We know when it's considered a micropenis, but when does it become a "macropenis"?

[Anonymous]

By definition, a micropenis is a penis that is smaller than 2.75 inches while erect (2.25 inches smaller than the average US penis), but when does a penis become a macropenis?

Would it follow that same rule of 2.5 standard deviants from the norm?
-Which would be (Standard Deviant = 0.825) (2.5 srandard deviants = 2.0625), macropenis is 7 inches or larger.

Or would it be based on percentage of occurance, which is estimated as roughly 0.14 - 0.6% of the general population?
-Which would be roughly 7.5 - 8.125 inches as the starting point.

Personally, I have to think it follows the rule of percentage of occurance, but I am wondering what others thoughts on this are.

Source for numbers:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/floyd-elliot/thats-not-normal-the-stat_b_4254842.html
https://www.realclearscience.com/journal_club/2015/03/03/is_your_penis_normal_theres_a_chart_for_that_109106.html
https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/average-penis-size
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/271647.php
https://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2015/03/05/new-study-gives-definitive-answer-average-penis-size/

[Anonymous]

Part of the problem is there is a minimum in the variation (0) and no maximum (though I think the longest proved is 13"). It skews the bell curve. The midpoint between proven maximum and minimum would be 6.5" even though that is more than the average.

[Asker]

Well to be fair, there is no minimum, and only a relative maximum. It is impossible for a penis to have 0 inches of length, and therefore there is an asymptote at 0 inches, and only a relative maximum asymptote at 13.5.

[Opinion Owner]

Another maximum would probably be the amount of blood required to be diverted for an erection. I would think for example, three pints would pretty much be out of the question.

[Opinion Owner]

If my calculations are correct a 15" penis with a circumference of 7" (it's going to have to be pretty thick not to buckle) assuming 3" is inside the body and 85% of the erect volume is supplied by blood, would take about three pints to fill. Which is probably why there aren't any. Yay science!

[Anonymous]

I'd say rate of occurrence so 7.5 - 8.1. It should be a independent variable and not related to micro. Because all this is based on the norm anyway right?

[Opinion Owner]

Also, there are abnormal cases in which a penis can be abnormally large. It's a ultra rare condition. Far more rare than a micro penis.

[Anonymous]

Men really need to find something else to do besides obsess over their dicks, you're getting as a bad as women and their breast size obsession.

[Asker]

At least it isn't as bad as women and their weight obsession yet.

[Opinion Owner]

Oh god, very true. "I'm 5'7" I weigh 100lbs, am I fat?" lol

[love2run13]

What 8inches is like my favorite length and for me thats like average, a macropenis is more like 12nches!! lol nah from 10-12 haha

[Trevox]

8 inches is average?

[JHAYES317]

@love2run13…8 inches isn’t average in any country except maybe upper end of average in Sudan…

[KDA20]

There is a 31% chance that I understood the question a 17% chance I cared and a 100% chance I an just typing this for Xper point.

[Asker]

The reason why you bothered answering is 1/∞

[HyperX]

When girls say, "Oh my goshhhh!!! :o " It becomes a macropenis

[Asker]

The majority of girls say that regardless of size. It's a common courtesy, just like saying she's tight no matter what.

[HyperX]

Umm then why are you worrying about the size then? :P Ask a biologist if you're seeking some knowledgable reply :D

[Asker]

Clearly that's what I should have done.

[Anonymous]

... Macro would be a size so large no woman would be able to fit it. And there are guys out there like that.

[Anonymous]

I love that
1) you took the statistical approach
2) I have a macropenis no matter how you divy up the results!

[Anonymous]

Hey! That means I have a MacroPenis? Because I am above your upper limit? Nice

[Asker]

There is 0.14% chance you aren't full of shit. And I really don't care.

[Opinion Owner]

Well I am in that 0.14%. Why did you ask a question if you were going to be a dick about people answering it.

[Asker]

I asked a question regarding opinion of how to measure, not what your measurements are. You did not answer the question, you bragged about your penis.

[Opinion Owner]

and no the variation would not be uniform on both ends of the scale. Micropenis is due to a genetic anomoly and also a developmental problem. Two causes that i know of. There is not an Analog with a Macro penis because you are talking about NORMAL variation which is for people much greater. So you can't extrapolate the same numbers.