Like if she had to work out for it or if she's just naturally thin. What do you prefer?
For example I eat a lot but don't gain weight, my stomach is flat, and my legs are muscular (not thick though) even though I don't play sports or go to the gym. I think its genetic...is that a turn off for guys? I guess the only thing on my body that shows I don't do sports is my butt, because it doesn't "go over into my legs", it sticks out, kinda a bubble butt.
Most Helpful Guy
In general I would have to say muscular legs on a girl are very attractive. However, I am above all a fan of function when it comes to fitness. By that I mean what you're physically capable of impresses me a lot more than how you look. I've seen a lot of girls who had athletic bodies but weren't really anymore capable than a girl who was only in average shape, and I've seen girls who looked average because they had a layer of fat covering the muscle but were amazingly strong, fast, and agile. I'd rather have the second kind because in my eyes, function > form.
Also, just FYI, bubble butt (as long as the bubble shape is firm and not soft) is exactly what a hardcore athlete's butt looks like. muscles grow when you build them and the butt muscle grows in a shape that's basically like a balloon being inflated. It doesn't flatten out. It grows and becomes round and hard like a pair of small bowling balls stuffed into your pants.