i'm 34. i'm married but if i was single i guess i'd consider dating as young as maybe 25. it really depends on the person though. i imagine there could be a 21 year old who seemed like a relationship potential while a 34 year old may not
I am 19 and the youngest I would date is 18 and my ideal oldest would only be a year older than me. If I really liked him I would say maximum is 23. This is only for right now. Once I am older I assume I will have a larger range.
I'm 26, youngest I would date is 26, realistically. But age is just a number, it is possible a 18 year old would catch my heart, though unlikely. Mostly younger girls are on my "bang only" list.
I was 16 and my boyfriend was 22. We are happily married and been together for 10 years now. I think it truly depends on the 2 two people. Age is just a number at the end of the day.
I don't care about age, just the person so I guess 18. However, it would be unusual to find someone that was 18 that would be datable. Not impossible just unlikely.
0
0 Reply
Anonymous
(36-45)
+1 y
Sounds like you should probably tell him then?
It doesn't really matter what other guys on some website think, it matters what YOU do. If he is interested, and you tell him that you are and OK with his age he will take it from there if he is interested as well. Pretty simple.
The youngest I'd go for is 21 (so she can legally drink)... I suppose I COULD stretch to 20 depending on how far away her birthday is and how awesome she is.
I think I answered this sometime ago but the youngest was 18 or 19 if I remember right. 20 isn't bad, some people may think thats a large age difference but women that same age be dating guys 50-60. So nope that's not bad.
I'm 20 (very soon) I'd probably go to 18, maybe 17. Not really into younger girls. But I do look and act 30 so that probably has something to do with it.
0
1 Reply
Asker
+1 y
Well at that age I think maturity differs very greatly between a small amount of years so your numbers make sense.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
119Opinion
i'm 34. i'm married but if i was single i guess i'd consider dating as young as maybe 25. it really depends on the person though. i imagine there could be a 21 year old who seemed like a relationship potential while a 34 year old may not
I am 19 and the youngest I would date is 18 and my ideal oldest would only be a year older than me. If I really liked him I would say maximum is 23. This is only for right now. Once I am older I assume I will have a larger range.
I'm 49, probably 35. its more a generation gap... having things to talk about. but who knows, depends on individual.
I'm 26, youngest I would date is 26, realistically. But age is just a number, it is possible a 18 year old would catch my heart, though unlikely. Mostly younger girls are on my "bang only" list.
My boyfriend is 33, I just turned 22! I think i'm the youngest he's ever dated, doesn't seem to be a problem, we both get along great.
I was 16 and my boyfriend was 22. We are happily married and been together for 10 years now. I think it truly depends on the 2 two people. Age is just a number at the end of the day.
The biggest age gap I ever had was 13 years younger (that was two years ago).
I do prefer a girl to be younger than me, I have dated older, but I'm young at heart and I like someone with that youthful energy.
I don't care about age, just the person so I guess 18. However, it would be unusual to find someone that was 18 that would be datable. Not impossible just unlikely.
Sounds like you should probably tell him then?
It doesn't really matter what other guys on some website think, it matters what YOU do. If he is interested, and you tell him that you are and OK with his age he will take it from there if he is interested as well. Pretty simple.
41 and about 27, 26 is the lowest I would go. She would have to be done school and started a career anyway.
Knew three guys 29, 28, and 26 who all went as young as 18.
I wouldn't go younger than 18, being 19.
Husband said he wouldn't go younger than 18 and he is 23.
The youngest I'd go for is 21 (so she can legally drink)... I suppose I COULD stretch to 20 depending on how far away her birthday is and how awesome she is.
I don't think I can actually understand this. What do you mean "21 so she can legally drink"? You can actually have a dinner without wine...
I think I answered this sometime ago but the youngest was 18 or 19 if I remember right. 20 isn't bad, some people may think thats a large age difference but women that same age be dating guys 50-60. So nope that's not bad.
I'm 20 (very soon)
I'd probably go to 18, maybe 17. Not really into younger girls. But I do look and act 30 so that probably has something to do with it.
Well at that age I think maturity differs very greatly between a small amount of years so your numbers make sense.
21, I know there are 'mature' 18/19 year olds but it still feels strange. There are plenty of girls that age I find attractive though.
I dont think im going to date again. Im better off single. So age wouldn't matter. Ill have regular friends of any age.
I'm 28. I'd prefer she be no more than three years younger, but I think the absolute youngest I'd go would be 23 at this point.
If I were his age I would be hesitaint if the age is a visual difference. But if he looks young it could be easily overlooked.
I know this is for men, but I'm 24. Youngest is 22. Oldest is 34.
24. I'll date a girl who's 21. So we can both drink legally :D and I can take her on wine tour/beer brewery dates.