Is it odd or bad to refuse a guy because he is not circumcised?

[EuropeanChick]

[Anonymous]

I think this is the type of preference you say you have until you're given a reason not to have it.

Picture this: you've been on 3-5 dates with this awesome cute guy. Your'e falling for him, he's perfect, y'all finally take it to the bedroom, and he isn't cut. Do you care then? I'll answer for you, you won't. You'll argue on the internet you would, but in the moment, you wouldn't.

[Robertcw]

Fuck yes. Circumcision is genital mutilation.

It’s wrong. Just like female circumcision is wrong.

Don’t complain about male circumcision unless you are willing to undergo female circumcision, period.

[morimeme1]

female circumcision is a bit more extreme tho

[OfDeath]

@morimeme1 not necessarily. Baby boys die every year from this operation even in the US

[morimeme1]

where is this statistic from? how do they die? It should not be possible since it's just cutting off a little skin...

[OfDeath]

@morimeme1 here you go http://www.cirp.org/library/death/

[morimeme1]

Most of thoss still refer to the early part of 20th century or tribes in africa (we all know that sanitation was still poor especially in rituals unsupervised by medical staff), I am quite sure that nowadays there are way less of those cases and really. Plus it is not the procedure that is dangerous or bad, it is just exevuted poorly, yes circumsized guys do experience a little loss in sensstion during sex because the skin becomes more dense but circumcised females practiacally lose all that was pleasurable about sex.

[OfDeath]

@morimeme1 you are entitled to a right of reply and I will accepted it as a comment and move along.

[Robertcw]

I don’t know about deaths. That seems too extreme. Here’s what I do know, male circumcision removes 70% of the nerve endings from a penis. Female circumcision removes a compatible amount of nerve endings from the vulva. That’s the bottom line.

[Robertcw]

The type that removes everything but the labia major and sows it shut — yeah that’s like the equivalent of chopping a dick of and leaving a hole for the urethra. That’s more extreme. But a regular partial removal of the clitoris seems to be on the same page as male circumcision.

[morimeme1]

I am pretty sure that is medically inaccurate as I just studied it in anotomy class, the glans of the penis (the head) has a lot of nerve ending therefore is very sensitive, if the protective skin is removed the glans becomes less sensitive and more dense therefore reducing the feeling and making guys supposedly last longer. Female circumcision is cutting off the clitoris which is about the only place which actually has nerve endings there so enjoying sex or at least orgasming would become virtually impossible for a female. :/

[Robertcw]

The penis glans do become harder and callous and lose sensitivity, yes. But there are a majority of nerve endings in the foreskin of the penis not the penis head.

When men feel pleasure from sex the pleasure is felt in the tugging of the foreskin, not in the rubbing of the head.

Male penis foreskin contains 20,000 nerve endings compared to the clitoris’ 8,000 nerve endings.

Circumcised men are three times more likely to have erectile dysfunction compared to circumcised men.

thenurturingroot.com/.../

[morimeme1]

Tnat is very interesting and weird at the same time, why would it affect blood flow to the penis. 🤔

[Robertcw]

It doesn’t effect blood flow. It effects if we an feel anything when our dick is touched. Male arousal is mental and visual. Erections are not caused by touch, they are caused by sight. Erection first, pleasure second caused by tugging of foreskin. Think about evolutionarily. How could a man get a woman pregnant if he couldn’t get erect before his penis touched anything?

[Robertcw]

affect*

[EuropeanChick]

@morimeme1 if it makes a guy penis less sensitive then is bad

[morimeme1]

But yes, it is mutilation, everything in the human body was created optimal and if that practive started purely out if hygenic reasons then now they really do it only as a tradition.

[Robertcw]

Thanks for saying that. It is mutilation, and modern research shows that it doesn’t actually help with hygiene the way people used to think it did. It only prevents 1% of cases of infection. If it actually worked, evolution would have done the circumcision thousands of years ago. in my opinion.

[SueShe]

Wow, if you start at age 22 to have preconceived ideas about circumcision and whether this is more important than his personality and his character is pretty stiff to me.

I just hope you won't make decisions in life about subjects as trivial as that and overlook the real important things that really matter.

[Rose54321]

Theirs nothing wrong with that, it's a preference like hair colour or build, I also do not like to date guys with foreskin, mostly because those who I had previously never washed properly and still pressured you to go down.

[EuropeanChick]

that's about hygiene

[ChurchOfIron]

Yeah, kinda fucked up. "No, I'll only take chicks who do not have a clitoral hood."

But, if that's what you want, that's what you want. So, nothing for it. Like pedophiles. It's not their fault they wanna bang kids. And, it's not your fault you only wanna bang mutilated penises.

[anupamagrawal]

Why would you think that way. Everyone has preferences for pussies, boobs, asses; so you have preference for circumcised penis. There is nitjing wrong in that.

Its about letting that thing inside of you, so if you dont like it why would you take it inside your pussy.

So refusal is not bad, but it should be in a gentle way telling that you have preference for circumcised, so You are sorry but you can't have him do sex with you.

[Alwaysthinking14]

No it’s a taste. Some men like women that have small boobs or black hair etc. You like someone who is circumcised, I don’t see what the big deal is.

[morimeme1]

Like is one thing but you usually don't refuse a great girl just because her hair is not of a particular color.

[Alwaysthinking14]

Well the question is about circumcision, that’s different than hair color. Hair color can be changed or you can wear a wig. Circumcision is something that can only be changed by surgery so it’s more involved. I’ve seen men reject great women because they’re over weight. So yes, men and women reject each other for all sorts of physical traits that they find unattractive.

[morimeme1]

Genital mutilation is a weird thing to have a taste for...

[Alwaysthinking14]

In your opinion. It’s a lot more common than you think.

[morimeme1]

I guess not in Europe, circumcised guys are pretty rare here.

[J3nny]

Wow. That's the shallowest thing I've heard in a while

[truthbeknown]

NO! You have every right to avoid what you don't like and go after what you do! You date someone to make YOU happy, not society. So don't listen to all the stupids fucks shaming you into liking something you naturally don't.

[katiesmuff]

What does refuse a guy mean? If it means dating how the fuck would you even know what kind of dick a guy has? I'm quite sure you don't just walk up to a guy and tell him you are interested in dating him, but let me see your dick first to be sure you are circumcised! This certainly is a very odd thing to worry about.
What possible difference would it make anyway. Circumcised or uncircumcised they still work the same,

[hahahmm]

If you’d be okay with a guy rejecting you because your clit has not been hacked off it’s fair

[Marcuslrh]

Yes that is odd and bad to think like that

[morimeme1]

Yes it is, that is such an insignificant criteria. 🤦‍♀️

[Rocky143143143]

Yes u r right

[someginger]

I would say it's odd and yeah a little bad, it would be like if a guy rejected you for not having your nipples pierced

[JoyISok3]

So stupid.

[boggboss]

Meh it's your choice but it's pretty silly then again not the worst preference I have heard off

[NEW_YUKI]

😂😂😂no...

[TadCurious]

It's very shallow and unaccepting of normal male anatomy. But the guy with the intact penis is better off not being with someone that immature.

[Straight_Shooter]

How do you feel about the natural anatomy of a woman who doesn't shave her legs or armpits? A lot of guys are turned off by that too. This really isn't that much different.

[Grobmate]

I would say it is yes. Refusing someone because of the natural characteristic of their genitalia is pretty bad. What would you do if a guy refused you simply on the grounds that your genitalia hasn't been mutilated?

[Dargil]

Not at all. Intimacy is as important as things can get. You have the prerogative to any details you want.

[0112358]

If you’re European and not Muslim or Jewish it’s odd.

Tbh in North America it’s still odd, but avoiding bj is more common.

[Ámayas_20]

As bad as a guy refusing a girl because she still has a clitoris.

[goaded]

About as bad as rejecting a girl because of her vulva. So, yes, pretty shallow.

[Drumlin2001]

Would seem swallow.

How would you feel about a guy who only dated women who had a boob job?