There's no "absolute" or "factual" answer to this.
It all depends on the person questioned.
One person might like very thin legs, then next may like incredibly thick legs.
In my case, I'm an avid lover of women with thicker legs. I find it incredibly attractive.
I don't mean to offend or oppose anyone's view on them, but in my opinion, thin or smaller legs just aren't much fun to me.
I find no satisfaction in them.
My girlfriend is very attractive. She's short, and her frame is small to fit her height. But she's thick for her size, and I love it.
Her legs are gorgeous and they're insanely enjoyable to rub, squeeze, and to admire/look at.
I'm just not the biggest fan of skinny or thin. Thicker women are beautiful to me.
But the size of the legs more than often comes from one of two things. Muscle or Fat.
Honestly I don't discriminate one from the other unless it's in excessive proportions.
Too much muscle is intimidating and scary to me. Too much fat is unhealthy and can be a turn off depending on how it's carried (IE if the skin looks soft and smooth, compared to the all too notorious "cottage cheese" legs.)
But again, it all comes down to individual opinion.
Some like excessive muscle, and some like excessive amounts of fat. Some even like minuscule of both and enjoy thin/skinny legs.
All IMO:
1 ... uh ... definitely thick. IMHO she'd look better thinner, but I'd still smash.
2 ... same, even more so. She carries well. She doesn't need white girl thin thighs, if she were still slightly thick she'd look great. Slightly thick is wear she should be aiming for looking optimal
3 she's white so obviously fine. J/k. ... they look good, best so far ...
4 looks photoshopped. Uhm, they're really full.
5 yeah, fat
6 muscular. would look equally good slimmer, doesn't need to though. similar to 3, bigger, but same idea.
7 a bit fat, and it shows in the texture.
So in summary, 3 and 6 look great, 1, 2 and probably 4 I'd prefer slimmer but still arousing, 5, 7 fat.
@Update ... yikes. I actually -like- thinner women then most men, and those legs were borderline too thin for me in the first. The second, same thing, and odd proportions. on the blond. I mean her body is okay, but its nowhere near ideal. Why is her rib cage so small compared to her shoulders? Half way between first update and girl 3 in the first set is probably 'ideal'.
the shirt gives the illusion that her rib cage is small
I'm holding a thumb over it. Her ribs and hips match each other, but seem too small for her shoulders, which match her head and height fine. Its ... a little odd. Not like 'eww she's hideous' but she's not ideal.
Third one - Not too bad, but I wouldn't want my legs to look like that. It won't look too good in dresses..
I really like the sixth one. - Tone/muscular but not too much.
The last one - Oh gosh! No way man.
I don't like the rest of them either..
1 yes, 2-not really because they are in propertion to her body 3-no4-i can't tell cause that ass is so humungo 5 no, her upper body is just fat,6 no 7 yes
They are not all fat, but they are all ugly & extreme. Either too muscly or too thick or too flabby
Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions
What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!do not really like the last pair, but all the others are AMAZINGLY appealing :)
1 - kinda
2 - yes
3 - no
4 - no
5 - legs no, torso yes
6 - dear god no. DAT ASS.
7 - yes
Fairly simple guide is cellulite or a swollen look = bad.
@update: first link - hell no, too thin. Second - more like it but still prefer a bit more on the bone
I think they're sexy.
I find the 6th link the best looking butt and legs.
The size is not the issue. The issue is whether or not it comes from muscle or from fat. Thicker legs can look good when the size comes from squats, lunges, and sprints. But when it comes from eating Cinnabons while sitting through marathons of Real Housewives then it looks utterly atrocious.
Yes... they are "thick". I like the second last one though. She isn't fat. Just muscular.
There are a couple in there with very muscular legs. Which is fine. I like an active girl.
The rest just have a lot of fat coating their legs.
3 is muscular not fat, 4 is a combination of fat and muscle and 6 isn't fat. The rest are... especially 7.
@update...Those girls are under weight. When your bones stick out like that or their isn't enough cushioning between the bone and skin bruising of the legs and hips. It sucks.
Your leg size is affected by your butt size, so, the ones who have "large" thighs, probably have large butts
1. They look a little flabby
2. Yes those are fat
3. No, they're perfect and toned
4. too muscular
5. HOT DAMN! INCREDIBLE
6. Her legs specifically don't look fat although the picture is photoshopped so you can't really tell but the rest is
7. Those are justt muscular with no real ass
7 is muscular?
link
lmao
ahh sorry lol, I guess I f***ed up with the numbering. no they aren't
eww, the updates are nasty as hell. I want to feed them. I see stilts not lets. I don't think that's healthy to encourage
My opinion goes:
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Muscular
4. Yes
5. A little, her stomach is though
6. Muscular
7. Yes
Not attractive though imo. Just not my thing.
@Update, yes thin legs are a lor more attractive. However those might be going on a little too thin. Pic one I find them a little thin. Pic 2 the girl on the right and the girl on the left pretty much have perfect legs imo.
I know thin legs are more attractive but whenever I post pictures of thin legs I get called anorexic or told that I'm pro-ana...I have muscular legs and I've asked for advice on how to thin them down but all I get are anorexic comments on here
Yeah it's just opinion. A lof of guys (In north America) are into what I'd call fat legs. If they call you anorexic for wanting a different body than what they like, f*** em. Thinning down muscular legs is tougher than thinning fat legs cause the legs are already toned. So you'll need to actually loose muscle. 2 ways to do that: -Overtrain your legs and consume too little protein + carbohydrates to recover -Or stop training your legs entirely + eat healthy, takes longer probably better though
Most of those legs looked great.
I think only the last one is in the "rather unacceptable" zone only because of cellulite. Most of the others are OK because at least they look toned.
Sometimes, I don't understand the down arrows. Personally, I don't give down arrows if I don't agree. I only give them if it is something plain wrong. So in this case I guess either the rater has legs like the last one or his wife has them.
Seriously? +1 happy? it doesn't even affect your points, my goodness
:) Thank you. But I have never looked at my points.
all those legs look hot.
Links 1,2,4,5 and 6 that you put up are all amazing legs. Link 3 did not work and Link 7 was the only disgusting one because they look flabby and cottage cheesy, not toned in the slightest.
Those legs are not fat at all!
I liked them... besides them being minorities.
the second to last -- OMG! WOW!
1. fat
2.
3. muscular soccer legs
4. fat
5. good
6. muscular soccer legs
7. fat and cellulite
lots of digital nips & tucks lol
2-3 of them are okish from what I can tell but none are what id like
I personally think these legs/hips/thighs are hot.
If other guys like skinny women then good for them.
Each to their own.
Myself I don't mind women who have a bit of extra as I see it as healthy.
My girlfriend says she is overweight, and doesn't feel good about herself.
I say to her she is even more beautiful than the first day I met her, and we have been together over 2 years and are very happy.
Sexual Relationships 
Sexual Health 
Most Helpful Guys