"Straight" women are more attracted to the female body than the male body?

Anonymous

You will rarely see a women looking at naked pictures of a man, you are more likely to see a "straight" women looking at other naked girls, i mean shit! lesbian porn is the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic, while playgirl was a complete failure and most of their customers were gay men when they were in buisness. In tests "straight" women have shown to be more aroused by the female body than the male body in every capacity, there is another test with a much larger test group than yielded the same results. https://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf Women generally aren't aroused by a random naked male, but for a naked female theywill get aroused. Now don't say "I am very attracted to my bfs body", well that isn't attraction to his body, since emotional attraction is the catalyst, if it was pure arousal to his body, then every other guy with a similiar looking body would immediately arouse you. So are women who claim to be straight truly more attractedd to the male body in general over the female body.

Updates:

+1 y

I guess girls really are closer to being lesbian than straight

+1 y

Bump

1 0

Most Helpful Girls

Lolomon Xper 6
+1 y
Um, I like paintings of naked women. it's not in a sexual way though it more of a intrigued thing. like I think she has a nice body , or those are my goals. But we live in a society where women are conditioned to find the female body attractive, doesn't make us bisexual but Its that we have been taught to be into, But when we see certain pictures of naked men its sexual, like naked pics made by gays do nothing for me, but when ita done by women or in a artistic way I look at it in a sexual way. apparently men like the look of a penis more than vagina , so are you all gay? This whole women are bisexual is dumb cause if that was the case many women would have stopped dating men along time ago , since women are easier for us. Women aren't all bisexual these studies are so ridiculous
1 1 0 1
- Asker
  +1 y
  Studies showed men weren't aroused by penis, but women were aroused by vagina read the link i posted. And don't confuse affect and effect, if society has made women attracted to other women, then they are still attracted to other women, the result is still the same and it would still mean they are bisexual, it would just be a reason why they are bisexual.
- Lolomon
  +1 y
  Hence why these studies are dumb. I've read studies where men like the look of a penis, men are the leading watchers of Trans porn, and we both know the penis is the the star on them.
- Lolomon
  +1 y
  Being attracted to physical and sexually are two different things. women would act on their inner gayness if we were all bisexual. Like the Roman Times men all slept with each other , does that make you guys all inherently gay? No, Iys because that is what society normalized and it was what men where conditioned to like. I don't like vagina, women's body is beautiful but I ain't into vagina
- Show All Show Less
- Asker
  +1 y
  If it's a tranny having sex with a normal girl they can still be straight, it's no differnt to watching a man fuck a women, but yeah if a guy likes to trannies going at it he isn't straight. The thing is there are more gay men, than lesbian women, but pretty much every women on earth is bisexual. Tranny porn may be viewed by more men than women, but it is no were near the top of the list for men overall, while lesbian porn is by far the NUMBER 1 viewed porn genre by women.
- Asker
  +1 y
  "Being attracted to physical and sexually are two different things. women would act on their inner gayness if we were all bisexual. Like the Roman Times men all slept with each other , does that make you guys all inherently gay?" Don't comfuse affect and effect, if society has made you bisexual or gay, then you are still bisexual or gay, but yeah those greeks (it wasn't as prominent in rome) were bisexual as hell, But imerically at least it seems like the default for women is bisexual while the default for men is heterosexual.
- Lolomon
  +1 y
  All women are bisexual I don't believe at all. Yea, women watch trans porn to but they see a penis, a person bigger than the women and of course male features. I guess this creates the argument are we inherently gay or is it our environment or society norms.. I don't know... and yes their are more gay men than gay women. Their are also growing numbers of gay men (1 in 20) and men who identify as women (1 on 1000) in the u. s. you get to south America and south Asia ita like more than 30 percent of male population identify as female.
- Asker
  +1 y
  And dating and who you love by very definition has nothing to do with sexual orientation, that's why women chose men over women for a relationship, we are ONLY talking about the sexual here
- Asker
  +1 y
  And self identification means little, women claiming to be straight have been shown to be more aroused by a naked women than a naked man, in fact they weren't roused by the man at all.
- Lolomon
  +1 y
  Who you love has everything to do with sexual attraction. Many gay men love women, love everything about them but the lack of sexual attraction won't work. or like a guy can be into a girl, but she just isn't what he is sexually attracted to , it would never work.
- Asker
  +1 y
  I don't know what point you are trying to get across with your last post
- Lolomon
  +1 y
  That love and sexuality aren't in the same ball field. And if women didn't get aroused by men They wouldn't have sex with them. these researchers are either pulling this out their butts , trying to convince women they are all same sex attracted or they are researching women who later come out the closet
snowangle Master
+1 y
Because the appeal in girls' bodies is more visual while men's appeal is more in their function/how they make us feel. So while we're attracted to men, their bodies simply aren't that aesthetically pleasing. Think about male lions, peacocks, etc. They are more visually appealing than the females of their species. That's how human women are.

And I really can't get turned on by lesbian porn. There just aren't many videos out there of a girl receiving oral by a guy (which is what I prefer to watch).
1 0 0 2
- Asker
  +1 y
  Gay guys weren't aroused by women in the tests, they were only aroused by other men, so it obviously isn't an innate aesthetic, it's female sexuality that is fluid. And when in shape i think the male body is more aesthetically pleasing than the female body.
- cavmanier
  +1 y
  If you use male lions as an example of being more attractive, I think male lions would translate more into the larger and more muscular human male. The real big difference is lion society doesn't show thousands sexual images of women a day training us that they are empirically more attractive.
- Asker
  +1 y
  This would just be a reason why women are bisexual and closer to being lesbian than straight, but they still are.
Azara Guru
+1 y
no. i am definitely more attracted to the male body. but not really bulky hairy bodies. i don't like the extreme physical attributes people attach to men and women. I'm attracted to guys who are lean long and have smooth skin and no body hair. but the chest and stomach shoulders no curves.. its different than a woman body and I'm more attracted to it.

guys bodies arouse m, e. a woman boy i can find attractive and made become attracted to eventually.
0 0 0 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  So still bisexual, man no women is straight
- Azara
  +1 y
  i never said i was straight. i just said i don't find women bodies more attractive than mens. i don't think anyone is strictly anything sexually. they just sometimes do only specific practices.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Unless I misinterpreted your last sentence, its littered with typos so its hard to understand what you meant at the end of your post.
- Show All Show Less
- Asker
  +1 y
  Men have shown to have hard wired sexual orientation, but female sexuilty is all over the place, promoting anthropologists to say women don't actually have a sexual orientation.
- Azara
  +1 y
  guys bodies arouse me. A woman body i can find attractive and may become attracted to eventually. but am not immediately aroused by. it'd be based on connection personality etc. not 'lust'. and what does that have to do with you're saying women are more attracted to womens bodies. i said I'm not. whether you want to say I'm bi or straight. makes no difference. most people are sexually fluid, they just can't handle it. but as for your statement, for me personally i am more attracted to men, physically.
- Asker
  +1 y
  As I wrote in my last post, only women have fluid sexuilty.

Most Helpful Guys

IceEverest Xper 7
+1 y
I completely agree with you...
Most of the girls think that their romantic and emotional feelings determine their sexual orientation.
Girls think that they are still straight even if they are more turned on by a nude famale than a nude male, as long as they dont date orfuck a woman.
Ask a girl if a male nude body turns them on and they will answer only their boyfriend body will turn them on. However , they can get aroused by any random nude female body... Okay, for a moment if I believe women need emotional connection to get turned on ( as they usually claim to be). Then why the same rule doesn't apply to random nude female body.
0 1 1 0
- IceEverest
  +1 y
  True straight women are a endangered minority... Most are confused girls...
- Asker
  +1 y
  By correct semantics I think women are closer to being lesbian than straight, and it disgusts ne that they still date us predominantly, the saying prostitution is the oldest profession in the world, coined by runard kipling refers to every women and not just the hooker on the street for a reason.
Anonymous
+1 y
Go on any of these social experiments on youtube and you'll notice the following:

1) Women are down to go on dates with other women than men.
2) Give out there number to women than men
3) Friendlier to women than men
4) Willing to makeout and kiss other woman than men
5) Willing to take a random girls offer at sex on the street than a males.

In short I think the vast majority of women want to sleep with women but they don't want to be looked at as full on gay.

I feel majority of women tend to only be with men for their resources.
0 1 3 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  Runard Kipling coined the saying "prostitution is the oldest profession in the world" referring to every women in the world rather than the women on the side of the street for a reason.

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

11 6

BaiFSho Xper 2
+1 y
This confuses me too. I'm straight, I've never dated or had feelings for a woman but straight porn doesn't turn me on. Only lesbian porn does. I'm not sure why.
0 0 0 0
- BaiFSho
  +1 y
  And to add to this, visual porn is one thing. But if I'm reading an erotic novel, lesbian does not turn me on. When it's in writing heterosexual or male on male get me aroused. I'm not sure why.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Maybe because you aren't straight, who you want to date, who you love... by very definition has nothing to do with sexual orientation, only sexual attraction and arousal has anything to do with being straight bisexual etc.
- BaiFSho
  +1 y
  I guess that would make me bisexual, not straight. Though I would not want to date or actually have sex with a woman. That doesn't appeal to me
loofah Xper 6
+1 y
A female body is honestly more interesting to look at. A random male body doesn't really do much for me unless I get some degree of emotional attachment to it, even if it's just being a character on a TV show. I wouldn't say being attracted to a boyfriend's body is purely the emotions. Emotions are a part of physical attraction.
0 1 0 2
- Asker
  +1 y
  So you are admitting to being more attracted to other women. you aren't claiming to be straight are you?
- KENKONG
  +1 y
  Sounds like you want a girlfriend. Emotional attraction to girl+body=Full on attraction.
- loofah
  +1 y
  I am straight. I cringe at the thought of touching a female sexually and females are never lingering in my thoughts. It's purely like looking at a painting for me. And if you wanna talk pornography or a sex scene in a movie, being turned on is more about empathy. Putting myself in her place. Not about her.
- Show All Show Less
- loofah
  +1 y
  @KENKONG No, the emotional attraction isn't there at all.
- Asker
  +1 y
  That's exactly why it is fluid and why you can't be heterosexual, when it is mostly about yourself and the partner doesn't matter so much,... that's why men can't be aroused by gay porn and women but women can be aroused by lesbian porn. A video of a guy getting blown will arouse a guy if it's a girl sucking it, with a women, the video can have pretty much anything eating her out and it will arouse her.
- loofah
  +1 y
  What? But my partner does matter. Women can be aroused by lesbian porn because of empathy. Our emotions are more developed and complex. It's not about being attached at all. We usually need the attachment for proper sexual attraction. If it helps, gay male sex can be arousing too. Empathy.. imagination. Whatever you wanna call it.
- Asker
  +1 y
  The empathy is what makes it fluid, your pleasure is the main route of arousal, you are far more attracted to yourself than the male body, that's why i agree with anthropologists when they say women don't actually have a sexual orientation
- loofah
  +1 y
  Maybe. Or maybe the definition of heterosexual applied to female should not be the same as the way it is applied to a male just to keep it simple. Also, a male's emotional response to stimulation can be extremely attractive.
- Asker
  +1 y
  No basic logic dictates it has to be the same, you can't say, "well she is straight, for a female" Even look at the etymology of the words in play, like bisexual and sexual orientation, emotional attraction need not apply, it is superfluous to semantics. It can be applied anecdotaly too, so many "straight" women have made out with other women, and are willing to do sexual things to another girl in an ffm threesome.
- loofah
  +1 y
  That logic is fine for the branch of science that wants to explore concepts or terminology, but for everyday purposes of two people coming together to have sex, date, marry, heterosexual identification does not need to fixate on the nature of attraction.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Aaah yes it does, English says so too, that's what the words in question mean, you want words to mean whatever you want now?
- loofah
  +1 y
  Not necessarily. I want words that serve a practical purpose to focus on the purpose and not get lost in the fluff of overthinking everything lol
- Asker
  +1 y
  overthinking? it's the most basic and flawless semantics
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  I agree with @loofah Like if somebody asks if you are straight, bi or gay they don't mean all that crap they just mean: Do you date/have sex with men, women or both. That's what these terms are for for the average person who doesn't overthink this
- bbb10
  +1 y
  If you women where any-bit intelligent you would see these women are not straight.
musicbrain5 Master
+1 y
Yet another question here claiming that all women are bisexual. No, not all of us are bi or lesbian. I'm not - I really don't find anything especially appealing about the female body. Doesn't turn me on. But that's just me...
2 1 0 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  Maybe not all, but it really seems like most are.
- musicbrain5
  +1 y
  But how can you claim most are when you only cite one study that only asked a total of 47 women? And why are guys bothered so much by bisexuality anyways?
- Asker
  +1 y
  There is another one with about 380 participants that claim the same results
- Show All Show Less
- musicbrain5
  +1 y
  Still... there's 3.5 billion women and girls in the world. 380 people is peanuts in comparison. With disproportionate sample sizes like that, the diversity of people is going to be different each time you conduct the survey. I could scoop up 380 Skittles from a bin, sort them by colour, find that 75% of those are red and therefore make the claim that 75% of all the Skittles in the world are red. But then you could come along, conduct the exact same experiment, and find that 75% of your sample is purple and conclude that 75% of Skittles are purple.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Honestly what are the chances of all of them yielding the same result, every last women and man ever tested, it's virtually impossible that it's some kind of coincidence
- musicbrain5
  +1 y
  The chances of several different sample group all yielding the same results are slim to none, because you're going to get different groups of people each time. This applies to all kinds of studies, including ones like this that assess sexual orientation.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Exactly, so are you agreeing with me now? it's obviously not a coincidence and women seem to have fluid sexuality.
- musicbrain5
  +1 y
  No, I don't agree. How are the results from two studies out of a thousand more that could be conducted not coincidental? You're cherry picking these statistics to support your argument, which is fine, but at least acknowledge that the results from other similar studies are likely going to be different. I wish guys like you could understand that not every woman is attracted to other women.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Lets see, the fact is right now it's all for women being bisexual and nothing against, but i bet if you were tested you would yield the same results from the plesmograph
- musicbrain5
  +1 y
  How can I say that I'm bisexual if I don't even find female bodies sexually attractive or lust after them? Is female sexuality more FLUID than male sexuality? Likely so, because there are far more women who experiment with other women (even just a one time makeout) than men do with other men. Yes I claim to be straight and yes I'm attracted to men and male bodies. I still can't understand why there's guys who are beating a dead horse with this whole "all women are bisexuals or lesbians" thing. Is it because they can't get women so they're making themselves feel better by saying we're just not all that attracted to men? Or is it because there are so many guys who find girl on girl action hot and they want us all to be convinced that were bisexual so they'll have a higher chance of FFM threesome with their girlfriends?
- Asker
  +1 y
  None of those things, the truth us the truth and women should stop claiming to be straight, I actually hate the fact, I wish women were genuinely straight.
- Asker
  +1 y
  And I have seen you answer questions in which you say you aren't aroused by the male body. If you need emotional attraction to be aroused by the male body then that is demisexuilty which is fucken far off heterosexuality and is arousal to non gender specific traits.
- musicbrain5
  +1 y
  OK but that doesn't mean I'm attracted to women.
erandal Yoda
+1 y
Guilty. I am definitely more attracted to the female body.
0 0 0 2
- Asker
  +1 y
  Then you can't claim to be straight
- erandal
  +1 y
  I guess not...
itsallover Guru
+1 y
Why are guys so set on trying to convince us and ourselves that we're bisexual?

Finding the female body attractive =/= we're bisexual
Enjoying lesbian porn =/= we're bisexual
4 1 1 7
- Asker
  +1 y
  Yeah being attracted to the female body sexually is sexual attraction which would mean by defintion you have to be either bisexual or lesbian.
- itsallover
  +1 y
  You can find the female body attractive but be completely straight. Sexuality isn't only defined by who turns you on, romantic interest and an emotion connection comes into it too. I'm sure you've looked at men who are attractive, and the only thing that goes through your head is: 'Oh, that's a good-looking guy' ... and you move on with your day. The same thing happens with women, believe it or not.
- itsallover
  +1 y
  There is a difference between physical and sexual attraction. Sexual attraction determines your sexuality, physical does not.
- Show All Show Less
- Asker
  +1 y
  "romantic interest and an emotion connection comes into it too" no it doesn't.. I am not talking about aesthetic appreciation, these girls are aroused by the women that's not just "Oh, that's a good-looking guy/girl"
- itsallover
  +1 y
  Where is the proof that we are supposedly turned on by women?
- itsallover
  +1 y
  If we're all so bisexual then why aren't all of us dating women? Since we're sooo attracted to them, and that's all that matters, right? Forget about emotional compatibility.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Read the study, and " lesbian porn is the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic, while playgirl was a complete failure and most of their customers were gay men when they were in business" There is also a newer study with about 380 participants that yielded the same results, even read peoples answers on here how "straight" girls admit to being aroused by other women.
- itsallover
  +1 y
  Have you maybe thought logically about why that may be? Most women don't want see videos titled 'Big titted whore gets wrecked by big c*ck', that are clearly geared towards male viewers. Lesbian porn is a lot more sensual and intimate and focuses more on the female's pleasure. Gay porn is also a popular category amongst women for similar reasons.
- itsallover
  +1 y
  Playgirl failed because we are not visually stimulated in the way that guys are. A picture of some boobs will make you get a boner, but a topless man won't get us wet. It's not a case of us being bisexual.
- Asker
  +1 y
  You think logically, women aren't aroused by naked men but are aroused by a naked women (read the study) so it's seems women are visually aroused when it comes to other women, but not me, yet they claim to be straight? hahahah what? and surely there is a limit that was past long long ago to still claim heterosexuality by saying "it's sensual and intimate." Even if your clit is getting cut off in the video, you should be more aroused by men than other women period if you claim to be straight. And that's precisely why women are bisexual, they aren't target specific, men could get aroused by a video of a blowjob, but it would have to be a girl sucking it, while a women would get aroused by a video of anything eating pussy, it's about themselves and the reason why it is said women don't have a hard sexual orientation like men do.
- Asker
  +1 y
  *but not men
- itsallover
  +1 y
  You've only given me one study about this so I'm not convinced, sorry. I've seen this thrown around on all discussions pertaining to women's sexuality and there's too many inconsistencies in it to name. What's wrong with being able to ignore gender in sexual activities? Sex is sex, I enjoy watching people do it regardless of their gender. Does that make me gay? Nope.
- Asker
  +1 y
  "What's wrong with being able to ignore gender in sexual activities? Sex is sex, I enjoy watching people do it regardless of their gender. Does that make me gay? Nope." it's a level of fluidity that a heterosexual person can't posses, it makes you bisexual, or pansexual, but not straight
- itsallover
  +1 y
  I don't think you're in a position to tell me whether I'm straight or not. Lesbian porn is actually one of my least favourite categories. Don't get so caught up in the semantics of 'heterosexuality' to the point where it makes you blind to possible nuances. It's not as rigid as you're making it out to be.
- Asker
  +1 y
  If it isn't rigid then it's a spectrum, and then you can't be completely straight or completely gay, thus bisexual
- itsallover
  +1 y
  You're doing mental gymnastics. Men's sexuality can be fluid too, societal and cultural norms just don't allow them to be as open and frank about it.
- Asker
  +1 y
  I doubt cultural norms can cause a man not to be aroused by something he would normally be aroused by in a test, deny it maybe, but the plesmograph wouldn't lie
- itsallover
  +1 y
  You'd be surprised how powerful outside influences can be on the brain. Why do people unconsciously associate black people with bad things (even black people themselves), and white people with good? Even though race is not a biological concept that would allow us to form innate biases? I'll link you the study if you don't believe me.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Anyway that would still just be a reason why women are bisexual, it doesn't mean they aren't.
- Markfish
  +1 y
  If you enjoy lesbian porn you certainly are bisexual or lesbian
RachelBrigs Yoda
+1 y
There's reasons for that, and I can get into them if you want, but women are more attracted to men, period.
I check out girls because I compare myself to them, so yes I do look at girls, but I also look at guys and for totally different reasons.
1 1 0 1
- Asker
  +1 y
  Masturbating to lesbian porn isn't some comparison of aesthetic appreciation like you explain.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Umm I don't recall saying that at all. I said I LOOK 👀at other girls to compare, not "I get off on looking at titties" So much to explain... I'll get into it. Prepare for an essay.
- Asker
  +1 y
  But statistically women most watch lesbian porn (pornhub statistics) so even if you personally don't look at women having sex to be aroused, a lot of women do.
- Show All Show Less
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Firstly, look at culture. Women's bodies are plastered everywhere, everyone is obsessed with them. We openly judge and critique them. I remember when I was like 13, being embarrassed to talk about how attractive a guy was, but it seemed normal and okay to say a girl was attractive/had a nice body. That was expected. Its got a lot to do with society. I promise you. A girl kissed me once, and I went along with it. It didn't arouse me at all. Kissing a guy I'm attracted to gives me tinglies, but kissing her felt like kissing my hand or something. I went along with it out of drunken boredom. If I was a guy I would've been ridiculed for kissing another guy. I think humans in general have the capacity to not be disgusted by/neutral towards sexual acts with the same sex BUT society tells men they're faggots if they do it but women are encouraged to do it. So of course you'll find more women who will kiss another girl. Does this mean all women are bisexual or lesbian? No, definitely not.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Basically, you're also saying that since girls aren't as aroused by random naked men as they are by their boyfriends, then girls aren't actually physically attracted to men, its just emotional. Completely untrue. If this was true, women would have no standards. Women wouldn't have a height preference, nor a body type preference, nor any kind of preference. If a girl likes tall fit blonde guys, are you really saying it's based on emotion? No, we experience physical attraction. Why do you think so many girls go crazy over actors and boys in bands, or have one night stands and FWBs? Explain that, please. Scientifically, men of a certain height, with certain muscle mass, with a certain waist to shoulder ratio, tend to be the most reprodutively successful, and men that fit those qualities tend to be viewed as ideal, the same way women with a certain BMI and a certain waist to hip ratio are as well.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Again, obese guys with pubic hair for a beard would be getting pussy if girls based attraction only on personality only.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Now as for girls watching lesbian porn, the ones who truthfully do that and enjoy it are definitely bisexual. However, that doesn't mean they're not attracted to guys or that they like girls more. there's that statistic floating around about most lesbian porn on a certain site being viewed mostly by women. This has a few problems. 1) even if all the viewers of a video were female, that doesn't mean all females would watch/watch that kind of video. 2) the site has no way to verify if the user is actually female, and you know damn well guys with one hand down their pants are creating a "female" account and watching lesbian porn. I'm sure that accounts for a substantial amount of those "female viewers" 3) a lot of girls watch porn with their guys because it gets them off.. doesn't mean the girl is enjoying it.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Anyway, if what you're saying is true, then the human race would've died out a long ass time ago.
- Asker
  +1 y
  I am claiming women aren't sexually aroused by men, while being sexually aroused by women. Some kind of aesthetic for mate selection with out pure arousal or sexual attraction isn't being talked about. In that study the results are clearly there, women are more aroused by other women. And cultural things would be affect and not effect, if the result is the same, what comes before doesn't matter, as in if society made women aroused by other women, that doesn't matter, since they are still aroused by other women.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Literally the study says women respond equally to both men and women. So your takeaway should be "women are bi" not "women are not aroused by men." The study showed women ARE aroused by men. Anyway, another study showed women also reacted to videos of chimpanzees fucking. What does that really mean? Does it mean that we are into monkeys? Don't think so. I think our bodies just register it as sex, or something sexual. I think there is a lot more to the story than meets the eye. Your assertion that we have an aesthetic preference for a man's body but we are not aroused by it is ridiculous. "Aesthetics" get our species nowhere. But the innate desire to fuck someone does. Again, explain girls who drool over actors, singers, and have ONSs? there's no emotional bond... hmmm... must be attraction
- Asker
  +1 y
  And you are still saying most women are bisexual, since lesbian porn is most popular and in every test women were more aroused by the female body. I AM NOT CLAIMING WOMEN ARE GAY, IM CLAIMING THEY ARE BISEXUAL, AND PROBABLY CLOSER TO BEING LESBIAN THAN STRAIGHT, which is disgusting considering they still mainly date men.
- Asker
  +1 y
  And just read on here how many "straight" girl like lesbian porn.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  If a hot girl and a hot guy are naked in front of me I'm looking at both. Looking at her to compare and be jealous, looking at him with lust. There is a difference.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  You are gonna believe what you wanna believe. I don't really care. No guy who has ever gotten pussy has ranted about bisexual women. So that's def your problem.
- Asker
  +1 y
  If it were just jealousy, then why are these women aroused? even read the other answers in this thread, they are actually turned on by the female body, not just admiring it.
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  Go back and read what I had to say about that, don't like repeating myself
- Asker
  +1 y
  Now ad hominoms, what parts quantify the exact part
- RachelBrigs
  +1 y
  " Anyway, another study showed women also reacted to videos of chimpanzees fucking. What does that really mean? Does it mean that we are into monkeys? Don't think so. I think our bodies just register it as sex, or something sexual. I think there is a lot more to the story than meets the eye. "
- Asker
  +1 y
  They where only slightly aroused by the bonobos having sex, barely different than the control video, but a naked women greatly aroused them. That's the thing though, that's why women can't be considered hetrosexual, there sexuality is fluid and not target specific. A man can get aroused by a video of a blowjob, but it would have to be a women sucking that dick to get him aroused, but a video of anything eating a pussy will arouse women, their pleasure and the scene matter more than the people in the film, saying women are only sexually attracted to men would be a falsehood. Anecdotal evidence of this can be seen in how many "straight" women are would like to makeout with another girl and how many are willing to do sexual things to another women in an ffm threesome.
_Feline Xper 5
+1 y
Um you can admire a female body, but only a MALE body will turn me own. the strong arms, chest, hands, biceps, jaw, all that turns straight women on. The way guys with these qualities grab you, etc. If you're turned on by a female body you're just simply admiring, or you're gay/bi.
0 0 0 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  simply admiring the body wouldn't turn you on
- _Feline
  +1 y
  Nah not turn me on but I'd admire it.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Well your last sentence did read " If you're turned on by a female body you're just simply admiring"
- Show All Show Less
- Asker
  +1 y
  sorry wrong person with that last reply
- Asker
  +1 y
  Wait that was for you sorry
Imafreespirit Guru
+1 y
Ehhh I kinda disagree... I'm straight as an arrow and Im difinetely more attracted towards the male body, I honestly don't look at other girls bodies, maybe just for fitness inspiration, but other than that not really.
0 1 0 0
Girl7150 Xper 6
+1 y
Yeah haha, my boyfriend is really ripped and doesn't understand why I still can't get aroused just by looking/touching at his body like he can with mine.. :D
1 0 0 3
- Asker
  +1 y
  But you aren't claiming to be straight are you, cause you are literally closer to being lesbian than straight.
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  No, I am straight, and sure he does turn me on. But I can't just get aroused by looking at him while taking his clothes off like he can with me. Like of course the inticipation and the emotional connection we have stuff could arouse me, but the sight alone - no
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  And in addition I would never even consider dating a girl, I don't think of girls that way at all - but the female body is very beautiful
- Show All Show Less
- Asker
  +1 y
  Emotional attraction, who you want to date, who you love... by very definition has nothing to do with sexual orientation, only sexual attraction and arousal has anything to do with being straight bisexual etc. When you said haha yeah, i assumed you meant you re more attracted to the female body than the male body, coinciding with the question, and if that is true you are closer to being lesbian than straight, emotional attraction to your boyfriend doesn't count, how is that gender specific? if you were attracted to his body alone, every male body that looked like his would be attractive to you.
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  Hmm it's hard to explain, but even though I find that womens bodies sort of turn me on, I don't feel like having sex with a girl at all in real life. The thought of having sex with my boyfriend - or straight sex - is way more appealing to me.
- Asker
  +1 y
  "way more appealing" don't confuse preference and orientation! prefering men doesn't make you straight. And if you aren't aroused by the male body, why do you even sleep with men besides emotional reasons (which once again by definition has nothing to do with sexual orientation), if you aren't aroused by the male body i don't see how a vibrator is much different.
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  Well I wouldn't want to have sex with anyone I didn't have feelings for, and I don't catch feelings for girls, and the thought of having sex with one is off-putting to me. But if I saw a male body and a hot female body next to each other I would probably get more turned on by looking the female body, however it's not because I want to have sex with it. It's so hard to explain
- Asker
  +1 y
  You have a fluid sexuality narcissistic, narcissistic sexual self affirmation. Being demisexual (needing emotional attraction to achieve sexual attraction) isn't being heterosexual anyway, you aren't attracted to men sexually, you are attracted to a man sexually, and emotional attraction by definition has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Seriously if you are more aroused by naked women than naked men you can't consider yourself straight (even if the reason is sexual narcissism, that is a level of fluidity that a hetrosexual person can't posses).
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  oohkaaay? :') I think most straight girls are like this as well, just saying.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Then they aren't straight
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  How am I a lesbian if I want date and have sex with guys? I don't want to have sex with girls or be with them. I just enjoy the sight of the female body - also a lot of mens bodies look gross
- Asker
  +1 y
  "I just enjoy the sight of the female body - also a lot of mens bodies look gross" yet you are straight? you are attracted to yourself and your partner doesn't matter that much
- Asker
  +1 y
  Lol at anyone who believes women are heterosexual, they are all bisexual, they consume 2.5 times as much lesbian porn as guys and it's is by far the most popular genre of porn to the female demographic (pornhub statistics,). "straight" women are also literally more aroused by the female body than the male body, indiana. edu/.../Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007. pdf (read that, it's scientifically sound proof). Playboy once did a test where women where aroused by a lap dance by both male and female strippers, while men where only aroused by female strippers. Most women will make out with other girls after minimal alcohol, and will be willing to do sexual things to another girl during an ffm threesome. Normally the thing that makes a girl want to have sex with a guy will be non physical, non gender specific traits and will need these non gender specific traits to feel sexual attraction to them in the first place.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Female sexuality is fluid while men have a hard wired sexual orientation. Anthropologists say women don't actually have a sexual orientation, just an amorphous mess based off sexual narcissistic self affirmation. Disagree with me if you want but there is far to much evidence (both scientific and anecdotal) to consider heterosexuality the female default, look up female sexual fluidity and see that anthropologists and neuroscientists agree with me (well I agree with them).
- Girl7150
  +1 y
  Okay but why don't we then just call the ones who date and have sex with men straight so we don't confuse anyone?
- Asker
  +1 y
  No we just say women aren't straight, because they truly aren't.
Watermelonoma Yoda
+1 y
its because women are drawn by their emotional attachments more than their physical ones. There's a lot more emotion and foreplay involved with lesbian porn, which is in stark contrast to the kind of porn guys are typically into where the girl is getting basically annihilated.
2 1 0 1
- KENKONG
  +1 y
  Explain twilight.
- Asker
  +1 y
  That in no way, i mean absolutely no way would mean they are straight though
pavlove Editor
+1 y
good. that means more threesomes for us why they try to figure out they're orientation
0 1 2 0
- KENKONG
  +1 y
  In on threesome.
  
  pbs.twimg.com/.../...50a3f7488bd73b24e791693a.jpeg
HaveNoName Guru
+1 y
I agree with your take 500 million percent
0 2 2 0
Polocrew Guru
+1 y
I can show you my Instagram comments where they are more "attracted towards male body" OP?
0 0 0 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  Bro i am ripped too, and trust me they are more aroused by a girl liking another girls snatch than they are by your body.
- Polocrew
  +1 y
  Not what my 1273 thinks bro, I mean I got random compliments on it on ig and off ig
- Asker
  +1 y
  Well do they masturbate to your picture right off the bat? that's what they do to a video of a women eating out another women's twat.
- Show All Show Less
- Polocrew
  +1 y
  Eww. Fuk no, You talking about lesbians bro? And I don't know pretty sure some might do..
- Asker
  +1 y
  Go look at the statistics from pornhub, "straight" women most prefer to masturbate to lesbian porn and read the link i posted, women claiming to be straight are more aroused by the female body than the male body.
Anonymous
+1 y
That might be the case for some, but not all.

As an art student, I had to look at both male and female nude forms, like live nude models, for drawing. No matter who the model was, it did nothing to sexually arouse me. I tried looking at porn, even lesbian porn once, but it didn't arouse me either. I thought I was maybe asexual, since nothing was arousing me. Then I met my boyfriend and he was able to arouse me. I liked his body and how he made mine feel.
0 0 0 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  Demisexual, very far from being heterosexual
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  Yes, I am a demi. But women do not arouse me in any way.
Anonymous
+1 y
Look at all the "Man Candy" type boards on Pinterest...
0 0 0 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  Yeah but they don't masturbate to the picture do they! yet thy will masturbate to lesbian porn
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  I do... So I would assume many others do too. Porn isn't a good way to gage female sexual interest because a lot of it is super brutal to the female.
- Asker
  +1 y
  Even if your clit is getting cut off in the video, you should be more aroused by men than other women period if you claim to be straight. You masturbate to random pinterest guys? you would be in a minority then.
- Show All Show Less
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  I bet more do than who admit it. Though pics of men tend to be all over the place in sexiness... Some have really distracting elements. (See pics below). And would you be aroused by a hot woman cutting a penis off or kneeing a guy in the balls? I'm asking curiously, not sarcastically. If so, I think that speaks more towards guy's intense focus than sexuality, honestly.
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  Weird pics:
  
  tippinthescales.files.wordpress.com/.../...-04.jpg
  
  www.homorazzi.com/.../michael-radon-workout.jpg
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  Sexy pics:
  
  s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...b41749ac85.jpg
  
  https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJz05t1XAAAZj3I.jpg
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  So I do think context affects females more. I don't that females could masturbate easily with a dog in the picture... Etc
- Asker
  +1 y
  I would be more aroused by it than gay porn, by a far way
- Asker
  +1 y
  Men need women in the video to be aroused, but "straight" women are aroused by other women.
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  I'm aroused by the guys I showed you. But messing up the scene with a dog, or a guy choking a bitch with his dick or a billion other stupid things would nullify my arousal.
- Asker
  +1 y
  But are you aroused with anything with just women in, no men?
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  No...
Anonymous
+1 y
Women are either bisexual or lesbian but 'never straight'.
0 2 3 0
- Asker
  +1 y
  True, they don't even know what straight means anymore
Anonymous
+1 y
Because women these days are afraid of admitting their sexualities.

Attraction to same sex =/= heterosexual.
0 1 3 0
- Opinion Owner
  +1 y
  I think the girls who downvoted me need to revise on what it means to be heterosexual.