- Save the manVote A
- Save the womenVote B
Most Helpful Guy
I'm sick of women, so I'd save the man.0
I'm sick of women, so I'd save the man.
oh gosh id need some time to think because APPARENTLY i need to think of the following...
what if she's a feminist?
what if he's a really handsome man?
what if the woman was lorena bobbitt and the man was mahatma gandhi?
what if the man might be the future inventor of cure for cancer?
-.- -.- -.-
I would save woman, most likely. Only because I'll assume she's going to be a bit smaller, therefore easier for me to try and save. I'm not the best swimmer so if I had a male of standard adult-male size going all dead-weight on me, we'd both probably go down.
I'd wait and see who can last the longest. And then I guess I'd save the winner and buy them an ice cream for a prize.
I would save the one I would be most likely able to save. If I have more of a chance being able to help out a either gender then I would. It depends on my strength and whether or not I would be able to pull them out of the water. Whoever was smaller is the one I would save.
Neither because once I got into the water I'd automatically become victim number 3 lol. I can't swim and I'm extremely afraid of drowning. So instead of definitely sentencing all 3 of us to death, I'd try to alert others so that maybe they both could be saved.
I'd go for the girl first, because chances are she weighs less and it would be easier to get her to the land. Then probably girl power up and go save the guy together. So yeah, whoever is smaller. Or whoever was closer to me at the time I noticed.
Quick assessment of who is smaller and therefore more likely for me to successfully save.
Let them both drown because they are too stupid to grab onto the pier...😒
I'm pretty sure you are looking for answers to insult people.
This guy is a lover of posting questions to hurl insults. Your reputation and language precedes you anon.
Let the insults commence.
Gah... god knows. In that sort of situation your brain doesn't engague you just act...
From a practical stand point I would save the woman FIRST, because generally speaking a guy will be able to hold out in the cold water for longer, and have slightly better stamina so he has a greater chance of staying afloat till I can get back to him, after saving the woman. Further If I saved a guy who is liekly to be heavier first I might be too knackered to try rescuing the lass.
But in no way would I be thinking "I can only save one" I would be thinking "gotta save them both, which first?" A life isn't intrinsically more or less valuable because of gender. Is the woman worth more because she's the 'fairer sex' and the 'damsel'? Is she worth less because there are more women than men? Answer: Neither.
A person's worth is far to complex a thing to be considering at such a moment.
depends who is farther away from safety and by how much and if there is people standing around. if all things are equal then I don't know i probably save the smaller person first.
Whoever was closest or that I could get to first and that I was sure I could save. In the moment especially a moment like that you don't have to think otherwise people will get hurt or die your body will either react or it won't.
I'd save the woman out of instinct I'm not sure why.
Or the one I'm closest too. I don't know. I'm bad at making quick decisions.
Sorry, dude. But I would save the woman. That way, mankind can continue.
I'd save the one with a Klondike Bar.
Let em both drown.
I can't swim so neither
the woman. women are better in ways that men aren't.
How sexists. Feminists should be appalled. After all its about equality for all.
You cannot undo this action. The opinion owner is going to be notified and earn 7 XPER points.