Have an opinion?
Maybe he needs to be neutered. I’ve heard that it calms them down sexually and prevents cancer.
I think chopping off a piece of a dog just for owner's convinience is the worst abuse inaginable. Don't u think?
It’s not the worst abuse imaginable but it’s certainly not an idea one should immediately dismiss. I had this discussion with my other half (I said it was cruel and not to do it); he went ahead and did it (it worked). His argument was that it was not for the owner’s convenience, it was in the dog’s best interest to not have it develop cancer.
should we chop off other parts that me don't see as necessary for dog? cancer is possible in every organ.or,should every man be neutered as well, to avoid the possibility of testicular cancer? :)
Nobody said that it’s not a necessary organ for a dog just like nobody mentioned men and cancer but just to humour you, women have double mastectomies as a preventative measure to prevent breast cancer. If taking a preventative measure is in someone’s best interest, it should be considered as a viable option. Why do you think healthy people take statins? Preventative measure (although statins actually cause more harm than good). You’re merely trying to make any justification for not being open to the idea and that’s up to you. You posted the question to read people’s opinions and suggestions. If you’re not willing to appreciate a suggestion, (I’m not even saying you should consider it) then why bother to ask the question? Just let your dog do what it wants to you.
I wasn't attacking you. I was (and still am) friendly to you, while confronting the idea of "fixing" male dogs.measures that you mentioned for humans are implemented very rarely, only in cases of high probability of cancer. While male dogs are neutered just to lower their sex drive.
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.