5 Reasons Why I Don't Feel The Need To Lose My Virginity Anytime Soon

[Anonymous]

1) It Doesn't Make Me Any More Or Less Of An Adult

I hear it all the time from other teenage girls:

"Oh my God, you haven't done it? You're such a baby!"

"Guys will think you aren't mature enough for them."

"If you haven't had sex then you don't know what a real relationship is like."

But how does having sex make you more mature? Does it change your opinions on politics? Or knowledge of world issues? Or make you more a responsible person?

Probably no.

2) It Won't Make A Guy Want To Be With Me More

I've heard this one more than once.

"If you don't give him what he wants, he's going to leave you."

Well honestly, if he leaves me because I didn't sleep with him then he didn't really like me that much anyway.

3) It Won't Make Me Feel Any Better About Myself

I truly believe that I don't need to have sex to know that it won't make me happier. It won't be a magical moment that changes my life and fixes all my insecurities. It won't assure me that I'm pretty and guys find me attractive and it won't assure me that someone cares about me either.

Because someone wanting to have sex with you doesn't mean you're perfect or cared for and I know that.

4) I Feel Really Confident Saying "No. Nobody's Had Me Yet."

It gives me a sort of rush of empowerment when people ask me. It's cool telling people that I've never been pressured into doing it and no guy has ever weakened me enough to have me give in. It makes me feel strong.

5) It's An Example To Other Young Girls

I like that other girls can look at me and think "Hey, she's confident, accomplished, and happy. And hasn't needed to give in to sex in order to be that way."

Now at some point it will happen, it could be two years from now or two weeks from now, but until then I am so content with myself.

*Thanks to the commenters <3

[SovereignessofVamps]

I srsly think this is pretty good! Boys your age... srsly they will barely last 2-3 minutes in bed, and can probably only barely do foreplay. They can be really cute, but if they have no skillz I don't think you'd orgasm from anything including foreplay, so it's just as well you feel this way.

I mean hell older guys barely last 5 maybe 10 minutes max usually. And for me that works because over 10 minutes can make me feel sore so... even 5 minutes is OK. I don't mind, but this is why I have to cum after sex by him doing oral or fingering or even grinding.

[SovereignessofVamps]

And no sex doesn't give you a real relationship LOL pls don't listen to people like that. If you really click with someone then you really click. sex is just a bonus but it doesn't make the relationship. look how many people cheat...

[AriadneSky]

for a virgin though wouldn't it be BEST if it didn't last long.. you know less time less pain :) tough the no good at foreplay thing, that ruins it. but that can be taught.

[SovereignessofVamps]

@AriadneSky honestly... yeah! I think that would be good. But I meant in a relationship, like having sex over and over.

[martyfellow]

I say good for you. Our culture would be healthier if we didn't pressure people into sex.

[Cccgala]

Thank you for writing this 😊

We do not really need to, in my opinion. Is losing it a prerequisite to adulthood? I do not think so.

[cpzpbx3]

You're young. The fact that you still have this mindset where sex is all give from the woman and all take for the man, just means it's probably for the best that you don't do it for now.

I don't enjoy sex because it boosts my confidence, or makes a guy want to be with me, or makes me an adult (paying bills does that just fine, sadly). I enjoy sex for what it is; physical pleasure and intimate connection with another person. You should never ever feel like it's one sided, and if you do, you're either not ready or you're not with the right guy.

When you are ready, just know you aren't "losing" anything. You don't wake up in the morning and forget where you put it. The guy doesn't put it in his pocket and refuse to give it back. You are actually gaining a life experience. That doesn't mean you should do it before you're ready, but don't ever let anyone make you think a man can "take" your virtue away, because that's hogwash.

[sophie176]

I will not lose my virginity anytime soon also I'm terrified of getting std/sti aids hiv and other diseases from sex guys can lie and say they did not slee with someone else and they could have caught it from their other partner or mother to child one

[ThatJarHead]

Though most of your points are false I agree that you shouldn't be pressured into doing anything. However, if you withhold sex to see if he is interested in you? Do you know what in your brain drives you to date? The urge to reproduce. How do mammals reproduce? Oh right sex and live birth! What are people again? Yeah... we are mammals. If you deny a man sex that's fine. However, don't claim to want to be with him for the long haul then deny him that physical connection for months. That's not fair and yeah, he's likely going to cheat on you. Making sure a guy will remain faithful is one thing. Intentionally avoiding taking the relationship to a more intimate level makes me thing you're merely wearing a mask of confidence and in reality you have low self esteem. You're a human being. You should WANT to have sex with your partner. That's what nature is! It should be a natural and primal urge that you feel. You should want to sleep with your partner to have a deeper underlying connection. I could go into the psychology of it all with reduced levels of cortisol and increased production or testosterone/estrogen the heavy releases of adrenaline and dopamine as well as the spike in production of serotonin but I'm just gonna receive hate for this anyways so I won't bother. Regardless, you do you boo boo. I won't judge you if you don't judge me.

Good luck!

~Jarhead

[myTake Owner]

The bullshit you just poured onto my take is essentially implying that reproduction is more important than unconditional love. And that is all I need to take from this to know you are a complete and utter imbecile. Good luck with that!

[ThatJarHead]

I was merely pointing out that the reason people date is for the primal urge to reproduce. Love and emotions were developed through evolution to give incentive to stay because the likelihood of reproduction is higher if you have one partner versus 16 partners. Love is a thing we developed in order to reproduce and survive as a species. I was merely pointing out that the reason we date and find partners is to fulfill the primary urge of what we are. Products of evolution. But go ahead and throw your temper tantrum because someone doesn't agree with you. See how much respect you get with that attitude.

[myTake Owner]

Do you hear what you just said? "the likelihood of reproduction is higher if you have one partner versus 16 partners" How on Earth does that even remotely make sense? No, the reason people date is love. The reason people fuck is reproduction. Grab a Bible and sit down sweetie.

[ThatJarHead]

It does make sense. If you sleep with the same person over a year you have a higher chance of having a child than having sex with 16 people one time over a year. I don't need a bible because religion is blind faith and I don't believe in it. I was raised Catholic. I don't believe in religion.

[myTake Owner]

If a man sleep with 16 people he has a chance of impregnating 16 different women, you absolute moron. Well there's your problem right there 😂 Wow, you ignorants really make my day sometimes lol

[ThatJarHead]

*sigh* you just really don't understand do you? It's not the quantity. Sure there's a chance that you would impregnate all 16 women but if it's a one night stand you'll be using birth control. If you have sex with the same woman once a day for a year your odds go up significantly. It also improves the likelihood of the child surviving and passing on your genes in turn.

[myTake Owner]

Is there birth control in nature? If we're talking about what we're genetically designed to do then do you think we're designed to have birth control? You're literally just contradicting yourself. If a man sleeps with 16 women (without birth control) the odds of quantity of children are quite obviously higher than sleeping with one woman repeatedly for a year. Are you dense?

[ThatJarHead]

Everything you do is a sum of chemistry and hormones. A human beings only true purpose in the natural world is survival. Human beings need to pass on our genetics to survive as a species. That's the main purpose of our existence in the natural world. In the societal world we date for love but the ultimate goal of human existence is reproduction. Pass on your genes and die. Circle of life. People are animals just as dogs or horses. The only difference is we have the intellect necessary to acknowledge our existence. What makes us people is our ability to feel empathy and our ability to recognize our own consciousness. What makes us human is our anatomy. We are made to reproduce. Love and affection were evolved into us as a means to help with reproduction and the raising of children.

[ThatJarHead]

No I didn't contradict myself at all. If you want to talk about the pure natural world I can prove my point there too. Emotional attachment was evolved to prevent us from leaving our families hence increasing the chance our off spring will survive and live to pass on our genetics to the next generation.

[myTake Owner]

You're avoiding the entire point of this argument. You said that being with one woman for a year will give more possibility than 16 women in a year, you imbecile. Also, your point is completely wrong and absurd to me as to why you're telling me it. I'm a Christian because I'm not ignorant to facts and knowledge and as a Christian I believe in love. You, as an atheist, believe in absolutely nothing, so arguing your point to me is irrevocably senseless.

[ThatJarHead]

I thought Christians believed in respecting all opinions and loving everyone. I'm not saying I don't believe in love. I've felt it. And I'm not atheist either. I believe in creationary evolution. And do you realize how dumb the argument "you aren't a part of my religion therefore your argument is invalid and moot!"

[ThatJarHead]

And besides the fact I don't believe in Christianity because I don't believe in cannibalism, I advocate equal rights for women, I don't believe that God needs mortals to worship him, I don't believe in magic, I advocate the use of birth control, and I believe abortion has a purpose in society. I'm not some heartless heretic. I just don't believe in blind faith. I think there is a higher power that put evolution in motion then took hands off. And I'm well versed in religion. I was raised by Mennonites. Also called The Amish. I know my way around a bible and I'm the last carrier In my bloodline of my family bible because my son died 3 days ago of pneumonia. Do you want to keep questioning my faith? Don't bible thump to me.

[myTake Owner]

That's not what I said sweetie. I said there was no point in arguing something to me that I don't believe in. You aren't going to change my mind, so why bother? As a Christian, I believe in telling someone the truth and if the truth is that you're an imbecile I will gladly tell you so. So you don't believe in God because you don't agree with the ideals of Christianity? #Logical Also, mennonites and amish are very different from each other and each get pretty easily offended when confused with the other, so I don't know what the hell you're on about. A mennonite or an amish person would never refer to themselves as "either or" Not believing in God because you don't agree with the man altered Bible is like not believing in the atmosphere because you've been told it might break and you don't like the idea of it breaking.

[ThatJarHead]

I specifically said I do believe in god you bigot. And the Amish and Mennonites are different yes but the religion is the same. Amish have their own way of life. Believing in hard work, traditional values, and not believing in technology. Where as Mennonites are more layed back in their beliefs. I do believe in God. I don't believe God needs to be worshiped. I also know I won't change your mind. You however, are not a true Christian. You wouldn't be this chauvinistic if you were. You need to fit in. You're a teenager. That's how you all are. Regardless the point you're arguing is I'm wrong because I don't believe in what you believe in. The point I'm arguing is your view is flawed but I respect your opinion. When it comes to interactions of the social kind I believe in hurting someone's feelings if it means voicing my opinion or telling the truth. I'm gonna keep replying as long as you do so are you going to be a true Christian and back off or are you going to continue to berate me?

[myTake Owner]

I know what the difference is, I just explained that to you. If you know they are different, why are you using their names interchangeably? So being a Christian has a certain personality type? No. And you can't tell me I'm not a real Christian, that makes YOU a bigot. I believe in God, have true faith in God, and believe in love. You, on the other hand, have changed your religion about three times throughout this post, so I'm not really sure what the hell you believe in, but you sure as f*ck are not a true Christian. Also, what about backing off an argument makes you a true Christian? And if you're so high and mighty, why don't you back off? All of your logic on life and religion is flawed and you feel attacked and have therefore resorted to saying "BACK OFF OR YOU'RE NOT A TRUE CHRISTIAN"

[ThatJarHead]

Or maybe I'm challenging your religion and you're defending it for no reason? Take a lesson from the Jahovas. They wake me up at 6am every Saturday. I'm nice to them. You attacked me first. And I haven't changed my religion at all. Where are you getting that from? I was raised Catholic by Mennonites. I personally believe in creationary evolution which believes a higher power (aka a God) put evolution into motion then took hands off. I never claimed to be Christian I just know what Christianity believes is right for a person to do and you aren't displaying that. I don't believe in Christianity because the Christian bible is full of nonsense, contradictory statements, and full of people blind to fact. I told you to back off because a "True Christian Woman" according to your bible must respect a mans opinion as law. You replying further proves my point. I believe in gender equality, free speech, abortion, and freedom of choice. Therefore I am not Christian.

[ThatJarHead]

Christianity is also a large cause of major historical wars, slaughtering, travesties, and oppression. Christianity caused the dark age of science. It caused the seven crusades. It caused the systemic oppression of women in the fifties, and it puts unfair expectations upon men. I can't support that therefore I don't believe in it. That doesn't mean I'm a godless heathen. I just don't believe in Chirtianity.

[myTake Owner]

You're literally mixing religions together to create your own bullshittery. First of all, the Bible is a book of metaphors. Second of all, the book has been altered by man since it's creation. So what you're saying has no basis. Like I said, saying God does not exist because you don't believe in the morals of Christianity is plain ignorance and stupidity.

[ThatJarHead]

Again I didn't say God doesn't exist. I said quite the opposite. I'm not merging or mixing religions either. I was raised Catholic but I personally believe in Creationary Evolution. The bible didn't poof into existence. It was written by humankind. It has never been said "And God descended upon man and blessed them with a book of knowledge!" No. The bible was written by the humans who followed him. I like how you get so irritated when I criticize your religion but you find no quarrel with insulting mine.

[ThatJarHead]

Regardless. This argument is pointless because you're too immature to respect others opinions. If you didn't read my whole opinion I said "I could go into the psychology of it all with reduced levels of cortisol and increased production or testosterone/estrogen the heavy releases of adrenaline and dopamine as well as the spike in production of serotonin but I'm just gonna receive hate for this anyways so I won't bother. Regardless, you do you boo boo. I won't judge you if you don't judge me." you're the one who turned into a religious debate with your bible thumping. You're just gonna keep fighting against it. The main moral of both Catholicism and Christianity is to treat others justly and fairly so I'm going to be the adult and here and bid you a due. Good luck with all your future endeavours and hopefull one day you'll stop bible thumping because it's annoying and berating. Have your religion just don't stuff it in people's face sweetheart. ~Jarhead

[myTake Owner]

But everything you're saying is simply ignorance. You're saying "NAH NAH YOU'RE WRONG, I'M RIGHT" without actually having a basis for your argument. First you say you have no faith, then you say you're mennonite AND amish, then you say you believe in God. Make up your mind and get back to me

[AriadneSky]

wait did asker say she was intentionally withholding just to test him? i dint think she did. as far as i can see she was just making a point that having sex isn't going to keep a guy who doesn't want you anyhow, so its one of the dumb reasons to rush. this a;also doesn't mean shed rush just to keep a guy. anyhow, it doesn't look like she says ANYTHING about testing. just that she's not going to rush and any guy who dumb her for that, well he can go with her blessing. and i agree.

[AriadneSky]

also waling till you're ready is not 'withholding' Its waiting till you are ready. would you want someone to have sex with you if they didn't feel comfortable doing so,. when you can just leave if you don't feel like waiting?

[amarahorrorstory]

I love this! I recently decided that I wanted to wait to have sex until I'm with someone who I know truly cares about me. Maybe even until marriage, I'm undecided. I also love that you didn't put down girls who have had sex, you only said why YOU don't feel the need to.

[AriadneSky]

yea im not doing it soon. first i have to meet a guy date him truss him then there testing for sase so id say its a long time off.

[justbanANNAz]

As a virgin, I truly dislike the way you made your own virginity seem superior to non-virginity. When you can appreciate your own experiences without putting others down, THEN ill respect this.

However, your take implies that people who have had sex aren't as confident, happy or accomplished, which does not sit well with me. Sure, not all non-virgins respect our choice either, but in the end, that's all it is. A choice, and it should be respected, no matter what.

[myTake Owner]

Where did I say there was anything wrong with not being a virgin?

[justbanANNAz]

Key word: IMPLIES.

[myTake Owner]

But where does it imply negativity towards girls who have sex? Isn't it all just positivity towards abstinence?

[justbanANNAz]

Exactly. When you overstate the positive of abstinence as a choice, you unconsciously convey negativity towards the choice to have sex. It is understandable to be passionate about your virginity and i think it's wonderful, but never forget that others who have had sex dont need to be portrayed as somewhat tainted. Maybe a simple disclaimer demonstrating that u respect all lifestyles will come in useful next time.

[myTake Owner]

Honey, that's just called being overly sensitive. If you're that easily offended you shouldn't be on the internet lol

[justbanANNAz]

haha good attempt.

[YourFutureEx]

Vault boy likes this
images.techtimes.com/.../...-boy-thumbs-up-jpg.jpg

[lightbulb27]

I agree, good job. Don't let people pressure you

[JuicyBrain]

Why do people keep promoting virginity? It's not "better".
If you want to be a virgin, fine, be one. What makes you think you are a good example? You are no better than girls who are not virgins. Get over yourself.
If you are not promoting it, then why the hell did you write this?

By the way. Sex is great. You will never know how much until you tried it. So you can go on believing that it won't make you feel better, but you'll never really know until you tried.

[stevie123]

Very good..
Wait until you feel ready

[Valkyrie1]

You're smart!

[Spiorad_Aisce]

Very cool and mature take - Well done.

[Lola679]

Yes I love this. I lost my virginity at 17. Yes keep that virginity on lock, because all of these are accurate. I totally wish I had waited till the right guy came around. When I lost it it wasn't special and the guy wasn't special to me. It was just a right now kind of situation. Sex can totally wait.

[Lola679]

It's more special and feels better when your with someone you love. Always stay true to yourself. Some may disagree and not see your perception. However I dig it completely.

[Mesonfielde]

1> true
2> false, and I counter with
"Well honestly, if she didn't sleep with him then she didn't really like him that much anyway."

3> this truly depends on your personal value system. Some people do feel better about themselves because they can connect with others physically.

4> this just means you have an extremely detrimental view of sexual intimacy. There is nothing strong or weak about choosing to have sex. This however also means that you'll never be able to establish a truly mutual bond with any guy, because you inherently distrust them and think you're "being weakened to give in to the pressure of being demanded of having sex"

Healthy individuals WANT to have sex with their partner. That's part of the reason why they're even dating. If you have no intention of doing so, or more-so even feel glad that you're avoiding to connect physically with them, and feel like you're somehow a "better person for rejecting your partner"; then there's no point for you to lie to a guy by claiming you care, because you don't, and you are not ready for a relationship, and you probably shouldn't want to be in one in the first place.

This is just narcissism to the extremes; believing that rejecting your own romantic partner somehow makes you a better person. It does not.

5.) This is a horrible example to "other young girls". It just shows that you hate men for being male, and you hate the idea of sexual intimacy, and you hate the idea of connecting physically with anyone; because you think it somehow makes you "weaker" and that in order to have sex you have to be "pressured into giving in". Like, what the f*** is that?

The REAL example should be that you should want to feel devoted to your partner and you should want to connect with them. And a part of connecting with them is being intimate with them, and a part of being intimate with them is having sex with them.

Treating the ability to connect with your partner as if people were trying to shove cigarettes and alcohol down your throat.

What a joke. I'm repulsed. I'm legitimately repulsed.

[SovereignessofVamps]

I agree with your being weakened point. I didn't like that either. BUT lots of guys do say stuff like that, that he made her submit and everything.

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps The "if he really cared about me then he would be willing to endure the fact I reject him physically continuously so if he doesn't accept that I'm stringing him along then clearly he was with me ONLY for the sex" view always pisses me off whenever I see it, because it's inherently incorrect, and extremely misandristic.

[SovereignessofVamps]

But wanting a connection isn't stringing him along. he could break it off if he was so unhappy himself.

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps No, see, that's the thing. Sex is part of the connection. Feeling rejected if she refuses to have sex is completely normal. Saying "oh he didn't care about me at all because he wanted to have sex" is just a rationalization, and it's inherently false and demeaning and wrong. If he breaks it off, she'll just brush it away, rather than realize how much she seemed to not care at all.

[SovereignessofVamps]

guys don't need sex. most barely last a few minutes! sex is good for them I'm sure, but... guys don't need it to feel a connection. Look at how people get obsessed with exes, or how much they <3 their female friends. Sex is just the icing.

[SovereignessofVamps]

I <3 sex 99% because of the affection myself. I could easily not have it. guys think differently, so they can have sex really easily w/o any feelings. they don't need a connection.

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps >> guys think differently, so they can have sex really easily w/o any feelings you say that as if women didn't participate in one night stands and as if males were incapable of feeling "affection" Have you ever even talked to a guy? lol

[SovereignessofVamps]

No, lots of women do the same thing too lol But it's more common with guys.

[SovereignessofVamps]

And I've talked to dozens of guys... they'd all probably agree with that.

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps >> lots of women do the same thing too lol Then stop pretending it's a "guy thing".

[SovereignessofVamps]

it's mostly a guy thing too...

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps You can't have one night stands without people who are willing to have one night stands. Explain the women who have one night stands if "emotional connection in sexual activity is an exclusively female thing that females do".

[SovereignessofVamps]

no... guys can be emotional of course! and they can make <3 with sex. but having sex or not having it, doesn't change the connection you have with someone. either you like them or you don't. I was just arguing that waiting for sex isn't stringing someone along. it's just sex.

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps Thinking of it as "just sex" is part of the reason why they're doomed to relationship failure and break-ups.

[SovereignessofVamps]

tons of people have sex and cheat anyway...

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps People cheat when they feel dissatisfied in their relationship.

[SovereignessofVamps]

yeah...

[Mesonfielde]

@SovereignessofVamps That typically means emotional and/or physical dissatisfaction. You can easily feel undesired if your partner refuses to have sex with you on a regular basis, more often than not.

[Keodkke]

i won't have sex until he marries me. If he wants a slut for fucking he can leave me for sluts

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke oh so if you don't marry someone and you have sex with only 1 person then you're a slut now? What an odd stretch of logic

[Keodkke]

If he wants sex he can find sluts. Sluts dont mond being used for sex

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke oh so now having sex with your partner is "using them". Good luck having a meaningful romantic relationship where you believe a male being physically attracted means they "use" you.

[Keodkke]

I did say "If he wants a slut for fucking he can leave me for sluts". Read once again carefully, boy.

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke and you essentially claim that it's impossible to have a committed relationship WITHOUT marriage and WITH sex. If he wants sex, then he is "using you". Your misandry runs deep.

[Keodkke]

If he breaks up for not getting sex then sex is what he wants from you

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke well people desire sex in any healthy and mutual relationship

[Keodkke]

Desire... yes but breaking up because you dont give them sex then yes sex is what they wanted from you.

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke and you should expect that sex is desired of you if you get into any romantic relationship.

[Keodkke]

Wanting to gave sex with someone you romantically live is very natural. But... breaking up with SOMEONE YOU ROMANTICALLY LOVE because they are not ready for sex shows you want them for sex

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke and if they had truly wanted to be with you as much as they claimed by agreeing to a relationship, then they would have been ready for sex. It makes sense to break up with someone who's leading you on and not taking you seriously.

[Keodkke]

Breaking up because you want more serious relationships (marriage) shows no love

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke refusing to have sex with someone you claim to love and rejecting them shows a lack of love I wouldn't consider marrying a girl who is not willing to have sex. In which case it's also reasonable to eventually break up with them.

[myTake Owner]

That's completely morally wrong and I sincerely and genuinely hope you die alone.

[Mesonfielde]

Oh and it's not "morally wrong" to reject people whom you claim to love? Leading them on, manipulating them, making them think you love them when in reality you're repulsed by the idea of being together? Hmph. If you choose to be a relationship, be devoted. Part of that devotion is the willingness to have sex with your partner. Hell, not even willingness, a desire to have sex. You should want to be all over them. It's a core element of any healthy relationship.

[Keodkke]

So wanting to marry them and spend the whole life together means being repulsed by them?

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke no, but if you want to marry them and spend your whole life with them, you should want to have sex with them. If you don't, that's not really a romantic relationship, which means you won't be married, because there's not much point having a marriage that isn't a marriage, or a romantic relationship that is not a romantic relationship.

[Keodkke]

If I want to spend my life with him yes this means I love him and want to have sex with him. No doubt.. i love him.

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke in that case he won't break up with you for not wanting to have sex because you do. :p

[Keodkke]

But I did mean sex after marriage. Read once again 😛😛

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke oh in that case you're blackmailing him by leveraging sexual intimacy. That's the issue with "sex only after marriage". I wouldn't marry someone who hadn't had sex with me.

[myTake Owner]

Like I said, die alone.

[Mesonfielde]

Hey, don't hate me just because you hate sex and you hate males for being males :p you're not obligated to be in a relationship if you're not interested in them, but then you'll be the one who dies alone

[Keodkke]

I want to make sure he loves me enough to spend his life with me.

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke I am pretty sure I cannot love someone to the fullest who rejects me physically. O_o

[Keodkke]

She doesn't reject you because she doesn't desire you. She rejects because she wants to spend her life with you

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke ... what?

[Keodkke]

She wants to make sure you want her like she wants you

[Mesonfielde]

@Keodkke... Wouldn't that mean that she should be as eager to get in bed as possible? Lol.

[myTake Owner]

@Keodkke There's no point in arguing with the ignorant.

[joeb73]

good for you. never do anything you dont want to do. Another thing you can say is the right person hasn't shown them selves yet. so untill they do im going to be who i am.

[zombiebabe]

good take

[KittieCat]

I've never heard any teenage girl say stuff under point one and I'm glad I haven't. Why the hell do other people care about your sex life? Do we seriously have nothing better to talk about lol

[SovereignessofVamps]

IKR people can be a trip.

[Heera]

good for you! especially that you don't care what others say. If you don't want to have sex yet is okay

[JoyGirl]

I am a virgin, and I approve of this myTake.