Most Helpful Guy
The logic behind no-fault divorce rises out of the fact that before it's wide adoption, it was common for divorcing couples to fabricate fault acceptable to the court. This most often took the form of "irreconcilable differences". This process necessitated a civil court trial. No-fault divorce achieves a similar result without the cost of a civil trial. Additionally, at-fault divorce with fabricated testimony has the effect of diminishing respect for the court and the law. If people were willing to perjure themselves just to be rid of a spouse, it makes sense that divorce not be so onerous a process.
Most Helpful Girl
Nobody else's business.
Two people involved would know far better how they feel, than relatives and other outsiders. Anyone but the couple have no businesses trying to interfere as they are not the ones IN the relationship, they're not the ones to deal with whatever bullshit that's within it, so their input is biased.
Trying to stop unhappy people from leaving an unhappy marriage is beyond retarded.
It actually makes me extremely angry that one of my friend's family guilt tripped her into staying with an abusive raping husband, because "divorce is wrong" and their religious convictions.