How many of you have seen a d*** that isn't circumsized, girls?

According to the media, and some friends I have in the west, most men in the US are circumsized. So is that true or do you have experience with that. Which do you prefer?
Updates:
+1 y
I look at it this way. A circumsised d*** is a lot more sensitive, so you can provide him greater pleasure, which I'd say is a plus. On the other hand, he'll come faster, so that'd be a neg.
+1 y
Yeah that's what I meant. It's late here and I'm high.
+1 y
That could be true for an experienced man. A virgin or a horny teenager is an entire different story.
+1 y
Oh and the hightened sensitivity for an uncircised d*** is not just because of the nerves in the skin. The head of the d*** is a lot more sensitive as well.
+1 y
Good point.
+1 y
Why is it more fun on a circumsized one? Is it because it stays clean easier? Is it because the skin can get in the way?
+1 y
I only have access to a crappy browser that won't let me use the comment button.
0 0

Most Helpful Guys

  • The percentage of men that are circumcised has changed a lot in the united states. At one point nearly no one was circumcised, So many of our grandfathers are not. Then it quickly went to 80% of boys being circumcised. This was largely do to the anti masturbation movement that believed that it would make masturbation less fun. There is a debate as to whether or not that it actually does make stimulation less enjoyable or not. Now I believe it is closer to 30 or 40% of boys being circumcised.

    • @ update. No he would not come faster. The experience becomes the norm for him. Plus there is evidence that sex with an uncircumcised man may be more pleasing for the woman, regardless of how long he lasts.

    • @ new update. Virgins and horny teenagers are almost always quick to cum. There would be no difference. They would be more use to higher levels of arousal during masturbation.

    • Yes the pants rubbing against the exposed head, will damage the sensitivity of the head of the penis over time.

  • It's the opposite here. People only get circumcised here for religious and medical purposes

Most Helpful Girls

  • I live in the United States. My best friend is uncircumcised, but it seems that the majority of my other friends are. There are some studies that say that it is decreasing every year, others say it is on the rise. I guess it depends on the source. I don't have a preference, a penis is a penis.

    • @ update, isn't it the other way around? Doesn't the foreskin have more nerve endings or whatever so uncircumcised would be more sensitive?

  • I've been with both and it wouldn't be a deal breaker, but it's a lot more pleasant to go down on a guy who is circumcised. I love that my boyfriend is and he definitely gets a lot more head because of it.

    • Like Butterfly said, comment under the answers, please.

  • Yes, my boyfriend is uncircumcised. I think it's becoming more and more common in the United States. I prefer uncircumcised but I'm definitely not going to turn down a guy just because he is circumcised.

    • Can you stop updating? You do realize you can post comments under the answer don't you?

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

3 1
  • I've been with both and don't really have a preference either way. My boyfriend is uncircumcised though and I like what he has a lot.

  • I've been with both circumcised and uncircumcised men, and I don't have a preference.

  • never. I've never been with someone who wasn't. but then again, I've only been with 2 guys

  • Its most likely true, 60% of US guys are cut now link so its more normal there

    • "1871 M.J. Moses declares that circumcised Jews are immune to masturbation" LOL

    • yeah, this is how stupid the system is in place that has fooled everyone into thinking not being cut is bad. They need to read up on the history