Would you hire a pedophile as a babysitter?

So the liberals are trying to make being a pedophile ok... as long as they don't touch the kid.
This article https://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/ is about a man that is sexually attracted to little girls, though he claims he will never abuse them.
Here's a small 2:36 minute video of him talking:



So considering that he will never abuse your little girl, he'll just go masturbate in the bathroom thinking about her, would you ever hire a man like this to babysit your daughter?
Yes, he's just a pedophile, not a monster
Vote A
Only if I know him personally
Vote B
No, I won't risk it
Vote C
Fuck no!!!
Vote D
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Girl Guy
1 0

Most Helpful Guys

  • I do think their are some points to what he stated, that said the last thing you want to do is put them near a child, thats like putting herion next to a herion addict turning your back and just hoping everything goes well ie nothing good is going to come of it. I think we should look at it as a condition and as such something they could be able to get help for (for example I was watching a documentary (when the whole church molestation thing came out) where a priest had essentially convinced himself it was a mutual attraction when it in fact wasn't he was arrested at which point he had to let go of his delusion that he did nothing wrong, he got counciling in prison, he got out continued counciling and as he put it he was still a pedophile, so he started chemicly castrating himself (drugs to repress sexual urges) and continued to go to counciling and he was still a pedophile. After a while he got himself surgicly castrated and as he put it, his sexual urges diminished but they where still there and he was still a pedophile. Thats a lot of effort put into trying to get rid of those urges so much so that I cannot see it as a choice (some are, those are mostly those people who go after teenagers, its when they get bored with sex then begin to fetishize teenagers because their taboo, those people choose it since its not an exclusive attraction). But its a screwed up situation so I don't blame anyone for their responses (its a difficult subject filled with a lot of emotion so its kind of hard to see past that initial response), and like I said putting a child in that situation is just a stupid risk to take.

  • I initially wanted to just give you a "no" answer. But I started to think.. If I wouldn't hire a pedophile, should I then also not want to hire a homosexual man, if my kid was a boy. Or lesbian woman, if my kid was a girl?

    I mean, generally we trust other people.. at least somewhat, no?

    • But just because they're gay or lesbian doesn't mean they're attracted to kids. I'm hetero and I don't find sexual attraction on little girls.

    • Obviously. But I mean, not wanting to hire someone for their sexuality, would be like saying they have no self-control at all. But I don't have children, yet, so I guess I couldn't say.

Most Helpful Girls

  • To me that is a HUGEEEEE Nope!

    in my opinion this guy is just trying to justify his behavior. Basically, he's trying to convince everyone he is a good guy simply because he didn't rape a child. No, you don't get bonus points for not raping children. That's just a general rule in society. You don't rape children. You don't rape anyone, that's a pretty standard expectation.

    He's sick. He was raped as a child and needs help. He realizes that. It's good that he never did anything. But what is concerning to me is that he allowed himself to be put in that position (a babysitter to a child, when he knew he had an attraction to children and a problem). To me, he was merely lucky that he had the ability to remove himself from the situation when it became too much. But what would have happened had he babysat again?

    Eventually I'm sure he would have done something. Also, he did masturbate in their bathroom. I don't think he's fully honest with himself about his problems. To me the whole video was just a big denial. He was trying to rationalize being able to be near children, putting them at risk. Because he thinks he's a great guy.

    I'm sure most people think they are great. But he knows he has this problem, so why put himself in the position where he could harm a child? To me that shows me that he is willing to tempt himself. It's not fair to put any child in that position. It's like feeding them to wolves.

    • I completely agree with you. What's worse in the video is how they portrayed the little girl as these beautiful desire, with her jumping around in slow-mo... disgusting :/

    • Totally agree, I didn't even get to watch it all. I had to go puke :S

    • Thanks!!

  • No. I would not. If I strongly suspected someone was a pedophile, I would try to get authorities and medical professionals help to get them under control of their urges not hire them as a babysitter. That's just stupid.

    I think you are misinterpreting this guy. He is trying to get pedophilia under control, not trying to make any pedophilic actions or thoughts acceptable enough to allow him to babysit children like a normal person. He is honest about his disturbing feelings instead of pretending they don't exist. That's the first step to dealing with it. Pedophilia is considered a paraphilic mental disorder under DSM V suggesting it is not normal and there is an out of control nature of it that requires help. It doesn't make the actions of the pedophile right, au contraire it's unfathomably HORRIBLE. It just means there are many out there and kids will be harmed if the problem isn't helped in the proper way. You can't just tell a pedophile to stop. It isn't normal, it won't work like it does on us.

    • But it doesn't seem like he's trying to get help to fix his mental disorder. Instead, he's trying to make us believe that it's not bad to be a pedophile as long as you don't sexually abuse a kid.

    • Na, he is trying to make us see that he can't help his thoughts but he is trying to control his actions. He is trying to show that pedophilia is a mental disorder. Often it's linked to being abused as a child. Would you ever want to be blamed for something you didn't do? If you were speeding recklessly, would you want to be treated as though you killed someone? No. Even the thought of driving recklessly is fucked up because it can kill. Same idea here, except pedophilia as a mental disorder isn't 100% the patient's fault. Not all pedophiles act upon their thoughts and that counts for something. It means perhaps with help, more of our children will be safe. It's understandably a very twisted topic for everyone. Even makes me uncomfortable. Looking at the big picture is key though. The fact that this man is an open pedophile who has not abused any children means more children are safe. Think about the pedophiles who hide out of fear of stigma. More children are at risk.

  • That guy isn't trying to get gigs as a babysitter. He doesn't want to be around children because he is trying to keep himself from acting on his urges...

    Sweeping pedophiles under the rug hasn't been working... we've been doing that for generations and kids keep getting hurt.

    • I'm not saying he's trying to become a babysitter, though he did say that he has worked as one and he used to go in the bathroom to masturbate thinking of the little girl. We aren't sweeping pedophiles under the rug, that would mean they can roam free, which is not true cause pedophiles do get sent to jail (well, except from the "divine" pedophiles, if you know what I mean). What that site is trying to do is actually treat them as normal people, as if it's ok to be a pedophile.

    • He was describing how he came to realize he was a pedophile. His website is not trying to normalize pedophilia, he's trying to give people like him a safe space to support one another and to advocate for better mental health supports for people with pedophilic urges so that they can control them. He doesn't want to hurt children, and there are many others out there like him. When I say we've been sweeping it under the rug I mean that we pretend it isn't as big of an issue as it is and we ignore it until a child gets hurt. What we should be doing instead is being proactive. We need to be able to study people with these urges and provide them with therapy and other support to help them control and resist their urges so that kids don't end up getting hurt in the first place.

    • As long as people are treated as the devil incarnate for having those urges, they will not feel comfortable seeking the help they need. Obviously, anyone who actually touches a child deserves punishment and is a monster, but someone who has urges they do not want and who wants help to control those urges should not be treated like a monster - they should be given the help they need.

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

33 23
  • How is masturbating to the thought of a CHILD any better than actually harming him/her? FUCK NO. I wouldn't want anyone having those thoughts about my future children! Especially not when I am trusting that person to be alone with them.

    • Seriously this! My thoughts exactly! He DID do something. Luckily the child was unaware. But he still thought of them in that way. That to me is disturbing enough.

    • How is masturbating to the thought of an adult women any different than raping them? Well there's a world of a difference you see?

    • @IntrovertedHotGuy I don't remember when I posted this comment, but my views on this have changed a lot. Lol. Thoughts aren't harmful, but I think I reacted so strongly because it can sometimes get out of hand. It would take a lot of willpower to snuff the flames of a vivid, reoccurring fantasy, so it's better to just not entertain those thoughts at all. At the end of the day, how much control does someone have when it comes to grabbing someone close to them, assuming that they find that person attractive? Let's say you're alone with a smoking hot woman, and you think about doing something with her daily. How much control would you have? Or, uh, a man, if you're gay. I don't know. People can only contain their actions so much. If a guy can't spend time with a child without needing to go to the bathroom and jerk off, then what will happen when he gets too comfortable with it all? That's what I meant to say, whenever the fuck this was posted. The date is hidden of course.

    • Show All
  • Hell no, words are just words, sometimes people say things and their actions go another way.

  • Fuck no!!

    The only people who I'd allow to babysit my kids is my immediate family and close friends

  • No, of course I would never knowingly hire a pedophile to watch my child. But if this person has such good control over their behavior and appears so normal that I can't tell that they're a pedophile and I have no idea, then I will have no way to avoid hiring them, but the good thing is that if this is the case they probably don't pose any threat at all.

  • Of course not, but just to be clear, no one is trying to make being a pedophile okay.

    It's not, and everyone knows that, but the difference is in how you handle it. Do we create an environment where people admit it, get therapy to help control their urges, and keep away from children, before a child gets hurt? Or do we leave it at them being sick monsters, end of story, as we've been doing for ages and watch as none of them admit to it until it's too late?

    Liberals, and any conservatives involved in this, aren't trying to make pedophilia fine, they're trying to facilitate practical prevention and solutions.

    I'm not sure where the babysitting argument comes into this, since no one is suggesting we trust them near kids (not even this pedophile) - the exact opposite in fact, but if someone's a pedophile, it's better that we know that and do something about it early on.

  • I'd rather skip whatever it is I'm doing than to let a person who is sexually attracted to kids around the hypothetical baby. Man or woman, I will not allow anyone to put their filthy hands on that baby!!

  • I wish... there was a way that I could capture... my facial expression atm... in a gif as I read this question😒😑

    • Well imagine my face when I was watching that video and reading the article...

    • I didn't even watch the vid in fear of rising my blood pressure and wanting to become a vigilante.

    • Just saw it😒😧😠😬😡🔫💣🔪

  • gifsec.com/.../HAHA-NO-GIF.gif?gs=a

    Well, at least he is trying to control himself, and haven't hurt any child until now.

  • You love women. So should we keep you away from women just because you might rape one?

    isn't that the same thing?

    • Dude, that's not even close xD

    • its the same thing lol there are so many pedophiles IRL, you just dont know cause they are being decent. Even on gag a guy called Flak38 or whatever "dated" a 15 year old girl who is also a member., and he's 26 I think. But to answer your question no I would not trust a pedophile because I would rather have someone who isn't sexually attracted to my baby take care of it. However, there is no guarantee that the nanny I will hire isn't gonna be a pedophile.

  • Hell no. That's too much of a risk.

  • I may find it weird, but I won't discriminate against a pedophile as long as they don't do anything to harm my child or make them feel uncomfortable. Even so, I would not allow one to baby-sit my child. I don't want her to become objectified like that. I don't want to even think there is a possibility that some guy I have baby-sitting my kid will later on use her image to masturbate to. I find that disturbing. I will treat them like a normal human being, but I don't want them around my children like that.

  • No way in hell!

  • Nope. If I knew someone was a pedophile I wouldn't even let them interact with my kids with supervision. I wouldn't want them in my life at all. I don't care if they say they'll never act on it. Once I know someone has those thoughts, I wouldn't even be friends with them. I don't have kids but if I did, no way in hell.

  • The last option sounds more fitting

    • How do you manage to be so beautiful?

  • Nope, they can be the nicest person on the planet. Rather not risk them losing self control and end up doing something without meaning to do it.

  • No, but then again I wouldn't even let anyone outside of my immediate family babysit. My grandfather lived with a registered sex offender once and my parents barely even left me in the room with him.

  • Absolutely not. Are those people suggesting it on crack?

  • I wouldn't risk it.

  • Show More (36)