"Girls don't fuck-- they *get* fucked."

[Anon-ymous1]

This shouldn't take too long.

Saw the phrase which is ^ this myTake title on another site once and thought it made a lot of sense, physically and anatomically speaking (dick vs. pussy and all that). Making "I fucked that guy last night" incorrect (unless he's into some kinky stuff like getting pegged, not that there's anything wrong with that I guess) and "I *got* fucked by that guy last night" correct. No?

I mean the logic is sound; if you finger a girl, she isn't fingering you too-- she's *getting* fingered. Your finger is doing the doing, just like a dick is doing the doing. The pussy is getting done. I suppose it's just semantics but words have actual meanings, so... seems relevant.

Likewise, if a guy or girl is going down on a girl, they are performing oral sex on the girl; the oral sex is not mutual. Performing. Action. The word "fuck" is a verb; verbs are words that denote action. "Fucking" is an act in which two parties are involved, yes, but one side is penetrating and one side is getting penetrated.

If for some reason that bothers someone because they think sex is a completely mutual act (even though in the next breath they'd probably acknowledge that they are sexually attracted to dominating their partner if male or being dominated by their partner if female), then simply say "having/had sex with" rather than "fucking/fucked."

That's about it, I guess. Words matter. Hugs and kisses.

[neilsmart]

that's true, we can't f**k only guys can

[Anon-ymous1]

Unless you're wearing a strap-on or something.

[LegateLanius]

Yeah.

[Soft4u]

Come on really, so the word " fuck " is owned by the guy? WRONG
To fuck is the act between two people, it has nothing to do with a dick or a pussy. SORRY!

[Soft4u]

To better clarify: To " fuck " is the act of sexual intercourse between two people.

[Anon-ymous1]

Nope. "Wrong." "Sorry."

[Soft4u]

I don't think so there Editor. You couldn't be more wrong, there's a few things in your brief article that don't make any sense.

[Anon-ymous1]

Such as?

[Soft4u]

I'm not trying to debate this really I don't have the time. You mention something about fingering, yes the girl is getting fingered, you're right it can't be said the the girl is fingering. I agree with that, to be honest I didn't read it word for word. You know fingering, oral, or whatever else are things done between a couple. Like if a girl is giving her boyfriend a blowjob, it can't be said he's doing it bc she's doing it. It's different tho when a guy & girl are fucking, it doesn't matter who's on top or the bottom, or who's doing the pounding, both the guy & girl are involved in the act of fucking, to fuck is an act between two people. To finger or to give a blowjob, or to eat a pussy is an act being done by one person. Believe me I'm not trying to throw you under the bus I'm not like that, when I feel strongly about something I usually don't give up. Just think about it.

[Anon-ymous1]

The one getting penetrated is the one getting fucked. There's nothing complicated about this. Think about it-- if two dudes are involved in a blowjob, who is MORE gay, the one receiving the dick in his mouth or the one whose dick is getting sucked? Sure it's gay either way but which is gayer? Having sex is an action between two people, and one of them is fucking and one of them is getting fucked.

[GoldCobra]

She’s actually right. Fuck is defined as sexual intercourse between two people. It has nothing to do with a guy penetrating a woman or penetration in general. If 2 women are having sex, they are technically fucking each other.

[Anon-ymous1]

@GoldCobra Nope; they're having sex. They're only fucking each other if they're penetrating each other.

[GoldCobra]

No, I just looked up the definition of fuck and it doesn’t mention penetration

[Anon-ymous1]

@GoldCobra Yeah... that doesn't really matter.

[Anon-ymous1]

@GoldCobra Stay with me bro. I need you to actually read what I wrote. Write about *that,* not a dictionary.

[Soft4u]

@GoldCobra Thank you, I didn't look up any definition, the act of fucking is an act between two people. A blowjob, eating pussy, fingering is done by from one to the other, fucking is an act involving two people, both are fucking.

[GoldCobra]

Well wtf are we basing this word off of if not a definition?

[Anon-ymous1]

@GoldCobra Try logic.

[Soft4u]

You have a problem admitting you're wrong, I see where you had told someone earlier maybe this wasn't the site for him because he didn't agree with you. How about you now you're telling GoldCobra to forget the dictionary and follow your logic, that's right it's YOUR LOGIC not any one else. You have a problem why bc you're an EDITOR? You are wrong admit it.

[Soft4u]

Mr Editor you are a fool, I see how hard you're trying to convince GoldCobra, forget the dictionary and let's go with your logic. You don't see the word penetration anywhere associated with the act of fucking, it's ONLY in your logic. Editors are allowed to be wrong, time to be a stand up man like you want everyone to believe you are.

[GoldCobra]

@soft4u is that really you in the picture?

[Anon-ymous1]

Nope, I don't have a problem admitting anything that's true. You aren't following the logic of what I said in the post because, simply, you don't want to. You already had your mind made up from the get go. You even admitted that you didn't read it all the way through at first, and it's not even long. You're wrong, admit it.

[Soft4u]

You are a piece of work you really are, it's so obvious where your head is you'd never admit anything you were wrong about, you're telling me to follow your logic and not what is true, who do you think you are anyway? Now you're claiming since I said I didn't read your article word for word I'm not right, no can't do that, I'm not going back and forth with someone that would never admit defeat, that's right defeat Mr Editor, a title you don't deserve. I'm done...

[Anon-ymous1]

Okay, you're done. Bye.

[Soft4u]

@GoldCobra Yes it is, I know my butt is too big right?

[GoldCobra]

@soft4u no way. If that’s you hen “holy shit!!” But I don’t think that is you. There’s no way

[Anon-ymous1]

@GoldCobra I also have my doubts.

[Soft4u]

@GoldCobra It doesn't matter to me what you think truthfully, you asked I answered.

[Soft4u]

That's understandable, you don't like me too much so you'll find anything to try and get even with me, you'll agree with anyone about anything against me, you are worse than these guy on here asking dumb questions, you Mr. Editor are a fake. btw- You and your bro can think what you want to about me, proving something to guys that have all the answers is something I stopped doing when I grew up, may I suggest you guys do the same, mainly you Mr Editor, after all you're the fake.

[Anon-ymous1]

Uh... okay. Good for you, or something.

[jellyroo]

Words matter, just not this much.

[Anon-ymous1]

They always matter.

[jellyroo]

Just not this much.

[Anon-ymous1]

Meh. I guess we'll just have to disagree on that.

[ChronicThinker]

I suppose so, yeah.

[Queen-of-Hearts]

Lol if you wanna be picky. 😉
I prefer the term "we fucked last night" because it is more vague, not giving away any details lol. If I did it the "proper" way then everyone would know what went on on which night. That would be awkward. 😘

[Anon-ymous1]

I guess I'd rather just use "we had sex last night" then. "Sex" is an act, while "fuck" is a verb.

[Queen-of-Hearts]

I can sex you lmao. 😂 Ya ur right, sex isn't a very good verb.

[kennajackson]

I won't lie, it's true

[Femdomina]

No, it's not true, and I'll explain why scientifically, cause you obviously lack knowledge.
It's all about active and passive voice, or verb in this case.
Fucking is an active verb, being fucked is a passive verb.
The one who is on top is fucking, because he or she is being active.
The one on the bottom is being fucked because he or she is being passive.
Get it?
Active or dynamic verb denotes continued or progressive action (of a fucker in this case) on the part of the subject (who is being fucked).
Passive or stative verb denotes the lack of action, or the state of being (fucked in this case).
So, scientifically speaking, if a guy is not doing anything, he is being fucked, if the girl is doing the penetration (not penetrating him but riding him), she is fucking him, penetration is not another word for fucking.
I assure you that I fucked all of my boyfriends, and they liked it a lot ;)

[Anon-ymous1]

You must be very highly educated. Where have you studied?

[Femdomina]

Yes I am. In the University of Montenegro, almost finished.

[Anon-ymous1]

What an impressive institution. You should be proud.

[Femdomina]

Indeed I am.

[Anon-ymous1]

You clearly have a strong grasp of science and the scientific method. What are you majoring in?

[Femdomina]

Thank you. I'm majoring in Economics.

[Anon-ymous1]

How accomplished. Not in English?

[Femdomina]

First class accomplished. Not in English, but as you see, I speak English quite well.

[Anon-ymous1]

Oh yes I see. I'm just surprised. Given that attempting to distinguish yourself thusly is the reason why you think you're right. You're not.

[Femdomina]

Unlike you, I am right, and you haven't accomplished anything in the University, so you should learn from those who know (like me) ;)

[Anon-ymous1]

Haha yes, of course. Like you.

[brennanhuff]

I don't feel woman on top positions are equal though It's hard for me to see that a woman is fucking a dude in say cowgirl, whereas, a much lesser known, but my opinion aggressive position because it's more 'fucking" like action with pounding and thrusting. Like reverse missionary , I'm more likely to feel a woman is "fucking a dude'.

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff Woman on top is not just equal, it's female dominant, and there are more different girl on top positions, not just Cowgirl and Reverse missionary.
Equal position is side-ways, when nobody is on top, and they are both equally active.

Here are some of my favorite positions besides the Cowgirl and Inverted Missionary:

Swimming position (aka Clasping position): goodtoknow.media.ipcdigital.co.uk/.../...ition.jpg

Pussy-Cat Control: guidetomakelove.com/.../...r-pussy-cat-control.jpg

Lateral Coital position (aka Cat Prowl): guidetomakelove.com/.../...the-pussy-cat-prowl.jpg

Jugghead position: i.pinimg.com/.../...302f49d7838ac3a05c567d8570.jpg

Amazon position: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CEb0vY7W0AEDPAV.jpg

[brennanhuff]

Well I think some positions are more dominant than others. A woman can be dominant in cowgirl position, but it seems just to be more aggressive than she would have to for other positions. Also with the fact that often women "grind" when in the cowgirl position, which just doesn't feel dominant to me. I know some bounce and go up and down in it, but the back and forth grinding, just doesn't seem as dominant or aggressive. I've often had a bias, maybe because I'm a guy, but the pounding actions as more dominant, because they are more aggressive and "impactful". Griding for me often feels like my dick is being massaged vigorously whereas, the thrusting hard in and out of her hard is more like her pussy is fucking my dick. And I've never done pussy cat control or amazon, but I would definitely feel more submissive and dominated than I do with a woman in cowgirl or similar positions and a lot to do withh what I've said

[brennanhuff]

It's also body positions too. I don't do it, but you ever see a dude in cowgirl with porn and such? How dominant is a position like cowgirl straddling, when dudes will have their arms behind their head? ha. It's why based on optics it doesn't seem like he's being dominated. It's because of him being straddled, and he's basically in a lounging position ha. It's how I lie back on my recliner, legs straight out when watching a football game. Then look at missionary, the female is in more of a prone position, legs apart, legs up, scrunched up. The man's position looks more dominant, and the woman's looks more submissive. Like she's getting fucked and to be fucked. That's why as well, pussy cat control and amazon and inverted missionary to me are the female dominant positions. Because they are more like how it is with missionary is for man and like role reversed and where the woman is thrusting and more like he's taking her pussy and she putting it on him

[brennanhuff]

you said swimming position. I don't see swimming as dominant, because that one the woman is lying all on the dude and it's usually one because of shallow penetration and limited movement, because she's lying all the way on the man without much or any space for leverage. It's usually a sensual position. This one is similar, but I think more aggressive and I think is a sexy one. It's called inverted missionary. Quite similar too similar but where the woman's body is up a little from the man's to allow more vigorous or provide for harder fucking and thrusting from her.

Here's inverted missionary

https://ibb.co/mMriQJ

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff Well, I also prefer pounding rather than grinding, I'm obviously quite vigorous, and I'm thrusting very hard when I'm fucking his dick. So, you like Pussy Cat control and Amazon, good, you should try it sometimes ;) Yeah, it's about the optics, but as I said, I'm dominant in Cowgirl position too, though, I prefer Inverted Missionary, just like you do. The photo looks like some sort of combination, because Inverted position usually looks like this: In Swimming position, woman's legs are between man's legs, while in Inverted Missionary are straddling, similar like in Cowgirl.

[brennanhuff]

Have you ever tried it like that picture I had, which like you said is like the combination of swimming and inverted missionary? Yeah the same name can be different positions for whatever reason. Like you said staddling, but other sites show inverted missionary as the one in the pic I showed. It's called that. If you've done the swiming position, the one I showed is basically like that, but your body a little off of his and maybe his legs more apart a little, thus more leverage for harder thrusting compared to swimming position. I've never tried those, unfortunately, I don't know if I would. I'm self conscious about that stuff. I've had girlfriends, but never brought it up. It would have to be with someone I'm like super serious with and feel I can trust. I don't want to be judged. I mean what do you think? I can't help feeling I'd be judged if I ever tried being up such positions to a SO. who knows.

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff Yeah, I've tried it and it was great, I think you should try it, I'm sure you'll like it too ;)

[brennanhuff]

Yeah. I know you like it but you’re an individual woman. I mean do these positions from an objective point seem extreme? I mean they are unconventional, but I never felt they were really anything like kinky or that much. But I know there are women that would judge? Do u think these positions are something that most women wouldn’t do or judge a man on? Last thing I’d want is to be seen as less of a man be a woman I started to get serious and wanted to share or try such positions with. I mean this seems like it’s pretty mild or should be compared to so many things, but I can’t help being self conscious about it

[Asker321]

Being dominant sexually isn't a matter of being physically more active, it's about attitude.

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff Why would they be extreme? They may look unconventional, because we live in society influenced by male chauvinism and Abrahamic religions (which are patriarchal) - that's why gender roles were constructed, in order to subjugate women. Even the ancient Jewish myth about Lilith confirms that women used to be dominant, but their "God" was against that, so he banished Lilith from paradise, and created a new wife for Adam, a woman who is submissive - Eve, weak and passive, just like the so called "gender roles" are trying to impose on all women. Women who would judge those female dominant positions are either indoctrinated by such religions, or are too lazy to be on top. You wouldn't be seen as less of a man if you like dominant women... when you find one, you'll see what I'm talking about ;)

[Femdomina]

@Asker321 I know, and I obviously have attitude too ;)

[brennanhuff]

thanks, I'm not even looking for a dominant woman as in how I perceive dominant and submissive people. I don't believe most people are 100%, and often subs and doms are more on the very end of the scale either way. Like a dom mostly or mainly dominant a big majority of the time, but perhaps once a blue moon may be submissive and vice versa for the sub. But like. But a dom, dominant like 90% of the time or maybe 80% at the least. Same for subs on the submissive side. Like I'm pretty balanced, I feel that's most fun. I like to dominate, but I find being ravaged just as much fun as me ravaging. So some called that a switch I guess. So since I'm balanced, just a balanced woman basically I'm cool with or prefer, but if she's balancced, that means she enjoys being dominant obviously or likes being dominant a lot.

[brennanhuff]

@Asker321 I feel it's the combination of the two

[Asker321]

@brennanhuff. This raises the question to; can @Femdomina be still in control and enjoy the sex when a guy is on Top of her? 😃

[brennanhuff]

@Asker321 Well I don't know about her, and not going there. But a perhaps a woman can be in control if she's like being bossy with him while he's fucking on top or taunting him or something or she's rough on him with her hands or maybe she' choking him or something. Guys like to do it , don't see it much with women, but heck if dudes do it, I say women doing it or can as well and would be a way of taking control on the bottom. Some dudes like to thrust from the bottom and take over somtimes. I guess a woman can also dominate or take control if she's thrusting up and taking control. Pretty rare but can be done and have seen it.

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff I see, so you're a switch, good for you, it's easier for you to find the right girl because most of them are switches.

[Femdomina]

@Asker321 I'm always on top, that's not going to change ;)

[brennanhuff]

Yeah but do you think many women who are switches would be judgemental? I know you don't know obiviously how individual women would be. But just wondered if a woman had to be dominant to not be judging of me for wanting to try said positions. Or these positions aren't really that weird and there's more women that would be fine with it or like it, that could be switches or women who switch not having a problem with it?

[brennanhuff]

you think most girls are switches? Unfortunately it seems like most women are submissive, well if going by many women who answer on GAG here. And seeing how popular 50 shades of grey is. It seems like most women are submissive meaning, not that they don't like to dominate. But women a majority of the time like to be on the bottom or dominated or the man to be in control. I mean I hope I'm wrong. It's just anedotal for me though from my personal experience, but maybe I just happened to attract women who were lazy in bed, I don't know. I had a question too. Do you think a woman who follows and watches 50 shades of grey stuff is an indicator that she's submissive? I used to feel that way, but there's some women who I've come across who just seemed aggressive and have implied stuff entendres that suggested they are aggressive in bed or take control, but followed 50 shades of grey. I don't know it's mostly submissive women or a woman can be a switch but still all into that 50 shades stuff?

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuffI don't think that switch women would be judgmental, they usually have more understanding for men, compared to submissive women. I guess those who like that movie are mostly submissive, or maybe switches.

[brennanhuff]

Do you think most women are submissive tho or probably mixed with balanced women? And it seeming like a majority of women are submissive is more just how it seems than actual reality? Perhaps submissive women are more vocal because it’s more acceptable whereas dominant women or switch women, are just not as obvious. Thanks for your input by the way

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff You're welcome :) Yes, I think submissive women are more vocal, because society encourages them, while dominant and switch women were being suppressed. In my opinion, most women are switches, while submissive women are also quite numerous, because of the patriarchal upbringing. Dominant women are rare, for the same reasons, but things are changing, there are more and more dominant women, who knows what the future holds? ;)

[ChocoLada]

Can you imagine, the asker claims he's not arrogant 😂

[brennanhuff]

@ChocoLada He’s also trying to toe the line of looking open minded when he is not. There’s like contradictions but he avoided touching upon them. He says men can only fuck because sex is not mutual act but something done to the other, dick doing the Pussy. But on same token he says if people feel women can dominate or tries to convey women can dominate but the word referenced would be having sex or something. That’s a contradiction because if a woman can’t fuck a guy and it’s not mutual but one sided like he sees it, then he is bull shitting on his act that women can dominate. I believe he doesn’t believe women can dominate but tries to act like he thinks women can. But everything he says, says otherwise

[ChocoLada]

@brennanhuff You're right, he's full of contradictions.

[Anon-ymous1]

@ChocoLada Are you stupid?

[ChocoLada]

Nope, are you?

[Anon-ymous1]

@ChocoLada Ehhh... no, but I highly suspect you might be, if you think that conflating "I'm surprised that no one's voting for goatee; goatees can be good on handsome guys" with "Girls SHOULD like goatees because I SAID SO" makes sense and is a sign of "arrogance." What the hell are you talking about? "The asker claims he's not arrogant." Where did arrogance come into play? Are you daft? Never mind. You and the other two deserve each other.

[ChocoLada]

Hahaha, nooo, you're arrogant because you are degrading girls with your primitive attitude.

[Anon-ymous1]

@ChocoLada Mmm... no, that implies that you think there's something inherently wrong with, or dirty with, sex, if you think that admitting that girls get fucked is somehow "degrading." It's just how literal physical anatomy works. Apparently a lot of people don't know or understand human anatomy and they're still mentally in the third grade, before anyone starts sex ed.

[ChocoLada]

You have no idea about anatomy or anything else, both girls and guys here noticed your complete ignorance.

[Anon-ymous1]

@ChocoLada They noticed their ability to write without making sense, nothing more.

[brennanhuff]

You never answered this though. Just admit it. You truly don't feel women can dominate men sexually. I mean everyone already notices your attitude, just let it out man. You've said or tried to act like you're open to others assertions about women dominating men, but everything you have written implies otherwise. Just admit it

[ChocoLada]

All of them make more sense than you do mr Arrogant.

[ChocoLada]

@brennanhuff Yeah, he's always running away from the truth.

[Femdomina]

@ChocoLada The Asker is one of the most ridiculous guys here, but not the worst, believe me, there are some others ;)

[brennanhuff]

Sorry to butt in. But yeah, he's not the best, but some dudes are just ridiculous. Either being chauvinist dicks, which often reeks insecurity. I seem some dudes with primitive views and get hell bent on anything in regard to a woman saying she can be dominant and get bent out of shape and start saying how much better men are or how society is run by men and garbage. And then the dudes who are creeps and just basically try sexting women who answer anything sex related question. Even though the women being harassed have reported them probably. I've reported dudes whom I see replying to women and harassing them or being creeps despite these guys not involving themselves with me. I just felt I wanted these dudes reported as soon for their shit.

[Femdomina]

@brennanhuff Yeah, me too, they can be such a jerks.

[ninjafemme]

What if she's riding you

[Anon-ymous1]

She's getting fucked.

[Anon-ymous1]

Good question though.

[kaskas19]

Well, "fucking" is having sexual intercourse. Not penetrating someone. Two parties are involved. The definition would be different if it was just speaking in regards to the person penetrating the other. Then again, it doesn't really matter.

[Anon-ymous1]

Yeah I disagree. And words do matter.

[Nik1hil]

You are wrong!..
Or probably never met a girl.. Who knows how to ride a guy..
I have seen some in action..
And they fuck back real hard.

[Anon-ymous1]

Nope.

[Anon-ymous1]

Is the guy getting penetrated, somehow?

[Nik1hil]

Yes mentally

[Anon-ymous1]

The fuck does that even mean?

[Nik1hil]

Get laid and you will find out

[Anon-ymous1]

Mmm... no, see I have a girlfriend and we have sex regularly and your comment still makes no sense.

[Nik1hil]

Well... Just read this comment when you are single again..

[Anon-ymous1]

I'm referring to what you said about "mentally." You're making no sense.

[kennajackson]

So you've seen some action, but obviously never had it...

[Asker321]

@kennajackson you already 😂

[Wowgirl10q]

I thought higher off you then to ask such a demeaning and disgusting piece of writing

[Anon-ymous1]

I have no idea what you mean.

[Wowgirl10q]

I had respect for you

[Wowgirl10q]

I thought you were attractive and a talented writer who had good mannors

[jacquesvol]

Linguistics proving dominant role of men in society since milleniums.

[brennanhuff]

which is why the OP feels this way, he thinks he's right and it's inherent. but a lot of this is due to linguistics based on past male dominant roles. And it being ingrained in people's minds

[jacquesvol]

Societal imagery of the conservative mind.

[jacquesvol]

by the way guys don't fuck. Guys get laid.

[Travis_Skyles]

This is semantics at it's best.

[Anon-ymous1]

Words matter.

[Juxtapose]

I disagree. Fucking is about who moves the most. A guy laying down and having a woman bounce on him isn't fucking her.. he is BEING fucked.

[Anon-ymous1]

Nah. She's the one being penetrated. Would you feel the same if the conversation was about gay sex and obviously one dude is pitching and one dude is catching? Why do we think that distinction is made? Because one is fucking and one is getting fucked.

[Juxtapose]

Ever heard of power bottoms?

[Anon-ymous1]

Yep, I have. And the matter still stands.

[Juxtapose]

And I still disagree. Fucking is the act of sex. A woman riding your face is "fucking" your face.

[Anon-ymous1]

Nope.

[brennanhuff]

Good point, it is callled fuckng his face.

[Asker321]

Of course a woman can "fuck" a guy but it won't be exactly the same like a guy "fucks", due to the contrary flow of the sexual energy. Anatomically men could be seen as the givers, but what you don't seem to get is that it's just an energy flow, it doesn't mean that woman ARE this energy, or become just a totally uncontrolled thing - the womb isn't a passive organ, it is like a dick that is turned to the inside and has an amazingly absorbing-power. They ACTIVELY receive it by thrusting, pumping, grinding or whatever. They can also control how much of the receiving energy they let in. So it could be said that they can control the energy-flow by their actions and that's what dominance is.

[ChocoLada]

You can explain to the asker for thousands of times, and he still won't get it because he is indoctrinated :)

[Asker321]

@ChocoLada i wouldn't be too harsh to him. to me he sounds like a sexually quiet submissive guy who has a hard time believing/accepting that woman can be exactly how he wants them to be, cause it sounds to good to be true. yes it's indoctrination, but this applies to most people in general. there are also many girls who have a actually sexually dominant nature, but can't really accept it cause they have no dicks. it's sad, cause it keeps people away from each other.

[ChocoLada]

You think he is submissive and too ashamed to admit that his girlfriend is fucking him? I guess you have a point :D

[Asker321]

obviously, though i don't know if he actually has a girlfriend. i understand his point. having a dick allows a more aggressive and extreme kind of dominance, but that doesn't mean a woman can't also dominate with her vag.

[ChocoLada]

LoL, yeah, you're probably right, maybe he is still a virgin, that's why he doesn't know the facts you explained 😂

[CT_CD]

True

[Anonymous]

Well that makes sense. But I thought fuck, the origins of that had something to do with fornicating under consent of the king or something like that. It sounds like it had to do with penetration, but I didn't think it literally meant to penetrate someone. If it does, then that does make sense. Do you think there's views in what people think as far as penetration that a person is doing who is penetrating, and enveloping can't be doing the phallus? It seems that thrusting and some have seen the one humping or thrusting is the one "fucking". I agree generally since the way women often having sex on top. Grinding and riding, legs apart and as "fucking themselvews on top" But some positions or there can be instances, not related to a woman penetrating a man, where her actions can be pretty much like she's fucking a man. I made up a term, "pussy-fucking" a dude. Perhaps it's still riding, but some can be very aggressive, thrusting and where a woman can pound a man's cock, which is like she's doing him. So it depends on what it literally means. If it means literally penetration because penertraion is fucking then no women can't. If it means doing something or effect and hard thrusting and fucking something, then women at times can fuck a man. But that also means the word fuck is used wrong in other ways. For example, 'titty fuck" Sure thrusting and the dick is involved. He's thrusting back and forth between a woman's boobs. But he's not literally penetrating. He's just going back and forth between the space between the boobs. His dick is not going inside anything when titty fucking, yet it's still called, titty fucking...

[Anon-ymous1]

The person being penetrated is the one getting fucked. It's pretty simple.

[Opinion Owner]

I don’t recall it literally being synonymous with penetration. I haven’t seen any definition where it means to penetrate someone. Do you have a problem with the term “titty fuck” then. There really isn’t literal penetration happening with that but still called “fucking”. And why do you feel the person getting penetrated is the one getting fucked?

[Opinion Owner]

You brought up action and doing which suggests or I feel someone thrusting or humping on said body part is fucking. Words that denote action, why wouldn’t a pussy thrusting upon or pounding a cock not be valid of action or doing or fucking! You just said means doing something or action , which if that’s the case. It can “do” a cock. And having sex with does not sound dominant. Only the penetrator can use aggressive words on regard to sex?

[Anon-ymous1]

It's not about who can use aggressive words. The penetrated party can use whatever words they want. I don't really know what you mean. Anyway, why wouldn't the pussy be doing the fucking? Because... it's not doing the fucking. It's being penetrated, not penetrating. Refer back to where I talk about fingering and oral; do you say that the party DOING the oral is somehow also being done? No-- it's not a mutual act. That's the point. During fingering, is the party being fingered also fingering the other party because "fingering" is somehow a mutual act? No, the girl simply says "I got fingered" because that's what happened.

[Opinion Owner]

you act like envelopment or such isn't or can't have an act on a phallus. A woman giving a hand job is using her hands like it's an opening and stroking the dick. The stroking motion or something can pound or go hard via envelopment to where it;s doing something to the phallus. It's because you think something phallus apparently is inherently dominant because to fuck is a strong word of action. Envelopment is not strong enough of action to fuck right? by the way nothing I've seen shows where fuck literally means to penetrate. It's just viewed that way by you and others because of seeing penetration as the only way of "doing". Something doesn't have to be penetrated "to be done". Many disagree with you, so it shows you're hung up on what you want it believe, when definitions of fuck saying nothing about penetration. fuck fək/Submit vulgar slang verb 1. have sexual intercourse with (someone). 2. ruin or damage (something). noun 1. an act of sexual intercourse. exclamation 1. used alone or as a

[Opinion Owner]

So a woman the vagina is passive right? sounds like you have old views based on sexual intercourse. If man can only fuck then that means penetration is the aggressive, dominant action and envelopment is passive. You said women can dominate, but should be called have sex. Which nothing in that word usuage shows dominance, and If a woman gets fucked and can't fuck. How is she every being dominant? Because that suggests her actions are passive or not strong actions upon the dick. Yeah that's naive especially considering that would mean any body part being penetrated is passive. I don't know about you, but the dick is in a passive position when a woman is giving a blow job.

[Anon-ymous1]

Not really. I could show you a whole lot of aggressive blowjob videos on porn sites that would change your mind about that.

[Opinion Owner]

yes, but the point is that you feel the dick is dominant or aggressive simply because it penetrates. As fucking means and sounds like an aggressive, dominant strong action. Like envelopment is a weak action thus not "doing" a phallus which isn't completely true. Yeah you;re talking about throat fucking, which just shows perhaps pornstars and some dudes hell bent on wanting to feel their dick is dominant no matter what. It's why porn is so ridiculously boring. Just piston fuck a woman in every type of way, rinse and repeat. Except pretty much same positions just different women, but just same thing. Hell bent on dominate every orifice of a woman, that it goes even to her mouth and thrusting hard in her mouth, like some they just can't accept anythiing other than trying to dominate through penetration. Yet, the blowjob is aggressive in the first place, is because the woman allows it. And that just points how an orifice doesn't necessarily based on context mean it's passive or dick dominant

[Opinion Owner]

Despite the hard fucking on the woman's throat... ummmmm... that orifice... the mouth has teeth. She's curling her lips and being careful just so she doesn't hurt the man's mighty powerful, "fucking" machine dick right? The mouth is an orifice, yet it can very, very easily hurt, damage the mighty dick right? Fuck a person without even teeth if accidentally bit down just with their gums, that would be quite bad news there. Ever hear how dudes are hesitant on getting a blow job from a chick that has braces on? Quite a passive act envelopment is huh? If a phallus can only fuck, than it means it's only aggressive or dominat and a strong act, and envelopment passive or something done to it. But that just shows that's not true and that envelopment can ravage too.

[Femdomina]

Wrong, it doesn't make sense at all. The only thing you said right is that fuck means "Fornicating Under Consent of the King" (it's an abbreviation). Fornicating doesn't mean penetrating, it means having sexual intercourse (in the medieval times it was usually term used for sex outside marriage, or before marriage). The one who is on top and being active is fucking, the one who is on bottom and being passive is being fucked. Therefore, if a man is lying down, and the woman is on top, riding him, he is being fucked, because he is not doing the penetration, she is (and I repeat, fucking also doesn't mean penetrating). So in conclusion, yes - woman can fuck a man, and she doesn't need a "strap-on", that's only for men who have latent lgbt tendencies.

[Anon-ymous1]

@Femdomina While that's interesting to know-- assuming it's true-- it doesn't really matter. Language changes and evolves and context alters from one time to another. No one really uses the word "fuck" because they want to say "fornicating under consent of the king," now do they? Nope. Anyway dude, you're really caught up on this, but you're still not correct. Sorry. In gay sex, the penetrated party is the one getting fucked, whether or not they're the one "moving" or not. "Having sex" is an act (noun). "Fucked" is a one-sided (verb). If you want to denote even footing by both parties, simply say "have sex" or "we had sex." It's pretty simple.

[Femdomina]

Wrong dude, in Lesbian sex nobody is penetrated but someone is fucking, and the other one is being fucked. Sex can be vaginal, oral, or anal, but not every sex is about penetration, the same goes for "titty fucking", just like the anonymous guy said. So fucking is obviously not one-sided, only penetration is, those two words are not synonyms.

[Opinion Owner]

Who said anything in gay sex. You’re the one so caught up by it that semantics bother you. That’s the point , why do you believe the vagina is always passive? I believe it’s because you have outdated view of what actions are strong “penetration” and a phallus being enveloped , pounded thrusted upon isn’t being fucked. You never explained why it’s a one side verb. Why is a dick aggressive and vagina passive? That’s the thing you see it in one type of way, which to me makes me feel you think envelopment is inherently a weaker action. By the way I don’t believe you actually feel a woman can dominate. If she can’t fuck a man and her pussy is passive, how is she exactly dominating just from intercourse?

[Anon-ymous1]

@Femdomina "Titty-fucking" isn't actually fucking. It's a misnomer.

[Anon-ymous1]

What do you mean "why?" Because the dick is what controls the action. That's why.

[Opinion Owner]

And why does it control the action? Seems like you have preconceived notions about sex. Why and how does it control the action? Just because it penetrates? Like what makes it inherently In control of the action. The person and body part moving is in control of the action

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Yeah I agree I just wrote that to him or meant it in the way like? It makes sense if fuck was literally synonymous with penetration, but I’ve yet to see that it literally means that. Good points

[Anon-ymous1]

No, movement does not matter. I don't know how to make this simpler for you.

[Opinion Owner]

you never explained what it is about penetration that makes it in control of the action, thus fucking. What makes the dick in control of the action? Just because it penetrates? How does it make it inherently in control of the action? You aren't even saying it, but the only way that's true is if the dick is dominant and pussy passive. Which contradicts your belief or you say women can dominate, but the term would be have sex. I don't know if you really believe a woman can dominate via just intercourse if you see the pussy in such a passive way and it's inherently in a passive role just because it envelopes instead of penetrates. But there are two types of actions going on, it's just that you feel penetration is inherently a stronger action, which there is a fallacy there.

[Anon-ymous1]

"just because it penetrates" Yes, I'm not sure how it took you so long to understand that.

[Opinion Owner]

that's silly. Because it penetrates it's in control. Why? Like I said before chicks mouth is more in control of a man's dick, despite the mouth being penetrated. What makes the dick in control via penetration? And what makes a pussy enveloping less in control of the action? You see you can't answer it... your reasoning is..."just because"

[Anon-ymous1]

I already did answer it-- I logically compared it to other sexual acts in which the penetrated party is obviously the one who is having the thing done TO them, not the one doing the doing. You simply didn't like the answer given. It's already been solved. So now my answer is "because" because I'm tired of repeating myself.

[Opinion Owner]

lol you never answered though. It's just your own personal belief, nothing inherent there. As you see many guys don't believe penetration men's to fuck. There's nothing that says fuck litersally means to fuck, that's just how you take it. If it means to take control of the action, there's nothing inherent about penetration that makes it in control of the action, than say a woman's mouth or pussy. You can't answer though

[Anon-ymous1]

I don't know what you mean by "you can't answer though." I already have answered it. Several times. You simply aren't paying attention.

[Opinion Owner]

All you said was something was about gay sex but this has nothing to do with that. In order for penetration to mean control of the action, means it’s a dominant act to you but on same token you feel or say a woman can dominate a man. Sounds like a contradiction. How is a woman able to dominate a man if she can’t fuck him? I believe a woman can, but you don’t think so. If her pussy is being done to, it means you feel it’s a passive receptor in sex and not more. you don’t see any equal aspect but a lopsided view. That means which you are avoiding to say that women can’t dominate via Piv intercourse, because of their equipment. That’s not inherently or completely true and matters on context and who it is and body parts etc

[Anon-ymous1]

"This has nothing to do with that?" What are you talking about? We're talking about sex, dude. Gay people, both male or female, can't have sex because it's not a dick in a pussy?

[Opinion Owner]

No the only example you made about fucking was about gay dudes. You never explained how penetration means the dick is in control. You never gave an example of how a dick penetrating pussy means it's in control of the action. All it means is it penetrates, that's it. You've made conclusions as far as control of the action. Why is the dick in control of the action when penetrating? I don't thinkk that's inherent and always true. Something can "be done" to the dick. Something does not have to be penetrated to be"done" or fucked. You never explained how penetration equates to all this

[Anon-ymous1]

... Yes. I did. Several times. Read it again.

[Opinion Owner]

in your response to me or in the blog post? I don't see anything that answers that other than what was written in your post and your replies to me.

[Anon-ymous1]

Uh huh... the post. Read it again until you understand.

[Opinion Owner]

why is penetration the 'action' to you. That's the point, it's your perspective, but not inherently true. My point is it's a matter of perspective. A person can see envelopment the stroking, and pounding the dick is "taking" from the orifice as an action done to the dick from vagina or mouth. That's the point. It's like a person seeing a glass half filled as half full and another seeing it half empty. Neither is inherently correct, but a matter of their perspective.

[Opinion Owner]

yeah I read it, it doesn't answer anything, just your conclusions about penetration vs envelopment

[Anon-ymous1]

... Because penetration is the deciding factor in who is being done as opposed to who is doing the doing in other sexual acts. Which is what I already said. Several times. Many times. A dozen times, perhaps. It didn't change from any of the other times I already said it.

[Opinion Owner]

I’ve read that. Why is it the deciding factor? That’s my point, you decided or came to that conclusion

[Opinion Owner]

Whose being done is a matter of perspective which was my point not some inherent thing. Like I gave with the glass half full half empty analogy.

[Femdomina]

@Anon-ymous1 No, it's not misnomer, it's a term used for Mammary sex, just like a Hand job is also known as Manual sex, as I said, and I repeat, fucking is not a synonym for penetration. Dick is not "always in control", if a woman is on top, and a man is lying down, he is not doing anything, so he is obviously not in control, pure logic, movement matters because it's action vs passiveness - in conclusion, movement is the only deciding factor, not penetration. Synonyms for penetration are: perforation, piercing, puncturing, stabbing, pricking, probing, spiking, sticking, impaling, drilling, lancing, tapping - but NOT fucking! Synonyms for fucking are: shagging, fornicating, banging, laying, screwing, copulating, bonking etc - but NOT penetrating! Fucking is sexual intercourse, it requires action - not penetration, because sex can be non-penetrative (e. g oral), regardless of that, woman can control penetration by being active, while male is being passive - scientific explanation ;)

[Femdomina]

Opinion Owner - Thank you, I'm glad you agree with me, science always beats chauvinism ✌️😎

[Anon-ymous1]

@Femdomina Lol, "science." Right. Um... this isn't a scientific matter. So... Hey, actually no, it is "Science" and "science" is on MY side, not yours, so I'm right and you're not. Lol what are you talking about?

[Anon-ymous1]

@Femdomina No, it's not sexual intercourse-- sexual intercourse is sexual intercourse. A mutual act. Fucking is aggressive and one-sided. You're not correct, but think what you like. You can't be convinced with any amount of rational discourse. Good luck with that.

[Femdomina]

@Anon-ymous1 I gues you never heard of Sexology science? Sexual intercourse = Fucking, it's a synonym, that's what it means. Yeah right, and if a woman is aggressive and one-sided (because a man is laying down and not doing anything) - she is fucking him, think what you like, but I'm correct ;) You have no rational discourse, only chauvinism, meh 😂

[Anon-ymous1]

@Femdomina Sexology science? Uh huh... and?

[Opinion Owner]

So it can’t be one sided or aggressive with the woman doing huh? I knew your belief about domination was bull shit. You tried to act like you felt women could dominate but then you said they can’t fuck. You said when a woman is on top it’s sex because it’s a mutual act which is bogus. That meAns a woman can’t dominate just admit it. If it’s mutual act then a woman isn’t dominant

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Those words too I learned and shows ingrained from anonymous , how culture influences views on sex. Like stabbing, impaling and words to mean dominance from the male persepective you see that? But not so much the other way but I’ve learned it’s a reflection of cultures for that, not inherent

[Anon-ymous1]

Sure they can fuck-- if they wear a strap-on or are using a toy or their fingers to penetrate and move the action.

[Opinion Owner]

See that's your perspective. One can argue the vagina is enveloping the dick, then the penis is passive and vagina active. Is something going in a person's mouth. Is is penertated or is the object being swallowed or engulfed? Depends on the persepctive to what's acting on what. Like I said half glass full vs half glass empty. Nothing inherent, it's just your perspective and there are many who see it that way it's there are influences that are part to do with that ingrained in people's minds. But as you see many women AND men don't see it like you do, right as you see from the comments. by the way, you brought up fingering and the action to the vagina. How about a woman humping the persons finger, not her action is upon it. And like wise, a handjob. the hand, wrapped around the dick is doing the action to the dick from the stroking. You just don't want to see it that way, but it's not inherent, just your perspective.

[Femdomina]

Opinion Owner, you are completely right, unlike the Anonymous, who is obviously indoctrinated. You have excellent points, and there are lots of other examples. If a fish is eating a worm, does that mean that a worm is penetrating the fish? Nope, the worm is being eaten, fish is active, worm is passive - just like in case when vagina is active and on top, while penis is passive and on bottom ;)

[Anon-ymous1]

"One can argue?" What does that matter? Your point makes sense because "one can argue" it? By the same logic, MINE makes sense, because I have been arguing it. To answer your point-- no. Keep replying if you want, it makes no difference to me. You're both wrong. Enjoy your delusion.

[Femdomina]

The only one in delusion here is you, and you really make no sense ;)

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina 😄 like I told him how he never answered and his answer was “just because” . He never had a valid reason other than “just because “

[Femdomina]

Exactly, great point, you told him 😎👍

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina ddsdsd

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina don't mind that? lol I was seeing if I was blocked, because I couldn't post on this question anymore and I didn't think I was blocked by you, but didn't know if from you or the question asker. But I was able to reply so I don't think I was blocked, I have no idea ha. I just had a question

[Femdomina]

Nope, I didn't block you, what is ddsdsd?

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina that was me just typing random stuff as I wasn't sure anything was gonna post since other posts I tried didn't reply. So it was a quick way of testing to see if anything would show up instead of taking time to write a question to you only to the the red block bar to show up and all that writing for nothing ha. I think the asker somehow blocked me from responding to you, as I was able to reply to you here, but not to your reply to my opinion. Weird. Sorry this is a few days later, I didn't want to keep going back and forth, and it just came to me now. The positons you showed, were those ones that you learned from a sex guide or from others or what came to you? It sounds funny, but pussy cat control and inverted missionary were ones that like I always had in my head or a curiosity before ever seeing the positions or them even having a name. I doubt I'm the first person that has, but I find it interesting that it's so seemingly rare and would think others had such curiosity

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina such curiosity or outside of the box position thoughts without ever seeing them from a sex guide, or porn or whatever. Maybe people have, but kept it to themselves, and such positions finally have been more known because now they are brought up now unlike in the past. Just thought it was interesting.

[Femdomina]

Inverted missionary was kinda natural for me, but cowgirl was my first position ever, as for the others, like the Amazon and Pussy-cat control, I've seen them in some sex guide, I decided to try them, and I liked them from the start.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina cool, I was talking like as in between his legs like that swimming position or the one I showed the pic of. I tried following but was blocked, but then again maybe you have it set so no one try to follow or send a follow request which is fine and understandable. , I usually don’t follow or try to follow anyone on here, but wanted to ask a question. Nothing much different than these, it’s just resale my own self consciousness is why i didn’t want to ask publicly but I’ll ask here I guess if so

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina *really auto correct is a pain sometimes

[Femdomina]

Yeah, I prefer it that way, like in Swimming position ;)

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina I guess I'll ask here. You said you're dominant and have tried very dominant, lesser known positions like amazon and pussy cat control. It's good to think outside of the box sometimes with positions like it seems you have and your mind since you've done such. Have you ever have sex standing up? It's interesting that it's really really rare. I know standing sex is difficult in general, even for the guy taking control. While it's difficult, it's not impossible for a woman to bang a guy standing, as I've seen it. And fact of the matter is more difficult man on top, weird crazy positions I've seen more of than that, despite I feel it more possible for a woman doing such standing positon than some crazy man on top ones. Yet despite that, you're morre likely still to see those crazy positons than woman in control standing sex. My curisity has stretched that way as well.

[Femdomina]

No, I never tried any of the stand up positions, because I prefer it in a lying position, it's relaxing and much more comfortable.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Are you tall? That would make sense for it to not be relaxing. I brought up the idea because you said you are dominant and just wondered if you ventured into other aggressive dominant fucking positions. But it’s where heights have to be aligned or configured. But anyway I always felt standing sex can bring out more dominance. I’ve never tried it reversed because like I already said of my self consciousness. But for instance I’ve felt more dominant and it looks more dominant pinning a woman, your partner against the wall and pounding her standing. It feels and looks more dominant than missionary lying. Tho really it’s pretty much vertical missionary for the guy fucking. It’s difficult but not impossible but looks like a way a woman can be really dominant or match the aggression that Amazon and pussy cat control positions would do.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Would a man have to be insecure about trying that too or bringing up? I would show a gif or whatever but can’t here. I guess I could explain if not sure what I mean.

[jacquesvol]

Get queened. 😆

[Opinion Owner]

@jacquesvol that shit is lame. Is that what you like? Nothing wrong with that, but I find it interesting that so many guys like being submissive almost always in that way and not other ways.

[Femdomina]

Yes, I'm quite tall. True, It's possible for a girl to dominate man in standing position:

i.pinimg.com/.../...277f1b8c16460dc774cdd01dae.jpg

But I just prefer it in the lying position, it looks and feels more dominant for me.
What kind of gif?

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina like the position or one that I've seen that was hot and dominant, but I can't post that here. I'd have to pm you. Well obviously you want to be comfortable, but I think you should try standing sometime if it's possible, because it could be quite dominant.

[Femdomina]

It could be, but lying down is more comfortable.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina true but it can be passionate and ravaging. A woman pushing a guy agaisnt the wall and then fucking him hard. Ravaging him and him left ravaged, she make him moan and leaving him worn out after.

[Femdomina]

True, but it looks more dominant when she is lying on top of him whole nigh (in my experience) ;)

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina I'll just explain, just so like I'm not making it up because I feel others feel it's not possible, just because it's difficult. I'm sure you feel it's plausible, but the fact it's so rare makes me feel two different reasons. It's rare I think is similar of how pussy cat control and amazon are rare positions though becoming more known than years before. But it's tough, but couples if matched up well, usually it's the guy lifting the woman's leg thrusting or such. But I've seen couples where they are able to fuck just standing or if she's shorter, she's wearing heels to match up better or he's lowering or squating slightly. But some where both are standing and able to fuck. But I saw one clip ( mind you I don't watch porn much because I think most sucks), I'm not really into bdsm stuff. But this one was kind of like that. But the man was standing but his hands up and tied and legs tied. His legs apart a little. And the woman fucke him first by backing into him

[Femdomina]

I don't wear heels, they are unstable, unhealthy and uncomfortable, and as I said, I prefer lying down because it's more comfortable and relaxing.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina And lifted one leg and fucking him standing. But after fucking with leg up, she left him inside her, lowered the lifted leg so she's standing. Her legs not outside his, but kind of aligned with his, not inside his either. She grabbed his ass, I think to provide more leverage and keep him in her maybe and for more thrusting power maybe but she pumped the hell out of him. It may be a rare skill for women or just not many that aggressive, and sounds funny saying it as it's usually guys doing it or only able to do it. But she pretty much, piston-fucked him standing. But since everything was aligned, but she could've fucked him with her legs inside his, since she was already doing it lined up to his and not outside his. That's what would've made it better would've been that and then my thought of if his back was against the wall. Role reverse from the usual of the guy banging the girl against the wall. It's difficult, but obviously not impossible.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina A dude can't have a small cock for sure though. And not impossible, because it's been done, and wou;dn't have been able to be done if impossible of course. It sure takes creativity and angles and calculations for sure ha

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina It was kind of funny/hot though because after the fucking the dude seemed like he was still reeling from the fucking, and might've been weak legged if he tried walking after that

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina well I didn't mean you but just explained it that's all

[Femdomina]

I know it's not impossible, I'm aware of that :) Cool story, very intriguing ;)

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina With the way it's so rare, you'd think people think it's impossible ha. Like the standing position I just described from a sex clip I've seen, I've yet to see that in an sex guide site and that includes those one's that have pussy cat control and amazon position and 245 positions or whatever. None of the standing positions listed have it like that ha. So either people don't think it's possible or cultural ingrained attitudes like you've said that makes minds to not in venture of that possibility or show it, when it can be done. Like I said, I've seen male dominant sex positons, crazy ones that are seemingly impossible or less plausbile than the standing female fuck I just described, which actually can be done because of like I've seen different female dominant standing fuck variations, but that one was one of the hottest ones. But it's like soooooo rare, more rare than even amazon and such positions.

[Femdomina]

Yeah, it's rare because standing up during sex is tiresome for most people, lying down is more natural.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina yeah but male dominant standing is quite commonly shown in sex scenes, in porn or even couples despite it being tiring for the man. I know it's tough and why people don't do it or often. It's not something I would do often, but I think it's something that can be sexy for a couple to try on one of those hot passionate nights and just going at it. Maybe just for a small period and then go to the bed. But I think it could be hot for the woman to take charge that way as she can really dominate a guy, like usual female on top positions usually don't allow other than inverted missionary, amazon or pussy cat control. But like I said I mean standing sex where the dude is picking the woman up and either he's thrusting into her or he hold her while she grinds and rides on him. That would be really really tiring for both, but especially the guy since he's lifting her whole weight. But despite that being more tiring than most positions even more than the female dominant fuck I said

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Despite that, that male dominant standing fuck is pretty common, meanwhile you never see the woman dominant standing fuck I explained. You talk about tiring, and you said you are on top most or all of the time. Do you get tired, how do you feel dominant to your man if he's just lying back when you're doing all the work? Or do you force him to like hold you or move you with his arms and do work in that way or maybe wear him out with your fucking? Because in some ways it seems like the man just lying back all the time and the woman if she's tired from being on top when fucking, is kind of letting the man have it easy and him having it easy. I feel usually the one on top if with the attitude and aggression is dominant. But if said person really fucks the person hard where said person makes noise and reactions and the person being fucked is tired after too and worn out and like a ravaging effect or impact on said person being fucked

[Femdomina]

I'm active all the time, I don't get tired when I'm on top because I'm in excellent physical shape, I'm just saying that it's more relaxing and more comfortable in lying position, as well as more pleasurable, and it feels more dominant for me. Stand up sex is only good in porn movies, but in reality, most people don't like it, that's why you can't find such positions in any book, they are not very popular.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina ok so you do ravage on top. Yeah I got ya. Yeah but like I said it's interesting that movies and porn even amateur porn which is real couples. Has sex standing where it's male dominant, so it just goes to show how ingrained it is or how people don't even open their mind to even with of female dominance in such a way. I mean inverted missionary even one that seems fairly tame like the picture I showed, is pretty rare. Not rare like the standing female fuck I brought up. But it's rarely shown in movies, or porn or even amateur couple sex despite sex guides having some like that. Even the swimming positon, which is just reverse missionary as in the way you bring up reverse missionary, but just the woman's legs inside the guys, that's all. And her body lying on him. But as far as couples talking about sex positions or movie scenes or porn clips or amateur. It's like almost every other female on top positions are shown but those like swimming, inverted missionary I showed

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina And amazon and pussy cat control. Like 95% of the times, it's cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, and basically variations of those all the time, or like the lotus like position. And some times reverse misisonary as in the woman straddling but lying foward but rarely comes across as dominant and more in a grinding movement

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina But you do find standing positions in sex positiong books just not the female dominant kind like I said. I find that interesting, it might be ingrained stuff why that is

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina they are also in sex guide stuff, but like I said it’s the maze dominant standing positions. However it’s the female dominant standing position that’s rare not male dominant ones

[Femdomina]

I know all that. I recommend you books by Tracey Cox, she has some very comprehensive sex guides with lots of positions, including lots of girl on top positions.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina I typed in her name. I don’t believe I’d buy a sex guide book. Theatres one where it says 101 positions, but I’m pretty sure sex guides online have the positions she has in her book and more. I didn’t look at them all but there was one guide that had 300 something positions ha. You said standing positions are rarely done irl but they almost always are in sex position guides and books as far as male dominant ones. I’m sure Tracey Cox has some male dominant standing positions in her books. So do you believe it’s because of cultural views why female dominant standing sex is so rare and not even in sex guides? Cuz like I said as little often people do it or difficult it is, you still almost always see standing sex positions shown in guides or books but they are all male dominant. It seems to say a lot there

[Femdomina]

I think most people prefer lying down positions instead of stand up positions, regardless of their gender, because it's more comfortable and more pleasurable that way. Still, you should check out the books, they are very interesting.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina I known. I meant something standing as in a once in a while I passionate thing that could be sexy. Yeah that’s true but female dominant standing dominant positions seem non existent. Whereas, plenty of male dominant ones are in sex guides probably because of some ingrained pre conceived notions. I know you said you don’t do them as lying down is more comfortable but did the ones I explained sounded kind of hot? Is that something for a guy Feel bad about sharing or most dominant women or switch women Wouldn’t judge?

[Femdomina]

The position you described sounds ok, but I prefer lying positions ;)

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina yes you like comfort ha. It's probably not an issue with you, but I wondered how some women who are dominant, or maybe the guys are submissive or know better than trying to take over control. Like I actually wrote questiont to some dudes as in what is up with some dudes so hell bent on trying to take control that they try to do so or jack hammer when on the bottom. I know some dudes do it out of impatience if the girl is tired or what not. Which I feel he might as well be on top, because not only is that wicked tiring thrusting up for the guy, and he will get tired fast. I mean there are like soo many male dominant position. My opinion is if the woman is on top it's her time to shine. But I wondered how dominant women handle that, or they quickly end that if the dude tries to hold their hips and thrust up trying to take over. If dominant women just put their weight down and slam their hips down and end that quick and fuck down hard, stopping it and taking over again ha

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina You probably have been with submissive guys so they probably haven't tried that. I'm not submissive, but I mean will move or be active with the woman on top, but I don't try to take over from the bottom because I see it like this. If I want to take over, then I'll simply be on top. If she's on top, I want her in control and like the point of it. You probably haven't dealt with that huh?

[Femdomina]

All of my ex boyfriends were submissive, as well as my current boyfriend. Initially, some of them were switches, but I made them submissive, including one guy who was completely dominant before he met me ;) There are lots of girl on top positions too, just read the books by Tracey Cox and you'll see. Yeah, most of those positions are not in stand up positions, but some of them are, the reason for that is popularity of lying down positions. I usually use 7 girl on top positions, but there are many more.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Don't mind that last one. I was trying to reply and some stupid add popped up. I tried to click it out and some reason my post sent without me writing anything, that's why you see that reply but no words ha. Ah, so none of your past boyfriends have tried to take over from the bottom huh? Or they knew they wouldn't be able to with you? What are the many on top positions you've done or like that you haven't named? Even try amazon on the couch or edge or bed? Sorry for these question, just was curious. It's interesting too how some dudes try or well can take control from the bottom. Women can too, though more difficult I assume. But the big difference is some dudes can try to take control from the bottom, whereas, women rarely try to from the bottom.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Hey sorry about that question, I shouldn’t have asked that. Or at least the first half part

[Femdomina]

Hahahaha, it's ok, they knew they wouldn't be able to with me. I like all the girl on top positions I mentioned before, but I don't like some others, like reverse cowgirl for example, because I prefer eye contact.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina yeah Even though guys like it. It’s one that a woman has to be more careful with as far as movement or while it sounds nice for the guy and liking it. It’s abother thing doing it and could be uncomfortable if the dude has a very rigid dick thus less bending down ability than other men’s. It’s because the way she’s face in which grinding or movement could make the dick bend in the wrong direction. Regular cowgirl that’s less of a problem. Though you want to see the guys eyes but guys get a nice view which is why guys like to try it or theoretically anyway ha

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina I just asked about amazon in different ways because I know it can be done or some do it in other places than the bed which sounds hot, like the couch or edge of bed. Tho i think , thinking it through first works better with using cushions or whatever to raise and be aligned better so the woman doesn’t have to squat or lean too forward making it more tiring or tougher to do

[Femdomina]

Guys have a better view from the regular Cowgirl, if they like watching boobs. Yeah, Amazon can be done on the couch but it's easier on the bed, because there is more space for moving.

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina Yeah that's true. Edge of the bed sounds fun if providing extra mats or higher up so the woman doesn't have to lean forward or hunch over as much. If worked so aligned better, it would seem fun too. Yeah guys love boobs, I obviously know that ha. But yeah, as you know, guys or there seemingly are just as many guys who love booty as tits. I'm one who loves cake, not that I don't like boobs of course. I know guys have different preferences, but most guys like boobs. But something like reverse cowgirl from a visual stand point I can see why guys love that if one loves ass which many do and I being one of them. I don't mean to ask so many questions and all these replies. You're probably tired of it, I don't usually reply so much to people on GAg. I've replied to others here and there. But never this many times, so it's not something I normally do.

[Femdomina]

It's ok, hahaha :) Some guys like legs more than boobs or ass apparently, they also like Cowgirl position for certain reasons.

[Anonymous]

Dude, not true, if the girl is riding him, she is fucking him, he is just being her submissive slave.

[ChocoLada]

Exactly, some guys know the truth.

[Opinion Owner]

@ChocoLada Thanks

[Anonymous]

No way, for your information, fucking is not a synonym for penetrating.
The one who is doing the work is fucking, the other one is just being fucked.

[Anon-ymous1]

Nope.

[Opinion Owner]

Yep.

[Anon-ymous1]

Nope

[Opinion Owner]

Oh, you poor little thing, I guess I was right, but don't worry, you should see a therapist, you are probably ashamed of being raped by a girl, I'll try to help you if you want to get rid of your frustrations.

[Femdomina]

LOL, nooo, I thing his problem is a bit different, he is most likely a 25 years old virgin, that's why he is so bitter and hates women, typical Incel 😂

[Anon-ymous1]

Yawn

[ChocoLada]

@Femdomina Everybody here can see he's being arrogant, even guys, but he is obviously living in some sort of macho delusions.

[Opinion Owner]

@ChocoLada Okay but you don't have to give me the notifications, I know that asker is a bigot :)

[Femdomina]

@ChocoLada Yup, I bet he is a virgin :P

[Femdomina]

Opinion Owner, sorry for the intrusion, I just had to say that :P

[Opinion Owner]

@Femdomina and @ChocoLada It's ok, I know he's a beatch ;)

[Anonymous]

Depends on the man. A man can fuck a woman but that woman may not feel like she got fucked.

[Anon-ymous1]

Lol I suppose that's possible.

[Soft4u]

Yeah me too!

[Asker321]

or maybe she don't feels to get fucked, because that's not the way she perceives sex in general. ;)

[Opinion Owner]

@Asker321 depends on the guy fucking. Believe me a girl knows when she's been fucked by a real man.

[Asker321]

You don't get it. It also depends on the girl, if she's a sexually dominant she will be turned off when he tries to control her by going in too strong for example. That's why some woman prefer guys who are sexually less aggressive than themselves.

[Opinion Owner]

@Asker321 nah. Girls prefer a man they can't dominate. Like it's fun to be in control but at the same time a girl wants a real man that can take charge.

[Asker321]

I know, but that's not the point. If someone prefers to be "dominated", it's not because he can't take charge, it's because he just prefers it that way. So what are you talking about?

[Asker321]

You really don't know

[Opinion Owner]

@Asker321 he may feel that way but most women view a guy like that as less than a real man.

[Asker321]

I know. Most.

[Anonymous]

If a girl is riding a guy she is fucking him. Dominating him sorry but WOMEN RAPE ALSO # MeToo

[Anon-ymous1]

1) No. 2) Have no idea why you're bringing rape into this. Like, at all. Put your hashtag away; no one wants it.

[Opinion Owner]

How do losers like you become editors. It just drives people away from a fun site.

[Anon-ymous1]

How do people like you manage to get an account? It just drives people away from a fun site. If discussing things in a new light that you're not used to is something that bothers you, then maybe this isn't a site for you.