Because it's better to get a free meal. And it's better to date a guy who has enough money to pay for dates. I'm not saying this is good or right, and you are free to refuse to pay for dates. But women are also free to refuse to date you if you don't pay.
Either a very single life awaits you unless you were to change your traditional, hypocritical, ludicrous views, or an unfortunate heartbreak awaits for boyfriend/future partners that you mooch off of. You are the type of person people would stay away from, and are definitely far from being the most pleasant in comparison. You are by far one of the most hypocritical women I have ever met. Hopefully you're a better person outside of these views, but I hope to never see you again. I will not block you, but your views are very controversial. Good luck in this foreseeable future.
@daveses What makes you think you can sleep with anyone at all? You have this completely backwards. Some women won't like you even if you spend money on them. Prostitutes are a sure thing because the sex if what you're paying for.
I feel as a guy, that if I felt the woman I was dating thought as you do, I would not find her worth the effort. Relationships have give and take, but all see from what you said is take. Granted I don't know you, but this just makes me think I don't really want to know you. I wouldn't want to spend my money getting to know you.
@Justinaveragedude I'm talking about the first few dates. There's no relationship at that point. You're trying to convince her to have a relationship with you.
I won't go out with someone that I don't already know reasonably well. It may j us be a relationship based on friendship, but I have a relationship long before I ask them out. However, when I ask, I intend to pay for the date because I want to.
So you admit that it's scummy but you still do it.
Women like you are the reason men can't stand dating. Because there are so goddamn many of you degenerates, it's damn near impossible to have a functional dating life without letting women walk all over us. Screw you.
@tyber1 It's not scummy, and don't do it if you don't want to. No one is forcing you to date any woman you don't want to date. You also can't force me to date any man I don't want to date.
"I'm not saying this is good or right, and you are free to refuse to pay for dates. But women are also free to refuse to date you if you don't pay." translation: it might be wrong, but you're the one who is letting me do it. If you don't let me, I'll walk away and you'll have nothing.
@tyber1 and that will change her? She will become your idealized version of a woman because we berate and belittle her? No, all it does is make us look petty. Be the bigger person and let it go. Take the knowledge that this is a type of woman you don't want to be involved with and move on. Otherwise we all end up just looking like petty jerks ganging up on someone with a different opinion and lifestyle and that in it's own way is still immoral.
@Justinaveragedude no it won't change the fact that she's a bad person, but I disagree that it makes me petty to point it out.
She basically admitted that she was taking advantage of the no-win position men are put in. That isn't a difference of opinion, that's her being a scumbag.
@tyber1 Honestly, you're pathetic. I'm not trying to manipulate anyone. You all have free choice in the matter. You just can't stand it because I'm exercising my choice as a woman to date the men I want, and reject the ones I don't want. If you can find someone who's ok with you not spending a dime on her, that's great. I can't care less.
"You just can't stand it because I'm exercising my choice as a woman to date the men I want, and reject the ones I don't want." Gold diggers could be argued to use the very same logic, what an interesting coincidence that money happens to be the very same thing that gold diggers consider to be a deal breaker or deal maker. It's almost like, you are one, just to a lesser degree.
People can be manipulated and still 'have a choice'. You're not in the clear just because you didn't think it was manipulation. Women like you are using the prisoner dilemma to get what they want, whether they are 'trying' to be manipulative or not is irrelevant.
Prisoner dilemma is when the best possible outcome can only be achieved by both parties working together, but both parties have the option of betraying the well being of the other person so that while their own benefits are greater, the other person gets screwed. There are 3 possible way for the game to go, both people can work together, both people can screw over the other person, or one person can be cooperative which makes them the sucker because the other party betrayed them for their own benefit. By completely removing the possibility of working together, you ensure that the only options in the game for the male are to be the sucker, who still gets to keep playing but at a significant disadvantage to themselves, or they can also betray the female, in reality doing nothing more immoral than what the female was trying to do, but at the cost of eliminating his ability to keep playing.
Continuing to play the game in bad faith, along with the majority of women who also play the game in bad faith, makes the best possible option (fairness and cooperation) an impractical goal. You are being manipulative. You're making the only choices for the male to either be a pushover and submit to what you want, or for him to lose the game over and over again.
Men who pay for dates aren't 'gentlemen', they're pushovers.
@tyber1 you are like the guy in Family Guy following Peter every where screaming, "hey you're a phony, you know who lives there a phony." You've pointed it out, then keep pointing it out. My guess is you've fallen victim to this sort of thing before, most guys have. Join the club. Honestly though at this point you are beyond petty. Or maybe you are@raspberry just trying to bully @raspberry0416 into dating you, in which I say good luck little man.
@tyber1 This is why I wanted to post in this thread. I’m sick of immature, socially inept man-children thinking that their failures in dating is somehow my problem. You are not entitled to anything from a woman. I am not here to serve you, or make your life easier. I’m here to get what I want in life. And that doesn’t make me a horrible person. It makes me a rational one who’s not gonna put up with your bullshit guilt-tripping and name-calling. So go jerk off into your fleshlight because you sure as hell aren’t getting any real woman anytime soon. And by the way, every woman wants the guy to pay when they first start to date. Calling them “entitled” just goes to show how insensitive you are to women’s feelings. The world does not revolve around you and your needs. If you don’t like it, don’t date. Don’t expect women to lower their standards for your sorry, cheap, selfish ass.
"And by the way, every woman wants the guy to pay when they first start to date. Calling them “entitled” just goes to show how insensitive you are to women’s feelings." Oh wah, cry me a river. They are entitled.
"Don’t expect women to lower their standards for your sorry, cheap, selfish ass." I'm not the selfish one out of the two of us.
"I’m here to get what I want in life. And that doesn’t make me a horrible person." That's highly dependent on how you go about getting what you want in life.
"You are not entitled to anything from a woman." I'm entitled only to be treated decently, women like you are not decent.
Wah wah wah I'm so insensitive to women's feelings, not wanting to be taken advantage of by women who are too fucking cheap to buy their own fucking dinner. It's like you're all fucking 12 year olds who want their daddy to take care of them.
"Women want" yeah well I want plenty of things that wouldn't be fair to ask of other people, so I don't because I'm not a scumbag like so many of you are.
@tyber1 at one point I agreed with you, but you became a bitch. You are about as mature as a 12 year old boy who just found himself. At least she is honest about who she is. Grow up and be honest with yourself. You are also immoral and a huge imbacile. Say what you want after this, you aren't worth aknowledging further.
@Justinaveragedude I've done nothing to prove myself an imbecile, as for whether or not I am immoral, it's be more fair to say that I'm intolerant of people who excuse to help themselves at someone else's expense. I don't care if she's honest about what she is. What the fuck difference does that make?
I was never not honest with myself, so that little piece of advice seems pretty worthless. I was harsh on her but she deserved every word of it.
Also, she wasn't *really* all that honest about what she was all about, she contradicted herself on whether or not what she was doing was wrong, she tried to frame it as though her behavior was okay because it's normal and then tried to frame it as being okay because 'it's what women want' and if I didn't accept that then I'm just being 'intolerant of women's feelings'.
But I've had an epiphany. It *is* in a guys vest interest to pay. When a girl let's you pay, that's just a sign of things to come, so it can be a great filter to get rid of the gold diggers. The courts are stacked against us men (I do child support, it's my job, trust me here), we need to start screening out the filth in the beginning. Paying for 2 dinners is much cheaper than paying out tens of thousands of dollars because your relationship didn't work out. And if it helps increase your chances of getting laid, all the better, use her body like she used your wallet then toss her to the side to focus on women who are worth dating. I may have to write a myTake on this subject, a sort of public service announcement to spread my message so guys can protect themselves.
the last two are wrong but the rest of them I agree. I'm no expert on these matters but most women I've heard talk about this subject say that if the date wasn't going well they would pay just to get the date over with.
I used to always pay my share and insist. However, I've come to realise that sometimes the guy genuinely wants to do the things they consider "manly", which includes paying for my stuff sometimes and fixing things around the house that I could do. It's like an old school traditional way of thinking that is buried deep inside guys' heads.
So now, if they want to pay, i let them. otherwise, i'm super happy to pick up my own tab.
There are a lot of other ways besides paying for something to show care. I'm ok with paying my half and if he offers to pay, i'll accept. Sometimes I feel bad though so I invite him.
If I feel the woman would appreciate the gesture, I would pay for some dates. But to avoid being used, the FIRST date would be dutch. We each pay our own separate tab.
Now if she didn't have a job at the time of the first date, or if I made way more money than her, then I would pay for her.
They sole reason why a woman would potentially want a guy to pay is because she wants to date a guy who is willing to provide for her. If he pays on the date it shows that he is capable of doing that. Not all women want that type of guy either, I think it's about 50/50, maybe even less. Maybe the ones who are looking for a partner like that are actually weaker and less independent than men.
women are weak, and regardless of social constructs specific to each country, biologically they are inferior to men. nothing can really change that, and this is why they are hypergamous, and thus they demand more from men than they can offer back to him, and this includes paying for her in various ways.
look up hypergamy, red pill knowledge, 80/20 rule etc, gynocentrism, mgtow
Youtubers such as turd flinging monkey, black pigeon speaks, peter molyneux, they explain in detail why the genders aren't equal and why feminism is a failure and not sustainable. This is also why gender relations are so extremely bad in modern times and why divorce rates and the ammount of single moms are through the roof. Men are waking up to female nature and are avoiding marriage for good reason.
Sure women are not tailored to the same tasks as men (primarily physically), but to outright call them weak or inferior is just misogyny. Physical traits are only part of the equation.
It's a sad sad truth, aint' it? The FI simply will not accept this dynamic and mean to topple it somehow in any way possible. Even if it means making men second class citizens.
@Levelthree i stopped caring about womens feelings long ago after realizing how selfish they are, so i only care about the facts. The facts show us clearly that women are inferior overall compared to men, they have lower IQ, weaker physically and mentally, consume more than they produce, all of this is true in general compared to men. exceptions exist but women are primarily adapted to make children at the cost of being worse compared to men at pretty much everything else, but modern women in the west are not having nearly as many children as they used too, so essentially they are making use of the main thing that makes them valuable. Because of how the genders have adapted, men bear all or at least most of the responsibilites in society, women are not capable of handling this, and this used to be balanced by men having higher authority, but feminism has removed most of the male authority while still excluding women from bearing the same responsibility as men.
Feminists will boast how strong and independent they are 'till their car breaks or their roof leaks - then they need a man to fix it. But that's okay, they have an equal pay job now so they can hire it done. Then they tell you they don't need a man to raise children - they can be both mother and father. And they expect the little boys to act just like little girls, even drugging them if they don't. And we've raised a whole generation of weak supplicating cry-baby men that act just like women. The 'hipster' moniker is a good one. Or the metro-sexual. Egads.
No, they have made a point of lowering all the job requirements so they can qualify, and even then the really difficult or dirty jobs they don't want anyway. What they fail to realize is our entire modern western society has been built by men. If men quit working tomorrow the whole thing would come to a grinding halt in about 48 hours.
But the FI will boast how awful men are and that all of societies ills are caused by them.
No, being biologically weaker isn't that much of a big deal in a western society. Just because they tend to be over the average man, doesn't make them inferior in every other way. Don't ever understimate women or anyone really.
@MrNameless wrong, it makes a difference because we are more durable and can more more and for a longer period of our lives, most of the heavy physical labour most women are not fit enough to handle that. Because of women being significantly biologically weaker than men and mentally weaker as well they are unable to handle the same responsibilities that men carry, being conscripted to war is just one of those things. There are so many things which women need which are payed for by the welfare system which is sustained by mostly male tax money. Women do not deserve the same authority as men because they cannot bear the same responsibility. period.
Not quite. It's that they believe that paying shows respect, and that's not necessarily true. There are many ways to show respect to a woman, much better ways, before a date. As for a woman paying for me, I wouldn't believe that she respects me, since she could be paying out of courtesy. If she were to offer to pay for him however, it does show that she actually likes the guy, but you know.. that never happens with this belief in play.
If you had kids, would you pay for them or make them use their allowance money to pay their way? In the old farm days, kids paid for things they wanted, not their parents.
If they lived on a farm, no, it was part of living on a farm. If they where seasonal farm families who traveled a crossed the US finding jobs on farms during different harvest times, no the mother or father was given all the wages for the family. If you where hired as a farm hand, yeah you got paid, if you where lucky and really good at your job you might even make 60 cents a day. But you tended to hire adults who could work more harder then the children.
True and not true. I personally want the man to pay. I'm not expectant of it, but it would disappoint me if he wouldn't pay. I am not a feminist by the way. I'm definitely for equality, but I'm definitely not a feminist. I believe to a certain extent in gender roles. With no gender roles, society is a free for all. Consider me traditionalist or too conservative, but I do like to have a man that dominates to an extent.
If you expect the guy to pay, what do you offer in return? Just curious to know as I see most girls expect the guys to pay but when you ask them what they offer, they don't say much.
Of course you're not a feminist.. Because true feminism gives independence to women and not rely on men at all. But you can't just say you're for equality and expect guys to pay. lmao. You have no idea what you're talking about.
lol that policy works if food out is good, I like imagine if people would go picnic baskets to go if that even possible anymore. sharing a meal is also good policy?
You know, it's funny you would say this. It is well established that women will generally do pretty much anything for a price. It's simply a matter of establishing what that is. I didn't believe it myself, I was MUCH MUCH older than you before I figured this out.
And the masculine concepts of honor and loyalty are pretty much non-existent in a woman's mind. They can and will justify any action they deem to be 'what they want'. The term is 'solipsism'. It's simple biology. You can't fight mother nature. You can try, but you'll never win out.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
34Opinion
Because it's better to get a free meal. And it's better to date a guy who has enough money to pay for dates.
I'm not saying this is good or right, and you are free to refuse to pay for dates. But women are also free to refuse to date you if you don't pay.
Either a very single life awaits you unless you were to change your traditional, hypocritical, ludicrous views, or an unfortunate heartbreak awaits for boyfriend/future partners that you mooch off of. You are the type of person people would stay away from, and are definitely far from being the most pleasant in comparison. You are by far one of the most hypocritical women I have ever met. Hopefully you're a better person outside of these views, but I hope to never see you again. I will not block you, but your views are very controversial. Good luck in this foreseeable future.
I love how a 17 year old guy thinks he knows more about my life than I do. You will grow up and learn, little boy.
"But women are also free to refuse to date you if you don't pay." those women are prostitutes
I don't. Good luck pal.
@daveses
Princesses maybe, not prostitutes
You literally have to pay before you can really date her and sleep with her, so literally a prostitute/whore.
@raspberry0416 Nah, those are queens. Princesses are different here.
@daveses
If that's how you feel then you can stick to escorts and prostitutes. Not my business.
Explain how they aren't prostitutes? You can't sleep with her without paying, it's a prerequisite to sex!
@daveses
What makes you think you can sleep with anyone at all? You have this completely backwards. Some women won't like you even if you spend money on them. Prostitutes are a sure thing because the sex if what you're paying for.
I feel as a guy, that if I felt the woman I was dating thought as you do, I would not find her worth the effort. Relationships have give and take, but all see from what you said is take. Granted I don't know you, but this just makes me think I don't really want to know you. I wouldn't want to spend my money getting to know you.
@Justinaveragedude
I'm talking about the first few dates. There's no relationship at that point. You're trying to convince her to have a relationship with you.
I won't go out with someone that I don't already know reasonably well. It may j us be a relationship based on friendship, but I have a relationship long before I ask them out. However, when I ask, I intend to pay for the date because I want to.
So you admit that it's scummy but you still do it.
Women like you are the reason men can't stand dating. Because there are so goddamn many of you degenerates, it's damn near impossible to have a functional dating life without letting women walk all over us. Screw you.
@tyber1
It's not scummy, and don't do it if you don't want to. No one is forcing you to date any woman you don't want to date. You also can't force me to date any man I don't want to date.
"I'm not saying this is good or right, and you are free to refuse to pay for dates. But women are also free to refuse to date you if you don't pay." translation: it might be wrong, but you're the one who is letting me do it. If you don't let me, I'll walk away and you'll have nothing.
I'm not saying I want to force you to date anyone. I just think you're a shallow, self centered, manipulative person.
Women like you are really just employing game theory against men, making it so that the guy loses if he doesn't let you win.
Ok, first off she did say that she wasn't saying this was right or good. We don't need to keep going after her.
@Justinaveragedude disagree, she knowingly engages in immoral behavior, that is worthy of ridicule.
@tyber1 and that will change her? She will become your idealized version of a woman because we berate and belittle her? No, all it does is make us look petty. Be the bigger person and let it go. Take the knowledge that this is a type of woman you don't want to be involved with and move on. Otherwise we all end up just looking like petty jerks ganging up on someone with a different opinion and lifestyle and that in it's own way is still immoral.
@Justinaveragedude no it won't change the fact that she's a bad person, but I disagree that it makes me petty to point it out.
She basically admitted that she was taking advantage of the no-win position men are put in. That isn't a difference of opinion, that's her being a scumbag.
@tyber1
Honestly, you're pathetic. I'm not trying to manipulate anyone. You all have free choice in the matter. You just can't stand it because I'm exercising my choice as a woman to date the men I want, and reject the ones I don't want. If you can find someone who's ok with you not spending a dime on her, that's great. I can't care less.
Lmao you are a bitch
"You just can't stand it because I'm exercising my choice as a woman to date the men I want, and reject the ones I don't want." Gold diggers could be argued to use the very same logic, what an interesting coincidence that money happens to be the very same thing that gold diggers consider to be a deal breaker or deal maker. It's almost like, you are one, just to a lesser degree.
People can be manipulated and still 'have a choice'. You're not in the clear just because you didn't think it was manipulation. Women like you are using the prisoner dilemma to get what they want, whether they are 'trying' to be manipulative or not is irrelevant.
Prisoner dilemma is when the best possible outcome can only be achieved by both parties working together, but both parties have the option of betraying the well being of the other person so that while their own benefits are greater, the other person gets screwed. There are 3 possible way for the game to go, both people can work together, both people can screw over the other person, or one person can be cooperative which makes them the sucker because the other party betrayed them for their own benefit. By completely removing the possibility of working together, you ensure that the only options in the game for the male are to be the sucker, who still gets to keep playing but at a significant disadvantage to themselves, or they can also betray the female, in reality doing nothing more immoral than what the female was trying to do, but at the cost of eliminating his ability to keep playing.
Continuing to play the game in bad faith, along with the majority of women who also play the game in bad faith, makes the best possible option (fairness and cooperation) an impractical goal. You are being manipulative. You're making the only choices for the male to either be a pushover and submit to what you want, or for him to lose the game over and over again.
Men who pay for dates aren't 'gentlemen', they're pushovers.
@tyber1 you are like the guy in Family Guy following Peter every where screaming, "hey you're a phony, you know who lives there a phony." You've pointed it out, then keep pointing it out. My guess is you've fallen victim to this sort of thing before, most guys have. Join the club. Honestly though at this point you are beyond petty. Or maybe you are@raspberry just trying to bully @raspberry0416 into dating you, in which I say good luck little man.
@tyber1
This is why I wanted to post in this thread. I’m sick of immature, socially inept man-children thinking that their failures in dating is somehow my problem. You are not entitled to anything from a woman. I am not here to serve you, or make your life easier. I’m here to get what I want in life. And that doesn’t make me a horrible person. It makes me a rational one who’s not gonna put up with your bullshit guilt-tripping and name-calling. So go jerk off into your fleshlight because you sure as hell aren’t getting any real woman anytime soon.
And by the way, every woman wants the guy to pay when they first start to date. Calling them “entitled” just goes to show how insensitive you are to women’s feelings. The world does not revolve around you and your needs. If you don’t like it, don’t date. Don’t expect women to lower their standards for your sorry, cheap, selfish ass.
"And by the way, every woman wants the guy to pay when they first start to date. Calling them “entitled” just goes to show how insensitive you are to women’s feelings." Oh wah, cry me a river. They are entitled.
"Don’t expect women to lower their standards for your sorry, cheap, selfish ass." I'm not the selfish one out of the two of us.
"I’m here to get what I want in life. And that doesn’t make me a horrible person." That's highly dependent on how you go about getting what you want in life.
"You are not entitled to anything from a woman." I'm entitled only to be treated decently, women like you are not decent.
Fucking imbicile
Wah wah wah I'm so insensitive to women's feelings, not wanting to be taken advantage of by women who are too fucking cheap to buy their own fucking dinner. It's like you're all fucking 12 year olds who want their daddy to take care of them.
It's a miracle you made it to 29 years old without starving since you're so helpless that you can't feed yourself.
"Women want" yeah well I want plenty of things that wouldn't be fair to ask of other people, so I don't because I'm not a scumbag like so many of you are.
Women are innately hypergamous whores/prostitutes
@daveses for ever decent one there's like 4 of these
@tyber1 at one point I agreed with you, but you became a bitch. You are about as mature as a 12 year old boy who just found himself. At least she is honest about who she is. Grow up and be honest with yourself. You are also immoral and a huge imbacile. Say what you want after this, you aren't worth aknowledging further.
@Justinaveragedude I've done nothing to prove myself an imbecile, as for whether or not I am immoral, it's be more fair to say that I'm intolerant of people who excuse to help themselves at someone else's expense. I don't care if she's honest about what she is. What the fuck difference does that make?
I was never not honest with myself, so that little piece of advice seems pretty worthless. I was harsh on her but she deserved every word of it.
who make excuses*
Also, she wasn't *really* all that honest about what she was all about, she contradicted herself on whether or not what she was doing was wrong, she tried to frame it as though her behavior was okay because it's normal and then tried to frame it as being okay because 'it's what women want' and if I didn't accept that then I'm just being 'intolerant of women's feelings'.
You're getting told by a guy who is 12 years younger. I'd feel like crap too.
@MrNameless she should be more embarrassed by how selfish she is
But I've had an epiphany. It *is* in a guys vest interest to pay. When a girl let's you pay, that's just a sign of things to come, so it can be a great filter to get rid of the gold diggers. The courts are stacked against us men (I do child support, it's my job, trust me here), we need to start screening out the filth in the beginning. Paying for 2 dinners is much cheaper than paying out tens of thousands of dollars because your relationship didn't work out. And if it helps increase your chances of getting laid, all the better, use her body like she used your wallet then toss her to the side to focus on women who are worth dating. I may have to write a myTake on this subject, a sort of public service announcement to spread my message so guys can protect themselves.
the last two are wrong but the rest of them I agree. I'm no expert on these matters but most women I've heard talk about this subject say that if the date wasn't going well they would pay just to get the date over with.
True, I do see this happen sometimes.
I used to always pay my share and insist. However, I've come to realise that sometimes the guy genuinely wants to do the things they consider "manly", which includes paying for my stuff sometimes and fixing things around the house that I could do. It's like an old school traditional way of thinking that is buried deep inside guys' heads.
So now, if they want to pay, i let them. otherwise, i'm super happy to pick up my own tab.
That's fine.
There are a lot of other ways besides paying for something to show care. I'm ok with paying my half and if he offers to pay, i'll accept. Sometimes I feel bad though so I invite him.
Exactly
If I feel the woman would appreciate the gesture, I would pay for some dates. But to avoid being used, the FIRST date would be dutch. We each pay our own separate tab.
Now if she didn't have a job at the time of the first date, or if I made way more money than her, then I would pay for her.
I agree with you all the way. It's hard to convince women to pay for the first date without looking "cheap." I hate it. It's a lose lose situation.
Well, done on your myTake! Now, take me to Red Lobster. You're paying. *-*
Only if you take me out to all you can eat burgers 😊😂
That depends on how much you plan to eat. 😅
I can pay for a few, but not all you can eat. xD
Don't worry. You can always pay with love. A simple kiss could do the trick 😌👌🏽
Ok, then. Just as long as I get my fair share of the deal! 😏
Oh don't worry about that..
Lmao 😂
Didn't realise so many women on this website were gold diggers, lol. But I shouldn't even be surprised.
When I was dating I always paid because that was what I was most comfortable with. I don't mind either way. As long as she and I both agree on it.
I can't find a loophole. All points make sense!
Thank you!
Sorry this is bad, have you actually been on real dates dates? I can't see how these are realistic at all.
They sole reason why a woman would potentially want a guy to pay is because she wants to date a guy who is willing to provide for her. If he pays on the date it shows that he is capable of doing that. Not all women want that type of guy either, I think it's about 50/50, maybe even less. Maybe the ones who are looking for a partner like that are actually weaker and less independent than men.
Are you saying that men should provide for women outside of a relationship with the risk of her walking away right then and there?
No, I'm just saying I don't think your reasons are accurate. I'm not saying it's right or wrong
Very well then.
women are weak, and regardless of social constructs specific to each country, biologically they are inferior to men. nothing can really change that, and this is why they are hypergamous, and thus they demand more from men than they can offer back to him, and this includes paying for her in various ways.
Hm, I'll have to look further into this.
look up hypergamy, red pill knowledge, 80/20 rule etc, gynocentrism, mgtow
Youtubers such as turd flinging monkey, black pigeon speaks, peter molyneux, they explain in detail why the genders aren't equal and why feminism is a failure and not sustainable. This is also why gender relations are so extremely bad in modern times and why divorce rates and the ammount of single moms are through the roof. Men are waking up to female nature and are avoiding marriage for good reason.
Sure women are not tailored to the same tasks as men (primarily physically), but to outright call them weak or inferior is just misogyny. Physical traits are only part of the equation.
Hm, well I've already seen Red Pill, and I already don't believe in marriage anymore.
It's a sad sad truth, aint' it? The FI simply will not accept this dynamic and mean to topple it somehow in any way possible. Even if it means making men second class citizens.
@Levelthree i stopped caring about womens feelings long ago after realizing how selfish they are, so i only care about the facts. The facts show us clearly that women are inferior overall compared to men, they have lower IQ, weaker physically and mentally, consume more than they produce, all of this is true in general compared to men. exceptions exist but women are primarily adapted to make children at the cost of being worse compared to men at pretty much everything else, but modern women in the west are not having nearly as many children as they used too, so essentially they are making use of the main thing that makes them valuable. Because of how the genders have adapted, men bear all or at least most of the responsibilites in society, women are not capable of handling this, and this used to be balanced by men having higher authority, but feminism has removed most of the male authority while still excluding women from bearing the same responsibility as men.
Feminists will boast how strong and independent they are 'till their car breaks or their roof leaks - then they need a man to fix it. But that's okay, they have an equal pay job now so they can hire it done.
Then they tell you they don't need a man to raise children - they can be both mother and father. And they expect the little boys to act just like little girls, even drugging them if they don't. And we've raised a whole generation of weak supplicating cry-baby men that act just like women. The 'hipster' moniker is a good one. Or the metro-sexual. Egads.
No, they have made a point of lowering all the job requirements so they can qualify, and even then the really difficult or dirty jobs they don't want anyway. What they fail to realize is our entire modern western society has been built by men. If men quit working tomorrow the whole thing would come to a grinding halt in about 48 hours.
But the FI will boast how awful men are and that all of societies ills are caused by them.
No, being biologically weaker isn't that much of a big deal in a western society. Just because they tend to be over the average man, doesn't make them inferior in every other way. Don't ever understimate women or anyone really.
@MrNameless wrong, it makes a difference because we are more durable and can more more and for a longer period of our lives, most of the heavy physical labour most women are not fit enough to handle that. Because of women being significantly biologically weaker than men and mentally weaker as well they are unable to handle the same responsibilities that men carry, being conscripted to war is just one of those things. There are so many things which women need which are payed for by the welfare system which is sustained by mostly male tax money. Women do not deserve the same authority as men because they cannot bear the same responsibility. period.
If she isn't my woman I'm not spending a dime on a woman that isn't mine.
Awesome 👍🏽
Well wouldn't a woman paying for a man also show that she respects him?
Not quite. It's that they believe that paying shows respect, and that's not necessarily true. There are many ways to show respect to a woman, much better ways, before a date. As for a woman paying for me, I wouldn't believe that she respects me, since she could be paying out of courtesy. If she were to offer to pay for him however, it does show that she actually likes the guy, but you know.. that never happens with this belief in play.
Men ain't greater than women and women ain't greater than men. If a man paying shows respect, then so does a woman paying.
No, paying doesn't show respect period, is what I'm saying. The women who want men to pay just believe that it does, but it doesn't.
If you had kids, would you pay for them or make them use their allowance money to pay their way? In the old farm days, kids paid for things they wanted, not their parents.
In old farm days child labor laws where more lax.
@Justinaveragedude
Still the kids got paid.
If they lived on a farm, no, it was part of living on a farm. If they where seasonal farm families who traveled a crossed the US finding jobs on farms during different harvest times, no the mother or father was given all the wages for the family. If you where hired as a farm hand, yeah you got paid, if you where lucky and really good at your job you might even make 60 cents a day. But you tended to hire adults who could work more harder then the children.
True and not true. I personally want the man to pay. I'm not expectant of it, but it would disappoint me if he wouldn't pay.
I am not a feminist by the way. I'm definitely for equality, but I'm definitely not a feminist. I believe to a certain extent in gender roles. With no gender roles, society is a free for all. Consider me traditionalist or too conservative, but I do like to have a man that dominates to an extent.
If you expect the guy to pay, what do you offer in return? Just curious to know as I see most girls expect the guys to pay but when you ask them what they offer, they don't say much.
Yes, make the man pay while you do nothing. So dominating. Lmao
Unfortunately, I disagree dear friend.
Of course you're not a feminist.. Because true feminism gives independence to women and not rely on men at all. But you can't just say you're for equality and expect guys to pay. lmao. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Why women want men paying for dates? They want a free meal.
idc . fancy or Mc's . he pays 1st date .
for that he gets my attention and my companionship
if i like him he gets something more than that
Cool
no pay
no play
$$$ up front
I admire your honesty.
And if you don't like him he wasted his money
lol that policy works if food out is good, I like imagine if people would go picnic baskets to go if that even possible anymore. sharing a meal is also good policy?
They need a deposit just in case things don't work out. You're getting played possibly as a man every time you pay.
What I tend to do is go for a coffee informally, and see if we click. If we do then I'll pay the first date and split anymore after that.
Sweet. Not bad
They are prostitutes, that's why, a women won't sleep with a man without him spending money in some way.
lol some are, some aren't. There are still good women out there.
You know, it's funny you would say this. It is well established that women will generally do pretty much anything for a price. It's simply a matter of establishing what that is. I didn't believe it myself, I was MUCH MUCH older than you before I figured this out.
And the masculine concepts of honor and loyalty are pretty much non-existent in a woman's mind. They can and will justify any action they deem to be 'what they want'. The term is 'solipsism'. It's simple biology. You can't fight mother nature. You can try, but you'll never win out.