Sexual Relationships
+1 y

Feminist rape culture: Are all men rapists? Yes!

One of the earliest forms of male bonding must have been the gang rape of one woman by a band of marauding men.



Man's discovery that his genitalia could serve as a weapon to generate fear must rank as one of the most important discoveries of prehistoric times, along with the use of fire and the first crude stone axe.

After a thunderbolt of recognition that this particular incarnation of hairy two-legged hominid was not the Homo Sapiens with whom she would like freely to join parts, it might have been she, and not some man, who picked up the first stone and hurled it. Female fear of an open season of rape . . . was probably the most important key to her historic dependence, her domestication by protective mating. From prehistoric times to the present, I believe rape has played a critical function. It is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear.
- Susan Brownmiller

Susan Brownmiller was one of the known second wave feminist activists who changed the image of rape, and laws on sexual assault in 1970's with sexual revolution.

This is the feminist definition of rape culture. Rape culture is not a culture of “forced sex” in the feminist literature as some people assume when they hear the term. Rape culture is the culture of the society, and sex itself and the sexual image of masculinity itself is “rape”.

We cannot work around the fact that in terms of human anatomy the possibility of forcible intercourse incontrovertibly exists. This single factor may have been sufficient to have caused the creation of the male ideology of rape. When men discovered they could rape, they proceeded to do it.

In other words, anything masculine is about rape. Rape is not a psychopathic behaviour, a behaviour out of the norm. It is the normal tendency of every male.

Marriage and especially monogamy for example, is only a structure made through women’s fear of rape:

Women’s fear of rape, leads them to seek male protection in an instance of the fox watching the chicken coop.

Monogamous relationship and marriage in the feminist theory is a process through which males as a united group, sexually terrify women by the threat of rape and violence, into seeking shelter in another rapist’s arms where she will have to serve him to be protected against other rapists.

Serve a rapist to be protected against other rapists. Makes perfect sense to me.

Or does it? ( ͡° ͜.. ͡°)

In other words, a masculine male is equal to a rapist. Is it a joke? no.

When we say feminism, not new feminists or feminazis, considers all men regardless of social class, education, wealth, culture, rapists, it is because the feminist theory of civilization considers all men rapist. As simple as that. It is in their theory.

And what do they do to fight this rape culture? They don't fight violence, child abuse, and poverty in the society that is the root of all violence and abuse. Instead, they fight monogamous relationship of men and women, and the culture in which this monogamous relationship is practiced.

What do they offer to replace this culture when it is gone? Promiscuity, State dependency, single mothers and fathers, skyrocketing government spending, a flooded labour force supply, etc etc etc.

All of these make the society? Poorer. And as a result? more depressed, more violent, more abusive.

Feminists' war is a war against the existing culture, and a war against men, not against rape. They use a twisted definition of rape to feed their ideology. When a feminist uses the word rape, know what she is saying.

I see people usually use the term rape culture badly and don't know its origines or true definition in the real second wave feminist literature.

And also many people are confused what is the answer to the question:

Does feminism consider all men rapists? the answer is a clear yes.

So I wrote this short take to just clerify things for some people who like to talk more authentic.

If you want to have the pleasure, or displeasure, of reading the book like me here's the link.

But why should one buy this masterpiece? Here's a free link. After all, sharing is only fair. against our will

Well I guess this is enough. It's night time and guess time for what. ( ͡° ͜.. ͡°)

And don't forget to enjoy other feminist masterpieces before you go:

0 2

Most Helpful Girl

  • I was raped for real and people saying shit is not taking my trauma seriously, and that is why I hate feminists.

    • *hug*

    • I am very sorry to hear that. Feminists are busy fighting the culture, they weren't ever made to care about real victims. I hope you heal sooner. :)

    • I hope the wounds in your soul are healed with love, in time.

Most Helpful Guy

  • Optimist - The glass is half full
    Pessimist - The glass is half empty
    Feminist - The glass is being raped

    • If i may ask, why is your gag name klara hitler.. Lol?

    • It used to be something else, but people got prickly over her historically sound opinion on a particular population and eventually got deleted or something, and this was her third name.

    • @Mesonfielde oh lol. Were her other names quite like this? Like basically hating jews?

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

10 53

  • Remember that one time Lesbian Separtist Feminism was mistaken for all of feminism?
    Welcome to GAG!

    Sorry, while Lesbian Separtism may be a part of feminism, it isn't feminism itself.

    You come off more uneducated than anything pretending like Feminism doesn't have multiple branches and conflicting ideologies.

    Can't blame you though, most people who try to decry or even uplift feminism typically have no understanding of how splintered feminism is. How difficult it is to say exactly what feminism is.

    I'd like to think I'm not as ignorant as those people. I can say feminism is neither good nor bad.
    It's simply a vessel that people focus their frustrations or their hopes. Only the educated realize it's a place for both.

    One of the biggest problems is that there's these people running around with this "Us vs Them" mentality that completely dehumanizes the other side in hopes to make their side more human.
    But if you have half a brain, you can see through that transparent tactic.

    No, I don't like Lesbian Separtist Feminists that have stolen the spotlight of second wave and third wave feminism.
    I also believe Feminism needs to take a step back to give men a chance to increase their consideration in facets of society where they don't gain equal consideration.
    Feminism can't take on the burdens of men. It's not equipped to do so at its core.
    And they shouldn't be threatened by that. It's something that will equalize the sexes.

    Many pockets of feminism do believe men get unfair treatment in family courts. But there is a divide on why that is. Which is stupid. The solution is the same either way. Stop seeing women as the perfect care-givers and men as the perfect career-takers.

    • You come off as most uneducated when you call Susan Brownmiller a lesbian separatist. There is two great branch of feminism. The libertarian feminism that existed before 60’s and has role models like Camille Paglia who’s a lesbian herself and against second wave feminism. And Gloria Steinem’s wing of feminism which is a radical wing of feminism and the leading wing of feminism in west after 60’s and was influenced by European and American Marxist feminism that again existed before 60’s. Many lesbians of 60’s were actually against everything the second wave Gloria Steinem’s wing of feminism started to preach such as the rape culture. Susan Brownmiller not only is not a lesbian separatist she’s a leading figure of white women’s movement. Straight middle class white women. And she’s straight herself. She insulted the Lavender Menace, a group of lesbian radical feminists who protested because women’s movement who created the term of rape culture didn’t recognize them inside

    • ... the movement. "A lavender herring, perhaps, but no clear and present danger". These are the ideas of second wave Gloria Steinem’s wing of feminism which today we know as feminism in general, because they crushed all other wings of feminism like the libertarian sexual wing of Camille Paglia in the past 50 years. And please, don’t try to start an argument before you actually read something about a subject. I don’t have time to write posts just to correct people because they are too lazy to read.

  • The alternatives offered by liberated feminists are absolutely appalling. Feminists take conservative family values for granted, the very values that we benefitted from as children, in favor of a culture of promiscuity that breeds bastard sons and jaded daughters.

    Monogamy has been a social construct enforced by religion, and may be religion's greatest contribution to humanity.

    Entitlement culture marks the demise of our species. When marriage gets tough, divorce. When you abandon reproductive responsibilities and get pregnant, abort. When you dress in ways that incite natural perversions in men, they are rapists.

    This aversion to conflict and unwillingness to experience discomfort undermines our resolve, the resolve that made us the superior species on this planet. We are weaker for it, and time will name the price we pay.

    • Marital monogamy in catholic Christianity, yes. But not social and sexual monogamy. In Ethnographic Atlas of 1,231 societies 186 were monogamous 453 had occasional polygyny, 588 had more frequent polygyny. If you study social anthropology, not the substance dualistic feminist sociology that is debunkable in a page debunking substance dualism, you will see in all societies two forms of mating always existed, polygyny and monogamy. Both polygyny and monogamy are natural for humans and not man-made or exclusively cultural. This is important because many people nowadays believe that monogamy is an unnatural phenomena made by religious leaders to control people. And according to how our hormones work, we have a greater tendency to have monogamous relationships. That is why even polygamous societies mostly had/have a tolerance for polygamy instead of actual widespread polygamous marriages. Even in polygamous societies that there is no law against polygamy monogamy is preferred.

    • It is not socially forced to people, it is a natural demand and so has a cultural supply. If promiscuity was the dominant instinctive demand we would have at least one religion or culture organizing that form of pair bonding. It’s simply supply and demand. There is none, at least that I know of, because there is no demand. If we look at how evolution works too, if we were promiscuous breeders our hormones would have evolved to be fit for that life. They aren’t. We are made to get attached by sex and to commit. Not only we don’t naturally demand promiscuous breeding, promiscuity mentally hurts us, it’s against the healthy balance of our hormones. I said to mesonfielde too, Helen Fisher’s theory based on how our neurotransmitters drive us forward is that humans are more or less monogamous, they had serial monogamy. And polygyny is a product of this serial monogamy in a lifetime. Though her 4 year period serial monogamy is the most basic form based on having 1 child,

    • this is while until 100 years ago many people had 2 children in 3-4 years and 5 or more children together in 10 years. With every child the time of bonding is increased by our hormones. children lower the testosterone level of men and increase vasopressin and oxytocin in them, so do in women. That is why it is as hard for men as women, if not harder than it is for women, to leave their children behind and give them to the woman in a divorce. Paternal feelings in human males are extremely strong. A fact in biology that feminists absolutely avoid and do not mention on purpose in their sociology, to completely dismiss men as care takers in the human society and simply win in their campaigns on child custody laws. So even the extended version of monogamy 10-20 years is natural for the people who have 2-3 or more children together. Our hormones make us bond together to take care of our young.

    • Show All

  • look, i'm a little over tired here, it's been a long day. Are you saying that feminists consider all men as rapists, or are you explaining why, as a feminist, you believe all men are rapists? because those are two different things, that deserve different reactions, and my mind is just not awake enough right now to properly grasp which one you mean.

    • The former.

    • @0112358 oh, ok. no need for me to be upset. well, i mean, there is, but... i'm sure you know what i mean.

  • Don't worry, I'm going to get castrated soon just so I don't become a rapist. Don't know why I ever was sexually attracted to females since men always rape them and I'm a man. Huh at least I'll be liberated from my sexual desires and focus on what I need to in my life.

  • I have no problem believing that rape shaped society. I don't see how it changes anything though. Even if I believe in equivalence between gender, it can only be achieved by capitulation from men. The fact is, we males have physical advantage over females and it doesn't look like it is ever going to change. The lion will always chase the gazelle, never the other way around, no matter how much bitching and complaining comes from the gazelle. Sorry, that's the way it is. Why can't we just accept it and try to make the best of it? Peace can still be achieved and it would be better for everyone.

    • "I have no problem believing that rape shaped society." Then you don’t know society, our hormones, and rape. Society is shaped by and based on paternal feelings and maternal feelings. Paternal feelings are associated with personal sex, romance, feeling protective of the woman and children. Family is a structure made in the pair bonding of humans to primarily protect, nurture, and support the young. “The lion will always chase the gazelle” Only that men and women are not lion and gazelle, they are lion and lioness, alpha male and alpha female in a wolf pack. Male fights other males, not the female population, to impress the female and to copulate. The kind of you with your lack of knowledge about society show male sexuality and role as the mindless predator instead of the caring father which it is in reality. These kinds of nonsensical analogies comparing men and women to the predator and victim of two different species are what kept feminism alive in the past 40 years.

    • Oh if I had known I would be talking to a doctor in anthropology who knows everything I might have just shut up and left you the floor. Sorry for wasting your precious time with my frivolous opinion.

    • Not a doctor yet, takes more time, patience, and "reading" to take my degree. Will take it soon though while you're raping women and shaping civilizations with it miraculously.

    • Show All

  • If thre was an "rape culture" in the western world then why how comes that rape is Illegal? rape was really used and still used mostly in the third world in war, and in many cases if in time of "peace", but it considered an war crime by UN, and while being humiliated by an dicks is not pleasant, especially if the women is pure virgin, getting an axe to the head is worse, and many women who was raped was left alive, while at the same time men from their community was killed, partly because they don't have sexual value to the raiders, but of course most feminists don't care about men that got murdered. Feminists that consider all men rapists only prove that they are feminazis and misandrists, and by fighting monogamous relationship they only prove that they are sluts.

    tvtropes.org/.../AllMenAreRapists

    tvtropes.org/.../RapePillageAndBurn

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDMETLBu0kAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFPKBq9RaCk

    • feminist, feminazi, misandrist, what's the difference.

    • "Black and Gray Morality", the more radical they are, the worse they are. :)

      tvtropes.org/.../BlackAndGrayMorality

  • marriage for a male is a what? next time don't forget to add the point that giving birth is also a way to satisfy male needs of rape since they give birth to a girl so that they can rape her when she grows up and to a boy so that he can rape the girl if the father dies off.

    • can anyone explain that videeo to me... please...

  • Are all Men rapist no? But rape even in Roman Times was considered a luxury. something that was allowed and won wars. Why did it win wars? Because if you rape the woman of the land your invading you will have left you seed in hee belly therefore putting your DNA in that land. even now, something I've heard time and time again, a saying in the military is you don't win a war by weapons but penis, rape the women destroy their mental health you destroy the land. Women keep the world running. But this saying predates the Romans, and the Romans more than any other civilization put this into practice. even animals rape,

    • This is about, and we are talking about violence and rape inside the society, not rape in war. Rape in war is another topic. "War provides men with the perfect psychological backdrop to give vent to their contempt for women." This is actually another quote by Susan Brownmiller in her history of rape, and is nonsensical. 1. Rape and torture of men was and is as common as women's in wars. 2. Rape in war is an act of violence that happened when cities were looted, everywhere not in Rome. Read the conquest of Arabs and what they did to women and children. Soldiers looted everything in the violence and Lawlessness of war, in many cases women and children included. And in many cases they didn't. Lawlessness during wars can create a culture of impunity towards the behaviour towards abuse of civilians. looting of civilian areas was and is considered a way for soldiers to supplement their income and the army. especially in the old times it was a must-do in any campaign.

    • But both in Athens and in Rome there were legal protections against rape. In Athens, there were laws specifically prohibiting the rape or prostitution of children, and more generally rapists could be charged under the law concerning hýbris, or assault. In Rome rapists could be punished under laws against "vis", violence. For systematic control Romans had Romanization that was the cultural dominance by converting the certain nations’ nobility to respected Roman citizens and spreading Roman customs. Romans were intelligent enough to know a mentally unhealthy nation isn't useful for them. Even in their slavery they rejected unintelligent slaves because they weren't as useful. So know: 1. Wartime rape is not a violence against "women" it is against men, women, and children. 2. It happens mostly in lawlessness of war. 3. Has nothing to do with rape inside the society from the ancient times to modern times.

    • I don't know where you got your info, but rape of children was normal. More young girls had abortions than women. and I mean the Romans cut the balls off of little boys so she, they went through puberty they wouldn't be too masculine. Either way like I said do all Men rape no, but rape has almost become desensitized in humanity humanity

    • Show All

  • Oops, I think someone opened Pandora's Box xD

    Great take, thanks for writing it.
    Let me grab a sit and enjoy :)
    rlv.zcache.com/...79069eacc14b_x7jg9_8byvr_324.jpg

    • Thanks. What do they want to say really? The book was a best seller. I first saw it in an essay of Minister of Justice Deputy Attorney General for the Province of Manitoba. Which means they use the book almost as a source.

  • So you claim to be a feminist funny thing is your actually being sexist 😂😂

  • myths and facts about rape:
    https://www.yale.edu/consent/truth.htm

    Myth: Rapists are mostly psychotic men.

    Fact: Most rapists are men or women with no obvious signs of mental illness. In study after study, researchers are unable to find any significant psychological difference between those who rape and those who don't.

    • Rape is a tendency to have impersonal sex with the use of coercion and violence.

      Psychopathy-Related and sociopathic traits have a direct link to tendency to have impersonal sex and rape acceptance.
      www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465782/

      Sociopathic and psychopathy related behaviours are related to a lack of emotional empathy that can be developed.

    • I'm done. you're very ignorant. what is even the point to this mytake? I'm not a feminist either, but all you're doing is downplaying rape and making excuses for rapists. claiming it is caused my mental illness is basically saying they don't know any better so lets just give them a slap on the wrist and move on. that's fucked up.

    • just because most rapists are psychopaths, doesn't make it better. people who are psychopaths are pure evil and rape is evil so it is nothing to be downplayed agree with opinion owner

  • Are you kidding me, seriously? How can u say all feminists are like that? Thats not fair. I am one. AND I DONT BELIEVE SUCH BULLSHIT. NOT ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS. Clear and simple.

  • Thank you for writing this myTake and sharing the origins of this nut job theory about all men being sexual predators simply because. . . well they have a penis.

    • same I agree

    • You're welcome. Better if people read more and realized it 40 years ago. There was a hype against traditions with the hippie movement in west. That made it easy for feminism to take charge as the people slowly went to sleep.

  • Lol, I always thought feminists were closeted misandrists. Only first world women have the luxury of judging men. Anywhere else, she'd probably be taken to the backyard of her house and be promptly shot. Why doesn't anybody write a MyTake about that? Where feminism is really needed.

  • This was a clever way to show fallacies in modern feminism.

  • this is a good summation of the issue, it would be so nice if some of the naive Feminists on this site would actually investigate their beliefs and be critical about it.

  • This is craziness. I'm not afraid of men... men are afraid of me if anything. I love men and I love masculine men. Feminists pretend to empower women but what they really do is make us out to be weak and fragile and living in fear of dicks.

    Sociologists are batshit. There's a term for this kinda "connect" the dot thinking. Its like borderline schizophrenic...

  • Reminds me of this video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPsn17_a8-g

    • save rape ? wtf!!

  • Yeah, but you forgot, all those second-wave feminist scholars and academics, the ones to laid the groundwork for the waves to come -- the ones in academia and government pulling levers and changing society, getting laws and policies put in place, the ones keeping the debate about male genital mutilation alive, the ones teaching all the other feminists how to be feminists... they aren't REAL feminists. So no need to worry about them. They don't represent feminism.

    Julie, who you met at a coffee shop, who "believes in equality," she's the REAL feminist, and why you should be a feminist too.

    • OR we should just all become egalitarians, so we don't have arguments about pointless semantics, and we have a gender neutral tone.

  • Darn it our plans have been foiled!

  • Show More (43)
Home >  Sexual Relationships  > Feminist rape culture: Are all men rapists? Yes!