Evolution And The Differences In Male And Female Behaviors

Our different behaviors are due to biology, instincts, and our (historically) different roles in life.
Our different behaviors are due to biology, instincts, and our (historically) different roles in life.

Lots of questions get asked about the opposite sex and why they think differently, act differently, or what different things then the asker’s sex, and everyone wants to know WHY. Why are men so obsessed with sex? Why are relationships so important to women? Why do guys show off? Why do women spend so much time on their appearance? Why are men protective over women? Why do women have so much empathy?


The answers to all of these questions and many more like them come down to our two primary biological imperatives: to SURVIVE and to REPRODUCE. Even in modern times, with the education and technology that we have available to us, and with modern societal standards, our daily behaviors are STILL heavily influenced and affected by our biological instincts that have kept humans going as other species (including other humanoids) went extinct.

Darwin helped define the language and greatly expand our knowledge on evolution and Natural Selection.
Darwin helped define the language and greatly expand our knowledge on evolution and Natural Selection.

Charles Darwin called what he observed during his studies “Natural Selection” - how any trait that helps or improves survival or reproduction is going to be reinforced, because people with those traits will tend to survive and reproduce, while those that lack the trait will be less likely to do so. Over generations, these traits evolve and strengthen or weaken. If things go the wrong way, the species tends to die out, and if they go the right way, the species thrives and grows. Natural Selection and the traits it caused humans to develop - both physical and behavioral - are still with us and affect us daily.


If you forget about the last 300 years and you look at how people lived for all of history prior to that, it’s easy to see that men and women had very different roles in daily life, reflecting their roles in survival and in reproduction.

Hunting dangerous/deadly game was one of many roles for men throughout history.
Hunting dangerous/deadly game was one of many roles for men throughout history.

Men tended to do the “heavy” and dangerous work, farming, hunting, smithing, mining, construction, woodcutting, and soldiering. It wasn’t uncommon for men to be die at young ages - fighting in wars, being injured during work, or from conditions like “black lung” from working in mines. Men were somewhat expendable, and their role was “heavy work” and “protection of the family.”


Women generally worked in the home and on the farm - feeding and caring for the children and animals, tending to the garden (most homes had one), cooking, sewing, and cleaning the home. Nurturing was a big components of the woman’s role.

Like bees, a man's role in reproduction is to fertilize - a job that can be completed in mere minutes.
Like bees, a man's role in reproduction is to fertilize - a job that can be completed in mere minutes.

Roles related to reproduction were also very different. Men are pollinators - their mission is primarily to fertilize as many eggs as possible, and from a genetic/Natural Selection perspective, the more women he impregnates, and the more diverse their genetics are, the more likely at least some of his children will survive illnesses and genetic flaws that he may carry, because some of those women will have a resistance to those diseases that he lacks. This is why men are attracted not just to having sex with many women, but with DIFFERENT women - women of different races and tribes - because that improves genetic diversity, which improves survival. It’s also important to note that men can fulfill their role in reproduction in just a few minutes, and he can potentially impregnate several women per day, every day - so absent other factors, sex only affects a man for an hour (being generous).

Women's role in reproduction is far more significant, both in personal risk and in time, affecting years of her life at minimum.
Women's role in reproduction is far more significant, both in personal risk and in time, affecting years of her life at minimum.

Women’s role in reproduction is vastly different. For a woman, a pregnancy is going to directly impact her for nearly a year, during which she won’t be able to be pregnant again - and after giving birth, she’ll need to spend at least 2 years feeding and caring for the child before it can survive even a few minutes on its own. During much of this time, the woman is vulnerable, as it can be nearly impossible to either fight or flee during the late stages of pregnancy or with a young infant. These factors all drive women to seek the stability and security of a relationship - preferably from a man with strength and resources - because without that, she and her child might not survive.


Those traits became instincts over time, for both men and women. Scientists say that it takes about 1000 generations for behavior to become instinctual, which means it takes about 20,000 years to make changes to instinctual behavior for humans. That’s why those instincts and behaviors are still with us today, despite life being much different.


Today, we have advanced healthcare and birth control and many of us have stability that couldn’t be imagined a few hundred years ago - war isn’t in our neighborhoods on a regular basis. That makes it easy to think that past history isn’t important - but it is, because it informs the instincts that we have today.

Stealing women from another group or tribe has been common throughout history.
Stealing women from another group or tribe has been common throughout history.


Why are men so visually attracted to women? Because for much of human history, one tribe would raid another for women (genetic diversity), and the target would be nubile women - women who were young but post-pubescent and therefore at the start of their reproductive years, and most likely to be able to bear the man many children. Being able to identify these women by the presence of breasts and prominent hips from a distance was an important skill when you were literally risking your life to obtain them.

Historically, a relationship meant a much better chance for a woman's survival, as well as her children's.
Historically, a relationship meant a much better chance for a woman's survival, as well as her children's.

Why do women want relationships and not just casual sex? Because sex had an impact on women that is a orders of magnitude greater than men - women could get pregnant, carry the child, and then would have to care for the child and provide protection for it until it could protect and care for itself - which meant in a historical context that she needed a strong man with resources to protect her and provide for her and her children. Women didn’t want to be vulnerable (pregnancy) or have her children vulnerable, and because prior to the 1960s, sex more-or-less always led to pregnancy before long, most women did their best to keep sex within relationships (often within marriage). That was also critical in many societies, where societal rules meant that only “legitimate” children were entitled to the man’s family name and to inherit his property or titles (if any).


No matter what behaviors confuse you because they are different from your own when it comes to relationships or sex or just behaviors and priorities, most of them will make sense if you remember to think of them in the context of Natural Selection and the different roles that men and women have historically had in both daily survival and in reproduction. Those differences are still the basis of our instincts and desires and behavior today, despite the relatively recent changes in modern society in much of the world. Even though we think we’ve adjusted to modern life, our instincts definitely have not, and will not anytime soon.

3 11

Most Helpful Guys

  • This biology and evolution argument has always felt like a repeated excuse to me. It's basically letting people off the hook by saying they're not really responsible or using their own will and minds to decide what they do, it's scientific factors that influence them, and this just isn't really correct.

    A woman wanting a million-dollar man for "financial stability" is not based on her "survival instincts," it's based on her own own vanity, shallowness, and ignorance.

    A man wanting nothing but casual sex forever is not based on his survival instincts, it's about his own lust for pleasure.

    And ages of racism and ethnic conflict have nothing to do with biology and evolution, it's about the wickedness of their own hearts and wanting to assert superiority over others.

    I simply don't by the "survival" argument.

    • It's not an excuse, it's a partial explanation, and it's repeated because it's true. Of course that's not the whole picture - social structures and norms and pressures, as well as individual choices all have influence. But those don't explain why men from so many different cultures and experiences have so many of the same behaviors - this does.

    • Both of you have very valid points. Tribalism was a big part of our history where we laid waste and slaughtered one another for numerous reasons. I'd like to point out that we used to rape people for preserving our bloodline, it doesn't make it right.

    • @SirRexington Lots of things in history weren't right, but were common and justified by the people at the time, based on the rules of society at the time. No one is suggesting that we do those things today, but we also shouldn't deny that they happened, and they had an impact on our evolution.

    • Show All
  • Knowing this, how can us guys except or want sex in a relationship or a fling when women are the ones who really pay the price for having sex? Doesn't it seem selfish? To think that I can knock someone up is scary, I avoid it at all costs. But more than ever you see women who want to wait for marriage and guys making a huge fuss over it. She can get knocked doesn't that make you want to stop and think? Maybe try not to fuck every thing that moves. I sure as hell don't want a kid with someone I don't see myself with for the rest of my life. That way of thinking is better than to only think about an orgasm or for the virgin dudes out there who desperately want to fuck a chick. That shit doesn't matter when you knock her up.

    • You can treat women with respect, take care of her needs and desires as she takes care of yours, and use birth control. It's not all that difficult to do, really.

    • She can still get pregnant though.

    • All that birth control shit is complicated. I dont really understand what it is or what they have to do. But it seems like that type of thing you can easily mess up.

Most Helpful Girls

  • the only issue is that these aren't really biological, they're social adaptions made to a specific society. Once you study anthropology you'll start to understand that there are a tonne of variables and humans have shown to take on a massive spectrum of roles from male to female. The easiest one to debunk is the sex one because not only is it a relatively recent phenomena and specific to only certain societies, the biological reality actually goes against your argument. Not to mention you cannot really equate human sexuality with that of an animal or reproduction, because sex in a lot of ways primarily serves a social not reproductive purpose.

    • Point taken, and obviously I'm tremendously simplifying concepts that are worthy of broad, multi-generational studies. But many people don't even have a starting point, and that's what I'm trying to give here.

    • Are you ok if I make a response mytake?

    • Why would I mind?

    • Show All
  • It wasn't really a good read, sorry. I highly doubt the validity of information and given that in several parts of history, things have been very different.

    Humans are complex beings and explaining certain human behavior is not just as simple as this. That's exactly why the only thing that will make human race go forward is humanity and morality. Plus things change overtime. Such as, why do I need my man to be rich and 'resourceful' when I am also capable of making money and being rich? Is a man being a fuckboy justified? Let's just say human trafficking exists because selling humans used to be a thing back then. Perfect.

    • I don't think that's what he's saying. And roles can certainly be individualized when society and its hardships change. Its why gender is a big thing now, before it had a clear observational role, now it doesn't as much. But those predispositions still exist for the majority of us.

    • A part of it is true, but not all.

    • Yes humans are complex and no it is not merely as simple as this. The author of this myTake is simply reflecting on a single bucket within a swimming pool of information that might collectively formulate a reasonable understanding of human nature. To give an example. A chicken sees a rooster, why did the chicken cross the road? You can answer this question from the perspective of fetal development, neurochemistry, and in this case evolutionary biology. Of course its more complicated than that. The confusion in your language starts when you use the word "need". Its more about what you want and see as valuable in your relationships. You also need to understand that what you 'desire' or 'want' is usually not in your control and you actually have very little to say about these impulses. Evolutionary biology doesn't really reflect moral understanding (because a part of that is social). I think you aren't really understanding what the author is trying to say here.

    • Show All

Scroll Down to Read Other Opinions

What's Your Opinion? Sign Up Now!

What Girls & Guys Said

15 37
  • Worth reading it. Well done.

  • "Those traits became instincts over time, for both men and women. Scientists say that it takes about 1000 generations for behavior to become instinctual, which means it takes about 20,000 years to make changes to instinctual behavior for humans. That’s why those instincts and behaviors are still with us today, despite life being much different."

    Tell that to a baby who's playing with a tablet and who's mastered it to second nature status quicker than you did as an adult and certainly quicker than your nan did.

    • You clearly don't understand the difference between an INSTINCT and higher cognitive skills (or motor skills).

  • What's with all the haters? This is literally bab's first Darwinism.

    • Wow, that was probably the most worthless attempt at sarcasm ever re-reading this^. Please, whoever sees this, help get it up to 10 dislikes

  • I disagree. I think it depends on which region you descended. In Africa, most women were single mothers and raised their children in matriarchal groups. Fathers weren't really present.

    The mom, grandmother, and aunts would all help each other and raise kids. There weren't fathers and they had no need for them.

    Patriarchal society came to Africa when they came into contact with Europeans and Arabs who then gave them Abrahimic religions which passed down patriarchy and therefore ended the traditional matriarchal households African societies had.

  • Excellent Take here. We shouldn't forget what we have evolved and are biologicall programmed for.

    • *what we are biologically programmed

  • Great take. Good luck convincing people who've been brainwashed their whole lives to believe that we're pretty much the same.

  • Great take

  • Was a fun read and a very good MyTake. I do want to share a major disagreement.

    --"The role of men is primarily to expel as many eggs as possible"
    For many organisms that carry the majority of the seeds that does happen to be the case (ex: insects). With mammals however, we need to remember that there are hefty values associated with ensuring survival of the young. In humans this is done with female agreeability, there are a significant number of studies that show that women are generally more agreeable than men. Another study (used to enforce Genderlect theory) concludes that women also have a much more emotional vernacular (presumably because the connection between the lexical and emotional cortex in the brain develops for a longer period of time in girls). Why would such traits be beneficial? Because if people care about them more, and find them particularly likeable, then they and the children they bear are more likely to be cared for within the community.

    The notion that men need to seed in as many women as possible can often be confused with how it works in several ape families. Some of these apes have one male who gets to seed within all the females, others have a hierarchical system (like ours). Take baboons for example, strong social bonds in baboons are a key indicator of a successful 'ripe' baboon. These baboons have sex frequently and not monogamously, but their partner choices replicate the hierarchical structures in their lives.

    The point i'm trying to make here, is that its much more complicated than that. We pick partners and stay with them because we might see them as a valuable asset. It isn't so much about seeding as much as possible. If a partners value declines, we might seek another one. But if it remains high then we will seem more monogamous. :)

    • Thanks for adding an intelligent response to this mytake unlike almost everyone else who responded

  • Great job

  • You mention men dying early, but due to childbirth being so dangerous, women actually had shorter lifespans than men up until about 1920 which was also the time when childbirth began to become exponentially easier.
    source about men living longer throughout most of history: www.beyondveg.com/.../angel-1984-1a.shtml

  • I read pretty much the same thing on other sites. It makes total sense if you put the pieces together. 👍

  • Well said

  • Two human beings.
    One releases sperm.
    One gets period.

    Without the period.
    1x1=1

    Baby.
    A boy?
    A girl?

    • Aha, the only thing women have on their minds these days is sex, sex and more sex

    • @obi-wan_kenobi dudes are like that too

  • Thank you for this. So I'm not a gold digger for wanting a financial stable man. I don't do casual sex either.

    • Thank you for existing, we need more like you.

  • Interesting take - At a base level you are correct but the many societal levels that come in on top of that are counter natural selection - Humans while being the top species is the species that adheres least to natural selection especially in modern times - Your take also reinforces the notion that "Bias" is a societal construct - Yeah as I said plenty of meat to chew on there

  • Excellent take, good job 🙂

  • The only thing I'll add, is that spreading the seed around for "genetic diversity" proved fatal in the long run because women who were pregnant needed protecting and no man was going to let another protect or be trusted to protect the woman and offspring so they developed monogamy as to further ensure the survival and upbringing of said offspring.

  • There's a difference between socialisation and biology.

  • I agree whole heartedly with your main point. Which is that women and men are biologically different. However I got a bit tripped up in some of the details, such as the one describing how, when clashing clans went to steal an opposing clan’s women, they were able to see she was fertile by her breasts and butt from afar? And this is attributed to women developing larger breast tissue and deposition of body fat in the buttocks? Can you please site your source for this bit?

  • I liked the information and it is really worth of appreciation.

  • Show More (32)