So i see on gag sometimes when a guy post a question saying he can't bring himself to find women over 30 or 25 or some age attractive or won't date them that he's met with backlash. On both male and female sides people start posting up celebrities over this age group who are dolled up in professional makeup as an argument. Some girls and guys even leave a remark that the person is limiting their dating pool and missing out on great girls because he is narrow minded. The same can be said when a man has a problem wanting to not date a girl who is pass a particular weight.
Yet, when women don't want to date guys younger than them, when women don't want to date guys shorter than them, when women don't want to date guys who are below a particular height, when women don't want to date guys who don't have a degree or make X number of dollars a year. People have no problem with it. No one tells women they are close minded and limiting their dating pool by only wanting men who fit these cookie cutter criteria traits. No one post up pictures of men who are short and great husbands/BF as a counter argument.
We all accept the women's choice and leave it at that. Why is it women are allowed to have standards but men are not?
Why is male preference demonized but female preference is socially accepted?
Post Opinion
24 Opinion
Like
Share
Follow
What is your opinion?
Add Opinion
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
I feel like you're lumping questions and comments here together, and that's skewing your view.
Okay, so people basically post their preferences in one of two ways:
As a question: "Hey everyone, I only like men/women with feature X, is that bad?"
Or as a comment to a question "I only like guys/girls with X".
If you post your preference as a question, you are being deliberately incendiary and you are ~inviting~ people to tell you how narrow-minded you are.
If you are posting your preference in response to a question, you are not likely to get that same reaction.
If you were to find a question on this site stating "I only like super-fit guys who are at least 6'4 and have eleven inch cocks, is that bad?" I simply don't believe you would find hordes of comments from men and women saying "Yeah, I totally get it, that's reasonable as fuck", because that's a bitch question.
However, you probably WILL find plenty of women saying "I like guys who are taller/have bigger cocks/are super fit" when they are ~responding~ to questions asking things like "Do girls like short guys?" or "Do girls like big cocks" or "Do I need to be super fit to get a girlfriend"?
But the same is also true for men. If you come out with a question that serves no other purpose but to state what your preferences are. It's kind of an asshole thing to do, and you're are asking people to come tell you how narrow-minded you're being.
But no guy is getting reamed for saying "I only like fit girls" when responding to a question from a woman that says "Do guys think that back fat is sexy?". Because they're stating their preference in response to a question about preference.
So It's really less about what your preference actually is, and more about whether or not you're being a dick when talking about it. And when you ask a question that serves no other real purpose than to let people know what your preference is, you're being a bitch, and it's going to set people off.
"Why is it women are allowed to have standards but men are not?" because we have a women loving, yet men hating society going on, right? That also likes to kiss their ass and tell them that 'you only deserve the best or to not lower your standards" to make others happy lol.
While we as men are expected to take anything that comes our way for some reason and if we complain about it we're considered "pussies and or picky". Yet for them on the otherhand, they're expected to be the choosers of society, that'll only make the choice the moment the "perfect" guy walks into the pic (never expected to settle for less).
This was taken from one of girls on a question asking women to date down financial. What do you think?
"No absolutely not. I will never lower my standards and I will never "date down". Either I get a guy that I truly want or I stay single. You see, me and a lot of other girls, don't feel like we need a relationship. Would it be nice? Yes! Do I sometimes miss not having a boyfriend right now? Yes! But at the end of the day, I don't want a relationship with just someone, anyone. I want a relationship with the "perfect" (in my eyes) guy. If I can't have that then a relationship is pretty worthless to me. I have my own money, my own apartment, my own friends and family, I can travel/go out to eat/go to the beach/movies or whatever on my own or with friends/family. I could even get a friends with benefits to sleep with and cuddle with if I wanted (I don't though).
When I want kids I can have them either with a guy friend, a gay man or sperm donor. So what would a boyfriend that I don't truly want to be with add to my life? I would have to share my life with someone I don't even want and I would have to have sex with the guy on a regular basis, even though I'm not even attracted to him. Why would I want that? So, no. I will not date a guy I don't want to be with."
Everyone has their own preferences and things they like. No one is under any obligation to date a certain people. I'm sure you are literally now just knit picking that it's always men who are being criticized over it and basing it off GAG and the internet.. God, I know many guys who have rejected girls for many reasons often lack of physical attraction. It happens and no one makes even nearly of a big deal of it in real life or in person. In fact, I could argue that women get flack all the time for rejecting someone cause then automatically she gets told she wants to date assholes and bad guys cause she rejects someone she's simply just NOT attracted to or feel chemistry with. I see it daily on here.
Because in the majority of the animal kingdom the female does the choosing NOT the male. The women can find sperm anywhere because sperm is cheap and the womb is not. Women can only have 1-3 children at a time so they HAVE TO BE picky. Men don't have to picky because they can impregnate hundreds or thousands of women. Women control reproduction/sex. That is an indisputable fact. The only time a man becomes something close to being a chooser is if he has so many females to pick from that he can't even count. This is due to the fact that the male is either ridiculously good-looking, rich or powerful or all 3 and MOST MEN are not any of those things. Like the saying goes beggars can't be choosers.
Its true men would not have had any reason to be picky about just sex. However men would have incentive to be picky about who they invest resources and become exclusive with.
@ThisDudeHere Because women KNOW these facts subconsciously and only open their legs for those they consider high value in their opinion. If we opened up our legs to just anyone not only would we get pregnant by any scumbag, there would be a lot uglier, stupider, psychopaths walking around today. Plus pregnancy takes a hell of a toll on a woman so if we're going to suffer through that PLUS bring an innocent life into this world then the man better be worth it. @Bandit74 Yeah but that doesn't change the fact that women do the choosing no matter how much men delude themselves into thinking that they have any say in the matter. When men do the choosing it's called rape. The most "choosing" men can do is ignoring a woman they don't like. You didn't choose the woman you're with she simply ALLOWED you to touch her. My (very objectively handsome) father even told me this. Women do the picking not the man.
I don't see anybody doing that. First of all from a evolutionary stand point a majority of men being hyper-picky is relatively new. Hyper-Pickiness in men ONLY works if you're super good-looking, powerful or rich. For one, most men (even cute ones) don't get hit on by women left and right. So being picky is only going to hurt you especially if you're average or below-average. Even if you did find the girl attractive followed her around like a lost puppy and ignored the other unattractive ones you STILL are not actually doing the picking. You can stare at an attractive women all day long but if she doesn't consent to you because she finds you attractive then you're just going to be labeled a creep that needs to be avoided at all costs.
By definition, unless the guy doesn't have any alternatives, he is choosing too.
Also I have seen numerous questions on this site where the girl is hooking up with a guy and wants to know how to get him to commit. In those scenarios it definitely seems like the guy has more leverage.
For sex girls are pickier because they have more to lose, but for commitment guys are pickier because they are investing more and have more to lose.
Noone says a man needs to have a certain job and make certain amount of money its 2016 not 1950. Get out of a mindset that generally doesn't apply to the modern world unless you come across female gold diggers. Women are far more lenient in looks period. Women settle for looks, quality of sex... etc for a guy who makes them feel loved and equal. Men care about the looks way more than women do this is fact and women are held up to a standard much higher than women hold men upto. But have no fear, women are too learning they dont need to settle and they have the right to be picky about looks as well.
No most woman dont like a man to be taller than them. If they did it would be a breeze. Most woman want a man to be taller than them by a certain amount.
I'll give you a personal example. When I was in highschool I was rejected by my crush for being too short. I am 5'9 she was 5'7, obviously I am taller than her. But still not tall enough. So I am too sure on how woman are more lenient on looks than men
@drkcmana like i said if women only went after guys 6 ft that is like 10 percent or less of males in the u. s, and the 90 percent of you would be doing eachother. One experience you had does not represent a billions
I can completely understand where you are coming from. There are double standards both ways. But, it's not always necessarily true. Typically women will date short, ugly, fat, etc. guys as long as they make up for it in some other way. In my experience I often hear women say, "oh, I won't date such and such, he's too short," and then end up marrying the guy. Men, on average, will typically not date someone below their own physical attractiveness regardless of personality traits, on the whole we are a more shallow breed. This is less cultural, and more the natural design of male vs. female. Men are programmed to seek out attractive mates to pass on those attributes to their offspring, and women are programmed to seek that much less so. Women are in fact programmed to seek out survivors, providers, alpha males, etc. Looks take a back seat to these things usually. I know feminists will rip me a new one for expressing an obvious scientific fact, but here's my argument. We lived in a very different world 2000 or however many years ago. Men were the hunters, they were sought after for their ability to provide. I'm sorry, but litteraly any woman could learn how to knit and grow corn, the level of hunting skill varied from man to man, and was usually a matter of brute strength. Now a days, these roles don't make much sense, since the genders are equally able to provide or so pretty much anything useful. But we aren't about to re-wire our brains in a matter of a couple centuries.
MARRY THE GUY=/= She finds him desirable. Women get desperate they lower their standards and the guy she marries isn't the guy she wants to be with. I've seen all to often girls reach an age where the guy they want to settle down and marry isn't ready yet and they dump him and get some other guy who she doesn't really like that much but willing to commit to marry her.
Menn will not date someone below their physical attractiveness is again bs and your deluded by this through the use of makeup on women's face. Men date down in looks often these days too. I see plenty of fit guys going out with skinny fat, and overweight girls.
And your whole argument comes tumbling down when you factor in the fact women still want men to hold onto traditional dating roles while absolving themselves of any responsiblities.
Yet, women still want to date up economically for resources (i. e. guys who make more money than them), still want guys taller than them to feel protected and safe, still expect men to be the unofficial body guard in relationship and still expect men to lead.
So women have basically thrown away their responsibilities while asking men to maintain there. Men still have to approach women, still have to plan dates, still have to be the initators for sex.
@BubbleBoy69 I'm just talking about averages here. There will exceptions to any broad generalization. But, in very few cases will anyone marry anyone that they don't find desirable on some level, that's just silly. Go out and count how many couples you see where the man is more attractive than the woman, and compare that to the other way around. It is ridiculously in favor of the ladder. And, as I said that is not anyone's fault, nor is it cultural influence. It's genetic design pure and simple. We are at our core, animals that operate instinctively. But yes, women will settle, where men probably won't more often than not. That was basically my point. Women are genetically coded to find a mate that will support them and that they can reproduce with, as I said, it doesn't make much sense anymore, but the coding is still there.
Half the problem is that your arguments are verging into the realm of mysogeny, where as mine are just abject ice scientific realities. I can't debate science while you are debating culture. And relax dude, women aren't evil.
You gave a case of women marrying a guy she considered too short or unattractive. A woman marrying you she tends to lower physical attraction and factor in things like financial resources, stability. 70% of divorces are initiated by women and the number one cause is over money. You are underestimating how many women marry guys for resources, money, stability at a particular age (late 20's and 30's) and not for love. Hence, why they eventually hold resentment for the man and divorce him because he's not the guy she wanted to be with.
I can go out and count that on average when i look at couples the man and women are of equal looks. i see on gag and real life people often elivate girl's scores and downgrade men. You want a key idea if a woman finds you desirable then see if she is willing to date you when she is young and had options. If she isn't willing to date this guy in her prime then she doesn't find him that desirable.
Guys who are male models but we don't mention it are getting scores like 6/10 and 7/10 from men and women on gag. Meanwhile basic girls who slap on maekup are being told they are 10/10 and 9/10 on here.
It's your perception perhaps because you don't find men attractive that you think women are better looking than men when really couples tend to be in same ball park in looks.
The only time a girl is way better looking than the guy is when the guy is rich in most cases.
And you said women will settle right. And I agree they settle when they become desperate. Men however, tend to not settle so much because all their baskets aren't tied to their looks but money/resources/status. So a guy who has lots of these has a choice between getting with a 30 year old woman or a 20 year old.
He'll pick the 20 year old not because he doesn't want to settle because he has no need to his value has gone up. What you and many men don't realize is men value go up as they age.
Women value starts out high when they are young (17-24 yr) old range and goes down each year. So a woman coming to you when she is 29 or 34 may not in fact because she finds you desirable because she realize less men are paying her attention, less men want to commit, by age 30 (90% of a woman's eggs are gone). She can't be so picky on her standards and lowers them or else face being child less when menopause kicks in. She picks a man who she might have very little to no sexual attraction towards and choose him to pump her full of sperm and give her the kid she wants and support her.
And that is what realistically happen most of the time when women find THEMSELVES in their late 20's and 30 age group.
@BubbleBoy69 now I'm pretty positive you are pulling that statistic out of your ass. There's no good way to collect that data, but from the majority of what I have read, most marriages end due to either irreconcilable differences, which can mean anything, or infidelity, where typically the man was at fault. As for the rest, you are basically proving my point. Women think on a different wave length then men. The man who makes money, is today's better hunter, it doesn't matter if they are short or ugly. This doesn't make women greedy, it makes them part of evolutionary design. If you understand that, you'll get women, if not, good luck.
@BubbleBoy69 my point is. A man that wouldn't get a swipe right in tinder to save his life, can actually become physically attractive to women simply by being confident, successful, etc. A woman in the same situation will still appear unattractive to men regardless of success. I know this is hard to understand, because you litteraly can't think like that, but that's really the point. I'd just count your blessings that you were born the gender dealt the better cards in this instance.
We always here women are strong and independent. We hear women don't need to cook, clean anymore gender roles are sexist but yet stay quite and still want marry up, still want guys taller, still want guy who have high social status.
We hear women say they marry or date you for love and how they make their own money now and aren't with men for their money. Yet, so money still want men who have a lot of cash. Yet so many still only want to date men who make more than them.
So obviously women still want to old onto the gender role that benefits them. Yet, when want to hold onto the old primitive plot/script of finding a young, fertile woman to impregnate rather than a woman who is closing in on menoapuse you somehow think he is on a different wavelength to women.
Men are following the same caveman/women script from long ago. Women have their own money but want to date/marry up. Men want young, fertile women to bear their children rather than a woman in her 30's approaching menopause sooner.
And you would be very wrong. Ugly Women actually do hell of a lot better in online dating and places like tinder than average men who are more attractive than them.
Men are thirsty these days and while you are right that men can increase their self worth through being more wealthy, confidence (somewhat BS), having high social status. A man's value initially in life start off low. A man who worked and built himself up is rewarded. He gets access to more female attention, more women wanting him as a parrtner.
A study was actual done which showed that when it comes physical attraction more men find majority of men physically attractive. While women find only a small subset of men attractive.
Hence, why some guys can basically write "want to fuck" and get a girl over like that. While another guy would have to go on several dates and win her over.
The point being i'm getting at is men are more gracious and give more women a chance. The average woman has a LARGER NUMBER OF SUITORS.
The Average man has A WWAAY SMALLER NUMBER OF WOMEN INTERESTED. So each sex has inbalance in attraction.
Men tend to think most women are attractive so you'll find it's spread across evenly in terms of attraction, people interested in you etc. Of course the more attractive girl will have more of this and less attractive would less. So it's like a bell curve with women.
While for men it's a lot less even out. The average guy has some girls interested him but probably like 5 or 6. The hot guy has like mini harem of like 30 girls who are trying to get at his dick while the ugly guy has like near 0 to 1
So i really don't feel sorry to women. They have options when they are young even when they are old they have options but they picky and a lot of them take good opportunities for granted and only get off cloud 9 when they are in their 30's or late 20's.
@BubbleBoy69 yes, lol. I think we agree that this is primal and not cultural. So, this goes back to my original point. Woman do not place nearly as much emphasis on looks as men, we're all shallow, just in different ways. Women are not critizied for emphasizing looks, because in practice they will rarely marry a guy based solely on physical attraction.
And again marriage is dying these days and marriage =/= she finds you attractive. You think married women is going to stop a woman from cucking you and sleeping behind your back? You think divorce is bad for women? Most divorces end with women getting cash prize, most of the property and custody of the children.
Women do care about looks. The difference in our points is you think marriage=love or attraction. Marriage is about survvial, money, security.
If you truly want to know if a woman loves or finds you attractive then see if she would date you in her youth not when she's an old woman.
Um, yea, if a girl says I only want to date wealthy guys she's typically called a gold digger and shallow. And it's pretty much accepted that guys don't want to date fat girls (that's why there's so much pressure on women to be thin). Also there a fairly big difference between saying I don't want to date a woman who's x amount of years older than me and saying I don't want to date women who are in their thirties. Plus most women aren't like “hey, everyone on the internet, I won't date short guys" were as the guys you're trying to defend fill compelled to tell everyone why women over thirty ate undatable. I mean listen you can have whatever standards and opinions that you want, but if you post in on the internet whenever possible be prepared to get criticism for it. I'm a Christian, and I mention it a fare amount in my answers, and I use Christian reasoning when answering questions/giving opinions. And I know, and accept that people are going to criticize me because of it. So, I'm not going to be like “this is so unfair, poor me, whenever I share my faith people are mean to me, boo hoo hoo." Point is stop with the pity party. If those are your standards their your standards, and if you feel a need to tell everyone them than accept that some people are going to knock you for it. Like the old saying goes, if you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen.
Because when it comes to looks, women are generally have far more fragile egos than men do. As long as the guy isn't a super self absorbed body builder, most guys recognize their level of attractiveness/unattractiveness fairly accurately and can take criticism of it fairly dispassionately. For a portion of women, their dream scenario is a world where they can keep a piece of paper in their pocket listing all the things they are unattracted to in a man, while having the freedom to prevent men from carrying a list of their own... basically giving them all the selection power. It's partly a product of the hypersensitive culture we live in today. A lot of people just can't accept that their are others in the world who don't see them or people who look like them as attractive. This goes for men as well, but women get a free pass for it more often in my opinion
", their dream scenario is a world where they can keep a piece of paper in their pocket listing all the things they are unattracted to in a man, while having the freedom to prevent men from carrying a list of their own... basically giving them all the #selection power" EXACTLY what Iw as trying to say LOL.
I don't #endure it IMHO because I never allow myself to face it. And "it" in this case = allowing for a woman to "pick" me out of a line of dudes that are chasing after her. Because just like you said it, "it gives her all of the selection power while putting me at her mercy" which is a big no-no for me. Like meet me half way or it ain't shit to talk about hahahaha.
And just like them, I have standards while also know that I have a lot of sexual market value. So hey "2 can truly play at their game" in this case lol #NoSweatOffMyBack.
We catch shit all the time for saying "he's not my type".
I can't tell you how many times people have scoffed and/or told me to just give a guy a shot because I never know, despite telling them already that he isn't my type.
Like just because someone is interested in me I'm supposed to be grateful and give him a chance, even if he's physically unappealing to me and I find his personality weaker than the titanic faced with an iceberg? No.
You're right. There's nothing wrong with having a type and all that. The problem is the hypocrisy of it all. And it comes from both genders admittely from us guys as well. My point is that if you're a girl and you say you only date guys that are 6 feet tall. Thats fine, but you have absolutely no right to complain when guys say they want woman young, curvy, with hourglass figure and big booty and big boobs. I dont know about you, but I think a lot of men would get bashed for being open about such prefernces.
This tends to only happen online, cause online is where you'll find the biggest amount of misandrists, bitter, ugly and fat women. Ugly women don't want to face the fact that it's gonna be hard for them to find a guy that's attracted to them, so they want to shame guys who don't find them attractive in order to make it more "acceptable" to like fat and ugly chicks.
In real life you'll rarely find a girl complaining about your preferences.
Because men who think like that are a waste of time. This is something a 40 year old knows, a 30 year old knows, 20 year old knows etc. These men will never commit because they only want you for sexual satisfaction. We all grow older, it is something we can't help. If a man only loves us when we are young, what does that say about him? He is a douche.
I currently like a shorter guy so please save that to yourself. It's one thing to prefer a guy to have certain characteristics and another to only want a young girl.
What if the "certain characteristics" the guy prefers are those that are more common in younger woman and older woman like smooth skin and firm body. Can a guy then say he prefers a girl with smooth skin and go for that (which in this case would mostly younger woman)
It's retarded. Any man who puts an expiration date on a woman is a douchebag. That man only sees our outer appearance and not our soul and therefor he does not deserve our respect. If you happen to fall in love with a younger woman... that's another issue. But if you actively seek younger women you are a douhebag. Sorry but it's my opinion.
@drkcmana when you meet that person who rocks your boat you forget about what you liked before. I thought I liked tall guys but I fell madly in love with a guy shorter than me... what people say they like and what they are actually attracted to is two different things. We are not out physical attributes. Our presence, our personality, our confidence will be a deal breaker most of the time.
Its the hypocrisy I am trying to bring to attention. Any girl who has a height requirement for a guy, forexample won't date a guy below 6'1, has no right. And I mean no right to bash men who have age and look requirements on a girl. Its a two way street.
@drkcmana No you can't compare those too. What about guys who have boob requirements? Only double DD? I find that more reasonable than age requirement. There is not a bigger douchebag than a man who only wants to date young women. Guys want a tight ass, nice figure, pretty face. If a girl wants to date a tall guy why not? Plenty girls who will date a shorter guy. Plenty guys who will date a girl with smaller breats. But that age requirement shows that the man is in for himself. He is not interested in that girl as a person, he wants her youth and he is the biggest douchebag out there. I see plenty men in their 50's wanting a girl who is my age. That to me is sick. As I said if a older man falls in love with a younger woman (genuinely) I see no problem in that. But if he actively seeks young girls there is something wrong with him.
The sickening feeling you get from 50 year old men chasing younger woman is exactly the same way I feel about woman that place height requirements on me.
@drkcmana yeah, they say that, but they really don't care. It may be harder for a short guy to break the ice, but attractive woman will still date you if hey like other traits.
@Nothanks700 I just cannot agree with you on it being something they just say. You can make it up for by being succesful, highly educated, financially stable and buff as a brick house. Thats still work in progress for me (I am 21) However I cannot agree with you because I will always be haunted by a personal experience in highschool where I was rejected by a girl for being too short. I am 5'9 and she was 5'7. I was taller but no tall enough. Therefore I have zero respect for woman who put goes through these requirement and then cry about how much pressure guys put on them to look a certain way.
@drkcmana I'm 5'6 and I'd be totally fine with your height. For me it was always my height or taller. But now I like a guy shorter than me... A lot of his taller friends like me but I choose him because they are not as charismatic as he is.
@drkcmana yeah that sucks man, but it's also anecdotal. You are making a pretty broad generalization. 5'9" isn't exactly short, I'd say it's average. I know a literal small person 4 feet or so, and he gets more action than me and the rest of my friends combined. It's about confidence. If you make a big deal out of your height, so will they. I know plenty of girls that are into short guys as a preference.
Men have higher expectations. Most believe they DESERVE a hot 20 something year old. Women are just doing what men do. Why is no one saying anything about it? Men have been "deserving" of hot younger women forever. Its gotten old hearing about it. Women are now realising they "deserve" a hot guy too.
3
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
The way women traditionally would prefer society to be organized has been considered the good or right way for some time now. It's a complex phenomenon having to do with cultural, political and economic changes.
Because it seems better for women a lot of men seem to think it's some kind of conspiracy or power grab by women but really it's the result of forces no one is controlling.
Actually, I have been here for about 2 years and I have seen a lot of women bashing by men (for the very things you mentioned) on this site. My question is, why are people so miserable that they have to bash others to begin with?
As a 20 y/o female, I find young female chasers repulsive, this is why I don't date older dudes. Ie: A 38 y/o doesn't want to date a 36 y/o woman cause she's old? Ummm honey you're "old" too, and you're a hypocrite on top of that.
As a 5'9 guy I find tall male chasers repulsive. Literally, whenever I hear a girl say a guy needs to be a certain height for her to date him I feel like throwing up.
But I guess its more acceptable for woman to have height requirements but not for men to have age and other shallow requirements.
@BubbleBoy69 That woman's a hypocrite, besides fat girls can loose weight, short guys can't grow taller though, which is something that absolutely pisses me off!
I'm pretty sure they'd be a hypocrite if they said they don't want to date an older woman for whatever reason or belief (usually relating to morals) and then did it. I don't think the person being old too is relevant if the guy just wasn't attracted to older women. If that were true, wouldn't a guy saying they don't date men, yet they are a man, be hypocritical lol? Funny concept.
@cavmanier I am actually Ok with dating an older man who doesn't really have an age requirement, as in, he just dates a woman he likes, and if she happens to be like um 23 then OK no problem, as long as he doesn't specifically hunt for younger preys because women his age are past their "consumption time", I have seen questions from older dudes here saying he applied for college OnLY (over 35) to see hot young student girls , so cringy :/
I can see hearing someone saying a woman over 25 or 30 being "expired" as being pretty offensive. It's not really true. If a girl keeps her body attractive, in my opinion they can look attractive a lot beyond 30.
I bet it can be pretty gross to get that kind of attention from a guy twice your age or older. It's kind of terrible how many guys do seek you young women. I mean because older women want love too, and the though of being sought because of your looks feels pretty bad.
Yeah I think you're seeing only what you want to see.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(30-35)
+1 y
Because it's okay to demonize men, if you demonize women, you're sexist. No one wants to be called a hateful bigot. Apparently, even women can't go against it.
We still treat women as though they are snowflakes just on the brink of being shattered. It turns out that no one, including the women, are doing much to stop that.
Most Helpful Opinions