My boyfriend wants to pee in my ass and I am ok with it but I want to now what others think about this?

Cayzzy Xper 4

0 0

Most Helpful Guys

normalice Master
+1 y
It sounds fun, actually, but just don't let him take a 'big' pee. If there is too much it could cause serious damage. If at all possible, have him pee slowly and stop the moment there is even a hint of internal discomfort. Also, you might want to do it in the shower, as it could get messy.

also, I think there was a song about this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfW2-k1xfMY
0 0 0 0
- normalice
  +1 y
  crap. stupid link
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONLGa8eU_J8
JuicyBrain Yoda
+1 y
If you want to do it, do it ! Don't look around for people's approval. You KNOW that lots of people think sex is dirty and a bad thing. Why would you want their opinion?

Your bedroom is your own universe and has it's own rules. First rule is what happens there is nobody else's business...
1 0 0 0
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  Nobody thinks it's a bad thing. But THIS, cannot be sanitary.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag Dude, believe me, dirty sex is the best sex... There is nothing more boring than "proper" clean sex in a white immaculate room with a cross on the wall. You gotta want to try stuff and not be scared of getting messy. If you don't feel the need to take a shower once you are done, you didn't do your job properly LOL
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  I get the feeling you just have a fetish of some kind.
- Show All Show Less
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag Of course I do. A got a couple. Nothing out of this world though. It has nothing to do with having good sex though.
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  Just to be sure, you are aware of the real definition of the word "fetish," right? A fetish (or "paraphilia" as psychologists call them) is an abnormality in the list of things that turn a person on. A fetish is by definition something most people do not have. www.psychologistanywhereanytime.com/.../...ist.htm
  
  It's even one of the 14 signs of a potential serial killer. https://www.drphil.com/articles/article/188
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  By the way, we Christians can still be kinky. Just ask @gwenlota2442
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag I actually know what the word fetish means exactly. But people are using it so lightly nowadays that I figured you were using it that way too. No I do not have a "fetish" in the sense that I don't "need" it to get pleasure. That was pretty cheap amateur psychology on your part by the way. With that said, that doesn't mean that I don't enjoy killing a prostitute once in a while... :-P
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  You are right. Christians are renowned all around the world for their kinky, unbridled sex...
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  It'd probably be easier if I just gave you a few links.
  
  sin-and-love.deviantart.com/.../Mere-Christianity-bk-3-ch-6-552240466
  
  sin-and-love.deviantart.com/.../Mere-Christianity-bk-3-ch-5-553691823
  
  read what I said in the comments here: www.girlsaskguys.com/.../q1473295-do-you-think-it-s-inconsistent-to-be-christian-also-do-sexual-things
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag I read them. I didn't think I'd go through the trouble but I did. Truth is, I was bored to death and now I regret the time I lost doing it. In no ways did it change my mind. I don't even get why you told me to read that. What were you trying to convince me about? That christians can have sex too? Do you want me to give you examples of christian girls who are unable to have sex after marriage because religion fucked them up? There are plenty of them... When a girl tells you she is a christian, in no way in your mind do you hear the words "Oh yeah ! She must be crazy good in bed !". That's because Christians are taught young that sex is dirty and prohibited. Not ALL of them are scarred by it. But many are...
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  I am aware of such women. I think the problem is that they think Christianity forbids masturbation in addition to premarital sex. Masturbation is fine. I explained why in the comments in that one question I already linked you to. Also, no true Christian is taught that sex is proibited. It's only the Christian EXTREMISTS that have that attitude. Every group has its extremists. religious extremists are called "fundamentalists," or "fundies" for short. Also, that gwenlota2442 is a VERY kinky person, AND a devout Christian. I can't @mention her because she blocked me due to something I said in a moment of Aspie stupidity (I accidentally crossed a boundary, and she got the wrong idea.), and she seems to have changed her account to a private one after she blocked me, so if you could@mention her, she will prove you dead wrong.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag I was baptised as a Christian. that doesn't mean much. I am talking about real believers. Those who actually believe no sex before marriage, etc. I maintain what I say, christians (as a general rule) are not what you go for when you're looking for fun in the bed. I am happy for your friend who blocked you, she was able to blossom on salted land.
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  Okay, maybe some secular science will convince you that sex is best saved for marriage I once read a magazine called Psychology Today, the August 2014 issue. Title: Love & Lust Yes, you can have it all. The title article occupies pages 51-55 and pages 86-88. "Contrary to conventional wisdom, married couples--and their cohabiting counterparts--have more sex than the nonmarried, a fact confirmed in a 2010 survey by the Kinsey Institute revealing who does not have sex. Three out of five singles had no sex in the previous year, versus one in five marrieds. in the prime years, ages 25 to 59, married individuals were five times more likely to have sex two to three times a week (25%) than singles (5%)." --page 51 "Aging and the dramas of raising a family and earning money change when and how people do it, but long married couples still have an advantage: they enjoy it more. Studies also show that long-term couples get better at sex and get more pleasure out of it. That is true of men as
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  Tthat is true of men as well as women, heterosexual and same-sex couples."--page 51 "Significantly, Gottman discovered that men who do housework have more sex than men who don't. His studies are especially significant because they track couples' inner and outer experiences over time in multiple ways, rendering the results particularly reliable."--page 52 "Respect and understanding are communicated by accepting influence from one another; that is, partners are responsive to eachother's feelings In a study conducted with psychologists Laura Carstensen of Stanford and Robert Levenson of UC Berkely, Gottman followed couples over 20 years--one group starting at age 40, another at age 60. Barring health problems, the couples had sex with eachother on a regular basis, but only under one important condition: that they didn't resort to stonewalling, pre-empting, or defensiveness to shut out the other when discussing problems. In the 16% of marriages that were sexless, says Gottman, there was
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  there was no 'give.' The relationship was adversarial, shut down, zero-sum. And that kills desire." --page 86 You should go and check out the article yourself. It goes into detail on how to keep things intimate.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag LOL The fact that it is non secular doesn't mean it's accurate. How are you supposed to quantify enjoyment in an accurate way? You might have enjoyed all the movies Adam Sandler made. I think they're shit. Does that mean that people who wait until marriage before having sex enjoy Adam Sandler more? Also, how are they supposed to say they enjoyed it more since they have never known sex with anybody else? It's bullshit. You are looking for research that fits with the way you see things. The thing is. if there was research proving you were wrong, you still wouldn't change your mind. Just as I won't change mine. I don't care what research you throw in my face, I would never wait until marriage. Anyway, I didn't read the research cause it sounds boring as shit and I already went out of my way by reading the texts from deviant art which I didn't even think I would do. That was too much to ask of me.
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  The study scientifically debunked the myth that marriage kills sex. It turns out that married couples have MORE sex than non-married people. You really ought to read what I have to say. If you don't, then why should I read what you have to say?
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag You really don't have to. You'll have to forgive me if I don't feel like reading a whole research paper just for the sake of you trying to convince me of something that goes against my grain. It was a good decision since I never said that married couples had less sex.
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  I didn't post the entire research paper, just a few quotes from it.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag That I did read. Let's keep it at that ok?
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  Could you at least @mention my friend so I can explain things to her?
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag @gwenlota2442
- gwenlota2442
  +1 y
  Why are you bringing me into this? I didn't even give an opinion.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @gwenlota2442 he asked for it. I personally didn't care...
- gwenlota2442
  +1 y
  yeah, I know. I read the whole "argument". He did the same thing to me that he's doing to you when I asked a question on here a while back. And no, I'm not his friend.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @gwenlota2442 Yes I figured he wasn't your friend lol I didn't really want to draw you into this. Please disregard all this. Thanks.
- gwenlota2442
  +1 y
  no problem.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag Looks like your "friend" is not interested...
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  Look gwen, I'm sorry I creeped you out. I wasn't perving on you; I didn't mean what I said that way at all. See, I have Asperger's, so I have trouble recognizing social boundaries. please forgive me. <:'-(
- gwenlota2442
  +1 y
  @Skadouchebag its called common sense. if you actually went out and talked to people you would have learned that a long time ago. and don't go calling me your friend.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  *grabs popcorn

Most Helpful Girls

Onlyinit4fun Xper 5
+1 y
You say in one of your replies "it sounds kinda gross to be honest".. than don't it. Only do it because it gives you sexual pleasure and you yourself have fantasised about this.

I like watersports but I don't see the appeal in this. But I'm not into anal or doing things that will mess my vagina. So having a guy pee inside me is a big no for me.
0 0 0 0
NatashaAnnJames Xper 5
+1 y
Firstly - it sounds gross and unhygienic

Secondly -How exactly is that going to work?, my boyfriend can't pee when hard.

I have lots of different scenarios going through my mind right now.
1 0 0 0
- Cayzzy
  +1 y
  well they stick it in when hard but don't move and when they are soft enough to be able to urinate then the do. I Googled it.
- NatashaAnnJames
  +1 y
  *mouth open wide, eyebrows raised* Fair enough - I can't say much more, I'm lost for words.
IamNuts Editor
+1 y
...
ip.bitcointalk.org/
...
0 0 0 0

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

6 28

SN2015 Xper 4
+1 y
I think it sounds disgusting and pointless, but if you're okay with it then go for it. I just don't understand the appeal of pissing or pooping for that matter on someone.
0 0 0 0
ChainzElla Xper 4
+1 y
That is filthy😂
1 0 0 0
- Cayzzy
  +1 y
  I am not sure what to think I mean I usually will try almost anything but it sounds kinda gross to be honest.
- ChainzElla
  +1 y
  It is gross But if you want somebody's urine inside of your body then go for it I'm just strongly advising you not to as that is actually really disgusting 😂
- ChainzElla
  +1 y
  Oh I just googled this You can get infections from this And also if you do choose to do this I suggest you do it when he is erect making it harder for him to pee
Goldie757 Yoda
+1 y
It sounds unhygienic.
2 0 0 0
madhatters4 Master
+1 y
honestly I believe to each their own but it sound gross to me... and potentially not healthy, but what do I know
0 0 0 0
mooky06 Editor
+1 y
umm not my thing
0 0 0 0
JenkPac Xper 4
+1 y
Its a kink for sure.

Nothing wrong with it save for maybe possible hepatitis B concerns.
0 0 0 0
cavmanier Master
+1 y
You might end up getting pissed
1 2 0 2
Xelebrum Yoda
+1 y
i2.kym-cdn.com/.../580.gif

That's enough GAG for one day. ;-;
2 2 0 0
sawno Master
+1 y
Isn't that potentially harmfull to the bacteria in there?
I don't know about this one, expect diarrhea i guess haha.
But i am no medical expert so its just a guess on my part.
2 0 0 0
slatyb Master
+1 y
Harmless as long as he doesn't have any STDs.
1 0 0 0
- Cayzzy
  +1 y
  He is a virgin he wants to try this on his first time.
Dєѕιвσу Xper 6
+1 y
You both can act in dirty pornogrpahy.
0 0 0 0
BelleGirl21 Guru
+1 y
The clean freak and germaphobe in me just started screaming and ran into a wall.
2 0 0 0
Dargil Master
+1 y
Sounds repugnant to me, but then anal intercourse does on its own.
When a guy is hard, he is pretty much unable to pee. Add to this the restriction of a tight anus and the probable presence of poo in front of it.
1 0 0 0
Skadouchebag Yoda
+1 y
If either of you gets an infection, don't be surprised if they give you something called a "Darwin Award"
1 0 0 1
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  Sure... He wouldn't want to dirty her squeaky clean colon totally deprived of bacteria right?
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  @JuicyBrain My point exactly. Anal sex *alone* is filthy, so if you urinate up there... I mean, the colon interior is lined with blood vessels, and anal sex tears these easily (which is why anal transmits STDs so much easier). SO if you urinate into torn blood vessels...
- Avalon4
  +1 y
  Theirs already bacteria in there some more won't do any harm.
- Show All Show Less
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  I don't think you understand me. Urine is almost sterile. There are already much worse bacteria in the colon. If it was so dangerous, you'd have people dying like flies because of their bleeding hemorrhoids...
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  @JuicyBrain It's sterile? Huh. How about that.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  They supposedly found SOME bacteria in women's urine but to find it, they had to take it from a catheter directly from their bladder. They never found them from the "normal" way of collecting it. So if you compare with what's already inside the colon, it's really not a problem.
- Skadouchebag
  +1 y
  @JuicyBrain Well it's still gross.
- JuicyBrain
  +1 y
  Can't say I am eager to try it either. But you know, to each his own... I prefer not to judge what other people do.
sexyphil Explorer
+1 y
If you want to then go ahead I doubt it will do any harm but be near a toilet as I reckon it will act like an enema and you will evacuate your bowel almost immediately after.
1 0 0 0
Kuraj Yoda
+1 y
I know people who get off on being peed in either of the holes, sometimes during intercourse. Not that unusual fetish nowadays.
0 0 0 0
OrdinaryGentleman Guru
+1 y
well this... is interesting..
0 0 0 0
SIGguy Xper 6
+1 y
Uuuuuuuuuuuh... how do I answer this?*blushing*
0 0 0 0
smahala1991 Editor
+1 y
WTH did I just read lol. But seriously no just no.
0 0 0 0
GodzillaGuy Xper 5
+1 y
Well your large intestine that is attached to your ass is super absorbent so you will be taking in his urine. You could over toxify yourself so be careful.
1 0 0 0
Show More (14)