1. The Uncertainty principle.
2.The fact that Schrodinger cat is obviously bullsh*t.
observed, there is a 50% chance it will be dead, and 50% chance it will be alive." Its one or the other, it cannot be both.
If you cannot see that logical flaw you are a moron.
3. The Gettier problem.
4. The thousands of men who were released from prison because they were "proven" guilty and now were "proven" innocent because of the new evidence.
If they were "beyond a shadow of a doubt to be "proven" guilty, and now thousands are proven wrong, how can these objective observations of their guilt be correct when they are now obviously proven wrong?
And how do you know that some of them were not doctored? do you have to make an assumption that none of the "new" DNA evidence was doctored to make it look like he was innocent when he was guilty?
So your not assuming then? you have "knowledge" that they all were proven innocent that, "all" of those people got it wrong the first time and NOW they are right.
Obviously they were making some assumptions then, and making some assumptions now.
So OBVIOUSLY making ANY kind of observation requires some assumptions.
And if they require assumptions they are obviously INHERENTLY subjective.
Something being subjective does not require questioning "everything."
The point is, subjective opinion is subjective because people don't wish to "question eveyrhting" and because people make assumptions based on observation, it is therefore subjective based on these assumptions.
Most Helpful Guy
With Schrodinger's, you have to realise. The cat, while unseen, can not exist. It's not a 50/50 thing. We have no basis on which to prove the cat is there, other than to look. It isn't bullsh*t, it's just logical.
Now to the interesting bit. You're sort of asking a 2+2=5 question. How can we be sure the information on which we base ANY decision is right? What if everything we thought was right is in fact, wrong? We have to believe what we have at that point is right. We have no choice but to do that. If not, we end up going nuts questioning the existence of everything. 2+2=4 because it is logical to the basis of our understanding of the universe.
Or something like that...
- Show AllShow Less