fraud.

    These kinds of women, especially when they pressure men into sexual situations the men aren't comfortable with, and also when they turn around and make suggestions of bestiality to the man out of nowhere because the gal thinks it's funny, need a word as bad as "slut" to describe her. Or something even worse.

    I agree that when a young teen is manipulated into having sex, the word should not be used on them the first time. If they have a rotten attitude toward authority figures scolding them for being sexually active, then there are a variety of other words for a gal like that with a rotten attitude like that.

  • I agree that it is a vulgar term. We shouldn't use it so liberally. However, I also feel kind of indifferent to the term. Sometimes, some women do wear very revealing clothes that may be perceived as indecent or lewd, and "slut" just happens to be the first word that pops into your mind. Of course, your mind has a filter/censor system, so hopefully you will use it and not express the actual term in your mind. Instead of slut, I'd go with a more formal term: prostitute. For adjectives, I would go with "lascivious" or "fornicatory" or "temptress" or "seductress". That way, I'd use less vulgar terms that still convey a negative or ambiguous connotation. Now, if the person in question is extremely sensitive, then I'd probably just not say any comment at all, because persistent negative comments tend to be perceived as harassment and illegal behavior.

    • While I still contend that we as people don't have a moral "right" to judge others, it is human nature to do so. I did it A LOT in high school, but would not have voiced it to those that I judged. I'm a believer in the Golden Rule, and that we should not judge, lest we be judged also. Thanks.

    • Yes. I agree that we do not have the moral obligation to judge other people. However, we do have a moral obligation to be forgiving. Forgiving does not mean to overlook the wrong as if it has never existed, and forgiving does not mean to forget the wrong. Forgiving means the willingness to accept someone's repentance, which involves a change of heart. Someone's dress should not be much of a concern for other people; however, if it leads to unhealthy or irrational lifestyle choices, like having multiple sexual partners with little or no long term commitment, then maybe one really should monitor oneself in dress and behavior. The best form of protection is total abstinence, and the ideal relationship is that it is long term and monogamous, with both partners having no sexual contact prior. I do not consider setting an ideal as being judgmental, because if we do not have ideals that are higher than what we can do, how can we improve ourselves?

    • Agreed. But I feel the best way to accomplish those things is to be the personal example that you want to set for others... hoping that they will see it and take notice. And if they don't, then live and let live.

    • Show All
  • Show More (103)