The topic of circumcision is controversial, no doubt about that. It can also be a deeply personal one. But in the United States, most parents will be faced with a decision to make about circumcision at some point. Expecting parents face a barge of information and opinions on the topic, and it can be hard to tell what's important from what's just noise. Add to all of that noise the fact that for many father's who are circumcised it can be hard to admit to themselves that they might be missing something, and have never experience being uncircumcised.
There are arguments with various levels of credibility about cleanliness, STDs, sensitivity, what future girls will want, if infants can remember the pain, interrupting breastfeeding, etc. It can be overwhelming.
My argument is one of choice. If parents chose to leave their sons intact, that leaves that choice for their child to make when they are old enough to make it. If parents chose to circumcise, that removes the ability for that child to make that choice. Choosing not to circumcise values their autonomy.
There are thousands of choices new parents will have to make. This one can be easy. Paint the nursery orange- you can paint over the orange if your child doesn't like it when they're 12. You can't undo a circumcision if they are unhappy with it later, but they can always choose circumcision for themselves when they're old enough to understand.
Most Helpful Guy