I was married for 12 years but am single for 4 years now. I've repaired the gaping financial wound she left on her way out and now have excellent credit and high income. I am considered good looking and in shape, at least most people think so. Since I have started dating again I have found women today to be entitled, status seeking and flighty. In my income range I can afford beautiful escorts. By that I mean ones that charge several hundred dollars for their charms. These women are gorgeous! I have calculated that I actually would spend less money hiring escorts than I would dating and the pay off (sex) would be a sure thing. So-a variety of beautiful women, guaranteed sex, I actually save money-why would I not?"You can have this guaranteed or take a chance on that E-date whose picture is from 10 years and 22 pounds ago!"
With the laws and family courts extremely biased against men, it would be foolish to get married. However, rather than escorts, I suggest a sugar baby (perhaps a cute college girl). On Seeking Arrangement (seeking. com) there are 3 or 4 sugar babies to every sugar daddy. Therefore, if you negotiate down from their suggested asking price, you can find attractive sugar babies for $500 to $1,000 per month. That is far cheaper than a wife and no pretty woman will marry you if you don't have money. With women, marriage is always about money or status. Also, unlike a wife, a sugar baby must treat you well or you will find another one.
0|0
0|0
Is this still revelant?
Asker
24 d
You make a good case but a sugar baby lacks the variety component
That is true. Therefore, if both variety and looks are important enough then escorts might the better choice. However, if like most men, you are happy to fuck down, there are lots of women you can fuck for the price of dinner.
Curmudgeon | 1.1K opinions shared on Dating topic.
Guru
27 d
For men, the risks and costs of marriage have risen dramatically, and the benefits have declined dramatically. When something rewards less and pays off less, you get less of it.
0|1
0|0
Is this still revelant?
Most Helpful Girls
Wonderer89 | 1.9K opinions shared on Dating topic.
Master
27 d
No one is forcing you into a conventional relationship 🤷🏻♀️ If you gain more satisfaction from short term encounters with a financial exchange then you do you
NO- I see risk-huge risk. Risk to my financial well being. I see no women out there who are willing to consider what they bring to the table as well as what I offer. I would once have preferred a relationship but its not worth the risk of all I have built when I can get sex easily enough without it. I have close friendships (yes with girls) but no interest in a romantic relationship-it offers nothing for men but expense and obligation
Your calculations are probably correct. If you wanted more constant company, you could always make an arrangement with a sugar baby, or find a roommate who will provide you with your requirements in exchange for housing, food, etc.
If you don't care about "love, or a life partner or having kids", why not go this route? Not only does it give you choices, but you are free to change it up whenever your agreement period is over. I'm in complete agreement with you.
yeah, I see nothing wrong with it. You been there and done it? I wouldn't want to try to redo or even outdo something like that. Roll wit the punches and take what comes your way. Life good and goes on.
Most Helpful Guys