Why girls are never beautiful... Biologically!

[babu_001]

Female human body is considered to be as the most beautiful figure, even it is widely fantasized that woman is the best & the most beautiful creation of god!

Let's discuss about this & debunk the truth that why girls are never beautiful ...biologically.

1. The most prominent part of girls' body -- breasts.

75% of men are attracted to women only because of their breasts. A good pair of tits can bring a lots of eyes towards you. Though they are fleshy & soft, look sexy & arousing, do not forget - breasts are not genitals. They are milk glands, only to feed the babies. But breasts are a thing for men's enjoyment. Even the desperate girls with small boobs & aged women with saggy boobs resort to implant surgery....only to look "physically attractive".

2. The next? The hole of the whole universe! Vagina!

Vagina is the center of universe, the whole world is populated today only because of one vagina. Men are mad to get a glimpse of the hole, to taste a bit, to penetrate with their penis. Vagina is not a beautiful thing to look at, it's a genital, it's purpose is to attract male counterparts & produce babies. It is known that vagina leaves phermones in the air which attract men, so be not surprised men, it's not your fault, it's biology. While you think vagina is a pure scenery you were inhaling all the phermones of the vagina. And with the current culture, brazilian waxing has become widespread -- only to make vagina look cleaner, younger & beautiful.

3. Buttocks! Heaven on earth?

A nice pair of round buttocks is always symbolized as femine beauty, even the heart symbol is somehow derived from female buttocks ... a research proved. Nice ass has become more mainstream than the previous decade, every men fantasize about them. But wait a second, what is in it? Why is it so round & pulpy? The answer is biology.

Buttocks help as a shock-observer while the baby is inside the womb. It's not for entertainment of men!

The entire female body is to house a baby, feed it & grow it.

Unlike men's body, the female body contains more fat than muscles & thus it looks curvy, nice & sexy. But no it's not beautiful, it's just biology.

Womens' facial beauty doesn't play any role in growing babies, some can argue but let's not forget facial beauty is only to attract males to copulate so that they can have babies!

[YourFutureEx]

Biologically, they are multi-purpose. To attract the male and to nourish the child.
https://s.mlkshk-cdn.com/r/AAB
The better genes the girl have, the better looking face she'll possess. Biologically, botulinum helps them. Why? -To attract males.
Oxytocin, a hormone that simultaneously acts as a neurotransmitter. It is released during orgasm in both sexes and is associated with feelings of love or attachment after sexual acts. But it is also used in particular during and after childbirth for milk ejection result from positive feedback mechanisms.

BEING BEAUTIFUL IS A PART OF BIOLOGY!!!

[Ivy_Nicole]

Because those features are biological doesn't mean that they are not beautiful. Same for men, those features are also designed for specific purposes, so why only women?

weird take this is.

[emmabee11]

So... only physical attraction and nothing about our personalities is attractive too? what message is this article send to females? nothing good... because it's saying to be attractive we must be really physcially attractive or a guy won't find us attractive... don't put things like this please...

[aniemist]

there's always people like this, in both genders that say hurtful things, most men don't think like this.

[emmabee11]

well says a lot about you then if you do lol

[MaskedSanity]

Reading this has made me want to projectile vomit on your face.

[AshleyMD]

Well everyone's beauty is at the end of the day a sign of their healthy. The face does play a role because it gives us a clue to genes. Symmetry makes a face beautiful, it indicates good genes and thus someone you would want to procreate with. Softer edges indicate more female hormone and rougher edges, more testosterone. The female body does carry a baby, but it also is attractive to most males because it indicates health and that's why most women can be attracted to men, because men's bodies and faces tell us about how good their genes are and how good they are us a person, evolutionary at least.
The butt is found attractive because it's a sign of good health and more fat where it's healthy to be (butt and thighs). The butt is not a shock absorb-er, our butt as humans is to help in running which distinguishes us humans from other apes.

[LauraMarx]

this is the kind of misogyny I prefer personally this kinda really openly fucked up what the fuck level misogyny. The Guro Manga, of misogynist screeds. More /d/ than /r9k/ we need more of this I think

[ajr92]

I'm glad I fall into the "25%" of men that look beyond solely a girl's chest when I determine their beauty... I actually prefer smaller boobs too. Implants? Now they're a massive turn off.

If you look at the female form and your first thought is "Fantastic biology there, very good.", good for you. Can't agree with your take though, I happen to think it's bloody beautiful.

[BuchitaBuchys]

I knew it! I knew guys really don't like small boobs and only say that to make us feel better and not get implants.

[aniemist]

I wouldn't take it that seriously, certainly there are men like that around, but there are men that like women with all sizes of boobs. I like with all sizes myself and I'm sure there are other men out there like that as well. One more thing, what people like in this respect is just as unique as anything else.

[BuchitaBuchys]

@aniemist I wish I could find one lol

[StickStickity13]

For me breast size isn't taken into account unless they're sagging hardcore

[peachblossomluck]

Whatever we desire is beautiful to us! All of those women had incredible fugures. Any of that supposed to be ugly? OP sounds neurotic

[Genie23]

I Laughed Out Loud @ this take.
It's so ridilculous, hahah. You deserve a high five in the face, with a chair.

[aniemist]

I dont even know what to say about this, it might be one of the most sexist, and unthoughtful articles I have ever seen. By your logic man is only a walking penis made to impregnate women and there is nothing beyond that in comparison.

I really feeling like you must be trolling us with this one.

[Creole_Flavor]

What in the actual fuck did I just read?

[ObscuredBeyond]

The author thinks there is no beauty in practical design. But in reality, a good-looking machine that is also good at performing its jobs is the most beautiful thing it can possibly be. Yes, housing babies can be tough. But what in life worth doing is ever without some risk?

[AKashM]

Biology is the science of study of living beings and beauty is a matter of perception of our mind. They have not much of a connection to say that woman are not beautiful biologically. However all of your contents are true but not the title. The conclusion of your description here is that the part of woman which make them either beautiful or ugly are not present in woman just for the looks. They are present in them so that they could have babies and some of them are also required for other function like urinating, menstrual cycle etc.

Somehow humans have come to perceive beauty from those parts of woman and between homo sapiens woman are considerably more beautiful than man but in other species male gender is much more beautiful then female like lion, peacocks, etc.

[DodgersGM]

I mean, as a hetero male I personally believe that there's a great deal of beauty in both sexes. Admittedly, though, "beautiful" is more of a feminine term, but I think you know what I mean.

Anyway, this Take is kind of irrelevant in the sense that each sex derives their physical beauty from parts that are functional: a woman's hips versus a man's shoulders, a woman's booty versus man's arms, etc.

[sammy_31]

Way to rip the beauty out of the female body bruh. I still think a female body is an art and a "house" for the baby. Good take though :)

[convisoinarie]

How come women evolved with no figure still can have children the natural childbirth way so I have to disagree its only biology. If it was natural selection alone then people would all look very similar

[abundantlyrich]

You can't say it's not beautiful when it's a hot young thing.

[KBob93]

I didn't know that about the butt!

[Dєѕιвσу]

Well i don't care cuz i love women lol.
But it's not all biological as you think.

[YingKim]

I think girl usually not beautiful, but not for your reasons. ^^

[ElizabethFaith]

I think you might be gay :/

[Dakota_The_Rota]

Cool cool, now don't go around women if you don't like them.

[ArabianPwincess197]

Lol.

[mrrapperguy]

biology and beauty aren't mutually exclusive