Biologically a child needs a woman much more then a man
who made up that lie TV the child needs both the parents now if the men knew what i knewso many women would be killed and rightly sothey are not allowed to take a child away from the father unless under physical abuse
No that's the ways life was designed. Have you ever thought of why a woman can only have kids till like 45 and a man can have kids whenever? Because nature designed it so that women can raise a kid till the kids full development (22) and still be alive.
LOL WHAT!!!(No that's the ways life was designed)tell that to the single fathers where the mother left literally right away hun stop believing a lie
I'm not believing a lie I'm just telling you how evolution sculpted nature. Just because some women are asses does not mean anything. And by the way there are many more single mothers then single fathers.
see hun you believe you came from a monkey I believe i came from GODme and you have a totally different process of thought
I believe I came from a unicellular prokaryote which arose in the early conditions of the atmosphere, which is how all life formed, over 3.6 billion years. Not through god.
i believe carbon dating potassium argon datinglead datinguranium datingetcdon't give actually dates but random numbers this seal was only a few years old why is it dated as 1300https://jesus-abc.com/img/SEAL2.jpgbefore any dating method was formed the geologic column was formed in the head of Charles lyell and a few others stating that the earth was millions of years oldyet they had no science behind it, they just made it up off the top of there headand put it in a book called (principals of geology) now lets look at the geologic column 4.bp.blogspot.com/.../StrataColumnRayTroll.jpg how does something like this get under ground no teeth marks from other animals in very good condition, made a big flood, water, dirt, pressure sounds about right svpow.files.wordpress.com/.../...-jango-elbow.jpeg
if you wanna debate i will make evolution look like a jokehun you learned from school i learned from my own personnel study
You can't make facts look like a joke. Especially since it's hard to understand what you're saying because your English isn't the best so I don't think we can have a debate.
you say the earth is 3.6 billions how did you get that date?
Earth is 4.6 billion years old (byo). We can arrive at this number very simply by carbon dating the crust of the earth (at least that's how I think it would be done).
okay so i just showed you that a seal was only a few years in age was dated 1300 years oldnow that's carbon dating a 98% inaccuracy yet you trust it when it comes to the age of the earth yet actually written history without any dating methods goes only 5000 to 6000 years old let me show you the truth about the DNA of monkeys and humans its not 98% its more like 54% https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24DnTk3YCVo
I don't get what you're saying sorry. That's the problem you don't know how to communicate your thoughts.
okay you wanna be stupid bye
Sure dude go ahead and believe everything the bible tells you
its not my fault you dont study cause if you could you would prove your caseget me scientific evidence then visual evidencehun you have nothing plus my bible is more accurate then any thing in those texts books
I'm in med school right now so trust me I study this stuff.Transition fossils: example- Tiktaalikwww.earthhistory.org.uk/wp-content/Tiktaalik.jpgTiktaalik had scales and fin like a normal fish but unlike normal fishes it had a neck and had unusual placement of eyes. What does that mean? It was likely a transition organism between fish and amphibians.That's just one example I can list off hundreds of pieces of evidence such as this.
so because of a different eye placement its a transition lolDO YOU HEAR WHAT YOUR SAYING?hey this girl is cross eyed she is a different transition of human lol WHAT!!!the truth is I don't blame you,,, i went to school just like you didthe difference is i wanted to understand where they got these ideasthat it billions of years old that some how humans lost there taillol now that i have studied it out its a joke i mad at myself for ever believing in it let me show you what real evidence looks like okay
There is a lot of evidence. Look at DNA sequences. 99% of our sequences are the same as in monkeys. What does that mean?
Genesis 6:4There were giants on the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to themhttps://img.webme.com/pic/k/ka-ta/1.jpgwww.talkpundit.com/.../footprint-31.jpgEgyptianthats about 12 to 13 feet right 2 humans males s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/.../...f4d542332c.jpgIt was 12 ft 2 in (3.71 m) tall, weighed 2 tonnes (4000lbs), and had 6 toes on its right foot. After being exhibited in Dublin, it was brought to England and exhibited in Liverpool and Manchester at sixpence a head, 'attracting scientific men as well as gaping sightseerswww.6000years.org/graphics/irish%20giant.jpggo outside get a rock and measure 12 feet 2inches and mark it now add 4000 lbs to it this is robert waldo he is 8ft and some inches tallwww.messagetoeagle.com/.../wadlowfam.jpg
watch the video there is no 98% relation
Dude I worked I'm working in a genetics lab right now yes there is...Your arguments have nothing disproving evolution.
im not here to try to make you look stupid i here to tell you the truthi want you in heaven
Well you're failing to make me look stupid because you're not giving real evidence to disprove evolution.
im not arguing im showing you physical evidence for my claimwhere is your physical evidence?all your doing it talking
physical evidence for evolution please show me
I just showed you fossils and DNA sequences. Homologous structures is next. For example, humans and whales have similar arm/hand/wrist bones (radius, ulna, humerous, carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges). This suggests that these animals diverged from a common ancestor, hence the term divergent evolution.
no you showed me a drawing i wanna be able to touch it i want other people to be able to touch itit has to be physical not a drawing
Drawings are better. If you are dumb enough not to understand evolution then you won't get anything other then drawings.
so i bring you something real you bring me drawings loland i went to high school i under stand the concept but there is no touchable evidence for ithere is what they do they make an animated CGI kung fu panda style video of a monkey becoming a human but in real life never happensI've never seen it happen and neither have you you are believing it blindlyblind faith sounds like religion
You bring me stupid facts and the Bible... I show you scientific evidence. Damn you're dumb.
at least mine are touchable lol
Wtf does that bs mean
when in a real debate which i have done several times you need something touchable and visibleor else they just take it as words that mean nothing so if i tell you the earth cracked and water came out from undergroundthere has to be some evidence for my claim fault lines the earth is cracked www.mapsofworld.com/.../fault-lines-map.jpgthere all connected blog.esurance.com/.../...san-andreas-insurance.jpglarge amount of water underground www.higherperspectives.com/...cean-1561950869.htmlthats how you win a debate in an actual setting
Either can do the job just as well. It depends on the people. And your caps lock is stuck.
how about they both do there job and take care of there child
And what if one had no choice in the matter, like in the case of death of one parent?
i understand that completely there are many situations that can happen in this
Have an opinion?
Just because a mother gave birth to the child, it doesn't always mean that she can provide the essentials needed or can cope alone without the 24/7 support. Same goes for males as well.
Wait why would the woman stay with the child wtf?
Women take better care of the child
now this study was done in 2008 and your telling me women are better lolwww.breakingthescience.org/...fiedDataFromDHHS.php
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXv9y8OtkLANOW THEY ALWAYS SEEM TO POST THIS KILLED OVER CHILD SUPPORT UGH... THAT'S RIGHT HE HAS 4 KIDS WITH A WOMEN THEN ONE DAY SAYS A FEW HUNDRED DOLLARS IS WORTH MORE THEN THERE LIFEDOES THAT MAKE SENSE OR MAYBE ITS SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY
I'm talking based on my experiences
Whoever is best for the child would be ideal
whats considered best?
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.