Why are girls lying about penis size so much on here?

Chico_brah Yoda

I've been with enough chicks to know that these gaggers are lying when they say penis size is irrelevant. It's fucking annoying to read the delusion on here. You can't compare your dick size to her bust, because your dick is not only visual stimulation. Her sexual stimulation is dependent upon your penis. You can still get off by fucking a girl with an A cup easily. An average girl isn't going to get off very easily by having a skinny 4-5 inch cock penetrate her.

If you have a skinny 4 -5 inch cock, then I'm sorry dude, you're fucking small. No study with an obvious confirmation bias is going to change that. Women want to be filled up. It should fit like a glove. Women, stop fucking lying because it's cringe.

I'm a girl and I lie to make guys feel better

Vote A

I'm a girl and if you're 6+ inches and girthy, then you're good

Vote B

I'm a girl and I prefer 7-8 inches and girthy.

Vote C

I'm a girl and I prefer 8+ inches and girthy.

Vote D

I'm a girl and I honestly don't care

Vote E

I'm a virgin and/or guy

Vote F

Stop being mean.

Vote G

Select gender and age to cast your vote:

Girl Guy

0 0

Most Helpful Guys

0112358 Master
+1 y
I tried to do a well designed poll in this once and the results were interesting and not what I expected.

What I expected was most women okay with anything normal or better with a few size queens.

There were very few size queens.

A -lot- of women wanted above median. Not necessarily huge. But the large side of median.

A lot of women claimed not to care.

Some of those I suspect were full of shit.
Lots probably just have low sex drive. They don't care about his dick size because they don't care about sex period.
And a bunch don't love intercourse that much. They like mutual oral best so are happy with any size.

Women who like fucking most want a good size dick.

I spoke to one woman here who told me she actively preferred shorter because angled right they hit her g spot best. Given I was not her preferred range I have no reason to think she was lying.

So yeah most women who like fucking care.

Short sick guys get your thrust angle game -on point- Probably matters more for you than bigger guys.
0 0 0 0
America1st Yoda
+1 y
I have to disagree with you. There are many, many women who don't worry about size. They worry more about being satisfied and it doesn't take a big one for them. There are also some women who can't take a big one without pain. They don't go without orgasms. Just like men with breasts, women are all different in their preferences in this area.
1 0 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Sure they have issues with bigger ones. Maybe 8-9 inches. I'm 7 inches and that's not massive by any means. I think it's a good size. A woman is able to have babies. A 7 inch cock isn't going to be unbearable for her by any means. I've already explained why breast can't compare to this.
- America1st
  +1 y
  Again, I disagree with you. A girls breast size is as important to her as a guys size is to him. You make such broad statements when this is an area that has many, many differences in things they want. You just can't paint every guy and girl one color when a rainbow of colors is what is real.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  I know you disagree with me since you already told me that. I'm open to talking about this disagreement. A girls breasts size is not the depending factor on whether or not you can get off. A woman doesn't not penetrate a man with her breasts.
- Show All Show Less
- America1st
  +1 y
  You are stuck on that. I have been with a number of women who get off better from other things beside penetration. Where do these women fit in with your beliefs?
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Are you saying that penetration is to be deemed irrelevant to the argument and/or sex in general? Penetration is a very important part of sex. That's actually what sex is. Penis to vaginal penetration.
- America1st
  +1 y
  I never said that.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Well you indirectly deemed penetrative sex irrelevant or of lesser relevance by saying women get off in a lot of other ways despite penetration.
- America1st
  +1 y
  I just stated a fact. Nothing more.

Most Helpful Girls

RJGraveyTrain Editor
+1 y
I think that a lot of it could be related to experience. You have to keep in mind (no offense to anybody here) that a lot of G@Gers either haven't had nearly as many sexual partners as some folks, or any at all. I can use myself as an example, having only ever been with somebody of average size, that large penises aren't something that I value all that greatly. It isn't necessarily that I think they're bad or wouldn't be good but my experience is with somebody of an average size, and I've never had any issue being satisfied with that and never found it small. Again, having been a virgin prior, I'm biased as I've never experienced anything smaller or bigger than average.

I think it's going to be relative to experience and preference when it comes down to it, but I think if any girl could pick a size she'd pick something a little fuller than a 4"er hard.
3 0 0 0
SovereignessofVamps Editor
+1 y
If he's small, then he can fuck really hard w/o hurting her, so I've seen girls say they love small dicks. FYI, vaginas are different sizes too. A thick and small dick would be perfect for me. I've never fit the whole thing inside.

And there are some great deep spots, but the G spot and a lot of the sensation is in the first 1-2 inches of pussy, so that's why some girls just love it when his head penetrates, like more shallow sex.
0 0 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  "so I've seen girls say they love small dicks." I've literally never come across this. Vaginas are elastic. Girth is in relevance to size as well. The majority of women like to be filled up. If you like that shallow feeling then you would be one of the few.
- SovereignessofVamps
  +1 y
  No, like I said Vs are different lengths. But here, the original post was deleted for some reason but the comments say all: www.reddit.com/.../
- SovereignessofVamps
  +1 y
  New shortened links are cool lol
- Show All Show Less
- SovereignessofVamps
  +1 y
  And yeah, even when I'm really turned on it doesn't stretch that much. I can almost touch the back with my own fingers...
BaileyisDarcy Editor
+1 y
"Because its cringe"

Im sorry, whats cringe? Cringe? You sure thats not you because i was taking you seriously for a moment there and then im like woah. This guys believes in the cringe. Fuck shits getting fucked up in here, better get moving out before the cringe bites me in my dick sizeist vagina.
1 1 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  I read this twice. Still don't understand lmao.
- BaileyisDarcy
  +1 y
  Thats cringey dude. Real fuckin cringey.
- ButtHurt
  +1 y
  Were you having a seizure when you typed that?
- Show All Show Less
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  @ButtHurt lmfao
- foodfairywins
  +1 y
  Right? How can he call anyone cringe when he's here literally triggered over what women think of penises. This is pretty amazing stuff - I'm dying over here. do you think obvious troll is obvious or what?
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  @foodfairywins I debate. I like to debate. That doesn't make triggered. Stop spamming my notifications bro.
- foodfairywins
  +1 y
  The pink coloured responses on this site are from women. You're not debating. You're just calling people replying to you liars. You have a poll - you have your results. FYI 6+ inches is great FOR ME. I can't speak for all women. A micropenis is dissapointing.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  @foodfairywins Lol what? I didn't even call anyone a liar. I articulated my response to every one of them.
- BaileyisDarcy
  +1 y
  LMFAO Now i dont use that acronym. Ever. But this is a special occasion, because YOU my good cringe man, have done fucked up. "I didn't even call anyone a liar." Take a moment, scroll up to the top of the page, and read your question title, my cringey friend. didn't call anyone a liar HAH.
- BaileyisDarcy
  +1 y
  @foodfairywins I would love to agree that obvious troll is obvious. But sadly, I do believe we are simply dealing with the self righteous cringe master.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  She daid in reference to me responding to these girls. You didn't catch anything. She implied as if they say something and I disregard it by saying its a lie.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  You girls can both come at me sure.
- BaileyisDarcy
  +1 y
  "You didn't catch anything." Thats your favourite saying, isn't it, Cringe Man. Course I didn't, Im arguing with you, from your point of view you are correct and all the women are liars. And youve told everyone this, not be replying to them, but before they even read the details of your question. "Why are girls lyings so much about penis size on here?" You called us all liars before we even clicked in to respond. Thats what @foodfairywins was saying. You need to learn to understand what people are telling you, not just read what theyre saying, Cringe Man.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  That's not a way to win an argument lol. She referenced me invalidating every woman's response on her by saying she is a liar which is simply not true. I have actually articulated myself to every response on here. I'm not going in with this nonsensical approach on the lines of "You all are full of shit" I'm forcing people to think and actually give me their reasoning. You can add the LMAO and HA all you want. That's not going to trigger me lol. If you want to actually have a civilized debate then I'm down. If you want to start name-calling me because you have nothing else to say then I'll be on my way. I asked this question in a very bold way for a reason. Bold responses. The issue with coming off this bold is people completely get off topic into irrelevant shit because it triggers them lol. Again, you can talk to me about the subject, but if it's name-calling trying to get a rise. I'll pass.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  That girl below me told me that the mode is the average. The average of the study is irrelevant. Lol. I mean. Cmon. I'm practically a math major and this girl in preaching elementary mathematics followed up with HA and LMAO that doesn't even make sense. The girl literally can't grasp the logic as to why we don't call the mode the average. It's just ridiculous aha. You can't fault me for laughing at that. I can't understand what she was saying because it mathematically didn't make sense.
- BaileyisDarcy
  +1 y
  You are accusing HER of something which is untrue. Again, listen to what people are telling you. Not to what theyre saying. You already TOLD US "youre full of shit" before we even responded. Why do you think i loaded my comment full of sarcasm? Because I knew rationality is NOT something you are looking for. What YOU are looking for, is someone who will bend to your logic. How do i know this? From reading your responses to others. You have not touched anyone who agrees with you, because theyre already on your side. You have no need to talk to them because you will get no satisfaction from it. You only respond to those who either disagree or go off topic. You won't stop arguing with me if you feel like you can win. But you won't, it feels like you could. But you won't. Because i know your game, and i play by MY rules. (Also i find no logic in telling me about a comment I've already read)
- foodfairywins
  +1 y
  This is inappropriate for me to say, because I am married, but I'm sure your penis is fine. Don't worry about all this so much. It's truly not THE number one thing a woman who is in love with you will care about. Attractive face, excellent teeth (believe me this is a BIG one for women, especially past 30+), nice body, solid job, funny charming personality, smart-to-boot, good listener come WAYYYY before penis size. A nice solid 6inch+ Jimmy is like the cherry on top of the sundae. The sundae is still good, but the cherry makes it exceptional.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  No I didn't tell you that you were full of shit. I made my stance. If I didn't say what I said, then you wouldn't be aware of my stance. My stance is that a lot of girls lie about having penis size preference on here. I don't need someone to agree with my logic. That's actually no fun. I like it when people disagree with me. Again, I like to debate. I like to force people to think about their reasoning. I have no emotional attachment to this question at all. I wanted to debate. I have done this with numerous other questions and my takes in the past. My opposing someone is not invalidating what they are saying. I'm reading and I'm digesting what they are saying. Then I'm responding in opposition. That's not be getting triggered, or me being irrational. All I really want to do is for you to respond to topic.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  @foodfairywins My penis is fine. I'm 7 something inches. My girlfriend is fine we are very much attracted to each other. This question has no personal emotional attachment to me what so ever.
- Timmay88
  +1 y
  Laughed at this
Mayamoon02 Xper 6
+1 y
Everyone has a preference and not all women orgasm through penetration.
I'm. guessing that those who fake orgasms during penetrative sex are also lying about the effect of penis size.
They probably prefer oral and clitoral stimulation so dick size isn't an issue.
0 0 0 0

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

15 8

kaylaS91 Editor
+1 y
For some girls, a guy who's dick is 4-5" long may be enough to get them to cum. It's not like guys have to bottom out in order to hit a girl's hot spot. Also, pussy's aren't 'once size fits all'.
Everything's relative. :)
1 0 0 0
225Taylor Xper 5
+1 y
I think the more experienced you are, the more it matters. I've had sex with 3 guys since I lost my virginity 9 years ago and they all looked to be about 5 inches. Got the job done for me, especially the 3rd guy! He knew how to work those inches!
0 0 0 0
watercolor_lions Yoda
+1 y
I will take a guy who is a master of foreplay over a huge penis any day.
1 0 0 0
Bleh-___- Guru
+1 y
Good thing GaG reopened all the questions. I can get back to this when I'm 40.
1 0 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Saving yourself till 40?
- Bleh-___-
  +1 y
  Against my will
foodfairywins Xper 3
+1 y
... oooookkaaaaay...
0 0 0 0
Spelling95 Xper 6
+1 y
Take everything women online say with a grain of salt. If you polled this website, half of all women would tell you income, height, dick size, race, and religion doesn't matter. We know that's simply not true irl. Pretty much if something is stereotyped as being a negative thing among women, it's because it is.
0 0 0 0
CheerGirl38139 Guru
+1 y
media.giphy.com/media/raBbE1fizfZGE/giphy.gif
0 0 0 0
DevikaButts95 Guru
+1 y
Where's the "4-5" is a regular size option? (Pretty sure that's the average size)
And that there can be such a thing as being too big?
0 0 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  4-5 would be considered below average.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  4 would, 5 and 6 seem to be the average, looking it up. So there you go.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  This study found the average penis size to be as follows: Average size for an erect penis is 14.2 cm (5.6 inches) Average circumference of an erect penis is 12.2 cm (4.8 inches). Mar 18, 2016
  
  www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/271647.php
  
  I like how you casually added that 6 in there.
- Show All Show Less
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  @Chico_brah That was the exact article I looked up. And while it gave the estimate of about 5 inches, it also said this: "Erect lengths average from 12 to 16 centimeters (4.7 to 6.3 inches)." Which is why I "casually added the 6 in there".
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  The total average was calculated at 5.6inches. That was the conclusion of the abstract. 4.7 inches would be on the lowest end of the spectrum. It just sounded kind of convenient that you mentioned the 6 when your introductory claim was 4-5 inches. In the world of statistics, we would by default reference the 5.6 inches. A 4.7 inch penis is a small penis.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  That's called cherry picking and it's stupid. Lmao. You don't get to just decide what is the average buddy. 5-6 inches is the average, based on what that article said. (I said 4-5 originally because I thought it was 4-5) Since penises tend to vary in size, it would always be a range of averages. So it would be like 5.5 inches +- .8 inches, again going off what the article suggested.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  What? That's not cherry picking. 5.6 inches was the abstract calculated average. That's literally what it says.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  https://i.imgur.com/jkHyTYL.jpg
  
  In the world of statistics, you would reference the cumulative abstract average.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  cdn1.medicalnewstoday.com/.../...ze-in-studies.png
  LMAO.
  Nice cutoff of that ruler saying "between 5.1 and 5.6"
  Cherry picking. ;) :*
  In the world of science, math, as well as manufacturing, you'd note the standard deviation. ;)
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  That doesn't even match what you said since you said 4 inches. Again, in a parameter, you reference the cumulative abstract average. You don't reference the lowest value of the study to make it fit your narrative. I'm very well of what a standard deviation is. I'm not trying to hide any part of the article. You didn't catch anything.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Read the bottom of that.
  https://i.imgur.com/WbSKAxT.jpg
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  That's referencing the standard deviation of a different study.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  Are you blind or unable to read? Lmao. Okay, I'll clear it up one more time, I originally thought it was between 4 and 5 inches,, on average. The article suggested this: "Erect lengths average from 12 to 16 centimeters (4.7 to 6.3 inches)." Inferring that it's between 5 and 6 inches, and then I changed it to that. Learn to read buddy. "You don't reference the lowest value of the study to make it fit your narrative." I didn't, I referenced the range of numbers from the study. Also, irony since you repeatedly keep referencing the highest number of the average to fit your narrative. Lmao. "I'm very well of what a standard deviation is. I'm not trying to hide any part of the article. You didn't catch anything." Lmao. Riiiiiggggghhhhhhtttttt.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  5.6inches is not the highest value. That's the abstract cumulative average. That was in reference to a different study if you bothered to look at the picture I just showed you. The study we are looking at said that OTHER studies found this. Despite that, you don't arbitrary take two numbers that are within the range of that standard deviation and call it the average. You use the the cumulative average.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  You use the cumulative average within that range. **
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  What would be the purpose in me hiding any of the article when you can easily click it and see for yourself that I am lying. There is literally no motive for me to hide the article. That would work against me if anything.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  @Chico_brah And I said 5.5 inches +- .8 inches, noting the range of values, with respect to standard deviation since amazingly all guys aren't going to fit the bill of exactly 5.6 inches. There's a range for the average in this case. A 5.6 would suggest that someone with a 5.5 inch dick would have a small dick and a below average. Absolutely insane. Lmao. This is why they teach you about mode in math class buddy. ;) The 5.1 - 5.6 one would become 5.35 +- .25 inches. Not sure what guy you're jealous of that's making you so antsy about this but lmao you're just gunna have to accept that 5 inches is average.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  No. Not everyone is going to have 5.6 inch penis. That's sort of a given?
  
  They fall within the realm of that standard deviation. You average that standard deviation and what you get is 5.6 inches. You don't arbitrary pick two values within that standard deviation and call it the average. You take the average of that standard deviation. 5.6 inches is the abstract cumulative average.
  
  On a bell shaped distrbution table. flylib.com/.../figu114_1.jpg
  
  The 68% percent represents one standard deviation. The 95% represents 2 standard deviations. The 99.7% represents 3 standard deviations.
  
  That 5.6 inches would be dead center of all of that. I can go over the Empirical Rule if you like. I can actually show you the formula in how we get this number. I can go through the formula to show you that a few percentage of the standard deviation fall within the 4 inch range.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Can we have a civilized debate without throwing in irrelevant jabs like "Yeah buddy" ? No need for that. I've literally been paid by a community college to tutor student in math. I've gotten students ready for their statistics midterms and finals. I'm an engineer. Mathematics is not something you're probably going to beat me at. Mathematics is a logic based concept. Mathematics is absolute. You can't wiggle your way around it. The fact is that the abstract of that study has confirmed that 5.6 inches is the average. You don't take two arbitrary numbers within the range of the 1st standard deviation and say that's the average. You take the average of it all. 5.6 inches is the average. A lesser percent is going to fall within the 4 inch range, therefore making it small.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  Holy wow dude that inability to functionally read. I dropped the 4 inch number long ago. And I've repeated that thrice now. Look buddy, it's unlikely that the number is 5.6 flat-out. You're going to need to include at least the first standard deviation for this, especially considering that it's probably more typical that a guy is bigger than the mean average. Here, let me put it in this scenario. Let's say that for every 7 men in the world, have these dick sizes 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 7, 8. That's the data set. Every 7 men have a dick of that size in inches. What's the average of that? 5 inches. But is that what men, in this world, have on average? No, most men have a 4 inch dick, in this world. (not in real life I stress this is a hypothetical scenario, you need that apparently.) 70% of men would have a 4 inch dick in this world. The average is not 5 inches like the mean is, that would mean 70% of men don't fall into this average. That's illogical.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  "Look buddy, it's unlikely that the number is 5.6 flat-out" I've already replied with. "No. Not everyone is going to have 5.6 inch penis. That's sort of a given?" I never said that every man has a 5.6 inch penis. I never once stated that. I stated that the average is 5.6 inches. On that bell shaped distribution table, the 5.6 inches would fall dead center. "But is that what men, in this world, have on average" The average is a reference point of everything put together. "In this world" That's how the world of statistics operate. You reference 5.6 inches as the average. The bell shaped distribution was designed in a way in which those outliers fall out of the given standard deviation. You're taking one variable of the formula that gives you the average. You're just supposed to take the average. You don't arbitrarily pick two numbers in a range and call it the average. You just take the average.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  The abstract average was calculated at 5.6 inches.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  "Here, let me put it in this scenario. Let's say that for every 7 men in the world, have these dick sizes 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 7, 8. That's the data set. Every 7 men have a dick of that size in inches. What's the average of that? 5 inches. But is that what men, in this world, have on average? No, most men have a 4 inch dick, in this world. (not in real life I stress this is a hypothetical scenario, you need that apparently.) 70% of men would have a 4 inch dick in this world. The average is not 5 inches like the mean is, that would mean 70% of men don't fall into this average. That's illogical." And that's why there is a range of values given, not just a flat out number. Actually that's part of why. Lmao. Anyhow 5-6 inches is an average penis size. Not the exact average if the word choice makes you feel better, but an average range.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Do you really not understand the logic of why we wouldn't take the mode and call it the average?
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  5-6 is a completed rounded number, therefore making an ineffective way to represent the average. If you would of used the exact low and highest value of that range then it would be a little more respectable. You're just saying 5-6 is average. 5.6 was the calculated average. No one in the world of statistics would ever choose two arbitrary numbers that aren't even the lowest and highest value and call it the average. The math has already been done. The average is 5.6 inches. You reference 5.6 inches as average.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  a number expressing the central or typical value in a set of data, in particular the mode, median, or (most commonly) the mean, which is calculated by dividing the sum of the values in the set by their number. This is what average means. And it's why you'd take the mode, or median in that situation. That's the central or typical number. Average means typical. "No one in the world of statistics would ever choose two arbitrary numbers that aren't even the lowest and highest value and call it the average." Well with standard deviation (5.5 - .8 is 4.7 inches, and 5.5 + .8 inches is 6.3 inches) they would. (That translates to between 4.7 and 6.3 inches written out, by the way. As the article, which relies on that STATISTIC, states. ;) ) I'm rounding to 5 and 6 there myself. 4.7 isn't the lowest number in the range either, nor is 6.3 the highest. I'm sure they had more above and below both those numbers, obviously.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Are you seriously not grasping the logic as to why you don't call the mode the average? I don't know how else to explain this lol. The center point of the bell shaped distribution table is 5.6 inches for a reason.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  I don't recall seeing a bell-shaped graph on that article. Lmao. Not to mention the definition I guess gave you. Lmao.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  That's a generic standard bell-shaped graph in the world of statistics. That's what study references their standard deviations into those percentages. That's what their standard deviation is based off of. If you really don't understand the logic as to why we don't call the mode the average then I'll explain it. Within that standard deviation there are going to be numbers that are not the mode. They are not to be deemed irrelevant. You're not going to disregard every number that is not the most frequent. You have to include all of the numbers within that range to get an accurate average. That's why they call it the average. There are a lot of people that participated in this study. You don't take the mode and call it the average for that reason.
- DevikaButts95
  +1 y
  Lmao that's incorrect. There's a reason that mode exists in the first place, and it's a means of determining the average. The same goes for median. In the example I gave, where 5 people have 4 inch dicks, saying 5 is a typical size of a guy's dick is insane and just plain incorrect. Lmao. There's discussion about how the mean is not always the best way to go about finding the average of something.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  You are literally too stupid to stupid to explain this to. I've never ended a debate like this. You're too stupid to argue with. Whatever I say you will just say you're right and rationalize in a way that doesn't make any sense at all. You don't have the cognitive ability to process something that a child learns within minutes of his 4th grade teacher explaining to him. Please do not reproduce.
- foodfairywins
  +1 y
  why are you getting so triggered
wittymilf Guru
+1 y
lesbians have better sex than you :)
5 0 1 0
- foodfairywins
  +1 y
  I get the feeling this is true!! hahah
TiffyPuff Yoda
+1 y
Lol, b. s. Like, seriously.

And why is this something that matters to you so much? That's kinda crazy.
1 0 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  What's kind of crazy? That's never a good rebute in an argument. It didn't take too much of a diligent effort to post this question in less than a minute. If it's bullshit, then tell me why size is bullshit.
- TiffyPuff
  +1 y
  So like, when I'm with a guy, I don't know how big his penis is until after I've decided to sleep with him. Cuz that's when his pants come off. And if I've gotten to the point where I trust a guy enough to let him have me, having an average sized penis isn't going to make me look for another guy. A guy's character is a bit more of an important factor in a relationship than his penis size. Hard to find good people.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  I'm referring to smaller penises. Not average penises. That sounds nice and pretty but the reality is that his personality won't be penetrating you when sex happens. His penis will be.
- Show All Show Less
- TiffyPuff
  +1 y
  4-5 is average. Says scientists who have measured more penises than they probably ever wanted to see.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  You can look at what I said on DevikaButts95 opinion. Just went over this.
- TiffyPuff
  +1 y
  Yes, and 4-5 is still average. Look, I don't really care about this topic enough to keep arguing with you. You came here claiming what women's opinions are, and yet when we've disagreed, you don't want to hear it. Who's the authority on women's opinions? You, or the women themselves?
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  I'm willing to debate. As I just told the other user, in the world of statistics, you reference the cumulative abstract average. You don't take the lowest value and reference that to support your narrative.
glitterberryalisa Xper 7
+1 y
I'm a girl and it really matters how experienced they are and how they use what they have! Too big can be painful anyways.
1 0 0 0
rgb008 Master
+1 y
BRB penetrating my boyfriend with my tits!!!
2 1 0 0
- BoobMan
  +1 y
  God. DAYUM!
Sparklegemz Xper 6
+1 y
Calm down u..
1 0 0 0
confusedgirlxox Xper 4
+1 y
No bigger than 6 inches and thick otherwise it hurts.
0 0 0 0
- confusedgirlxox
  +1 y
  I find really long penises kinda gross actually... this guy was sending my friend dickpicks and was really proud of his 9 inch penis and we all found it really gross
ButtHurt Xper 5
+1 y
Because it's PC... who tf knows
0 0 0 0
askaway2012new Yoda
+1 y
"It should fit like a glove"
Small dick needs a small glove.
0 0 0 0
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Vaginas are elastic though.
- Chico_brah
  +1 y
  Are you about to compare it to an elastic glove?
- askaway2012new
  +1 y
  I didn't study "dicklogy" nor did i learn what "pussylogy" course may contain. but i am sure girls dont love small dicks.
TonyRyanAgain Guru
+1 y
Lol, it's true... women don't want small packages, i think they're trying to be nice so the guys with little meat missiles don't cry...
2 0 0 0
pinkanon Explorer
+1 y
I tell the truth
0 0 0 0
Blitzkrieger Guru
+1 y
Well they can always get dick surgery. Or the woman can get botox injections in her g spot to enlarge it so she can cum faster, that exists too.
0 0 0 0
ToruMatsuda Yoda
+1 y
They probz never done it with a little fellow

Oh well I'm screwed😂
0 0 0 0
Show More (3)