Search Results: date material

I’ve seen a lot of desirable men date and try and mess with the super hot girl but when they marry, they always choose the girl that’s kinda cute and private with her life, will cook and clean etc

Stunning girls are too egotistical and attention oriented to be wives in many cases I see.

I think it is. It’s problematic because so few men are considered attractive physically. Maybe like a few in a hundred, you gotta have a good face, and tall and jacked. It’s rare and all the women chase this guy. I know many guys that struggle to get any interest or even get a date.

It definitely is the case for men, but so many women are pretty. So it works. Many men have low standards.

What we see is too many women being able to date up attractiveness and wonder why men are ‘trash’ when they aren’t fighting for the ones that are husband material. I don’t think women fight for the right men. It’s just looks. They let very attractive dudes get away with so much.

Hillary Clinton called for the repeal of Section 230 of the (way out of date IMHO - 1996!!) TeleCommunications Act, which protects online platforms from being held liable for users content on social media.

"We should be, in my view, repealing Section 230, which gave early platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be just "pass-throughs" and that they shouldn't be judged for the content that is posted," Clinton said "But we now know that that was an overly simple view, that if the platforms, whether it's Facebook or Twitter/X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control," she continued. "And it's not just the social and psychological affects, it's real life."

Clinton said the social media companies should have their immunity stripped so "guardrails" could be self-imposed WITHOUT regulations as the potential of being sued for third party user content would guarantee this self-serving outcome.

Many free speech advocates are torn by the issues raised. Some have said "This has nothing to do with censorship of either conservative or liberal views. These social media companies are publicly traded, private corporations accountable to their shareholders above all other considerations - that's capitalism. If, as private corporations they choose not to host material they believe to be inflammatory, false or misleading content that unfortunately would create another scenario whereby the private corporations are now the gatekeepers for an increasing number of Americans source of news." Others have stated "However, the imposition of rudimentary "guard rails" would be prudent and the issue of gatekeeping would have to be addressed as a known consequence of putting those guardrails in place.".

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-says-social-media-companies-need-moderate-content-we-lose-total-control.amp

This is assuming the posting of the material was lawful at the date/location it was posted.

Like let's say the guy "used to be" a worker in X job title or Y job industry that you discover from flirting or dating. Or she you find out "also used to work or current works at Y" and you're like oh wow I worked there also or oh yeah I remember that hell. Bonding lol 😆 does that help make them lover material or love making material potential lol "they still haven't changed the work uniform logo crest" lol.

If women will always cheat physically or emotionally when she finds her man is boring or going through bad phase or finds much another interesting man.

Then why do men keep trying to impress or date or marry women , whereas he has options to hire some girl for good time?

I'm saying this because the bloody truth is the women whom a man loves genuinely will cheat physically or emotionally sooner or later with other men and women is bad in nature and can never truly love a man unless he's rich , wealthy , lots of connections and handsome.

Not all man can't have it all. Not all man is created handsome by god , rich because of external circumstances

Besides man always love his chosen women with the core of the heart without having backup partner in mind , but women always does have backup partner even that women loves his man. So what kind of relationship is this?

Hypergamy, women always marry men who's upper than her (eg better connection, high status, education,) . But why men can't marry the woman he loves if the woman is rich.

Why women doesn't feel guilty when cheat physically or emotionally with other men, when on the other side his man is trying to create a world for her or loves her.

Finally let me tell something, if a man cheats he will do it only for physical needs , but when a woman cheats she does these things to satisfy other men who will just make her his whore , when she cheats she involves or create emotional bonding with her new lover. So that's why no man forgives that woman even if she was a heart for that man.

Dear women , as a man let me tell you there are still many good guys are available , please try to understand their heart.

If these cheating continues, no women will find husband material guy again for upcoming generation. Please do comment your thoughts, I think I'm right.